US Fed expected to pause rate cuts again, await clarity on tariffs
Survey data showed rising inflation expectations, suggesting tariff pressures may have taken hold despite stable market indicators. (Reuters pic)
WASHINGTON : The US Federal Reserve is widely expected to extend a recent pause in rate cuts this week as it waits to see how President Donald Trump's stop-start tariff rollout affects the health of the world's largest economy.
Trump has imposed steep levies on China, and lower 'baseline' levies of 10% on goods from most other countries, along with 25% duties on specific items like steel, automobiles and aluminum.
The president has also paused higher duties on dozens of other trading partners until July to give them time to renegotiate existing arrangements with the US.
Most economists expect the tariffs introduced since January to push up prices and cool economic growth – at least in the short run – potentially keeping the Fed on hold for longer.
'The Fed has to be very focused on maintaining inflation so that it doesn't start moving back up in a more persistent way,' said Loretta Mester, who recently stepped down after a decade as president of the Cleveland Fed.
'That would undermine all the work that was done over the last three years of getting inflation down,' she told AFP.
'Good place to be'
Trump reiterated his call for Fed chair Jerome Powell to lower rates in an NBC interview published in full on Sunday, claiming the decision not to do so was largely personal.
'Well, he should lower them. And at some point, he will. He'd rather not because he's not a fan of mine,' Trump said.
The Fed has held its key interest rate at between 4.25% and 4.50% since December, as it continues its plan to bring inflation to the bank's long-term target of 2%, with another eye firmly fixed on keeping unemployment under control.
Recent data points to the Fed's inflation remaining broadly on track ahead of the introduction of Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs, while unemployment has remained relatively stable, hugging close to historic lows.
At the same time, various 'softer' data points such as consumer confidence surveys have reflected a sharp decline in optimism about the health of the US economy – and growing concerns about inflation.
'Whether the economy enters a recession or not, it's hard to say at this point,' said Mester, now an adjunct professor of finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
'I think the committee remains in good condition here, and most likely they'll remain on hold at this meeting,' said Jim Bullard, the long-serving former president of the St Louis Fed.
'I think it's a good place for them to be while there's a lot of turbulence in the trade war,' added Bullard, now dean of the Daniels School of Business at Purdue University.
Financial markets overwhelmingly expect the Fed to announce another rate-cut pause on Wednesday, according to data from CME Group.
Pushing back rate cuts
US hiring data for April published last week came in better than expected, lowering anxiety about the health of the labor market – and reducing pressure on the Fed's rate-setting committee to reach for rate cuts.
Economists at several large banks including Goldman Sachs and Barclays subsequently delayed their expected date for rate cuts from June to July.
'Cutting in late July allows the committee to see more data on the evolution of the labor market, and should benefit from resolving uncertainty about tariffs and fiscal policy,' economists at Barclays wrote in a note to clients published Friday.
Other analysts see rate cuts happening even later, depending on the effects of the tariffs.
'A slower reaction to economic weakness' could happen 'if backward-looking data gives the impression of resilient demand while inflation gauges heat up,' wrote EY Chief Economist Gregory Daco.
The rise in longer-run inflation expectations in the survey data points to growing concerns that tariff-related price pressures could become embedded in the US economy – even as the market-based measures have remained close to the Fed's 2% target.
'I would be sort of in the camp (saying) prove to me that they're not going to be inflationary,' Mester said of tariffs, adding that it would be 'unwise' to assume that inflation expectations were stable, given the recent survey data.
But Bullard from Purdue took a different view, stressing the stability of the market-based measures.
'I haven't liked the survey-based measures of inflation expectations, because they seem to be partly about inflation but partly about many other issues, maybe, including politics,' he said.
'This is a moment where you might want to look through the survey-based measures that are talking about very extreme levels of inflation that don't seem likely to develop near-term,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
42 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
US aviation industry warns tariffs on aircraft parts risk harming key supply chains
NEW YORK, June 9 — US airlines and aerospace manufacturers insist they have no use for tariff protections, warning that the proposed Trump administration levies could eat into the healthy trade surplus the sector has enjoyed for more than 70 years. At the request of President Donald Trump, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's department launched an investigation on May 1 to determine whether to impose tariffs of between 10 and 20 percent on civil aircraft and parts, including engines. The US industry those tariffs were crafted to protect, swiftly let the administration know it was not interested. 'Imposing broad tariff or non-tariff trade barriers on the imports of civil aviation technology would risk reversing decades of industrial progress and harm the domestic supply chain,' the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) said in a letter addressed to Lutnick and obtained by AFP. The interested parties were given until June 3 to communicate their positions. The very next day, Lutnick announced that Washington aimed to 'set the standard for aircraft part tariffs' by the end of this month. 'The key is to protect that industry,' he said, adding: 'We will use these tariffs for the betterment of American industry.' But AIA and the Airlines for America (A4A) trade association voiced fear that far from helping, the tariffs would end up harming US manufacturers. No fix needed 'Unlike other industries, the civil aviation manufacturing industry prioritizes domestic production of high-value components and final assembly,' AIA pointed out. According to the organization, US aerospace and defense exports reached US$135.9 billion in 2023, including US$113.9 billion for civil aviation alone. This allowed the sector to generate a trade surplus of US$74.5 billion and to invest US$34.5 billion in research and development, it said. The sector employs more than 2.2 million people in the United States across more than 100,000 companies, which in 2023 produced goods worth nearly $545 billion. In its response to Lutnick, the A4A highlighted how beneficial the international Agreement on Trade in Commercial Aviation (ATCA) had been by helping to eliminate tariffs and trade barriers over nearly half a century. 'The US civil aviation industry is the success story that President Trump is looking for as it leads civil aerospace globally,' it insisted. A full 84 percent of production was already American, it said, stressing that Washington 'does not need to fix the 16 percent' remaining. 'The current trade framework has enhanced our economic and national security and is a critical component to maintaining our national security moving forward,' it said. For manufacturers, the potential tariffs would act like sand jamming a well-oiled machine that has been running smoothly for decades, experts warned. They would also throw off balance an ultra-sensitive supply chain still recovering from the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Competitive disadvantage' 'To avoid the situation getting worse, we advocate to keep aerospace outside of trade wars,' Willie Walsh, head of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), told the organization's general assembly last week. AIA meanwhile stressed that 'aircraft and parts are already in high demand and have a limited supply.' 'Integrating new suppliers and expanding capacity is complex, timely, and costly,' it warned, pointing out that finding suppliers capable of meeting rigorous safety certifications could 'take up to 10 years.' Delta Air Lines also argued for sticking with the status quo, cautioning that the proposed tariffs 'would hinder Delta's ability to maintain its current trajectory.' 'If component parts incur tariffs upon entering the United States, Delta will be at a competitive disadvantage to foreign competitors,' it said. 'The action would also impose an unexpected tax on Delta's purchases of aircraft contracted years in advance.' Delta chief Ed Bastian insisted in late April that the airline 'will not be paying tariffs on any aircraft deliveries we take,' adding that it was 'working very closely with (European group) Airbus' to minimize the impact. Delta pointed out in its letter to Lutnick that it currently had 100 aircraft on order from Boeing, and that it was demanding that its Airbus A220s be produced primarily in Mobile, Alabama. But if the tariffs are imposed, it warned, 'Delta would likely be forced to cancel existing contracts and reconsider contracts under negotiation.' — AFP
Malay Mail
42 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Does US law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?
LOS ANGELES, June 9 — President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard troops to California after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids, saying that the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framing them as a possible 'form of rebellion' against the authority of the US government. California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday said he had formally requested that the Trump Administration rescind 'its unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County' and return them to his command. What laws did Trump cite to justify the move? Trump cited Title 10 of the US Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the US Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service. A provision of Title 10 - Section 12406 - allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the US is invaded, there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion' or the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' What are National Guard troops allowed to do under the law cited in Trump's order? An 1878 law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Section 12406 does not override that prohibition, but it allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property. For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect US Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests. What are the implications for freedom of speech? The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to assembly, freedom of speech and the press. Experts have said that Trump's decision to have US troops respond to protests is an ominous sign for how far the president is willing to go to repress political speech and activity that he disagrees with or that criticizes his administration's policies. A demonstrator holds a US flag across from California Highway Patrol officers. — Reuters pic Is Trump's move susceptible to legal challenges? Four legal experts from both left- and right-leaning advocacy organizations have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10 in response to immigration protests calling it inflammatory and reckless, especially without the support of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who has said Trump's actions would only escalate tensions. The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the United States, experts said. Title 10 also says 'orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States,' but legal experts said that language might not be an obstacle. Legislative history suggests that those words were likely meant to reflect the norms of how National Guard troops are typically deployed, rather than giving a governor the option to not comply with a president's decision to deploy troops. Could California sue to challenge Trump's move? California could file a lawsuit, arguing that deployment of National Guard troops was not justified by Title 10 because there was no 'rebellion' or threat to law enforcement. A lawsuit might take months to resolve, and the outcome would be uncertain. Because the protests may be over before a lawsuit is resolved, the decision to sue might be more of a political question than a legal one, experts said. A demonstrator strikes a Waymo self-driving car with a skateboard as another burns in the background during a protest against federal immigration sweeps in downtown Los Angeles June 8, 2025. — Reuters pic What other laws could trump invoke to direct the National Guard or other US military troops? Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent. Casting protests as an 'insurrection' that requires the deployment of troops against US citizens would be riskier legal territory, one legal expert said, in part because mostly peaceful protests and minor incidents aren't the sort of thing that the Insurrection Act were designed to address. The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the US in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial. But, the last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama. — Reuters
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Dollar slips after rally, focus shifts to US-China trade talks
WASHINGTON: The dollar eased against all major currencies on Monday, as exuberance over a better than feared US employment report gave way to caution ahead of pivotal US-China trade talks set to take place later in the day. Top officials from both countries will meet in London to address disagreements around a preliminary agreement struck last month in Geneva, which had briefly cooled tensions between the world's largest economies. The talks come at a crucial time for both sides, with China grappling with deflation and trade uncertainty dampening sentiment among US businesses and consumers, prompting investors to reassess the dollar's safe-haven status. "How the trade talks go definitely is going to be critical for overall sentiment," said Kit Juckes, chief FX strategist at Societe Generale. He said Asia Pacific currencies including the Japanese yen and Australian and New Zealand dollars would likely see the biggest reaction to headlines from the talks. The dollar declined 0.46 per cent against the Japanese currency , trading at 144.16 yen after two consecutive weeks of gains. Japan is considering buying back some super-long government bonds issued in the past at low interest rates, two sources with direct knowledge of the plan said on Monday, underscoring its focus on reining in any abrupt rises in bond yields. The euro rose 0.2 per cent and was last at US$1.1418 as markets continued to price in the European Central Bank's monetary policy outlook issued last week, in which it indicated it may be close to ending its easing cycle, while sterling rose 0.3 per cent to US$1.3558. Elsewhere, China's offshore yuan was last at 7.18 per dollar after data showed export growth slowed to a three-month low in May, while factory-gate deflation deepened to its worst level in two years. New Zealand's dollar rose 0.6 per cent to US$0.60555, while the Australian dollar was last up by half a percentage point at US$0.6524 in light volumes as markets were closed for a public holiday. In Australia, a much healthier fiscal position than the US, attractive yields and a "not too bad" economy should support the Aussie unless there are negative headlines from the talks, Juckes said. Also on the trade front was a report that said Japan's chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is planning a sixth round of talks in Washington. An inflation report out of the US for the month of May will be in the spotlight later in the week as investors and Federal Reserve policymakers look for evidence on the damage trade restrictive policies have had on the economy. Fed officials have signalled that they are in no rush to cut interest rates and signs of better-than-feared economic resilience are likely to further cement their stance. Interest rate futures indicate that investors are anticipating the central bank may cut borrowing costs by 25 basis points, with the earliest move expected in October this year, according to data compiled by LSEG. "May is the first month where the impact of Trump's 10 per cent universal tariff on imports ex-USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) is expected to show.
