
Iran asks Taliban for ‘kill list' leaked in MoD data blunder in plot to hunt down MI6 spies
Fresh fears are brewing that the data breach could now become a tool for international espionage and terror.
9
Iran has reportedly asked the Taliban (pictured) to hand over a 'kill list' of Brit spies and special forces accidentally leaked by the UK government
Credit: AP
9
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting in Tehran, 2022
Credit: Reuters
9
Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps has 'formally requested' the Taliban share the list, with MI6 intelligence assets set to take priority
Credit: Reuters
9
The astounding list, accidentally leaked by a British soldier in 2022, exposes more than 100 British officials and up to 25,000 Afghans
Credit: The Times
The shocking move was revealed last night amid claims Tehran is coordinating with Taliban warlords to get their hands on the so-called "kill list".
The vast and highly sensitive database exposes more than 100 British officials and up to 25,000 Afghans who worked alongside UK forces.
Whitehall insiders are said to be "deeply concerned" by reports that Iran has set up a formal committee to hunt down British intelligence assets using the leaked file.
One senior Iranian official told The Telegraph that the Revolutionary Guard Corps had "formally requested" the Taliban share the list, adding that "MI6 intelligence assets will take priority".
The explosive revelation threatens to turn a scandalous British blunder into a deadly geopolitical weapon.
For two years, the government fought tooth and nail to suppress news of the breach with a super-injunction.
But now it's spiralling into an international crisis.
Iran's interest in the leak comes as Tehran scrambles for leverage ahead of nuclear negotiations with the West.
The Iranian official added: "On the Iranian side, there are also efforts to find the list, with a special committee assigned for it.
Defence chiefs braced for £1BILLION compensation bill over Afghan data leak scandal
"There have been discussions on cooperation between Tehran and Kabul on this issue as it can help both countries for negotiations with the West."
While the data may not explicitly label MI6 agents or special forces, intelligence insiders admit the codes used could still allow foreign actors to identify and target UK operatives.
The MoD warned : "It's a longstanding policy of successive governments to not comment on intelligence matters but this once again underlines how serious the original data breach was and why the previous government have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen."
The Taliban claims it got hold of the list back in 2022.
Experts remain sceptical, pointing out that such claims are tailor-made for propaganda.
But the chilling reality is that targeted assassinations of Afghans linked to Western forces are already being reported on the ground.
Since the breach became public, there has been a wave of killings reportedly linked to the leak.
According to the Daily Mail, one man was shot four times in the chest last month, a woman was beaten in the street after her husband, a former interpreter for British troops, went into hiding in Iran.
And another former Afghan soldier told how his brother was executed in retaliation for his ties to UK special forces.
He said: "If or when the Taliban have this list, then killings will increase – and it will be Britain's fault."
The leak — a spreadsheet containing full personal data of 18,714 Afghan applicants to the UK's resettlement programme — was mistakenly emailed in full by a British soldier in February 2022.
Instead of a trimmed list of 150 names, Afghan contacts were sent the entire file, exposing names, phone numbers, locations, and even family details.
It also included sensitive data on more than 100 British officials — MI6 agents, SAS soldiers, MPs, and even a Royal Marine Major General — who had endorsed the Afghan applications.
9
The Taliban claims it got hold of the list back in 2022
Credit: AFP
9
Whitehall insiders are deeply concerned Iran has set up a formal committee to hunt down British intelligence assets using the leaked file
Credit: The Times
9
Defence Secretary John Healey making a statement to MPs in the House of Commons
Credit: PA
The blunder was swiftly buried by a super-injunction in 2023.
And for nearly two years, the public was kept in the dark, Parliament couldn't be told and journalists were gagged.
But in July, the wall of secrecy finally cracked.
The government abandoned the first super-injunction, revealing a £7billion rescue mission to relocate thousands of Afghans via secret flights and unmarked planes under Operation Rubific.
Some 4,500 were quietly flown into Stansted and housed in MoD accommodation.
Defence Secretary John Healey later admitted to Parliament that the list "contained names and contact details of applicants – and in some instances, information relating to the applicants' family members."
"In a small number of cases, the names of Members of Parliament, senior military officers and government officials were noted as supporting the application," he added.
And yet, the government still hasn't come clean.
Lawyers for the Ministry of Defence returned to the High Court just last week to defend a second injunction — despite the core details already being read into the parliamentary record.
Mr Justice Chamberlain, presiding over the case, promised to "scrutinise very carefully" any attempt to hold more of the hearing in secret.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer slammed the former Conservative government's use of the courts to cover up the disaster.
He said "serious questions" remain over how the data was lost — and why the public and Parliament were gagged.
Healey, meanwhile, insisted the government acted to protect lives, not to hide embarrassment.
His predecessor, Sir Ben Wallace, backed that view, saying he made "no apology" for trying to prevent reprisals.
But with Iran now reportedly circling, and Taliban hit squads allegedly targeting refugees linked to the UK, the once-secret blunder is now a full-blown security nightmare.
9
Afghan scandal is the latest evidence public are lied to and ignored by consecutive governments, pictured fall of Kabul in 2021
Credit: Getty Images - Getty

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sunday World
3 hours ago
- Sunday World
Declassified docs reveal UDA leadership pledged to stop paramilitary activity 20 years ago
Details of the broken promise have emerged in declassified British government documents from 2003-4 National Archives records photo dated 06/02/03 of the former Northern Ireland Secretary, Paul Murphy, talking to reporters outside the Old Library at Trinity College, Dublin. Sinn Fein raised security concerns with the Government about housing Northern Ireland's new Assembly at Stormont, according to newly released documents from the National Archives. Issue date: Wednesday December 29, 2021. PA Photo. See PA story RECORDS Ulster Stormont. Photo credit should read: Haydn West/PA Wire ...A The UDA leadership pledged to stop all paramilitary activity in a secret meeting with government officials more than 20 years ago. Details of the broken promise have emerged in declassified British government documents from 2003-4. In a number of meetings with officials and then Secretary of State Paul Murphy, the UDA leadership, in the shape of Brigadiers Jackie McDonald, Billy McFarland, Andre Shoukri and Tommy Kirkham, said in return for certain assurances they were ready to transition away from criminality. They had agreed to make an announcement at Remembrance Sunday services in advance of putting their plan in the place. The proposals were warmly welcomed by British officials. Billed as an Ulster Political Research Group (UPRG) delegation, the four leading loyalists raised concerns about the influence of UFF commander Johnny Adair and they also demanded equal treatment when compared to the 'support'' given to the IRA as they stood down their activities. memo The UDA made the demands during a meeting with the NIO's Nick Perry, a senior government official. His memo, dated November 4, 2004, said: 'They had two main points to make. First, they want specification lifted before they make their statement on 14 November. Second, they are very concerned about the negative impact which Johnny Adair's release in January could have on the UDA. 'They did not expect him to stay in Northern Ireland after his release, but they did expect him to try to 'make his mark' before departing the scene, or attempt to do so by proxy after his departure.' They also raised concerns about the LVF, an even more sectarian terror offshoot set up by former UDA and UVF members opposed to a ceasefire. Kirkham said their followers 'needed to have some early 'wins' if they were to be persuaded to take a course many would find uncomfortable,' the memo states. Perry wrote: 'McDonald stressed that part of the process was about equality of esteem. The awful things the UDA had done were no worse than those perpetrated by, for example, the last Executive's Education Minister [Martin McGuinness], and the loyalists deserved the same chance of rehabilitation that the republican movement had received. 'Shoukri in particular said that he would need time to wean people off their criminality (!); more genuinely, perhaps, McFarland said that leaving too many people behind could be dangerous.' He said McDonald was 'vehement in his condemnation of drugs'', which Perry noted clearly made Shoukri uncomfortable. Under the terms of their intended statement, the UDA would remain intact and continue to be a proscribed organisation but with a commitment to cease criminal activity. Paul Murphy said it would amount to 'return to barracks'. In a memo to Prime Minister Tony Blair, Mr Murphy was positive about the developments. He said he would be 'announcing my intention to despecify the UDA' in light of the Remembrance Day statement. 'This move is largely symbolic. The UDA will remain an illegal organisation, as, for example, the IRA and UVF still are. Specification relates specifically to the early release of prisoners' legislation, and will have little practical effect. Former UDA spokesman Tommy Kirkham 'But politically it is important, as it involves the Government recognising the UDA's ceasefire. I am taking this step partly because the UDA's behaviour has improved somewhat in recent months, but mainly because there are positive signs that some in the UDA leadership, and their political wing the UPRG, now want to pursue a political path.' He said the Remembrance Sunday pledge in 2004 would a 'very forward'' development. Another letter from Nick Perry, dated November 4, described a 'constructive meeting' with Tommy Kirkham and the UPRG's Frankie Gallagher who 'said that their key requirement remained a despecification announcement ahead of their statement on 14 November'. 'At the end they stressed again the seriousness of their initiative: they wanted 'a dignified end to their war' and some acknowledgement in return. Their statement was not dependent on a breakthrough with the Provisionals, nor on action by the UVF. Billy McFarland 'The proposed statement is very positive (indeed, almost too good, given the UDA's lack of credibility); Kirkham, however, seems confident he can deliver.' One of the conditions was that the UDA would re-engage with the International Commission for Decommissioning. Elsewhere in the newly released files is a report of a meeting between Tony Blair and Bertie Ahern with the UVF-linked PUP where David Ervine told them 'there was only one blockage in the pipe – the IRA's refusal to acknowledge the war was over'. The document said he continued: 'If the IRA ceased to exist there would be no need for loyalist paramilitaries. It had been a long time since the ceasefires but still these hadn't turned into full cessation of activity. Both Governments should hammer home to the IRA the need to declare an end to the war.' The document adds: 'The end of the conflict, Ervine continued, had weakened the loyalist leadership. In particular, many of the 'good guys' [his term] had now walked away, to return to normal life. This meant the proportion of 'bad guys' increased. Previous bad summers had made communities feel insecure, increasing the likelihood of people getting involved with paramilitaries.' More than two decades later the UDA has yet to publicly state their intention to transition away from paramilitary activity and criminality. Jackie McDonald and Andre Shoukri News in 90 Seconds - August 6th


The Irish Sun
6 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Ex-Army chief Lord Peter Inge famous for ‘putting the fear of God' into officers leaves staggering sum to family in will
Lord Inge's daughters also get their South London-born dad's vast collection of military memorabilia HUGE FORTUNE Ex-Army chief Lord Peter Inge famous for 'putting the fear of God' into officers leaves staggering sum to family in will FORMER Army chief Lord Peter Inge left £3million in his will. Lord Inge died in July 2022, aged 86, after a five-decade career in which he rose from National Service conscript to Field Marshal. Advertisement He was the last Field Marshal to actively serve in the Army, with those since elevated to the highest rank, including King Charles, only done so after their retirement. Lord Inge was famous for putting the fear of God into other senior officers with cutting remarks and incisive questions. He was appointed Chief of the General Staff in 1992, then Chief of the Defence Staff in 1994. Lord Inge later became a fierce critic of the British campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan and blasted the Ministry of Defence for failing to 'think strategically'. Advertisement The South London-born officer took the top Armed Forces job after his predecessor was caught having an affair with a Tory MPs wife, and while British forces were struggling in Bosnia. Sir John Major's Conservative government had also pledged to further slash the size of the Army – with Inge under pressure to accept fresh cuts. The no-nonsense officer led forces through the conflict and was reportedly 'delighted' to come under mortar fire during a ride around Saravejo in a French armoured SUV. After being elevated to the House of Lords, Lord Inge of Richmond, Yorks., became a vocal critic of further plans to cut the Army. Advertisement He left £3,167,854 in his estate, reduced by £150,000 after deductions. His wife Letitia died in 2020 so it was divided between daughters Antonia, 63, and Verity, 59. They also get their South London-born dad's vast collection of military memorabilia, farm estate in Leyburn, North Yorks, and central London flat. 1 Lord Peter Inge died in July 2022, aged 86, after a five-decade career in the army Credit: Alamy


Irish Examiner
11 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Slovenia introduces ban on imports from Israeli-occupied territories
Slovenia on Wednesday introduced a ban on imports of goods produced in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territories and approved an additional aid package for Palestinians in Gaza, the government said in a statement. "The government today banned the import of goods originating from settlements in the occupied territories, including a ban on circumventing the ban on these imports," the statement on the government website said. The statement did not specify whether the ban refers to all goods produced in the territories or just Israeli goods. The government also instructed the competent ministries to consider banning the export of goods from Slovenia intended for these Israeli-occupied settlements. "Israeli government's actions, including the construction of illegal settlements, expropriations, the forced displacement of the Palestinian population, the destruction of their serious and repeated violations of international humanitarian law," Prime Minister Robert Golob said in statement quoted by the STA news agency. "These actions not only threaten the lives and dignity of the Palestinian population, but also the foundations of the international order." The news agency said the volume of goods affected is extremely low at under €2,000 in 2023. Most of the international community considers the settlements illegal. The Israeli government deems settlements legal under its own laws, while some so-called "outposts" are illegal but often tolerated and sometimes later legalised. The government also said on Wednesday it would provide material assistance in the form of food and blankets, estimated to be worth up to 879,490 euros, to the Palestinians affected by the war between Israel and the militant group Hamas in Gaza. Slovenia recognised a Palestinian state in June last year, following Spain, Ireland and Norway. It last week imposed an embargo on exports, imports and the transit of arms to Israel, two weeks after it declared Israeli ministers persona non grata. Reuters