Trump wants Texas to redraw its congressional map. Here's what to know.
The state's decision to recraft the boundaries of House districts comes midway through the decade and several years after its GOP-controlled Legislature adopted a redistricting plan in the wake of the 2020 Census.
Under that plan, Republicans hold 25 of the state's 38 congressional seats, while Democrats control 12. (The death of Rep. Sylvester Turner, a Democrat, has left one seat open.)
But with Republicans holding a razor-thin majority in the House, and the risk the GOP could lose control of the chamber in the 2026 midterms, a reshaping of the congressional districts could give Mr. Trump's party an edge heading into next year's elections.
Mr. Trump's political team had been pushing Texas GOP leaders to look into redrawing the state's congressional map, the New York Times reported last month. Gov. Greg Abbott confirmed the Legislature would undertake the effort, among 17 other agenda items, when it meets.
"I don't think this has anything to do with Texas — this has to do with Trump," said Joshua Blank, the research director of the Texas Politics Project. "This has nothing to do with the internal dynamics of the state, the political trajectory of the state. This is purely about this election cycle and one person's benefit."
How did we get here?
States undergo the redistricting process after every 10-year census, when voting lines are redrawn to account for population changes. After the 2020 Census, Texas crafted a new congressional map to include two new districts, bringing its total number of House seats to 38.
The maps drawn by the GOP-led Texas Legislature aimed to protect Republican seats in Congress and the statehouse. Democrats flipped two congressional districts and 12 state House seats in the 2018 midterms.
"In 2021, they spent a lot of time and effort making sure they had the best maps possible with the primary goal to ensure that the Republican majority was rock solid," said Mark Jones, a political science professor at Rice University. "And they created 24 of 38 districts where there is no way, shape or form that a Republican is losing those districts, absent some type of murder indictment or a serial adulterer, etc."
But the final version of the congressional map was met with criticism, and it has been challenged in court. Among the issues raised by voting rights groups is that 95% of Texas' growth has been driven by non-White voters, but the map crafted in 2021 created more majority-White districts.
A three-judge panel in El Paso is currently considering a consolidated challenge to the map brought by voting rights groups, Latino voters and lawmakers. The plaintiffs argue that the new lines violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. A trial ended in June.
Texas has a part-time Legislature, which meets for 140 days every two years. The governor has the power to call special sessions to cover specific topics, and the special sessions constitutionally cannot last longer than 30 days. The governor can, however, call as many special sessions as he deems necessary. After the 88th legislative session in 2023, Abbott called four special sessions that stretched into December.
Redistricting is one of 18 topics that Abbott has asked the Legislature to address. Four of those topics include disaster relief for the Central Texas floods and improving the state's warning system.
"I'm not convinced that the goal is to pass everything, but ultimately, Abbott gets the credit for trying, and the Legislature will get the credit for what it can accomplish, but it'll also get the blame for what it fails to do," Blank said.
Although the Democrats could leave the state to deny Republicans a quorum, like they did in 2021 to protest a voting bill, it's unlikely they would do so if it meant holding up flood relief.
Where does Trump and his administration come into play?
Texas has conducted two congressional elections under the 2021 map. But earlier this month, the Justice Department sent Abbott a letter alleging that some of the districts were racial gerrymanders that violate the Constitution's 14th Amendment.
Harmeet Dhillon, who heads the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, specifically pinpointed four districts — the 9th,18th, 29th and 33rd — that she said constitute "coalition districts" that should be redrawn. All three are currently represented by Democrats, and Turner, who died in March, represented the fourth.
Coalition districts are those that bring two or more racial minorities together to make up a majority of the population, and where voters from these groups vote together to elect their preferred candidate.
In her letter, Dhillon wrote that the state had to "immediately" rectify the alleged racial gerrymanders, and if it chose not to, it was at risk of legal action by the attorney general.
"The congressional districts at issue are nothing more than vestiges of an unconstitutional racially based gerrymandering past, which must be abandoned, and must now be corrected by Texas," she wrote.
Mr. Trump appears to be on board with the recrafting of Texas' voting boundaries. Before leaving the White House on Tuesday, the president said he is looking for a "simple redrawing" where Republicans pick up five seats.
"Texas would be the biggest one," he said.
But during the trial in the case involving the congressional map, state officials repeatedly said they were motivated not by race when they drew the district lines, but instead driven by politics. State Sen. Joan Huffman, a Republican who led the 2021 Senate Redistricting Committee, testified that the congressional map was "drawn blind to race" and "racial data was not considered at all during the drawing of the maps," according to court records.
"There is no legal justification for doing this. It sort of walks and talks and quacks like a political move," said Michael Li, a redistricting expert at New York University's Brennan Center for Justice. "The problem is that it's really difficult to get more seats in Texas without heavily undermining the political power of communities of color."
In claims of racial gerrymandering, those challenging a map have to show that race predominated for how the lines were drawn.
"This can't be a racial gerrymander if they didn't consider race," Li said. "This is a textbook, easy it's-not-a-racial-gerrymander. … If you didn't consider race, it can't be a racial gerrymander."
Has Texas drawn new maps in the middle of the decade before?
A divided Texas Legislature drew up a congressional map in 2001, but two years later, in a plan engineered by then-U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and Texas House Speaker Tom Craddick, Republicans wanted to redraw the lines to make the most of the growing GOP majority in the state.
Fifty-one Democrats in the state House fled to Oklahoma for four days, denying the Republicans the quorum they needed to bring the redistricting plan to the floor and letting the clock run out on the regular session. Then-Gov. Rick Perry called the Legislature back for a special session, but state Senate Democrats left the state to deny a quorum.
Although the Democrats remained out of state for more than a month, they couldn't stop the maps from eventually passing, and Republicans ultimately picked up five seats. The Supreme Court upheld the congressional districts in 2018.
But former Democratic Rep. Mark Strama, who ran for office after that round of redistricting, warned the effort did have some downsides for Republicans. The drama was covered nationally, and Strama himself flipped a Central Texas district in 2005.
"Voters were mad at both sides," Strama said. "They hate all these political shenanigans. But there's no question voters hate this."
While Texas has redrawn the lines of congressional districts in the middle of a decade before, Li said the current situation is far from normal.
"Outside of litigation, it is extremely rare," he said. "And it's exceptionally rare — in fact, I can't think of another circumstance, where a party drew the map, and then that same party redrew the map. Where there are mid-decade redistrictings, it's usually because political control changes hands."
Could this plan backfire?
While Democrats have not won statewide office in Texas since 1994, the best year Democrats have had at the ballot in the past two decades was in 2018. In that midterm election, former Democratic Rep. Beto O'Rourke came within three points of GOP Sen. Ted Cruz, and Democrats flipped two congressional seats and 12 state House seats.
Republicans have managed to quell those gains and, as Jones noted, the 2024 election was a high point for the party. But the dynamics of the 2026 election could mirror those in 2018, when Democrats ran aggressive campaigns targeting Mr. Trump and retook the House. Any changes to the congressional map might not be enough to stem Democratic gains this time around.
"If Republicans do engage, do go all out and try with the goal of flipping, say three, four, even five seats as President Trump says – it's far more likely Republicans see a net loss than a net gain," Jones said.
Plus, any map adopted by the GOP-led Legislature and approved by Abbott is likely to be swiftly met with lawsuits. If a federal court blocks its use, the new district lines may not even be in place for the 2026 midterms.
"President Trump is talking about five more seats out of Texas, and the only way you get five more seats out of Texas is if you seriously undermine the political power and the political voice of communities of color," Li said. "And that is a Texas-sized lawsuit with potentially huge ramifications."
Li said the redrawing of political bounds to give Republicans a leg up in the 2026 midterm elections is not only a legally risky move, but could be politically perilous too.
"The essence of trying to get more seats is that you have to spread your voters out more if you're a Republican," he said. "So you have a bunch more districts that you're not winning by 65 or 70%. You're going to have a bunch of districts that you're winning by 52, 53% and in a state that is changing as fast as Texas, that's growing as fast as Texas, that's changing demographically as fast as Texas. By 2030, these districts could look and perform very differently."
The 2020 Census showed that people of color accounted for 95% of Texas' population growth over the prior decade. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau released last year also showed that the number of Asian Americans in Texas grew by nearly 92,000 people, while there were more than 91,000 new Black residents in the state.
"When you gerrymander, you're making a bet that you know what the politics of the future will look like," Li said. "There are many places where you can safely bet on what the politics of the future will look like in the country. Texas is not one of those places. It's just changing too fast."
Republicans have made big gains in South Texas' Rio Grande Valley, once considered a Democratic stronghold. But even with those GOP gains — and running on the maps drawn in 2021 — two of the three seats remained Democratic in 2024.
"People talk about the Rio Grande Valley as if it's somehow indicative of Texas," said Blank of the Texas Politics Project. "It's less than 3.5% of the total statewide vote, and it's incredibly economically depressed and it's overwhelmingly Hispanic. It's not really indicative of any part of the state, it's indicative of its region of the country that happens to share a border with Mexico."
What can Democrats do?
Democrats on Capitol Hill and in the states have lambasted Republicans for pushing to redraw congressional district lines to hold onto power in the House.
"Elected officials should earn the support of voters they hope to represent," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told reporters Tuesday. "Republicans want a country where politicians choose their voters, not the other way around. It reeks of desperation, and we're going to do everything that we can in Texas and beyond to respond."
Jeffries said the reason for the special session in Texas is to "try to steal the midterm elections by rigging" the state's congressional map.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, meanwhile, has suggested that Democrats mount their own partisan gerrymander. California has 52 congressional districts, and Democrats represent 43 of them.
"There are *currently* 9 Republicans in the California Congressional Delegation. Just thought folks might like to know that fun fact," he wrote on X on Tuesday.
During an appearance on the podcast "Pod Save America," Newsom accused Republicans of trying to "rig the game" because they're concerned about maintaining control of the House next year.
California voters approved a constitutional amendment in 2010 that handed over the task of crafting congressional and state legislative districts to an independent commission. But Newsom suggested there are still two paths that could lead to a new congressional map: calling a special session of the California Legislature to put a measure on the ballot for a special election that would clear the way for new House district lines; or having the state Legislature create a new map under the idea that it's coming mid-decade and not after the census.
"It ups the stakes of the redistricting war, with the acknowledgment that Democrats have a limited hand to play," Li said of Texas' decision to draw new congressional lines.
Just 15 states have Democratic trifectas, where they control the state legislature and the governorship. Two of those states, Colorado and Michigan, leave the drawing of political voting lines to independent commissions like California does. Republicans are in full control in 23 states.
Plus, in other states where Democrats control the legislature and governor's mansions, the congressional delegations already heavily skew Democratic. In Illinois, for example, Democrats hold 14 of its 17 House seats. Maryland's eight-member congressional delegation contains just one Republican.
Son of man who was violently detained by ICE reacts after release
Wall Street Journal reports Trump sent "bawdy" birthday letter to Epstein, Trump threatens to sue
7.3 magnitude earthquake hits southern Alaska
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Trump says he 'absolutely loves' that CBS canceled Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show'
Colbert announced the cancelation of the iconic program, which comedian David Letterman also hosted for two decades, before his July 17 studio audience at New York City's Ed Sullivan Theater. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump cheered the cancelation of "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert," one day after the comedian and frequent Trump critic announced CBS would be ending his show. "I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings," Trump said in a July 18 Truth Social post, before also ripping ABC's Jimmy Kimmel, another late-night host known to skewer Trump. "I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next. Has even less talent than Colbert." Trump added that conservative Fox News personality and comedian Greg Gutfield ‒ host of Gutfeld! and co-host of The Five ‒ "is better than all of them combined, including the Moron on NBC who ruined the once great Tonight Show." Trump previously worked for NBC during his days as the star on "The Apprentice." More: 'Late Show with Stephen Colbert' to end next May: 'This is all just going away' Colbert, 61, announced the cancelation of the iconic show, which comedian David Letterman hosted for two decades prior to Colbert, before its studio audience on July 17 at New York City's Ed Sullivan Theater. 'Late Show' will continue for one more season and end in May 2026. "It's not just the end of our show, it's the end of the 'Late Show' on CBS," said Colbert, who has hosted the show since 2015, adding that, "I'm not being replaced. This is all just going away." The move comes after Paramount Global, CBS's parent company, agreed on July 1 to a controversial $16 million settlement with Trump over a defamation lawsuit tied to a "60 Minutes" interview with 2024 Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. Democrats and Colbert fans speculated whether politics could have played a role in the network's decision given the comedian's history of targeting Trump. "Just finished taping with Stephen Colbert who announced his show was cancelled," U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California, said in a post on X. "If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better. More: Jimmy Kimmel irate over Colbert cancellation, criticizes CBS ending 'Late Show' The traditional late-night shows on the three big networks have faced increasing challenges for viewers amid the rapid rise of streaming options. More: From Joe Rogan to Greg Gutfeld, conservative comedy's influence grows Paramount in a statement called the move "purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night. It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content, or other matters happening at Paramount." "We consider Stephen Colbert irreplaceable and will retire 'The Late Show' franchise at that time," the statement said. "We are proud that Stephen called CBS home." Contributing: Bryan Alexander of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

Los Angeles Times
a few seconds ago
- Los Angeles Times
Democrats are spiraling into irrelevance. Good riddance
It has been painfully obvious, ever since the presidential election last November, that the Democratic Party's brand is in tatters. This week, a Quinnipiac University poll revealed that congressional Democrats have a minuscule 19% approval rating — an all-time low in the history of that particular poll. Earlier in the week, a Harvard CAPS/Harris poll similarly found that the party as a whole has an approval rating of 40% — considerably lower than the Republican Party's 48% approval rating found by the same poll. Nor can Democrats necessarily rely on any GOP infighting to redound, in seesaw-like fashion, to their own benefit; for all the sturm und drang generated by the 'Epstein files' affair, President Trump's approval ratings have actually increased among Republicans this month. The issue for Democrats is that their current unpopularity is not a byproduct of the political scandals of the day or the vicissitudes of Trump's polarizing social media feeds. Rather, the problem for Democrats is structural — and it requires a rethink and a reboot from soup to nuts. As this column argued last November, it is clear that Barack Obama's winning 2008 political coalition — comprising racial and ethnic minorities, young people and highly educated white voters — has completely withered. 'Obamaism' is dead — and Democrats have to reconcile themselves to that demise. At minimum, they should stop taking advice from Obama himself; the 44th president was Kamala Harris' top 2024 campaign trail surrogate, and we saw how that worked out. In order for the party to rise up anew, as has often happened throughout American history following a period of dominance from a partisan rival, Democrats are going to have to move beyond their intersectional obsessions and woke grievances that have so greatly alienated large swaths of the American people on issues pertaining to race, gender, immigration, and crime and public safety. And the good news, for conservative Americans who candidly wish the Democratic Party nothing but the worst, is that Democrats seem completely incapable of doing this. Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old recent winner of New York City's much-discussed Democratic mayoral primary, is a case in point. The Ugandan-born Shiite Muslim Mamdani is a democratic socialist, but he is better understood as a full-fledged communist. That isn't hyperbole: One merely needs to consider his proposed policies for New York City and review his broader history of extreme far-left political rhetoric. Mamdani won the primary, and is now seeking the mayor's office, on a genuinely radical platform: support for citywide 'free' bus rides, city-owned grocery stores, a full rent freeze on certain low-income units, outright seizure of private property from arbitrarily 'bad' landlords, race-based taxation (an assuredly unconstitutional proposal), a $30 minimum wage and more. A true Marxist, Mamdani has said 'abolition of private property' would be an improvement over existing inequality. And he has something of a penchant for quoting Marx's 'Communist Manifesto' too. But Mamdani's communism is only part of his overall political persona. He also emphasizes, and trades in, exactly the sort of woke culture warring and intersectional identity politics that have defined the post-Obama Democratic Party. Mamdani is a long-standing harsh critic of Israel who had declined to distance himself from the antisemitic rallying cry 'globalize the intifada.' Most recently, he also opposed Trump's decision to have the U.S. intervene in last month's Israel-Iran war, condemning it as a 'new, dark chapter' that could 'plunge the world deeper into chaos.' (In the real world, there were zero American casualties, and the bombing run was followed promptly by a ceasefire.) There is, to be sure, nothing good down this road for denizens of New York City. If Mamdani wins this fall, expect a massive exodus of people, businesses and capital from the Big Apple — probably to the Sun Belt. But even more relevant: There is nothing good down that road for the national Democratic Party, as a whole. In order to demonstrate that the party has learned anything from its 2024 shellacking and its current abysmal standing, it will have to sound and act less crazy on the tangible issues that affect Americans' day-to-day lives. That isn't happening. If Mamdani's rise is representative — and it may well be, especially as other far-left firebrands like Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) continue to make outsize noise — then Democrats seem to be moving in the exact opposite direction: full-on Marxism and woke craziness. If the party continues down this path, it will experience nothing but mid- to long-term political pain. But as one of the aforementioned conservatives who wishes the Democratic Party nothing but the worst, I'm not too upset about that. Josh Hammer's latest book is 'Israel and Civilization: The Fate of the Jewish Nation and the Destiny of the West.' This article was produced in collaboration with Creators Syndicate. @josh_hammer


Gizmodo
a few seconds ago
- Gizmodo
NASA Staff To Mark Moon Landing Anniversary with a Protest Against Trump
On July 20, 1969, NASA astronaut Neil Armstrong took humankind's first steps on the Moon. And now, 56 years later, a group of NASA employees are set to mark that giant leap this weekend with a protest against the Trump administration's budget cuts to the agency. The Goddard Engineers, Scientists, and Technicians Association (GESTA), an employee association from within NASA, plan to demonstrate on Sunday, July 20, in Washington D.C. against the cuts, which they say would effectively slice NASA's science budget in half. The group also plan to protest against NASA's current leadership, arguing that the agency has already started acting on the proposed 2026 budget with staff layoffs and contract terminations. 'We are gathering on the historically appropriate Moon Day, the anniversary of the first human to set foot on the surface of the Moon, to try and save the agency that has inspired the world,' the group wrote in a statement. NASA is facing a $6 billion cut to its overall budget for 2026 compared to this year. Critics have argued that the funding shortfall will significantly affect the agency's biggest science missions, and potentially delay it even further from its goal of landing astronauts on the Moon this decade. Under the proposed budget, funding for NASA's planetary science would drop from $2.7 billion to $1.9 billion, endangering dozens of active and planned missions. Among them are the iconic New Horizons probe, which in 2015 became the first mission to visit Pluto, and is still returning valuable data from deep space. The budget would also gut the funding for the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory: In this scenario, LIGO, which facilitated the first direct observation of gravitational waves, would receive $29 million instead of $48 million, and one of its two interferometers would be shut down. The impact could be felt further afield: The European Space Agency recently revealed that three of its missions, developed in collaboration with NASA, are at risk of being canceled, including a space-based gravitational wave observatory, LISA. A contractor at NASA responsible for some of the staff working on LISA, which has been in the works for almost three decades, informed some employees that they risked termination by the end of September, reported. The planned protest comes after NASA began implementing a reduction in force earlier this year, closing three offices and laying off staff in compliance with the Trump administration's cost-cutting efforts. The agency also terminated $420 million in contracts. 'Current NASA leadership is already acting on the President's and [Office of Management and Budget's] proposed budget by beginning to greatly reduce the number of civil servants and contractors, which will be detrimental to the mission of this agency,' the NASA employee group wrote. 'Cuts to NASA's science budget will drastically hinder NASA's ability to produce science from current and future missions.' One small bright spot for the agency is the passage of President Donald Trump's signature tax-and-spending measure: The law allocated about $9.9 billion extra funding to NASA to support the International Space Station, the Artemis missions, and other space exploration efforts, including potential missions to Mars.