
Experts re-evaluate global warming targets, Pointing to risks at 1.5°C
Since 2015, almost every country on Earth has been bound by the Paris Agreement to try and keep global warming below 1.5°C. But climate scientists now warn that this limit is too high. Researchers from the University of Durham say that the world needs to stay within just 1°C of the pre-industrial average to avoid a catastrophic sea level rise.
With current warming levels already at 1.2°C, that means the world needs to seriously cool down to avoid disaster. While the researchers recognise that 1.5°C is an 'admirable' goal, they found there was 'no evidence to suggest it will halt or even slow the rate of SLR [Sea Level Rise] from the world's ice sheets.' Lead author Professor Chris Stokes told MailOnline that the 'best case scenario' for current targets is one where sea levels continue to show 'slow and steady' increases.
'The problem of sea-level rise is here to stay and will affect future generations, even if we limit warming to 1.5°C,' he said. 'If the current rate of acceleration continues, then we could see [sea level rises of] 10 mm per year towards the end of this century - that's within the lifetime of our youngest children.' The Paris Agreement is a legally binding treaty which requires signatories to limit the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels - the average temperature between 1850 and 1900. The agreement also requires countries to pursue efforts to 'limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels'.
This is because going beyond 1.5°C has been determined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to risk unleashing far more severe consequences such as increased flooding, droughts, heatwaves, and storms. In their new paper, published in the journal Communications Earth & Environment, Professor Stokes and his co-authors investigated what this would mean for the world's ice sheets. Meltwater from these ice sheets is the biggest contributor to rising sea levels, and, together, they hold enough water to increase sea levels by a whopping 65 metres.
Even at current rates of warming, the mass loss from these ice sheets has quadrupled since the 1990s, with 370 billion tonnes of ice melting each year. The researchers combined this data with computer simulations of how ice sheets might lose mass in different warming levels, and evidence from slightly warmer periods in Earth's history caused by natural variations in how the planet orbits the sun. Together, this evidence suggests that 1.5°C of warming is too high to save the world's ice sheets. Co-author Professor Andrea Dutton, of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, says: 'Evidence recovered from past warm periods suggests that several metres of sea level rise – or more – can be expected when global mean temperature reaches 1.5°C or higher. Furthermore, this evidence also suggests that the longer those warm temperatures are sustained, the greater the impact on ice melt and resulting sea-level rise.'
Sea-level increases on this scale will be extremely difficult and hugely expensive for the world to adapt to. Current estimates suggest that there are 230 million people living within one metre of sea level. The researchers say this melting ice represents an 'existential threat' to entire communities and nations lying in this zone. But even smaller increases will be devastating, as one recent study estimates that just a 20cm rise in sea levels by 2050 would lead to average global flood losses of $1 trillion or more per year for the world's 136 largest coastal cities.
What makes this especially worrying is that ice melt is essentially irreversible, meaning every millimetre of sea level increase is permanent. Co-author Professor Rob DeConto, of the University of Massachusetts Amherst, says: 'It is important to stress that these accelerating changes in the ice sheets and their contributions to sea level should be considered permanent on multi-generational timescales. Even if the Earth returns to its pre-industrial temperature, it will still take hundreds to perhaps thousands of years for the ice sheets to recover. If too much ice is lost, parts of these ice sheets may not recover until the Earth enters the next ice age.'
This is why the researchers say it is so important to act now to limit warming in the first place, before the world's ice sheets are lost for good. Although they say that more research is needed to discover the 'safe' temperature for the ice sheets, aiming for a temperature increase of just 1°C is a good place to start. Professor Stokes adds: 'Put another way, and perhaps it is a reason for hope, we only have to go back to the early 1990s to find a time when the ice sheets looked far healthier. Global temperatures were around 1°C above pre-industrial back then and carbon dioxide concentrations were 350 parts per million, which others have suggested is a much safer limit for planet Earth. What is very clear is that the sooner we slow and stop the warming, the easier it will be to return to safe levels.'
Want more stories like this from the Daily Mail? Hit the follow button above for more of the news you need.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Following low-calorie diet could make you depressed, major study finds
A new study has found that following a low-calorie diet could increase the risk of developing symptoms of depression. The researchers found that the effects of calorie restriction on mood were more pronounced in men and overweight people. These findings stand in contrast to previous studies which claim low-calorie diets improve depressive symptoms. However, the researchers noted that prior trials included tailored and balanced diet programmes that may not be the same as what people realistically follow in everyday life. For the study, published in BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health, researchers in Canada used data from the 28,525 people who took part in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and had completed a health questionnaire relating to depressive symptoms, which gave them a score based on severity. Of the total, 14,329 were women and 14,196 were men. A little under 8 per cent had reported depressive symptoms, while 33 per cent were overweight and 38 per cent were obese. The majority of the group (87 per cent) said they were not on a specific diet, while 2,206 were restricting calories. Some 859 were on a 'nutrient-restrictive' diet, low in fat, sugar, salt, fibre or carbohydrate, and 631 were on diets tailored for the likes of diabetes. Researchers found low-calorie diets were more common among obese patients and those who were overweight. Questionnaire scores for depressive symptoms, such as a low mood, low energy and sleep disturbances, were higher among those restricting calories compared to those who reported not being on a diet at all. The scores were also higher among overweight people following low-calorie diets. Researchers said: 'Numerous studies have consistently focused on 'healthy' versus 'unhealthy' diets. 'They have shown that 'healthy' diets rich in minimally processed foods, fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains, nuts, seeds, lean proteins and fish have been linked to a lower risk of depression. 'In contrast, an 'unhealthy' diet dominated by ultra-processed foods, refined carbohydrates, saturated fats, processed meats and sweets is associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms. 'Therefore, individuals must adopt a perfectly healthy dietary pattern to reduce the risk of depressive symptoms. This dichotomy fails to capture the complexity of real-world eating habits.' Restricting calories can lead to deficiencies in protein, vitamins and minerals, researchers suggest, which puts the body under stress. The findings also contradict previous studies showing low-calorie diets improve depressive symptoms. Researchers highlight that these studies were controlled trials, with those taking part following carefully designed and balanced diets. The team said a focus on 'idealised diets' can 'overlook the diversity of dietary patterns', adding: 'In contrast, real-life calorie-restricted diets and obesity often result in nutritional deficiencies, particularly in protein, essential vitamins and minerals, and induce physiological stress, which can exacerbate depressive symptomatology including cognitive-affective symptoms.' Researchers stressed the study has a number of limitations, but gives an insight to how diets recommended by healthcare professionals should be considered for risk factors for depression, especially in men and obese patients. Professor Sumantra Ray, chief scientist and executive director of the NNEdPro Global Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, which co-owns BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health with BMJ Group, added: 'This study adds to the emerging evidence linking dietary patterns and mental health, raising important questions about whether restrictive diets which are low in nutrients considered beneficial for cognitive health, such as omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin B12, may precipitate depressive symptoms. 'But the effect sizes are small, with further statistical limitations limiting the generalisability of the findings. Further well designed studies that accurately capture dietary intake and minimise the impact of chance and confounding are needed to continue this important line of inquiry.'


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
A storm is brewing in the Atlantic and could be the first to impact the US this season
Forecasters are watching a storm brewing in the Atlantic this week - just two days into the start of this year's hurricane season. A non-tropical area of low pressure is forecast to form near the southeastern U.S. coast over the course of the next couple of days. 'The low could gradually acquire subtropical or tropical characteristics later this week if it remains offshore,' the National Hurricane Center cautioned in a post on the social media platform X. Hurricane Hunters have tentatively scheduled a reconnaissance flight to investigate the system on Thursday. Yet, as of right now, environmental conditions appear only marginally conducive for the low to develop some subtropical or tropical characteristics later this week, if it forms or moves offshore. 'As the disturbance tracks north-northeast, it has a 10 percent chance of developing tropical characteristics if the circulation can remain over the Atlantic,' according to WXII 12. It is expected to shift east of North Carolina and out over the ocean by late Friday or Saturday. If it forms, it could be the first tropical storm to hit the U.S. this season. The first named storm will be called Andrea. Last year, the first storm was Alberto, which formed on June 19 and flooded the coastal community of Surfside Beach, Texas. It was soon followed by Category 5 Hurricane Beryl: the earliest-forming Category 5 on record in the Atlantic. Powered by climate change-charged ocean waters, this hurricane season is expected to be above average, according to officials. "In terms of tropical development of this feature along the southeastern U.S. Atlantic coast, water temperatures right along the coast are still below that critical 80-degree Fahrenheit threshold," AccuWeather Lead Hurricane Expert Alex DaSilva said in a statement. "Waters are warmer over the Gulf stream, but that is well off the coast at this time. So if this can try to develop later this week, it would probably be over that Gulf Stream and not along the immediate coast." Regardless, there may be some impacts for cities along the East Coast, including poor beach conditions and flash flooding due to heavy downpours. AccuWeather says it has also identified a low-risk zone for tropical development potential in the western Caribbean and eastern Gulf starting next week. "This [area] will be moving slowly through the zone from the western Caribbean and eastern Gulf around the same time when a surge of moisture may develop," AccuWeather Tropical Meteorologist Alex Duffus said. "For these reasons and a drop in disruptive winds in the region, we are issuing a chance for tropical development."


The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Struggling with lower back pain? This activity could help
A recent study suggests that spending time in nature can alleviate chronic lower back pain, which affects over a quarter of Americans and is the sixth-most costly condition in the U.S. Researchers at the University of Plymouth found that nature provides physical and mental benefits, including stress and anxiety reduction, for individuals with chronic lower back pain. The study, based on interviews with 10 participants experiencing chronic lower back pain for 5 to 38 years, highlighted the importance of natural features like fresh air and the sound of running water in promoting tranquility. Experts recommend that people with chronic back pain consider incorporating nature into their coping strategies, while taking precautions such as using proper hiking techniques and equipment. Researchers suggest making natural spaces more accessible through better paths, seating, and virtual reality innovations to ensure everyone can benefit from nature's therapeutic effects.