Cong, UDF will back nuns' legal battle, says Satheesan
"For the past nine days, two nuns were in jail for a crime they didn't commit. Those spreading religious hatred are attacking minorities. Govt lawyers in Chhattisgarh argued against granting bail to the nuns. Bajrang Dal lawyers also argued against granting bail, treating the nuns like criminals who committed murder. BJP national and state leadership supported this," said Satheesan.
"This is the 834th attack against Christians in the last 365 days.
The significance of this incident is that it exposed BJP's true face. The nuns were arrested on false charges of religious conversion and human trafficking. In BJP-ruled states, nuns and clergy in religious attire cannot travel freely. This is the same administration that shackled and killed the venerable Stan Swamy in jail. It was a violation of the constitutional protections guaranteed to them," he alleged.
"MLAs Roji M John and Sajeev Joseph, who led the legal efforts, succeeded in securing bail.
Support will be given to all legal battles until the FIR is quashed," he added.
"Kerala's secular spirit was united in wishing for bail for the nuns. BJP is trying to bring divisive politics into such a society. Congress and UDF will fight this with all their might," said Satheesan.
Quash case against nuns, Venugopal to C'garh govt
BJP state unit leaders thought they could earn votes in elections by playing a political drama to create an impression that they intervened after Keralite nuns were arrested in Chhattisgarh, alleged AICC general secretary K C Venugopal on Saturday.
"That is just a dream. The Sangh Parivar mind is full of hatred and revenge. The nuns were portrayed wrongly as part of that and they came up with the accusation of religious conversion. BJP can't hoist the flag of love. There is no love and sincerity in them," he said.
Venugopal was speaking to the media after visiting the headquarters of Assisi Sisters of Mary Immaculate, the congregation to which the two arrested nuns belonged, at Cherthala in Alappuzha.
He urged Chhattisgarh govt to show the willingness to quash the case against the nuns. "Why is Chhattisgarh govt reluctant to quash the fake case against the nuns? Govt wishes to prolong the trials against them," he said. Venugopal urged Centre and Union home department to demand of Chhattisgarh chief minister to quash the case against the nuns. "Strict action should be taken against those who illegally detained them," he added.
Govt has no role in bail, says KPCC prez
KPCC president Sunny Joseph on Saturday welcomed the bail granted to the nuns. However, he said neither central govt nor state govt have any role in the grant of bail to the nuns. "It is the court's discretionary power for granting bail. Those who claim that the bail was granted due to their generosity, should also be ready to take the responsibility of their arrest," he added.
Joseph alleged that the nuns were arrested in a fabricated case. "Bajrang Dal activists threatened and manhandled the nuns and the women who were with them at the time in search of a job. Legal action should be taken against those involved in the incident," he demanded.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Friendship Day wishes
,
messages
and
quotes
!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Jakhar joins BJP protest against mayor, demands audit of funds
The ongoing protest by BJP councillors against mayor Inderjit Kaur entered its fourth day on Wednesday, with BJP state president Sunil Jakhar lending his support by joining the demonstration outside the Municipal Corporation Zone D office. Jakhar slammed the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government for allegedly suppressing democratic voices and demanded immediate withdrawal of the FIR lodged against five BJP councillors. All the senior leadership from the district was present during the protest and raised slogans against the mayor and AAP government. BJP state president Sunil Jakhar sitting on protest along with local party leaders at MC Zone D office in Ludhiana on Monday. (Gurpreet Singh/HT) Addressing the protesting councillors and supporters, Jakhar said, 'The mayor and the AAP-led administration must stop misusing power. Lodging an FIR against elected representatives who were raising public issues is an attack on democracy. If the FIR is not revoked, BJP will intensify its protests and gather all MC zonal offices across Ludhiana in the coming days.' Jakhar also questioned the utilisation of funds under the Smart City Project, stating that over ₹900 crore has been received from the Centre, but the on-ground progress is negligible. He demanded a third-party audit of all the projects undertaken under the scheme. 'We want a complete audit report to be made public. The people of Ludhiana have the right to know where this money has gone,' he added. Jakhar also pointed out the recent arrest of the superintendent engineer by the Vigilance Bureau under the charges of corruption regarding the development project of the city. Senior BJP leader and advocate Bikram Singh Sidhu said, 'MC is miserably failed to maintain the city as roads are in deplorable condition, potable water is still distant dream, solid waste management is not maintained, sewerage system is also failed and MC is becoming a house of corruption and due to which we are requesting the union government of India through urban development ministry to constitute the special team to conduct a proper audit of smart funds.' 'The mayor has registered a false FIR and BJP workers will continue an indefinite strike against the mayor until the case will be revoked,' he added. The protest began after a confrontation took place between BJP councillors and the mayor during a meeting last week. The BJP leaders alleged that the Mayor misbehaved with them when they tried to raise civic issues. The Municipal Corporation later filed an FIR against five BJP councillors and 20 others, which further escalated the tension. The protest had seen participation from councillors and leaders of other parties, including the Shiromani Akali Dal and Congress in the past days, who have expressed concern over the growing intolerance in local governance.
The Print
20 minutes ago
- The Print
15 ‘oligarch billionaires' run India: Ex-Trump negotiator Lighthizer on why he failed with New Delhi
Late on Monday, Trump threatened substantial tariffs on India as he accused it of buying and reselling 'massive amounts' of Russian oil 'for big profits'. With Trump repeating the threat days after announcing 25% tariffs and a Russia penalty on India, a reading of Lighthizer's book presents key insights on Trump's India stance. Lighthizer writes in No Trade is Free that he would try to predict India's position in talks by tracking the interests of its 15 billionaires or 'oligarchs who ran the country', giving a rare insider's peek into how the US President's India policy has unfolded over his two terms. New Delhi: As US President Donald Trump has again threatened to raise tariffs on India supposedly for its Russian oil purchase, it's instructive to see what former US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, who set Trump's trade agenda and negotiated with India, had to say in a 2023 book. Lighthizer, a veteran trade negotiator and once a free-trade sceptic, is widely considered to have curated policy moves of US President Donald Trump, who abruptly revoked special trade privileges to India in his first term. He referred to these billionaires as 'oligarchs' and said it was unusual in the extent to which they 'influence government policy' in India. The 77-year-old also said that India 'suffered from an extremely strong professional bureaucracy' in all areas of government. 'When I was in negotiations with Indian officials, I kept a copy of the biography of each of the country's fifteen or so billionaires on my desk. In predicting Indian government positions, I would look to the interests of these men,' Lighthizer wrote in his book, which was published in 2023. India's opposition parties have often alleged that largecorporate houses and industrialists, such as Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani, enjoy easy access to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government, which work in their interests in exchange for funds. 'I can remember at one point telling an Indian friend of mine who had made a fortune in business that I thought there were fifteen oligarchs who basically ran the country. He corrected me. 'Bob, you're wrong. Only about seven of them actually run the country. The others just try to influence the seven',' Lighthizer wrote in the book, which has an entire chapter dedicated to India. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has called Modi's government a 'suit-boot ki sarkar' (government for the rich) to try to corner the Bharatiya Janata Party as recently as during the 2024 general elections. The Prime Minister has outrightly rejected the allegations, saying that such deceitful political vendetta only hurts the electoral prospects of the Congress. While the two industrialists, also two of India's wealthiest men, have not addressed the charges publicly, their business entities have denied allegations by the Opposition on several counts. India's 'protectionism' In his second term, US President Trump is pushing on with a tariff blitz across countries as he attempts to 'reorder the global economy' with the highest rates since the 1930s. Talks between New Delhi and Washington to clinch a trade deal have remained stalled, with experts saying highly protected agriculture and dairy sectors are sticky issues. Lighthizer also referred to India's 'protectionist' stance in his book. 'India is particularly protectionist in the agricultural sector, where it uses tariffs and safety standards to help politically potent farmers groups,' he wrote in his book, which is full of praise for Trump and his style of politics. In fact, he wrote that he once told Prime Minister Modi that India was 'the most protectionist country in the world' and that it was causing a large and growing trade deficit. 'Indian trade policies have long caused tensions with the United States. India uses many of the tools of modern mercantilism. It has high tariffs, a bureaucracy focused on keeping imports out, and a system of industrial policy and protectionism.' Also Read: Pakistan, Dhaka have played Washington well. Back home, Modi ecosystem has an inner conflict 'Natural friends' India & US Lighthizer, however, said India and the US were 'natural friends'. 'Perhaps, most importantly, the rise and growing militarism of China is the greatest geopolitical concern for both our nations… India feels as threatened as we do by the aggressive surge of China. There is truth in the old saying (modified for obvious reasons) that the adversary of my adversary is my friend.' Lighthizer, once called by Trump the 'greatest United States trade representative in American history', played a crucial role in the imposition of hefty tariffs on Chinese imports during the first term of the US President. While India-US relations grew for the most part during the presidency of Joe Biden, they have remained fragmented due to several trade and policy differences under the deceptive exterior of a vibrant bonhomie between 'great friends' Trump and Modi. Lighthizer said that the Trump administration's strategy with India was to maintain good relations but to use what leverage it had to increase its access to India's market to 'obtain fairness and reciprocity in trade'. He also commented on what he thought of as Modi's personality and political vision. 'Prime Minister Narendra Modi is a particularly interesting figure. He came up through the ranks of right-wing political organizations and clearly considers himself a nationalist. His political party, the Bharatiya Janata Party, is a right-wing Hindu party.' He added: 'He is an extremely gifted politician and the first leader of India who was born after its independence in 1947… Of course, Modi is dedicated to raising India out of poverty. He believes in doing it through state control of innovation, high tariffs, mercantilism, and protectionism. There are lots of hangovers from the time of British rule, but free trade is not one of them.' High praise for Piyush Goyal Lighthizer was sworn in as the 18th US Trade Representative (USTR) in May 2017 and worked in the position till 20 January 2021. The USTR is responsible for developing and coordinating international trade, commodity, and direct investment policy, as well as overseeing negotiations with other countries. At the time he was chosen by Trump to serve as USTR, Lighthizer was a partner at the law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (Skadden), where he practised international trade law for over 30 years. Before joining Skadden, Lighthizer served as deputy USTR for US President Ronald Reagan. During this tenure, he negotiated over two dozen bilateral international agreements, including pacts on steel, automobiles, and agricultural products. The latest flashpoint in the recent India-US talks came last week when the US President signed an order imposing a 25 percent tariff on India's exports, 'plus an unspecified penalty' for buying Russian oil and weapons. In the 2023 book, Lighthizer also reflected on his time negotiating with the Indian delegation on tariffs. 'I said (to PM Modi) that I had been negotiating with their trade minister, Suresh Prabhu, for two years and had made absolutely no progress. At times, I said, he had not even returned my call for weeks.' 'Soon after that meeting, negotiations began in earnest. This time they were with a new trade minister named Piyush Goyal, a smart, gifted politician from Mumbai. We raised our issues: tariffs, agriculture access, medical device impediments, barriers to e-commerce and insurance, discrimination in the electronic payment sector, fish subsidies, and the list goes on. We made headway but could never quite close a deal.' (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read:Trump tariff forces India to shed illusion. Stop conflating status with power
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Punjab village bans love marriages without family consent, sparks row
A village in Punjab's Mohali district has ignited controversy after its gram panchayat passed a resolution banning love marriages without family or community decision by the gram panchayat of Manakpur Sharif, located just 10 kilometers from Chandigarh, has drawn sharp criticism from political leaders and rights resolution, passed unanimously on July 31, prohibits couples who marry without the approval of their families from residing in the village or nearby areas. It also warns of punitive action against any villagers who support or shelter such 'This is not a punishment but a preventive step to protect our traditions and values,' said Dalvir Singh, the village explained that the resolution followed a recent incident in which a 26-year-old man, Davinder, married his 24-year-old niece, Baby. The couple has since left the village, but the incident has an impact for 2,000 villagers that are living here.'We are not against love marriage or law, but we are not allowing it here in our Panchayat,' Singh added. According to the resolution, the entire community shares the responsibility of preventing such unions. The panchayat has also urged neighboring villages to adopt similar move has sparked a backlash. Dharamvira Gandhi, Congress MP from Patiala, condemned the resolution, calling it a 'Talibani diktat.''Freedom to choose one's life partner is a fundamental right of every adult. The state must intervene and protect such couples from obscurantist attitudes,' he the resolution drew outrage from some quarters, local youth and villagers, speaking to India Today on the condition of anonymity, voiced support for the sarpanch.'We are with our Sarpanch on this decision and he is only authorised to speak over it. But we feel we have a legacy and reputation that should be carried. World is modern but we need to save our relations, our culture and our villages,' said one authorities have so far taken a measured stance over the incident. Sonam Chaudhary, Additional Deputy Commissioner (Rural), Mohali, said no formal complaint has yet been filed.'If the individuals are adults, they are legally free to marry whom they choose. Any future complaints will be addressed in accordance with the law,' she Aggarwal, Superintendent of Police (Mohali), emphasised the rule of law. 'This is not a banana republic. We will uphold the law and constitutional rights. As of now, no official complaint has been received. If it comes, we will act as per the law. No one has the right to take things into their own hands,' he told India the resolution was passed, the couple at the center of the controversy released a video on social media confirming that they married of their own free will. They also criticised local residents for tarnishing their reputation. Raj Lalli Gill, Chairperson of the Punjab State Women Commission, called the resolution unconstitutional. 'It's unconstitutional and decision by such Panchayat has no meaning. We will look into this. We haven't received any complaint against it,' she said.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Punjab
