logo
Baby Shark did not plagiarize, South Korea's top court rules

Baby Shark did not plagiarize, South Korea's top court rules

Saudi Gazette2 days ago
SEOUL — South Korea's Supreme Court has rejected a US composer's allegation that the producers of the inescapably catchy children's song Baby Shark plagiarized his work, ending a six-year-long legal battle.
The court upheld two lower court verdicts that favoured Pinkfong, the South Korean company behind the tune with the "doo doo doo doo doo doo" refrain that has been streamed billions of times.
Jonathan Wright recorded a version of the tune in 2011 based on a children's folk song. Pinkfong's version was released in 2016.
Wright said he owned the copyright to the interpretation, but Pinkfong argued that its version was an arrangement of the same folk song, which is in the public domain.
The court ruled that Wright's version "had not reached a level of substantial alteration" from the original folk song for it to be considered a separate work, which means it is not protected as a separate piece of work under copyright law.
Pinkfong's Baby Shark went wildly viral after it was released on YouTube, in a clip that included hand gestures for children to dance along with.
It became the most-viewed YouTube video of all time in November 2020, at the height of the pandemic, after raking up seven billion views. Just over a year later, it became the first YouTube video to reach 10 billion views.
Baby Shark is thought to have originated in the US in the 1970s and popularised at summer camps. One theory says it was invented in 1975, as Steven Spielberg's Jaws became an box office smash around the world.
The premise hasn't always been as cheery as Pinkfong's interpretation. In one version, a surfer loses an arm to a shark, and in another, the protaganist dies.
Wright, who goes by the stage name Johnny Only, created his sanitised version in 2011. The YouTube video, titled "Baby Shark Song (non-dismemberment version)", features him and a group of children and teenagers dancing to the song by a pool.
Wright said he initially thought, that since the song was in the public domain, "[Pinkfong] could go right ahead and use it".
The idea of a copyright suit arose when he realised that Pinkfong had threatened legal action when a South Korean political party – the current opposition People Power Party – used Baby Shark in a political campaign.
"The wheels in my head start turning... Doesn't that mean that my version also has copyright protection?" Wright told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in 2019.
There are also international adaptations of Baby Shark before Pinkfong's interpretation, including the French Bebe Requin and the German Kleiner Hai (Little Shark), which became a viral hit in Europe in 2007.
But none of these have reached the phenomenal success of Pinkfong's adaptation.
Since then, popular acts from Blackpink to Josh Groban have incorporated their version of the song into their performances; it has been translated into more than 100 languages and even been made into a movie.
"We call it K-Pop for the next generation," Pinkfong's marketing director Jamie Oh told the BBC in 2018. — BBC
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taylor Swift's Chat with the Kelces on 'New Heights' Marks a Milestone Moment for Podcasts
Taylor Swift's Chat with the Kelces on 'New Heights' Marks a Milestone Moment for Podcasts

Asharq Al-Awsat

timea day ago

  • Asharq Al-Awsat

Taylor Swift's Chat with the Kelces on 'New Heights' Marks a Milestone Moment for Podcasts

Since nothing Taylor Swift ever does is small, her two-hour conversation with boyfriend Travis Kelce and his brother Jason Kelce on their 'New Heights' podcast is a watershed moment for a media format that has already outlived the device it was named for. By Thursday afternoon, Wednesday night's talk had already been seen more than 11.7 million times on YouTube. But that's only a fraction of its circulation — clips distributed on Instagram, TikTok, X and elsewhere have received more than 400 million views, and the episode was also available for streaming on audio platforms. Swift, who infrequently gives interviews to journalists, revealed key information about her upcoming album, 'The Life of a Showgirl,' and talked about her relationships with Travis Kelce and her family, and her joy of gaining full control of her past work — a yearslong quest. It was a revelation for fans with whom she's primarily communicated through her music and social media Easter eggs, a treasure hunt of clues about what she's doing professionally. 'We have not heard Taylor speak in like a long-form interview like that in about five years,' Alex Antonides, a superfan from Dallas, told The Associated Press. 'She's never been in that comfortable of a situation, either. It's always been like more professional, like a professional interviewer asking her questions. And then this is like with her boyfriend and his brother. So that was ... an environment we've truly never seen her in before.' Celebrities like a friendly face for public talks Swift cemented a trend that's been seen in recent years among entertainers, sports figures and politicians who seek to deliver particular messages. A visit to friendly faces for a long-form conversation beats questions from nosy, prying journalists. In this case, Swift and Travis Kelce locked arms and cooed at each other between admiring queries. 'My boyfriend says,' Swift said in asides when Kelce laid things on too thick. 'The Kelce brothers have become the Barbara Walters of their generation,' said Nick Cicero, founder of Mondo Metrics, which studies the podcast industry. Fans ate it up. 'I think it's really nice and refreshing, especially for a woman whose primary fan base is young women, to see somebody that is so celebratory of their partner and also not self-deprecating in a bad way, but also really admires what they do, and they don't try to minimize that,' one fan, Britton Copeland, who goes by Britton Rae on TikTok, said in a Zoom interview. Swift interpreters immediately began online discussions about What It All Means. One fan discussed theories about the still-unheard song, 'The Fate of Ophelia,' listed as the new album's first cut. Others pointed out that the album release date of Oct. 3 coincided with National Plaid Day — apparently a Swift obsession — and National Boyfriend's Day. Such Easter eggs are likely to bring listeners back to the 'New Heights' interview again and again, meaning it could eventually stand as the most listened-to podcast episode on YouTube ever. 'It's got a chance,' Cicero said. Podcasts emerged in the 2000s as an audio-only programming format tied to Apple's now-defunct iPod. The New Oxford American Dictionary called 'podcast' its word of the year in 2005, even as many in the industry sought an alternative name almost as soon as it was coined. The well-regarded 'Serial' podcasts helped bring the format into the mainstream a decade ago. Particularly since the pandemic, and with the explosive growth of YouTube and personalities like Joe Rogan, video podcasts have become far more popular. Like most interview podcasts, 'New Heights' can also be enjoyed in an audio format — and it's background noise even for many who air it on YouTube — but being able to see Swift and the Kelces interact has its benefits. Will Swift outdraw President Trump's appearance with Rogan? Rogan's interview with President Donald Trump was a key moment in the 2024 presidential campaign, and has been seen 59 million times on YouTube in nine months. Certainly Swifties — and possibly Trump himself — will be eager to see if the 'New Heights' interview exceeds that number. Swift is among the celebrities who has drawn the president's ire. Swift's and the Kelces' teams were was particularly skillful in creating a huge demand for the interview with how its spread clips across various social media platforms, said Tom Webster, founder of Sounds Profitable, a firm that analyzes the podcast industry. By Thursday morning, Instagram highlights alone from the interview were viewed more than 350 million times, Cicero said.

Baby Shark did not plagiarize, South Korea's top court rules
Baby Shark did not plagiarize, South Korea's top court rules

Saudi Gazette

time2 days ago

  • Saudi Gazette

Baby Shark did not plagiarize, South Korea's top court rules

SEOUL — South Korea's Supreme Court has rejected a US composer's allegation that the producers of the inescapably catchy children's song Baby Shark plagiarized his work, ending a six-year-long legal battle. The court upheld two lower court verdicts that favoured Pinkfong, the South Korean company behind the tune with the "doo doo doo doo doo doo" refrain that has been streamed billions of times. Jonathan Wright recorded a version of the tune in 2011 based on a children's folk song. Pinkfong's version was released in 2016. Wright said he owned the copyright to the interpretation, but Pinkfong argued that its version was an arrangement of the same folk song, which is in the public domain. The court ruled that Wright's version "had not reached a level of substantial alteration" from the original folk song for it to be considered a separate work, which means it is not protected as a separate piece of work under copyright law. Pinkfong's Baby Shark went wildly viral after it was released on YouTube, in a clip that included hand gestures for children to dance along with. It became the most-viewed YouTube video of all time in November 2020, at the height of the pandemic, after raking up seven billion views. Just over a year later, it became the first YouTube video to reach 10 billion views. Baby Shark is thought to have originated in the US in the 1970s and popularised at summer camps. One theory says it was invented in 1975, as Steven Spielberg's Jaws became an box office smash around the world. The premise hasn't always been as cheery as Pinkfong's interpretation. In one version, a surfer loses an arm to a shark, and in another, the protaganist dies. Wright, who goes by the stage name Johnny Only, created his sanitised version in 2011. The YouTube video, titled "Baby Shark Song (non-dismemberment version)", features him and a group of children and teenagers dancing to the song by a pool. Wright said he initially thought, that since the song was in the public domain, "[Pinkfong] could go right ahead and use it". The idea of a copyright suit arose when he realised that Pinkfong had threatened legal action when a South Korean political party – the current opposition People Power Party – used Baby Shark in a political campaign. "The wheels in my head start turning... Doesn't that mean that my version also has copyright protection?" Wright told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in 2019. There are also international adaptations of Baby Shark before Pinkfong's interpretation, including the French Bebe Requin and the German Kleiner Hai (Little Shark), which became a viral hit in Europe in 2007. But none of these have reached the phenomenal success of Pinkfong's adaptation. Since then, popular acts from Blackpink to Josh Groban have incorporated their version of the song into their performances; it has been translated into more than 100 languages and even been made into a movie. "We call it K-Pop for the next generation," Pinkfong's marketing director Jamie Oh told the BBC in 2018. — BBC

South Korean Supreme Court dismisses US composer's ‘Baby Shark' copyright claim
South Korean Supreme Court dismisses US composer's ‘Baby Shark' copyright claim

Al Arabiya

time2 days ago

  • Al Arabiya

South Korean Supreme Court dismisses US composer's ‘Baby Shark' copyright claim

South Korea's Supreme Court rejected a 30 million won ($21,600) damage claim Thursday by an American composer who accused a South Korean kids content company of plagiarizing his version of 'Baby Shark,' ending a six-year legal battle over the globally popular tune known for its catchy 'doo doo doo doo doo doo ' hook. The top court upheld lower court rulings dating back to 2021 and 2023 that found no sufficient grounds to conclude Pinkfong infringed on Jonathan Wright's copyright. Wright, also known as Johnny Only, had recorded his version in 2011, four years before Pinkfong's, but both were based on a traditional melody popular for years at children's summer camps in the United States. The courts ruled that Wright's version did not differ enough from the original melody to qualify as an original creative work eligible for copyright protection, and that Pinkfong's song had clear differences from Wright's. Wright's South Korean attorney and Pinkfong didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Pinkfong's 'Baby Shark' became a global phenomenon after it was released on YouTube in 2015, with the original video now exceeding 16 billion views and peaking at No. 32 on the Billboard Hot 100.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store