logo
JGBs fall after weakest auction in 5 years spurs sell-off

JGBs fall after weakest auction in 5 years spurs sell-off

Minta day ago
TOKYO, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Japanese government bonds dropped on Wednesday after a five-year bond auction drew the weakest demand in more than five years, triggering a wave of selling by investors.
The five-year yield rose 3 basis points (bps) to 1.070%. The 10-year JGB yield rose 2.5 bps to 1.525%.
Yields move inversely to bond prices.
The lacklustre auction followed a session in which the 10-year JGBs untraded all day, reflecting thin liquidity during Japan's "Obon" holiday season.
"The market was worried about the liquidity and hesitated to participate in the auction," said Katsutoshi Inadome, a senior strategist at Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Asset Management.
The auction received bids worth 2.96 times the amount sold, the lowest ratio since March 2020, and lower than a ratio of 3.54 times at the previous auction in July.
The level of the five-year bond yield was not high enough, so that the market was afraid to buy bonds in case the yield rises in the coming sessions, said Miki Den, a senior Japan rate strategist at SMBC Nikko Securities.
JGB yields have eased from their highs in July as expectations of a rate hike by the Bank of Japan receded, following the central bank's caution over persistent risks to the economic outlook.
The two-year JGB yield rose 1.5 bps to 0.785%.
Yields on longer-dated bonds fell, with 20-year JGB yield slipping 0.5 bp to 2.515%. The 30-year JGB yield fell 0.5 bp to 3.085%.
The 40-year JGB yield fell 1.5 basis points to 3.285%. (Reporting by Junko Fujita; Editing by Sherry Jacob-Phillips)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blow to Trump's hopes as he won't like this: Fed's Daly says rate cut unlikely next
Blow to Trump's hopes as he won't like this: Fed's Daly says rate cut unlikely next

Economic Times

time29 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Blow to Trump's hopes as he won't like this: Fed's Daly says rate cut unlikely next

Fed interest rate cut September 2025: San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly does not support a large interest rate cut at the next Federal Reserve meeting. She believes the labor market is not weak enough to warrant such a move. This differs from some expectations. US President Donald Trump has been pushing for lower rates. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mary Daly Rules Out Big 50-Basis-Point Cut at September Fed Meeting Fed Official Supports Gradual Policy Shift, Not Rapid Cuts Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump Administration Pushes for Fed Rate Cuts FAQs US president Donald Trump may not be thrilled with the latest signals from the Federal Reserve. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly has pushed back on the idea of a steep 50-basis-point interest rate cut at the central bank's next meeting, according to a report from The Wall Street said in an interview with WSJ, published on Wednesday, that "Fifty sounds, to me, like we see an urgent — I'm worried it would send off an urgency signal that I don't feel about the strength of the labor market," as quoted in the report. She emphasised that, "I just don't see that. I don't see the need to catch up," as quoted in the WSJ remark strikes a different tone from what some market watchers and policymakers had begun to expect. Since the Fed's decision last month to hold rates steady, more Fed officials have expressed concern over the softening labor market and hinted they may be open to cutting rates, perhaps as early as September, according to a Reuters READ: Fed rate cuts are coming — here's how much the stock market could boom based on history This comes as the US president has been outspoken all year in his push for lower interest rates, as per the report. However, Daly's caution may complicate those expectations. While she has acknowledged that inflation pressures haven't been as persistent and that the job market is cooling, she favors a more gradual approach, according to the Reuters said that "Policy is likely to be too restrictive for where the economy is headed. So for me, that calls for recalibration," as quoted in the report. But she clarified that any shift should move slowly toward a more neutral setting 'over the next year or so,' as quoted by the Reuters READ: Google bets big on Bitcoin: Joins $3.7 billion deal that sends TeraWulf stock soaring 45% The Fed's direction remains a very important issue in Washington, especially as US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly continues to press for rate cuts, according to the report. Meanwhile, the administration is also exploring potential replacements for Fed Chair Jerome Powell, with a growing shortlist now up to 11 names, as reported by necessarily. Fed officials are divided, and Mary Daly has said she doesn't see an urgent need for a big rate cut right administration is reportedly considering a replacement, with a list of about 11 potential candidates.

Blow to Trump's hopes as he won't like this: Fed's Daly says rate cut unlikely next
Blow to Trump's hopes as he won't like this: Fed's Daly says rate cut unlikely next

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Blow to Trump's hopes as he won't like this: Fed's Daly says rate cut unlikely next

Mary Daly Rules Out Big 50-Basis-Point Cut at September Fed Meeting Fed Official Supports Gradual Policy Shift, Not Rapid Cuts Live Events Trump Administration Pushes for Fed Rate Cuts FAQs (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel US president Donald Trump may not be thrilled with the latest signals from the Federal Reserve. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly has pushed back on the idea of a steep 50-basis-point interest rate cut at the central bank's next meeting, according to a report from The Wall Street said in an interview with WSJ, published on Wednesday, that "Fifty sounds, to me, like we see an urgent — I'm worried it would send off an urgency signal that I don't feel about the strength of the labor market," as quoted in the report. She emphasised that, "I just don't see that. I don't see the need to catch up," as quoted in the WSJ remark strikes a different tone from what some market watchers and policymakers had begun to expect. Since the Fed's decision last month to hold rates steady, more Fed officials have expressed concern over the softening labor market and hinted they may be open to cutting rates, perhaps as early as September, according to a Reuters READ: Fed rate cuts are coming — here's how much the stock market could boom based on history This comes as the US president has been outspoken all year in his push for lower interest rates, as per the report. However, Daly's caution may complicate those expectations. While she has acknowledged that inflation pressures haven't been as persistent and that the job market is cooling, she favors a more gradual approach, according to the Reuters said that "Policy is likely to be too restrictive for where the economy is headed. So for me, that calls for recalibration," as quoted in the report. But she clarified that any shift should move slowly toward a more neutral setting 'over the next year or so,' as quoted by the Reuters READ: Google bets big on Bitcoin: Joins $3.7 billion deal that sends TeraWulf stock soaring 45% The Fed's direction remains a very important issue in Washington, especially as US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly continues to press for rate cuts, according to the report. Meanwhile, the administration is also exploring potential replacements for Fed Chair Jerome Powell, with a growing shortlist now up to 11 names, as reported by necessarily. Fed officials are divided, and Mary Daly has said she doesn't see an urgent need for a big rate cut right administration is reportedly considering a replacement, with a list of about 11 potential candidates.

Meta's AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info
Meta's AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Meta's AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info

An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are 'dumber than white people.' These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company's social media platforms. Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children. Entitled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards,' the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company's generative AI products. The standards don't necessarily reflect 'ideal or even preferable' generative AI outputs, the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found. 'It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art'),' the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that 'every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply.' But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: 'It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch').' Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed. 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,' Stone told Reuters. 'We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors.' Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was inconsistent. Other passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy document. The fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal, and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI bots. The standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as 'I recommend.' They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot 'to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics.' Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to 'write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people.' The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia – a claim that the document states is 'verifiably false' – if it added a disclaimer that the information is untrue. Meta had no comment on the race and British royal examples. Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI content. Douek said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in the document, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted. 'Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question.' Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualized fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as 'Taylor Swift with enormous breasts,' 'Taylor Swift completely naked,' and 'Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands.' Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: 'It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish.' The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risqué image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled 'unacceptable.' A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift example. Other examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent scenes. The standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt 'kids fighting' with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face – but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is off-limits. For a user requesting an image with the prompt 'man disemboweling a woman,' Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack her. And in response to a request for an image of 'Hurting an old man,' the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence. 'It is acceptable to show adults – even the elderly – being punched or kicked,' the standards state.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store