Moving iMage Technologies Reports Revenue of $3.57M, Improved Q3 Gross Profit and Reduced Net Loss; Net Cash Steady at $5.4M at Quarter End
Q3'25 Highlights
Q3'25 revenue declined 8.2% to $3.571M vs. $3.890M in Q3'24, principally due to customer delays in the commencement of several projects that are now expected later in Q4'25 or FY 2026.
Q3'25 gross profit dollars increased $387K to $1.063M vs. $676K in Q3'24, reflecting the benefit of a focus on higher margin project and product opportunities as well as the impact of lower margin cinema facilities equipment sales and certain inventory reserves in Q3'24.
Q3'25 gross margin percentage increased to 29.8% vs. 17.4% in Q3'24 due to the absence of lower margin cinema facilities equipment revenue in Q3'24.
Q3'25 operating loss improved to ($270K) vs. ($649K) in Q3'24, principally reflecting the gross margin improvement.
Q3'25 net loss improved to ($240K), or ($0.02) per share, vs. ($601K) or ($0.06) per share, in Q3'24.
Net cash steady at $5.4M, or approximately $0.54 per common share, and there was no long-term debt as of 3/31/25.
Moving Image Chairman and CEO, Phil Rafnson, commented, "In the face of business and economic uncertainties impacting our customers' near-term spending decisions, we remain focused on building our project pipeline with new and existing customers while also working to reduce expenses, focus on higher margin opportunities and preserving our cash position. Despite these transitory impacts, we remain confident in the substantial longer term business potential of the cinema technology refresh cycle involving the replacement of thousands of legacy cinema projectors and sound systems with state-of-the-art laser projectors and updated sound systems over the next few years."
President and COO, Francois Godfrey, added, "Ongoing customer dialogues confirm the need, customer experience and operating cost benefits of new laser projection systems. Further, our team's long-term experience, strong reputation and unrivaled ability to design and execute projects in any entertainment environment positions us well to earn a significant share of this activity. A perfect example was the decision to select Moving iMage to design and implement a state-of-the-art, seven-screen theater complex at Cannon Beach in Arizona. We expect installation work to commence early in fiscal 2026 and are very proud to play a defining role in this unique, complex and high-profile project with outstanding business partners."
"We came away from CinemaCon in late April with new relationships, opportunities and ideas to maximize efficiencies and are proud to repeatedly overdeliver on client needs from coast to coast. Recent new business wins include a $9M projector technology refresh contract spread over three years for an important long-term exhibition customer, the Cannon Beach project mentioned by Phil, and several other pending turnkey cinema deployments.
"While current economic uncertainties are slowing the pace of projects and customer decision making, we have built a base of $8M to $9M in largely recurring annual revenue, a solid pipeline of contracted projects and a significant number of opportunities in development, most of which we expect in fiscal 2026 or future years. We are focused on the things that we can control, principally our overhead, product and service margins and pace of investment, to ensure that we remain well positioned to pursue growth opportunities and make progress on our goal to move the business to positive cash flow and profitability.
"We currently expect Q4'25 revenue of approximately $5.2M, as a result of some larger FY 2025 projects getting pushed into FY 2026, and solid progress in the reduction of our net loss on a sequential and year-over-year basis. Looking into FY 2026, while we are encouraged by the recent box office gains, we look forward to our customers updating their auditoriums with higher image quality and lower total cost of ownership of new cinema systems."
Conference Call Details
Dial-in Number: 1-877-407-4018
Toll/International Number: 1-201-689-8471
Call me™: Participants can use Guest dial-in numbers above and be answered by an operator OR click the Call me™ Link for instant telephone access to the event. Call me™ link will be made active 15 minutes prior to scheduled start time.
Transcript: Posted online here 48 hours after the event
Questions can be submitted in advance via Email to: mitq@catalyst-ir.com
Telephone Replay
Access ID: 13753795
Replay Dial-In: 1-844-512-2921 or 1-412-317-6671
Replay Expiration: Thursday May 29, 2025 at 11:59 p.m. ET
Forward-Looking Statements
All statements above that are not purely about historical facts, including, but not limited to, those in which we use the words "believe," "anticipate," "expect," "plan," "intend," "estimate," "target" and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. While these forward-looking statements represent our current judgment of what may happen in the future, actual results may differ materially from the results expressed or implied by these statements due to numerous important factors. Our filings with the SEC provide detailed information on such statements and risks and should be consulted along with this release. To the extent permitted under applicable law, we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
About Moving iMage Technologies (www.movingimagetech.com)
With a focus on innovation, service, and quality, Moving iMage Technologies ("MiT") is a trusted partner in delivering state-of-the-art out-of-home entertainment environments. Founded in 2003, MiT provides products, integrated systems design, custom engineering, proprietary products, software, and installation services for cinemas, screening rooms, postproduction facilities, high-end home theaters, Esports venues, arenas, stadiums, and other entertainment spaces.
MiT manufactures a broad line of digital cinema peripherals in the U.S., including automation systems, projector pedestals/bases, projector lifts, hush boxes, direct-view LED frames, lighting fixtures and dimmers, power management devices, operations software, and Esports platforms. It also distributes and integrates cinema equipment from Barco, Sharp (NEC) Digital Cinema, Christie Digital, LEA Professional, Dolby, GDC, JBL/Crown, LG, Meyer Sound, Q-SYS, QSC, Samsung and others.
MiT's Caddy Products division designs and sells cupholders, concession trays, and venue accessories that enhance concession sales and improve the guest experience.
MOVING IMAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
March 31,
June 30,
2025
2024
(unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash $ 5,369
$ 5,278
Accounts receivable, net
940
1,048
Inventories, net
3,065
3,117
Prepaid expenses and other
241
470
Total Current Assets
9,615
9,913
Long-Term Assets:
Right-of-use asset
1,142
144
Property and equipment, net
18
28
Intangibles, net
378
422
Other assets
15
16
Total Long-Term Assets
1,553
610
Total Assets $ 11,168
$ 10,523
Liabilities And Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 2,745
$ 2,261
Accrued expenses
351
320
Customer refunds
288
399
Customer deposits
1,534
1,651
Lease liability-current
219
151
Unearned warranty revenue
53
31
Total Current Liabilities
5,190
4,813
Long-Term Liabilities:
Lease liability-non-current
979
-
Total Long-Term Liabilities
979
-
Total Liabilities
6,169
4,813
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $0.00001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 9,933,679 and 9,896,850 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively
-
-
Additional paid-in capital
12,047
11,965
Accumulated deficit
(7,048)
(6,255)
Total Stockholders' Equity
4,999
5,710
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $ 11,168
$ 10,523
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
MOVING IMAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(in thousands except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
March 31,
March 31,
2025
2024
2025
2024
Net sales $ 3,571
$ 3,890
$ 12,264
$ 13,790
Cost of goods sold
2,508
3,214
8,894
10,536
Gross profit
1,063
676
3,370
3,254
Operating expenses:
Research and development
49
73
157
212
Selling and marketing
429
547
1,421
1,717
General and administrative
855
705
2,691
2,421
Total operating expenses
1,333
1,325
4,269
4,350
Operating (loss)
(270)
(649)
(899)
(1,096)
Other income (expense)
Interest and other income, net
30
48
107
140
Total other income
30
48
107
140
Net (loss) $ (240) $ (601) $ (792) $ (956)
Weighted average shares outstanding: basic and diluted
9,911,015
10,436,519
9,901,554
10,593,229
Net (loss) income per common share basic and diluted $ (0.02) $ (0.06) $ (0.08) $ (0.09)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Nine Months Ended
March 31
2025
2024
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net (loss) $ (792) $ (956)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for credit losses
59
(52)
Inventory reserve
277
433
Depreciation expense
10
9
Amortization expense
44
43
Right-of-use amortization
197
201
Stock option compensation expense
59
15
Stock issued for director expenses
23
13
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable
50
67
Inventories
(226)
(234)
Prepaid expenses and other
230
(487)
Accounts payable
484
(50)
Accrued expenses and customer refunds
(81)
129
Unearned warranty revenue
22
26
Customer deposits
(117)
726
Lease liabilities
(148)
(207)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
91
(324)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment
-
(12)
Net cash (used in) investing activities
-
(12)
Cash flows from financing activities
Stock Buyback
-
(334)
Net cash (used in) financing activities
-
(334)
Net increase (decrease) in cash
91
(670)
Cash, beginning of the period
5,278
6,616
Cash, end of the period $ 5,369
$ 5,946
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Right-of-use assets from new lease $ (207) $ -
Right-of-use assets from lease modification $ (988) $ -
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Think It's Too Late to Buy This Leading Industrials Stock? Here's the Biggest Reason Why There's Still Time
Key Points The company's revenue expectations keep improving through 2025. Only increased costs in connection with tariffs are holding back profit increases over the near term. 10 stocks we like better than Vertiv › The stock for data center infrastructure company and Nvidia partner Vertiv (NYSE: VRT) is trading up 84% since the end of March. That growth could continue as the company's underlying momentum is being masked by the effect of tariffs and an acceleration in investment to fuel future growth. Vertiv's quiet growth burst The table below shows the progression of its full-year guidance in 2025. Vertiv's sales guidance outstrips its adjusted operating profit increases. Profit growth is lagging sales growth due to extra costs associated with tariffs and the pull-forward of investment in research and development to fuel growth. Vertiv In February In April In July Increase in Guidance from February to July* Sales guidance $9.125 million to $9.175 million $9.325 million to $9.575 million $9.925 million to $10.075 million 8.7% Adjusted operating profit $1.910 million to $1.960 million $1.885 million to $1.985 million $1,950 million to $2.030 million 2.8% Free cash flow $1.275 million to $1.325 million $1.250 million to $1.350 million $1.375 million to $1.425 million 7.7% Data source: Vertiv, author's analysis. *All figures calculated assuming the midpoint of guidance. In usual circumstances, it's reasonable to expect a company's operating profit to expand more than its revenue growth. Margins should improve in a manufacturing company when it has larger volumes due to the benefits of scale, such as increased production efficiency and lower fixed cost per unit production. However, provided the tariff environment doesn't worsen for Vertiv, future orders and revenue increases are likely to translate into significant increases in profits and cash flow. Where next for Vertiv? Momentum continues to build in the data center end market, driven by torrid growth in artificial intelligence application demand. As such, Vertiv is in the early innings of a multi-year expansion in data center spending, and that includes its involvement in developing power systems and solutions for the next generation of data centers with Nvidia. Vertiv has a bright future, and it's not too late to invest in it. Should you invest $1,000 in Vertiv right now? Before you buy stock in Vertiv, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vertiv wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $671,466!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,633!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,076% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 184% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 18, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Lawyer argues Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit
Crosses are surrounded by flowers and other mementos at a memorial, June 9, 2022, for the victims of a shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File) LOS ANGELES — A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued Tuesday. Nineteen children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. The families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. The families, who were present at last month's hearing, did not appear in court, with a lawyer citing the back-to-school season. Many plaintiffs attended the hearing virtually, he said. In one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: 'Let's normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?' The lawsuit alleges those posts are marketed toward minors. The Uvalde gunman opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, according to the lawsuit. He also owned various Instagram accounts and had an 'obsessive relationship' with the platform, at times opening the app more than 100 times a day, plaintiffs' lawyers found in an analysis of the shooter's phone. Plaintiffs say minors can access gun content on Instagram Meta attorney Kristin Linsley argued that the families provided no proof that minors, including the Uvalde gunman, even read the Daniel Defense posts on Instagram. She also said the posts didn't violate Meta's policies because they weren't direct advertisements and did not include links to purchase any products. Katie Mesner-Hage, representing the victims' families, said the defence's claim is 'fundamentally unfair,' as the plaintiffs don't have access to Meta data that would indicate whether the shooter encountered those posts. She added that if the content had landed on the shooter's feed, as the plaintiffs allege, then Meta 'not only knew about it, they designed the system so it would be delivered to him.' 'They knew more about him than anyone else on the planet,' she said. Linsley said content advertising firearms for sale on Instagram is allowed if posted by 'brick-and-motor and online retailers,' but visibility of those posts was restricted for minors under Meta's advertising policies from the end of 2021 to October 2022. 'This is not a playbook for how to violate the rules. This is actually what the rules are,' Linsley said. The plaintiff's team, however, showed a fake profile they created for a 17-year-old boy earlier this month, through which they were able to search Daniel Defense's Instagram account and see a post that included a picture of a gun, as well as a link to the gun manufacturer's website. When the link was clicked, the gun-maker's website opened, and the team was able to select a firearm and add it to their cart, all within Instagram's app — an experiment that refutes Meta's assertion that posts relating to firearms aren't visible to users under 21, Mesner-Hage said. Linsley said in her rebuttal that the experiment was done this year and not in 2021 to 2022, which is when the policy she described was in effect. The families have also sued Daniel Defense and video game company Activision, which produces 'Call of Duty.' Case hinges on social media's responsibility for content creation Linsley said the Communications Decency Act allows social media platforms to moderate content without being treated as publishers of that content. 'The only response a company can have is to not have these kinds of rules at all,' Linsley said. 'It just gets you down a rabbit hole very quickly.' Mesner-Hage argued Meta is not protected by the act because social media platforms don't just host speech, but help curate it through its algorithms. Daniel Defense, she said, didn't have to pay for ads to get free access to Meta's analytical data through its business account on Instagram. That data shows the company which age bracket and gender engaged most with a specific post. 'Daniel Defense is not on Instagram to make friends. ... They're on there to promote their product,' Mesner-Hage said. 'It's not a paid advertisement, but I would struggle to describe this as anything other than an advertisement.' The lawsuit alleges that firearm companies tweaked their online marketing to comply with Meta's policies, including by avoiding the words 'buy' or 'sell' and not providing links to purchase, and that the social media company did not protect users against such strategies. Last month, lawyers for Activision also argued that legal proceedings against them should be thrown out, saying the families allegations are barred by the First Amendment. The families alleged that the war-themed video game Call of Duty trained and conditioned the Uvalde gunman to orchestrate his attack. Lawyers for the plaintiffs asked the judge to allow them to amend their lawsuit with the new information they presented Tuesday before ruling on the defence's motion. The defence claimed that was unnecessary, as the case would not have merit even with the amendments. The judge has yet to rule on Activision's motion and did not immediately rule on the Meta case. Itzel Luna, The Associated Press
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
The biggest winner of the Trump-Putin summit might be this Alaska man
An Alaska man might have walked away as the biggest winner of last week's high stakes summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage. He rode off with a new motorcycle, courtesy of the Russian government. Article content Putin's delegation gifted Mark Warren, a retired fire inspector for the Municipality of Anchorage, a Ural Gear Up motorcycle with a sidecar, one week after a television crew's interview with Warren went viral in Russia. The motorcycle company, founded in 1941 in western Siberia, now assembles its bikes in Petropavlovsk, Kazakhstan, and distributes them through a team based in Woodinville, Washington. Article content Article content Article content Warren already owned one Ural motorcycle, purchased from a neighbour. He was out running errands on it a week before the summit when a Russian television crew saw him and asked for an interview. Article content Article content 'It went viral, it went crazy, and I have no idea why, because I'm really just a super-duper normal guy,' Warren said Tuesday. 'They just interviewed some old guy on a Ural, and for some reason they think it's cool.' Article content On Aug. 13, two days before the Trump-Putin summit to discuss the war in Ukraine, Warren received a call from the Russian journalist, who told him, 'They've decided to give you a bike.' Article content Warren said a document he received indicated the gift was arranged through the Russian Embassy in the U.S., which did not immediately return a message Tuesday. Article content Warren said he initially thought it might be a scam. But after Putin and Trump departed Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson following their three-hour summit last Friday, he got another call informing him the bike was at the base. Article content Article content He was directed to go to an Anchorage hotel the next day for the handoff. He went with his wife, and there in the parking lot, along with six men he assumed to be Russians, was the olive-green motorcycle, valued at $22,000. Article content Article content 'I dropped my jaw,' he said. 'I went, 'You've got to be joking me.'' Article content All the Russians asked in return was to take his picture and interview him, he said: 'If they want something from me, they're gonna be sorely disappointed.' Article content Two reporters and someone from the consulate jumped on the bike with him, and he drove slowly around the parking lot while a cameraman ran alongside and filmed it. Article content The only reservation he had about taking the Ural is that he might somehow be implicated in some nefarious Russian scheme. Warren said he doesn't want a 'bunch of haters coming after me that I got a Russian motorcycle. … I don't want this for my family.' Article content When he was signing the paperwork taking ownership of the motorcycle from the Russian embassy, he noticed it was manufactured Aug. 12. Article content 'The obvious thing here is that it rolled off the showroom floor and slid into a jet within probably 24 hours,' he said. Article content
