GWM reveals its first V8 – and the hardcore Tank 300 Hooke off-roader
And it could power a range of future GWM luxury models and Tank off-roaders in Australia – including the hardcore Tank 300 Hooke limited edition unveiled alongside it at the Shanghai motor show yesterday.
While you can no longer buy a V8-powered Toyota LandCruiser or, soon, Nissan Patrol, GWM says its all-new twin-turbo 4.0-litre V8 has been in development for at least three years, and will be backed by plug-in hybrid (PHEV) technology.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Speaking to Australian media in Shanghai, GWM International vice-president James Yang said the new V8 was under consideration for a variety of models to be sold in China and export markets including Australia.
'Our R&D centre as well as engine development department, the technology and also the level of skill is very high,' said Mr Wang through an interpreter.
'For the past three-four years we have been working on this V8, including lab as well as real-world testing.
'The Tank 300 is a very customisable and personalised vehicle, and in China there are already multiple versions and special editions that have been launched including one with a V6 twin-turbo engine.
'[A V8-powered Tank 300] is something that is definitely in consideration, and for right-hand drive markets is definitely something that we're still considering.'
Mr Yang said GWM's new V8 could be applied to a range of Tank models in Australia. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
'In this market, in the future, maybe we also want to launch the premium Tank 700,' he said.
'For this vehicle, I think the V8 is suitable, but only this model, or maybe such as the Tank 300 – the small vehicle, but the off-road capability is very good,' added Mr Yang, before asking journalists whether they thought the V8 was suitable for the Tank 300, 500 or 700.
The Tank 700 is the current flagship of GWM's Tank brand (sub-brand here), and has yet to be locked in for our market.
On the flagship off-roader, Mr Yang said: 'Because this model, in the future we'll have a different version. So we're also researching which is suitable for the Australian market.'
No further details have been announced for the new V8, but it's claimed to rev to 8000rpm and incorporate both dual fuel-injection and oil pump systems, and Mr Yang confirmed it will command a price premium.
'Currently, this is still under consideration so we can't tell at the moment how much the premium will be,' he said. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Through his interpreter, Mr Yang said the new V8 will be incorporated into a plug-in hybrid drivetrain that allows the vehicle to drive primarily on electric power, and only calls on the combustion engine during high-load situations such as hard acceleration and towing.
'The V8 will come in a plug-in system, and fundamentally when it's being driven in the city it will run majority in EV mode,' he said.
'When we consider towing massive 3.5-tonne plus caravans, the V8 would really help balance the whole situation with the plug-in.
'Overall, when in city driving, this will still run majority with EV mode and only when during hard work such as towing a massive van is when it will work in a hybrid situation.' GWM Tank 700 Credit: CarExpert
However, most of the powertrain's torque will still be produced by the V8, rather than the electric motor positioned between the engine and transmission.
Mr Yang said this type of powertrain was more suitable for off-roaders than pure-electric drivetrains.
'Basically with electrification on the vehicle, it's really changed the market and what we are doing is combining both,' he said.
'In particular, we found through research that when a motor is doing its peak output, it really heats up the entire system and that's when the performance sort of plateaus. GWM Tank 500 and Tank 300 Credit: CarExpert
'In particular, in 4×4 vehicles such as towing and off-roading situations, it's also not that great when you think of just pure electric motor output because it really requires the motor to spin in order to generate the torque.
'That's why the low-speed and high-torque application is not that great for like a more pure electric kind of setup, and with the higher capacity of the engine, it really helps compensate the shortfall of the BEV especially once again in towing as well as off-road situations.'
GWM's second eight-cylinder engine – following the flat-eight it revealed last year for its Souo motorcycle brand – could also power a range of new premium models being developed by the Chinese carmaker.
Potentially sold under the Confidence Auto banner, they will be positioned above models from the Wey luxury brand launched by GWM in 2016. GWM Tank 300 Hooke Credit: CarExpert
Revealed directly alongside the new V8 in Shanghai was the GWM Tank 300 Hooke, a hardcore off-road special-edition version of the large ladder-frame SUV that's already proving popular alongside the Toyota Prado and Ford Everest in Australia.
Its engine wasn't disclosed, but is likely to be either the 2.0-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder, the electrified PHEV version of that engine, or the 2.4-litre turbo-diesel now also available in Australia's Tank 300.
The most capable GWM vehicle ever features live axles both front and rear, eschewing the standard Tank 300's independent front suspension.
Four-corner coils and front/rear differential locks are retained, but the Tank 300 Hooke also adds 'disconnecting struts', a reinforced ladder frame, Cooper all-terrain tyres on beadlock-style wheels, a revised front bumper, and new front wheel-arch trims.
Named after the Hooke Trail, an off-road track through a mountain range in western China, the Tank 300 Hooke special is said to be undergoing final testing ahead of its launch in China later this year.
MORE: Inside Chinese GWM's plan to take on American pickups… potentially even in the USMORE: Everything GWM Tank 300
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
a minute ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Roundtable should consider new carbon pricing scheme
With the government's economic roundtable now under way (' Federal government's productivity summit begins', August 19), it will hopefully be looking at raising the revenue to fund the transition to net zero. We know that nine months after the introduction of the carbon tax in 2012 our carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation fell to a 10-year low, while the ABS reported a 2.6 per cent growth in the economy over the two-year period. After the Abbott government replaced the tax with an Emissions Reduction Fund, emissions started growing again as before. Surely now is the time to reconsider the reintroduction of a carbon pricing scheme. We know it works. Peter Nash, Fairlight Tessa Forshaw, an Australian scientist from Harvard, hits the nail on the head with her dissection of what's missing from the productivity roundtable and what's holding Australia back. It's a risk-adverse mindset (' Australia can't fix productivity without confronting its innovation hesitation', August 19). Our scientists are first-class, but too often have to move to the US or the UK to capitalise on their ideas. And that mindset has a lot to do with politics. The Hawke/ Keating government was not afraid to take risks. Since then, the chaos in Canberra and the Coalition's lost decade have landed us where we are now. Our Labor government has a thumping majority but is afraid to do what obviously needs to be done – because of the way politics works in Canberra. Under these circumstances, how can the populace be anything other than risk-averse? If we can't fix our politics, how can anything else work properly? The ray of hope is that the vote for the major parties continues to fall. Gary Barnes, Mosman Another topic that deserves discussion at the productivity round table is the multi-billion dollar diesel fuel rebate. Our current system refunds mining companies $495 for every 1000 litres of diesel used off-road. The Safeguard Mechanism penalty, meant to encourage emissions reduction in heavy industries, then charges these industries $5 for the resulting pollution. This is clearly a ridiculous situation, subsiding both pollution and the lame status quo. The productivity roundtable should adopt the Grattan Institute's proposal to wind back this generous diesel rebate, apply an emissions charge instead, and begin the shift to road-user charging. Mark Wills, Northcote (Vic) Paul Keating once said Ross Gittins was the only economist worth listening to. Personally, I never miss his column. So where is his inclusion in this week's roundtable? Judy Nicholas, Kambah (ACT) Qantas pays the price It's encouraging that Justice Michael Lee has not only upheld workers' rights, but also chastised Qantas for its unconscionable behaviour in profiting from the misery of its workers (' Payday for union as Qantas fined $90 million ', August 19). Perhaps the tide has finally turned against the decade-long conservative free-for-all that elevated profit and unethical business practice above workers' rights and drove the imbalance between wage increases and soaring profits. I'd take issue, however, with the suggestion that unions mount 'frivolous' cases. Generally, when a case is brought, it is to pursue fair and proper treatment. Alison Stewart, Riverview Justice Lee's judgment against Qantas highlights the value of unions. With no government agencies prepared to take on the might of Qantas for its sacking of baggage handlers, the Transport Workers Union (TWU) stepped up all the way to the High Court and won. Former CEO Alan Joyce and his minions engaged in conduct that damaged, both personally and financially, thousands of employees who had given decades of honest and faithful service to Qantas. Who stepped in to seek compensation for these workers; the government? No, it was one of the much-maligned unions that conservatives and the Murdoch press demonise at every opportunity. As a long-term union member I always saw the value of fighting for the rights and entitlements of workers. I applaud the TWU and the entire union movement for their tireless (and undervalued) advocacy on behalf of all Australian workers. Stronger together forever. Tony Heathwood, Kiama Downs The Morrison government gave Qantas about $2.7 billion in assistance during COVID, for which the taxpayer received no equity and lost a mountain of luggage. Last October, the company was fined $100 million for selling tickets for flights it had already decided to cancel. Now they have been fined $90 million for illegally sacking workers. Furthermore, they have killed any aviation competition in the regions by destroying REX through cross-subsidising their routes. Put plainly, the Spirit of Australia has become the Spirit of Mistrust and Exploitation. Malcolm Freak, Armidale Justice Lee's findings against Qantas and its IR breaches should send a clear warning to the Coalition shadow bench should it seek to water down employees' rights and embolden big business to maximise profits at the expense of workers' hard-fought and won entitlements. Severino Milazzo, Maroubra Why is ex-Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce not asked to repay some of his massive golden handshake? It was surely his decision to sack staff. Richard Harman, Banora Point Taco Trump Peter Hartcher's reference to Donald Trump's 'snivelling display' at his meeting with Vladimir Putin has many echoes of then British PM Neville Chamberlain's grovelling 'pilgrimage' to meet Hitler in 1938 (' How Trump went from American eagle to cooing pigeon ', August 19). Not only did Chamberlain (and France) agree to hand over part of what was then Czechoslovakia to Germany without that country's knowledge or consent, but like Trump's spurious claims of a '10 out of 10' outcome for his Alaska meeting, Chamberlain returned to England waving a piece of paper which he claimed represented 'peace in our time'. It's truly depressing to see the leader of the country that played such an important role in saving the world from Nazi and Japanese domination behaving in such a craven and cowardly manner in the face of a tyrant like Putin. Martyn Yeomans, Sapphire Beach It is all very well for Peter Hartcher to attack Donald Trump for his vacillation and possible motives for his efforts to end Russia's war against Ukraine, but the unaddressed question that needs answering is whether the best, if not the only, way to end the war is for the Western democracies to briefly take up arms on the side of Ukraine in defence of the principles of national sovereignty and peaceful co-existence. Ross Drynan, Lindfield In his letter, Peter Thornton admires Donald Trump for meeting some of 'the worlds' nastier autocrats' (Letters, August 19). He misses the fact that Trump isn't being altruistic. Rather, he admires them and feels they share something that he doesn't with other leaders. This isn't something for which to offer kudos. Luke Crosthwaite, Surfers Paradise Netanyahu gone astray The current diplomatic spat between Israel and Australia has its origins in Benjamin Netanyahu's desperate fight for political and personal survival (' Wong rebukes Israel's move to cancel visas for Australian diplomats ', August 19). As Netanyahu has become progressively alienated from Israel's sensible centre, he has had to reach out to right-wing nutters like Simcha Rothman, who was denied a visa to Australia, to cobble together a governing coalition. A more moderate Israeli regime would have ended the Gaza conflict long ago. The surviving hostages would have been returned, thousands of Palestinians would still be alive and receiving food and medical services, and many Gazan buildings would still be standing. While extremists like Rothman remain in power, the war will continue and former allies such as Australia will cut more of their ties with Israel. If Netanyahu regards Australia's support for peace and humanity as antisemitic, it shows how far he has strayed from the mainstream of civilised behaviour. Mike Reddy, Vincentia Veteran Middle East peace negotiator (is that an oxymoron?) Aaron David Miller thinks Australia's move to recognise Palestine will only encourage Hamas to hold on (' Stance on Palestine has no impact ', August 19). Naturally, he's supported by the usual pro-Israeli lobbyists. Meanwhile, Egypt and Qatar have negotiated a ceasefire with Hamas, which plainly demonstrates the gulf between rhetoric and reality (' Hamas accepts Arab-mediated ceasefire deal ', August 19). Phil Bradshaw, Naremburn It isn't a surprise that US Middle East adviser Aaron David Miller would declare our stance on Palestine 'has no impact'. It's just another way of creating obstacles to action, like throwing about the term 'antisemitism' at any criticism of Israel and most importantly, the inexcusable actions of Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. The global coverage of the Harbour Bridge march started more federal government action and caused more international consternation. It may be true that this is not having much impact 'on the ground', but I think the surest option now would be demanding the removal of Netanyahu from office. Enough is enough. Anthony Connolly, Beacon Hill Kean for change We owe a lot to Matt Kean for placing the NSW Liberal Party firmly in the climate action camp (' Balancing act: keeping parties cool on climate,' August 19). But with his departure from politics, the job of keeping the party there has been more difficult, given the 'climate wars' that are tearing the federal Coalition apart. In many ways, it's a pity he did not stay on to become opposition leader, but we can't blame him for eschewing this thankless job. He's right where the action is now, and we couldn't ask for a better, more qualified person to be chair of the Climate Change Authority. We should all wish him well. Ken Enderby, Concord Bridging transport gap Defecting from the inner west some years ago, the friends I left behind half jokingly called it a bridge too far, and time proved them right. Buses and trains, regular by day, after dark became scarce, unreliable or affected by dreaded trackwork, as if the city wilfully shut itself down. The metro has miraculously changed all that and made Sydney cosmopolitan (' How a year of metro has shaken up the way Sydney moves ', August 19). I now think nothing of seeing a show, and however late it finishes, a train will arrive within minutes, and I'll open my front door half an hour later. That type of service is no bridge at all. Peter Farmer, Northbridge Unloved tax Perhaps the best way to judge the potential effectiveness of tax changes to repair the budget bottom line is to look at voters' reactions (' Australians want Albanese to act to fix system – except for one tax,' August 19). The greater the effectiveness, the greater the opposition. The GST is a 'lovely tax' because it is paid continually by everyone, even those who reduce their income tax to zero through negative gearing or retirement with superannuation. No surprise that voters are opposed to an increase, despite it being one of the lowest in the world. There are parallels with the historic carbon tax – very effective in reducing emissions as it was paid by everyone, but tax-hating voters voted it down. It is almost surprising that there is more support for a change to negative gearing and capital gains discounts, however, the unfairness of these in favouring the well-off is a key factor. Geoff Harding, Chatswood Best defence After all the speculation about AUKUS, the expectation is that the agreement will be upheld after the Pentagon review by US defence official Elbridge Colby. But is it really in Australia's best interests? Our cities will still be wide open to attack by conventional naval and air forces, as well as by missiles, rockets and drones. Right now, a hostile navy could shell Sydney for half an hour and Australia would have to surrender in the absence of a missile defence system. And we can't count on the US coming in to bail us out. With the government splashing money on anything but defence, we need to spend the AUKUS money not on submarines, but on protecting our cities and deterring aggressors. Paul Everingham, Hamilton Improving lives Your article (' The 'miracle nation' at 60: How Singapore thrived against the odds ' August 11) relies heavily on longstanding detractors with well-worn criticisms to paint a skewed picture of Singapore. They claim that middle-class Singaporeans are 'truly squeezed' and that working-class citizens are 'worst affected by social inequality'. The facts say otherwise. The government heavily subsidises housing, healthcare and education, and provides additional support for those with less. Our progressive system of taxes and transfers has reduced both income and wealth inequalities, with the Gini coefficient, which measures income or wealth inequality, now at its lowest in almost two decades. Singaporeans continue to support the People's Action Party government because it has delivered results and improved lives, especially for the lower-income and broad middle. Anil Nayar, Singapore High Commissioner to Australia Vicious cycles A friend was walking home on the footpath of an inner Sydney street this week when a delivery e-bike slammed into him and knocked him to the ground. The rider flew off the bike onto his helmetless head and was taken to hospital unconscious. My friend sustained injuries to head, thigh, knee and hands. This street has a dedicated cycleway all the way along it. Passers-by urged my friend to take the bike rider's details for possible litigation, but my friend is aware that the rider is most likely a young migrant worker on a temporary visa with no recourse to any support from his employer, no money of his own and in contravention of the law. When will this delivery industry be properly regulated? When will its employees and pedestrians have proper legal protection? Bikes and cycleways proliferate now in Sydney. I am all for them, but I know when I come to Sydney I need to be very, very careful when walking the streets. Bruce Mcintyre, Armidale Playing politics Riley Brown gave it a good stir, but I think the respondents missed the underlying irony (Letters, August 19). The 'identity politics' that so distresses Mr Brown is just a weaponised label invented by conservative culture warriors, outraged at growing societal pressure to be less racist, less misogynist and less inequitable than they'd prefer to be. It attempts to usurp victimhood from the real victims. It's a tactic of distraction. Jeffrey Mellefont, Coogee
West Australian
a minute ago
- West Australian
Resources Technology Showcase: Joe Hockey sure there's a deal to be done with Trump on critical minerals
Former US ambassador Joe Hockey has attested he 'knows there is a deal to be done' between US President Trump and Australia's critical minerals riches, in a sobering interview where he also divulged how an assassination attempt changed the world leader. As Australia's man in Washington during Trump's first term as President, Mr Hockey had a fron- row seat observing a politician he now believes could be 'the most powerful and influential figure in American politics since Teddy Roosevelt'. And despite Australian PM Anthony Albanese's difficulties in securing a meeting with Mr Trump, the former Federal treasurer is convinced there is scope for a deal with Uncle Sam involving rare earths supplies and battery minerals. 'Modern militaries, modern national security, is defined by the reliability and innovation in its supply chain,' he told the Resources Technology Showcase on Tuesday. 'There is a deal to be done with President Trump, I know this, on critical minerals. He wants Australia to be party to that. We have a number of legislative advantages in Washington, DC that put us to the top of the list.' After a career that included serving as treasurer in the Abbott government, Mr Hockey founded lobbying and advisory firm Bondi Partners in Washington DC, where he currently lives, in early 2020. Despite being on the other side of the political aisle to Federal Resources Minister Madeleine King, Mr Hockey backed in the Labor Government's approach to shoring up local supplies and building up processing capacity on home soil. Ms King had delivered a speech earlier at the Perth forum pushing back against industry critics of downstream processing. The Federal Government has poured significant funding into trying to build Australia's ability to mine and process its minerals into more valuable products. It released a pre-election policy promising a $1.5 billion national offtake scheme to buy a yet-to-be specified list of rare earths from Australian miners. The policy was triggered by inflamed tensions between the world's two global superpowers, which swung the spotlight around to whether Western countries can break China's stronghold on mining and refining rare earths — a group of valuable minerals critical for making magnets used in iPhones, missiles and electric vehicles. 'Madeleine King is absolutely on mark with this,' Mr Hockey said, commending the Albanese Government's push to bolster Australia's downstream muscle. 'In the US, processing is agony. Building anything in the United States is agony. 'A Virginia Class submarine has two tonnes of critical minerals in it, most of it coming from China . . . an F35 fighter jet . . . has 500 kilos of critical minerals, a lot of it coming out of China. 'If we process and compete with China, that's important.' As for his recommendations for securing a meeting with the US President, Mr Hockey said 'you've got to know what buttons to push . . . I think Anthony Albanese can do that'. While Mr Hockey was optimistic about Australia's rare earths future, he delivered a sobering take on the future of Ukraine's riches under the ongoing assault of Russia. 'The Donbas region, it's 30 to 40 per cent of critical minerals, rare earths and resources of Ukraine,' he said. 'I'd be surprised if Russia doesn't end up getting that region, which makes Australia's supply chain even more important.' Over in Washington, Mr Hockey's former haunt, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had earlier attended a high-stakes meeting with US President Donald Trump. European leaders, including UK Prime Minster Sir Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian PM, Giorgia Meloni, were in tow for a secondary meeting. Afterwards President Trump said via social media that he would provide co-ordination between Mr Zelensky and Russian rival Vladimir Putin, but stopped short of any further intervention. Mr Hockey did not indicate either way on Tuesday whether he believed there could be a deal struck from here. 'What Trump has done is he's dealt himself in (to discussions) he didn't want to deal himself in,' he said. 'The fact that Trump is engaged is hugely important.' Mr Hockey also volunteered an insight or two into his personal relationship with Mr Trump. That extended into playing golf — observed as a common past-time for the world leader. Mr Hockey quickly shot down any insinuation that he would let Mr Trump win, but admitted that playing against him was 'incredibly stressful' nonetheless. 'When he plays he's very competitive. He does not cheat.' He volunteered that he had spoken with the President days after an attempt on his life last July. The harrowing event had changed the world leader compared with the man he worked with in his first term between 2016 and 2020. 'Profoundly, I spoke to him after the assassination attempt,' Mr Hockey shared with the audience. Pried for further details Mr Hockey said the incident had had 'a big effect'. 'He's not a religious person. . . he really believes he's got a job to do. He's outcomes focused, he doesn't care about process . . . but he is very focused on outcomes, and he is very determined to change America.'
The Age
31 minutes ago
- The Age
Manager at prestigious college alleges she was frozen out for working from home
A manager at a prestigious Melbourne college who says she was frozen out at work and demoted over her working-from-home arrangement has taken her employer to the Federal Court. Kelly Reed, a commercial manager at University College – a student boarding facility attached to the University of Melbourne – says her health suffered and that she was hurt, distressed and humiliated by the conduct of her employer after she asked last year for a formally agreed arrangement to work from home most of the time. Loading The case comes as the state Labor government prepares to give workers the legally enforceable right to work remotely up to two days a week – the first Australian jurisdiction to do so – and with the right to work from home emerging as an increasingly fraught workplace issue. Reed is suing the college and two of its senior figures, college head Jennifer McDonald and its governing council chair Lisa Williams, alleging multiple breaches of the Fair Work Act after she made her flexible working request. She alleges her bosses made it difficult to do her job, demoted her and stripped her of responsibilities after she appealed in the Fair Work Commission the college's refusal of an ongoing working-from-home arrangement. Loading Courts have previously held that workers have no legally enforceable right to work remotely, but Reed and her lawyers allege the college breached the Fair Work Act by violating the work-from-home agreement that the parties had struck in the Fair Work Commission, as well as other contraventions of the legislation. The college denies any breaches of the act, has lodged a defence with the court and declined to discuss the case when contacted on Tuesday. MacDonald and Williams, in response to Reed's case, have both invoked the 'civil penalty privilege', a legal concept that shields people from giving evidence that might expose them to potential penalties.
