Smithsonian removes Trump from impeachment exhibit in American History Museum, according to report
Orders to remove an impeachment reference to the commander-in-chief in the exhibit, 'A Glorious Burden', came as part of a recent content review, triggered by mounting pressure from the White House to make changes to the arts institution, according to a source familiar with The Washington Post.
The president was impeached twice during his first term in office, the first due to being accused of breaking the law by pressuring Ukraine's leader to dig up damaging information on the Biden family.
The second impeachment came after he was charged with "incitement of insurrection" regarding the deadly storming of Congress on January 6, 2021.
In each case, he was acquitted on all counts by the Senate. In both votes, the Republican party held the majority.
The Smithsonian Institution is the world's largest museum complex, consisting of 21 museums, the National Portrait Gallery, and the National Zoo in Washington, D.C.
In May, Trump called for the firing of Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery in Washington, D.C., labelling her a supporter of diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, and claiming she was unsuitable for the role.
She resigned from her post just two weeks later, following the president's criticism on Truth Social.
'Her replacement will be named shortly. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump wrote.
Sajet had led the gallery 'with passion and creativity' for 12 years, according to the secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, Lonnie Bunch, who wrote the resignation memo.
Trump's crackdown on the arts came in tandem with his March executive order that called for the removal of 'improper, divisive or anti-American ideology' from the network of Smithsonian museums, The Wall Street Journal reported.
However, even prior to the order, the Smithsonian canceled its diversity, equity, and inclusion programs to comply with Trump's anti-DEI vision in January.
The latest change sees the removal of a temporary label that described Trump's impeachment, notices that had been on display since September 2021.
The museum has now placed a 2008 label on the exhibit, stating that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal,' referring to Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, and Richard Nixon, according to The Post. Nixon would have faced impeachment had he not resigned.
The Smithsonian released a statement after the report that said, 'a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments.'
'In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden exhibition needed to be addressed,' the spokesperson told The Post.
They explained that the section of the exhibition covered Congress, the Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion, noting that the change was necessary because 'other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008.'
The institution said it was appropriate to restore the impeachment case to its 2008 appearance.
Trump's intervention in the arts space follows a string of incidents where he has sought to alter cultural institutions to align with MAGA values.
In February, he usurped the position of chair of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. – a hub lauded for its bipartisan approach.
'NO MORE DRAG SHOWS, OR OTHER ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA', he wrote on Truth Social at the time.
, and Republicans have now proposed a bill to rename the center after Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
GOP congressman who represents one of the most impoverished districts in PA recently bought a new helicopter
Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan, who represents one of the swing state's poorest congressional districts, has been accused of concealing the fact that he recently bought himself a personal helicopter. NOTUS reports that Bresnahan, 35, has not yet listed his 'secret' 2024 Robinson R66 chopper among his financial disclosures, with the model in question retailing for between $1 million and $1.5 million. The site was able to confirm the congressman's acquisition of the aircraft based on information garnered from Federal Aviation Administration records and commercial flight data. NOTUS adds that Bresnahan, a multimillionaire who recently sold control of his family's electrical contracting business, acquired the helicopter late last year and has already used it for dozens of flights, some of which have taken him to New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island. While there is nothing illegal about representatives buying personal aircraft, 'it's incumbent on members of Congress to be transparent about these kinds of things,' said Philip Hensley-Robin, executive director of the government watchdog group Common Cause Pennsylvania. 'We don't know if it's being used for official purposes, campaign purposes – it's a mystery.' Hannah Pope, the congressman's spokesperson, told NOTUS: 'In emergency situations such as downed power lines or washed-out roads, helicopters play a critical role in inspecting infrastructure and identifying areas in need of urgent repair. 'His goal was to work toward a commercial pilot certificate with a rotorcraft-helicopter rating and use the aircraft to provide emergency response and inspection services that help keep seniors warm, hospitals powered, and schools open.' She added, 'Since being elected to Congress, those business plans have been put on hold. No taxpayer or campaign funds were used to purchase the aircraft, and no taxpayer or campaign funds are used to store, operate, or maintain the aircraft.' The Independent has also reached out to Rep. Bresnahan for comment. The congressman represents the Keystone State's 8th District, which ranks second-to-last in median household income, $61,140 as of 2023, according to U.S. Census data. Bresnahan has previously sought to emphasize his everyman credentials, describing a childhood of plowing snow for neighbors and helping out at his parents' bowling alley and grandparents' electrical store in addition to completing his studies and participating in high school ice hockey practice. 'I will fight to protect working-class families in northeastern Pennsylvania and stand with President Trump in opposing gutting Medicaid,' he said in a statement in March. 'My position on this has not and will not change.' He nevertheless voted for Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which the president signed into law on Independence Day and which threatens to cut welfare for millions of Americans, leading to angry scenes at a Scranton town hall earlier this week organized to draw attention to his 'broken vows.' Bresnahan also faced questions in July after allegedly buying shares in defense companies ahead of Trump's strikes on Iran, despite previously pushing to block lawmakers from trading in stocks.
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
'ICE Barbie' Kristi Noem's cosmetic surgery and puppy slaughter is brutally-mocked in latest South Park episode
South Park continued its rampage against the Trump administration in its latest episode, which portrayed Kristi Noem as a Botox-obsessed puppy killer. The second installment of the show's latest season, titled Got a Nut, showed Noem shooting several dogs as Botox melted off her face - a reference to her admission that she once put down a rowdy puppy. 'A few years ago I had to put my puppy down by shooting it in the face, because sometimes doing what's important means doing what's hard,' Noem said in the episode as she introduced herself to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) recruits. 'Now I will ask for the same determination from you. Because detaining and questioning people is never easy,' Noem's South Park version added as she flipped her hair. The Secretary's good looks then disappeared as she takes a bath on the episode, before a glam squad appeared to put her public face back on. The episode eventually showed ICE agents and Noem raiding heaven as her face melted and fell onto the floor, taking on a life of its own. The parody showed Noem's face melting off as she goes about her DHS duties 'No more brownies in heaven!' Noem's Comedy Central version said to the agents. The Secretary of DHS then headed to Mar-A-Lago where she asked president Donald Trump if he was trying to replace her. 'Think I can't handle myself because I'm a lady with good looks that drives men wild?' she said as her face melted off again and moved across Mar-A-Lago on its on. South Park's new episode also targeted Vice President JD Vance, portraying him as a man-child servant to Trump. Vance did not seem bother by the portrayal, and wrote on Twitter: 'Well, I've finally made it.' The show also took aim at conservative pundit Charlie Kirk, showing him getting caught by his mom as he is 'master-debating' in his bedroom. It comes after the show's season premiere showed President Trump in bed with Satan. The premiere also took aim at Paramount and its $16 million recent settlement with Trump just hours after creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone signed a five-year deal with the company for 50 new episodes and streaming rights to previous seasons. The installment touched upon the controversial cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, which critics baselessly allege was axed by the network to appease Trump despite it losing $40 million each year. The White House issued a statement on the 27th season premiere after it aired last month. 'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in the statement. 'President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history – and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' Earlier this week, however, the Department of Homeland Security's X account shared an image of South Park's ICE depiction as it called on Americans to join the agency.
The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The NHL preached inclusion. So why has it got into bed with Donald Trump?
'Diverse representation within inclusive environments is proven to advance innovation, creativity, and decision-making – all of which are critically important to the growth of the sport and our business,' NHL commissioner Gary Bettman wrote in his introduction to the NHL's first – and only, so far – diversity and inclusion report, which it released in 2022. 'Recognizing these facts, we are working to better understand and accelerate our engagement across all layers of diversity – including nationality, race, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, and religion – and their nuances and intersections,' Bettman continued. Last week, Bettman was named alongside NHL legend Wayne Gretzky, Florida Panthers' captain Matthew Tkachuk and various representatives of other sports as a member of Donald Trump's sports council. The council will be responsible for – among other things – playing an 'important role in restoring tradition to college athletics, including … keeping men out of women's sports.' Not what you'd call an opportunity for Bettman et al to gain a better understanding of the nuances of gender identity, by the sounds of it. This is not the first time Bettman has given mixed messages around social issues. In 2023, for example, the NHL tried to host a career fair aimed at recruiting a more diverse workforce (its inclusivity report noted that the league's employees were roughly 84% white and 93% straight). The event, attached to that year's All Star Game in Florida, quickly caught the attention of the governor's office, which accused the NHL of discrimination – against white people. The league cancelled the career fair. A few weeks later, the NHL again had the opportunity to stand for its diversity values when a handful of players refused to wear their team's Pride-themed warmup jerseys. Instead, the NHL retreated meekly, encouraging 'voices and perspectives on social and cultural issues.' That June – Pride month, no less – Bettman cancelled the Pride jerseys altogether, calling the furor around them 'a distraction' from the intended message. One wonders what he will call his own foray directly into the culture wars or, for that matter, how the NHL may characterize this particular moment of self-expression from the commissioner. It's likely that Bettman's participation in Trump's sports council will fall into the 'voices and perspectives on social and cultural issues' category the league talked about during the Pride jerseys fiasco. But seeing as Trump seems fixated on getting trans women out of college sports – even though there are fewer than 10 transgender athletes in college sports, according to the president of the NCAA – this feels like a very specific kind of perspective on a cultural issue, doesn't it? What's so aggravating about repeated allowances for anti-LGBTQ+ perspectives from the NHL under the guise of simply letting all opinions flourish equally, is how it pretends that these views are all morally equivalent when they're not. Sure, the players who refused to wear a Pride-themed jersey can't be forced to wear them, but it's not like it was simply a fashion choice. Fundamentally, those players made that decision based on a worldview that refuses to accept LGBTQ+ people, including their fellow hockey players, as being equal to them and everyone else. It's not the jerseys that were the problem – but they did a great job highlighting it. Earlier this spring, Harrison Browne, the first transgender player in professional hockey, wrote that while in the NCAA, he was offered the option to have his own locker room and change his pronouns on the roster. 'Looking back, I realize how important it is for trans and non-binary student athletes to have those options, whether or not they take them,' Browne wrote in The Walrus. 'These choices provide a baseline of institutional acceptance and acknowledgment for gender-diverse athletes at all levels.' On Monday, Browne told the Guardian via email that 'to see [Bettman, Gretzky, and Tkachuk] get behind an administration that is targeting marginalized communities, especially trans people in sports, is deeply disturbing and a huge step backwards in making hockey a more inclusive sport.' And going backwards really isn't Bettman's thing, or it never used to be. When he accepted his job as commissioner in 1992, he told a room full of reporters that 'the way a league performs well is by making its product as attractive as it can to the greatest number of fans.' He believed in growth, in other words – even up until 2022. What he risks now is stagnation, regression even. On that same day in 1992, Bettman said that he wanted to make hockey, a sport that at the time was seen as violent and retrograde, more 'user-friendly.' And he acknowledged that to do it, he'd need to push some of the older owners into the future. 'It may be that we are going to head in new, progressive directions that will make sense to every one immediately,' Bettman said. 'For some, it may take a little more time.' Maybe the diversity and inclusion stuff doesn't totally make sense to Bettman in 2025 – other North American sports have decided that they don't have the stomach to fight the culture wars under Trump either, and NFL commission Roger Goodell is also on the White House sports council. But Bettman should give the league's diversity policies time to grow, rather than deliberately reversing course, hurting hockey's players and fans, and ultimately jeopardising the future success of the sport for everyone. If that's too much to ask, at the very least, if he's invited to join a club created by a hostile and retrograde president, he should by now have the smarts to just say no.
