Democrats are spiraling into irrelevance. Good riddance
This week, a Quinnipiac University poll revealed that congressional Democrats have a minuscule 19% approval rating — an all-time low in the history of that particular poll. Earlier in the week, a Harvard CAPS/Harris poll similarly found that the party as a whole has an approval rating of 40% — considerably lower than the Republican Party's 48% approval rating found by the same poll. Nor can Democrats necessarily rely on any GOP infighting to redound, in seesaw-like fashion, to their own benefit; for all the sturm und drang generated by the 'Epstein files' affair, President Trump's approval ratings have actually increased among Republicans this month.
The issue for Democrats is that their current unpopularity is not a byproduct of the political scandals of the day or the vicissitudes of Trump's polarizing social media feeds. Rather, the problem for Democrats is structural — and it requires a rethink and a reboot from soup to nuts. As this column argued last November, it is clear that Barack Obama's winning 2008 political coalition — comprising racial and ethnic minorities, young people and highly educated white voters — has completely withered. 'Obamaism' is dead — and Democrats have to reconcile themselves to that demise. At minimum, they should stop taking advice from Obama himself; the 44th president was Kamala Harris' top 2024 campaign trail surrogate, and we saw how that worked out.
In order for the party to rise up anew, as has often happened throughout American history following a period of dominance from a partisan rival, Democrats are going to have to move beyond their intersectional obsessions and woke grievances that have so greatly alienated large swaths of the American people on issues pertaining to race, gender, immigration, and crime and public safety. And the good news, for conservative Americans who candidly wish the Democratic Party nothing but the worst, is that Democrats seem completely incapable of doing this.
Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old recent winner of New York City's much-discussed Democratic mayoral primary, is a case in point.
The Ugandan-born Shiite Muslim Mamdani is a democratic socialist, but he is better understood as a full-fledged communist. That isn't hyperbole: One merely needs to consider his proposed policies for New York City and review his broader history of extreme far-left political rhetoric. Mamdani won the primary, and is now seeking the mayor's office, on a genuinely radical platform: support for citywide 'free' bus rides, city-owned grocery stores, a full rent freeze on certain low-income units, outright seizure of private property from arbitrarily 'bad' landlords, race-based taxation (an assuredly unconstitutional proposal), a $30 minimum wage and more. A true Marxist, Mamdani has said 'abolition of private property' would be an improvement over existing inequality. And he has something of a penchant for quoting Marx's 'Communist Manifesto' too.
But Mamdani's communism is only part of his overall political persona. He also emphasizes, and trades in, exactly the sort of woke culture warring and intersectional identity politics that have defined the post-Obama Democratic Party. Mamdani is a long-standing harsh critic of Israel who had declined to distance himself from the antisemitic rallying cry 'globalize the intifada.' Most recently, he also opposed Trump's decision to have the U.S. intervene in last month's Israel-Iran war, condemning it as a 'new, dark chapter' that could 'plunge the world deeper into chaos.' (In the real world, there were zero American casualties, and the bombing run was followed promptly by a ceasefire.)
There is, to be sure, nothing good down this road for denizens of New York City. If Mamdani wins this fall, expect a massive exodus of people, businesses and capital from the Big Apple — probably to the Sun Belt. But even more relevant: There is nothing good down that road for the national Democratic Party, as a whole. In order to demonstrate that the party has learned anything from its 2024 shellacking and its current abysmal standing, it will have to sound and act less crazy on the tangible issues that affect Americans' day-to-day lives.
That isn't happening. If Mamdani's rise is representative — and it may well be, especially as other far-left firebrands like Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) continue to make outsize noise — then Democrats seem to be moving in the exact opposite direction: full-on Marxism and woke craziness. If the party continues down this path, it will experience nothing but mid- to long-term political pain. But as one of the aforementioned conservatives who wishes the Democratic Party nothing but the worst, I'm not too upset about that.
Josh Hammer's latest book is 'Israel and Civilization: The Fate of the Jewish Nation and the Destiny of the West.' This article was produced in collaboration with Creators Syndicate. @josh_hammer
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
White House Will Release $5.5 Billion for Schools, After Surprise Delay
The White House will release $5.5 billion in frozen education funds, administration officials announced on Friday, bringing an end to a chaotic saga of the administration's making, which had sent school districts scrambling with weeks to go before the school year. The Trump administration had been facing growing bipartisan pressure, including from 10 Senate Republicans who signed a rare public letter urging the White House to release the funds. The money was part of nearly $7 billion in education funding that had been approved by Congress and was set to be released July 1, before the Trump administration abruptly withheld it a day before the deadline. The money included more than $2 billion to help train and recruit teachers, particularly in low-income areas that often have trouble competing for the most qualified teachers. It also included money for arts and music education in low-income districts, extra help for children learning English and support for children of migrant farmworkers. The Department of Education said that it would begin sending the money to states next week. On June 30, the administration said it was conducting a 'review' and later said it had found instances of federal dollars being 'grossly misused to subsidize a radical left-wing agenda.' But the administration quickly faced mounting pushback, including two lawsuits in federal court. Last week, the White House announced that it would release $1.3 billion that had been withheld for after-school programs. This is a developing story. Check back for updates.


Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Stephen Colbert, ‘South Park' And The Return Of Political Comedy
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert during Mondays June 13, 2022 show. Last week, CBS canceled The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. While the three-decade franchise is among the most-watched late-night programs, CBS said it was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night." However, over the last week, many have become convinced that it had to do with Colbert's comedic takes against Donald Trump (specifically his commentary on his parent company and their 60 Minutes settlement with the president) and the government's review of Paramount's merger with Skydance. Colbert's isn't the only anti-Trump content making waves for Paramount. South Park dedicated its 27th season premiere to mocking Trump. While South Park co-creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone revealed that they received notes on the episode from the network, the episode comes after a $1.5 billion deal between the show's creators and Paramount. These two news stories raise questions about political comedy, profitability and the role of comedians during a second Trump presidency. Comedy has long been a tool against unpopular regimes. From Charlie Chaplin's 1940s send up of Adolph Hitler The Great Dictator to Egyptian comedian Abu Zaid's 2018 arrest after working on a satirical news show, comedy and politics have often overlapped in important ways. Many have championed comedy as a means of political commentary. During the first Trump presidency, satire was not only popular but profitable (or at least it drove ratings for many tv shows.) However, as the second Trump presidency loomed, questions circled over the place of political comedy. Furthermore, many saw comedy as part of the reason Trump was reelected. Many comedians including Jon Stewart, John Oliver and Jimmy Fallon have spoken out in support of Colbert. Stewart and Oliver with their history with Colbert and political comedy more generally feel like obvious boosters; however, Fallon is more surprising. The NBC host isn't known for political commentary and his vocal support may even reach viewers not usually looking for political comedy content. Similarly, while South Park has a long history of skewering politicians, it hasn't been as synonymous with satire as it was earlier in its run. Millennials of a certain age may remember South Park for its take downs of George W. Bush regime, but it hasn't made political waves in recent years. In 2018, The Washington Post even called South Park 'the ultimate #bothsides show' and mentioned its ties to the Alt-Right and right-of-center politics. Leftist comedians haven't gone away or stopped talking politics; however, their reach has ebbed and flowed over multiple presidencies. The reality of this moment has more to do with a-political or not specifically-vocally-left comedians and their reactions. For many years Colbert was synonymous with political comedy. With nine seasons of The Colbert Report, he became one of America's most recognized satirists. However, since the show ended in 2014 and he took the reins of The Late Show in 2015, while still at times political, the focus of his comedy has shifted. It is hard to say if Colbert's cancellation or even South Park's reentry into the political comedy conversation will shift political comedy left or lead to more anti-Trump comedy. However, the closeness of these events to each other and to an essential time between Paramount and the administration seems like a step towards a return to a reinvigorated era of political comedy.


Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
'South Park' creators reveal battle with network over wild Trump depiction, joke they're 'terribly sorry'
"South Park" creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone discussed their controversial season 27 premiere at San Diego Comic-Con on Thursday, revealing a behind-the-scenes battle with network executives over airing a less-than-flattering depiction of President Donald Trump's penis during Wednesday's episode. The duo behind the long-running Comedy Central series spoke alongside a panel of other adult cartoon creators at the event, including "Beavis and Butt-Head" creator, Mike Judge, and "Digman!" co-creator, Andy Samberg. When asked if they had been following the reaction to their season 27 premiere by the panel's moderator, Josh Horowitz, Parker jokingly replied, "We're terribly sorry." As reported by The Hollywood Reporter, that's about as far as the creators went in responding to the controversy stirred by the episode, although Stone did address Trump more directly later in the discussion when the duo were asked about how they originally met. "For me and Trey, we met over 'Monty Python,'" he said. "In this day, when PBS is getting their funding cut, that's how I found 'Monty Python.'" Stone's comments on PBS come on the heels of a congressional vote last week to cut funding for public broadcasting. Trump signed the $9 billion spending cuts package into law on Thursday. According to Parker, the show's team finalized the season's premiere episode just shortly before it aired. "Just three days ago, we were going, 'I don't know if people are going to like this,'" Parker said, adding that the duo were reading news headlines and said to each other, "Let's put that in there." Horowitz questioned the "South Park" creators about whether there were any concerns about the season premiere from higher-ups at Comedy Central, with Parker detailing a discussion with the network about showing Trump's penis on the show. "They were like, 'We're gonna blur the penis,' and we're like, 'No, you're not gonna blur the penis,'" Parker responded, adding that the show's team agreed to add eyes to the depiction of the president's penis to make it a character. The White House, however, did not seem thrilled about the season 27 premiere of "South Park." White House Assistant Press Secretary Taylor Rogers issued a statement regarding Wednesday's episode to Fox News Digital on Thursday. "The Left's hypocrisy truly has no end — for years, they have come after South Park for what they labeled as 'offense' [sic] content, but suddenly they are praising the show," Rogers stated. "Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows. This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history — and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak."