Asim Munir fires back: Pakistan needed no China or Turkey, says India's ‘axis' claim is fiction, 'shoddy camp politics'
Operation Bunyanum Marsoos
are irresponsible and factually incorrect and reflect a chronic reluctance to acknowledge indigenous capability and institutional resilience developed over decades of strategic prudence.'
He called India's attempt to drag other states into the fray a cheap trick. 'Naming other states as participants in the purely bilateral military conflagration is also a shoddy attempt at playing camp politics,' Munir said, brushing off talk of a bigger nexus as just spin.
A blunt warning
Munir didn't stop at a denial. He promised a punishing response to any future strike. 'Any attempt to target our population centres, military bases, economic hubs and ports will instantly invoke a deeply hurting and more than reciprocal response,' he said. For him, the battlefield isn't decided by imported gear or catchy headlines. It's grit and discipline that matter. Or as he put it, 'Wars are not won through media rhetoric, imported fancy hardware, or political sloganeering, but through faith, professional competence, operational clarity, institutional strength and national resolve.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You
Dubai villas | search ads
Get Deals
Undo
India's charge: A hidden 'unholy' axis
India doesn't buy it. Lieutenant General Rahul R Singh, the Deputy Chief of Army Staff, laid out what he called the real picture. At a defence event in Delhi, he said, 'China is able to test its weapons against other weapons, so it's like a live lab available to them. Turkey also played an important role in providing the type of support it did.' According to Singh, China fed Pakistan live updates of Indian troop positions while Turkish drones filled the skies. His blunt verdict: India faced not one enemy, but three.
How it began
Operation Sindoor wasn't born in a vacuum. On 22 April, militants attacked tourists in Pahalgam, Kashmir. India blamed Pakistan. On 7 May, India struck back, hitting terrorist camps in Pakistan-held territory. What followed was four days of drones, missiles and artillery fire — some of the fiercest exchanges between the two since Kargil. It ended, officially, when both Director Generals of Military Operations agreed to stop on 10 May. India claims its strikes were so punishing that Pakistan had no choice but to sue for peace.
Live Events
Beijing keeps its distance
Caught in the middle of the allegations, China plays it safe. When pressed, the Chinese foreign ministry said only, 'China and Pakistan are close neighbours enjoying traditional friendship. Defence and security cooperation is part of the normal cooperation between the two countries and does not target any third party.' Not exactly a denial, not quite an admission either.
Behind the denials and threats is an old rivalry that refuses to stay quiet. Pakistan, once again describing itself as the region's 'net security provider,' still faces whispers about terror safe havens. India, meanwhile, is wary of an axis forming around its borders. For all the new weapons and fresh alliances, the script feels familiar.
This clash might have ended with a handshake between the two Director Generals of Military Operations, but the story is far from over. Pakistan continues to deny any link to the Pahalgam attack, even as India says the safe havens remain. Munir's tough words fit the old script: Pakistan as the regional stabiliser, India as the aggressor. On India's side, the claim is simple — the battlefield is bigger than the Line of Control and so are the players.
So the guns are silent, for now. But whether you believe Munir or Singh, there's one truth no one can deny: the next spark is never too far away.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC transfers Malinga assault case from Dholpur to Jaipur
1 2 Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court Monday ordered the transfer of a high-profile assault case involving former MLA Girraj Singh Malinga from Dholpur to Jaipur, citing concerns over witness safety and the accused's influential status in the region. The single-judge bench of Justice Umashankar Vyas issued the transfer order while hearing a criminal transfer petition filed by assistant engineer Harshadhipati, the victim in the case. The case stems from an alleged assault on Harshadhipati and junior engineer Nitin Gulati at the Bari discom office in Dholpur on March 28, 2022. Malinga, who is currently out on bail, has faced multiple charges of assault on public servants. He was a Congress MLA from Bari but switched over to BJP prior to assembly elections in 2023. He, however, lost the election. "We told court that victim and witnesses face life threats in Dholpur as the accused is a strongman," said Akhil Simlote, counsel for the petitioner. The court noted that a procession organised by Malinga's supporters following his bail release demonstrated his significant influence in the area. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The case will now be heard at the SC-ST Court in Jaipur district, with Justice Vyas directing for a timely completion of the trial. The high court has directed the Jaipur Police Commissioner to implement robust security measures during the case hearings. "The high court has directed appointment of one SI and two ASIs under the Case Officers Scheme in the matter to assist the lower court and the prosecution," Simlote said. Malinga's bail history has been contentious. Initially granted in May 2022 due to Covid-19, the bail was cancelled by the high court on July 5, 2024, because of the celebratory procession organised by his supporters. Though he again surrendered and was jailed on the high court's directions, the Supreme Court stayed the bail cancellation on Dec 13, 2024.
India Today
22 minutes ago
- India Today
Abu Salem to stay in jail till 2030, Bombay High Court rules out early release
The Bombay High Court on Monday observed that gangster Abu Salem's sentence in prison will get over only in 2030 and not on March 31, 2025 as he was bench of Justices AS Gadkari and Rajesh S Patil admitted his plea, which will be heard later and noted that the Supreme Court in its order had said that he could be sentenced only to 25 years, which would get over in the year 2030. The bench said, "We reckon that your date of arrest is October 2005. According to it, 25 years are yet to be completed."advertisementSalem, extradited from Portugal in 2005, was sentenced to life imprisonment for his role in the 1993 serial blasts by a special court under TADA and for the murder of builder Pradeep Jain. Salem had filed an appeal against that order and pointed out that when he was extradited, the Indian government had assured Portugal that he would not be sentenced for more than 25 years. It was in this context that the Supreme Court observed that he could be sentenced to 2030 lawyers, Rishi Malhotra and Farhana Shah, contended that Salem had earned three years and 16 days of remission for good conduct, along with a one-month credit granted by the Supreme Court for time spent in custody in Portugal. They claimed that these factors pushed his total sentence duration beyond 25 years, making him eligible for the Central Bureau of Investigation strongly opposed this argument. Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, appearing for the CBI, submitted that Salem was mixing up the calculations to meet the 25-year threshold. Singh also said that Salem should approach the Supreme Court for clarification if he believes its earlier order was not being followed Malhotra insisted that the 2030 timeline failed to account for the remission period, the bench responded sharply, saying, 'Are you saying that the Supreme Court order is wrong? Even applying simple logic, 25 years is yet to be completed.'The court admitted Salem's plea and agreed to an expedited hearing, but no date has been set.- EndsMust Watch
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Asim Munir reacts as India exposes Chinese support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor: ‘Factually incorrect'
Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir on Monday claimed that India's assertions about Islamabad receiving external support during the four-day conflict were 'factually incorrect.' Pakistan Army chief Gen Asim Munir dismissed India's assertions of external support during Operation Sindoor.(AP File) In an address to graduating officers at the National Defence University in Islamabad, Munir said that any misadventure or attempt to undermine Pakistan's sovereignty would be met with a swift and resolute response, without any constraints. 'Insinuations regarding external support in Pakistan's successful Operation Bunyanum Marsoos are irresponsible and factually incorrect and reflect a chronic reluctance to acknowledge indigenous capability and institutional resilience developed over decades of strategic prudence,' news agency PTI quoted Asim Munir as saying. His remarks came just days after Indian Army Deputy Chief Lt Gen Rahul R Singh said that Beijing had extended active military support to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, using the conflict as a 'live lab' to test various weapon systems. Speaking at a seminar in Delhi last week, Gen. Singh said Pakistan was the 'front face,' with China offering full support to its all-weather ally. He added that Turkey also played a significant role by supplying military hardware to Islamabad, saying that India was effectively dealing with 'at least three adversaries' during the May 7–10 conflict. Asim Munir also claimed that India's strategic behaviour is rooted in 'parochial self-alignment,' while Pakistan has focused on forging lasting partnerships through principled diplomacy, anchored in mutual respect and peace. He said that this approach has established Pakistan as a stabilising force in the region. 'Deeply hurting, more than reciprocal response': Munir warns 'Any attempt to target our population centres, military bases, economic hubs and ports will instantly invoke a deeply hurting and more than reciprocal response,' Munir said. He added that wars are not won through 'media rhetoric, imported fancy hardware, or political sloganeering,' but rather through 'faith, professional competence, operational clarity, institutional strength and national resolve.' India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terrorist infrastructure in areas controlled by Pakistan in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. The strikes led to four days of intense clashes, which ended with an understanding to halt military actions on May 10. New Delhi has maintained that India's decisive counterattack that day forced Pakistan to seek an end to the hostilities. With PTI inputs
