Watch live: Congressional Voting Rights Caucus rails against GOP-led redistricting efforts in Texas
GOP lawmakers in Texas are using the special session to attempt to lock in the party's majority in Congress by means of weakening or eliminating Democratic districts in the state. Democrats, led by House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.), have vowed to fight the moves tooth-and-nail.
Jeffries will be joined Wednesday by Voting Rights Caucus Co-Chair Marc Veasey (D-Texas).
The press conference is scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. EDT.
Watch the live video above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
7 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Texas just opened Pandora's box, and voters everywhere could pay the price
Redistricting is meant to occur every 10 years after the census. District maps should ensure that all voters have an equal chance to influence their representation, not to serve the personal or political interests of those in power at a given moment. Advertisement What makes this instance particularly troubling is the brazen nature of the effort. Trump and Republican leaders in Texas have been blunt: This new map is designed purely for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But this is not just a Texas problem. The consequences are already rippling outward: Lawmakers in New York and California are now considering redrawing their own maps in response — not to better serve communities but to counterbalance Texas's partisan moves. This tit-for-tat escalation is exactly what our democratic system cannot afford. Partisan gerrymandering has always been problematic, but Texas's mid-decade redistricting solely for political advantage is particularly corrosive to our democracy. Political leaders in Washington, D.C., have been gutting health care, tearing apart families with abusive deportation squads, and using federal power for revenge and personal gain. Rather than earning electoral victories by engaging with their constituents and championing policies that improve people's lives, they have chosen to simply redraw the district boundaries. As state Representative Advertisement This power grab is particularly harmful in Texas, a state with a long history of racially discriminatory map drawing and other forms of voter suppression. In Americans deserve better. We deserve fair maps designed to reflect communities, not to boost the political fortunes of the map drawers. And no matter which party is in power, partisan gerrymandering cannot come at the expense of voters of color and diluting their vote and voice. We the voters should choose our elected officials — not the other way around. This moment demands national urgency. Mid-decade gerrymandering to avoid answering to voters is already dangerous. Now the governor and attorney general of Texas are Advertisement Texas's actions set a dangerous precedent. If the nation's second largest state can conduct partisan redistricting mid-decade with impunity, other states will follow suit. We're witnessing a race to the bottom that erodes faith in democratic institutions, regardless of which party benefits. We the people are supposed to command our own fate. That means our representatives are supposed to work for us. Texas must back away from mid-decade redistricting. And Congress must act to end partisan gerrymandering and protect the freedom to vote for all Americans, especially those most targeted by these power grabs. Texas is showing us what happens when those in power use that power to entrench themselves instead of serving their constituents. If Texas gets away with this, this mid-decade power grab won't be an aberration — it will drag other states into the same game, and voters and our democracy will be the losers.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
John Leguizamo Blasts Ex-Superman Dean Cain for Joining ICE: ‘What a Moron'
Leguizamo called out the former "New Adventures of Superman" star for his intention to join up in Trump's anti-immigration effort John Leguizamo just hit Dean Cain with a healthy dose of Kryptonite. On Wednesday, Cain announced that he would be joining ICE 'ASAP' as part of President Donald Trump's mass anti-immigration campaign. It's a move that many, including the Colombia-born Leguizamo, have taken to task. More from TheWrap John Leguizamo Blasts Ex-Superman Dean Cain for Joining ICE: 'What a Moron' | Video Rosie O'Donnell Predicts 'The View' Will Be Canceled Because It Doesn't 'Align With Trumpism' David Ellison Says Skydance Was 'Not Involved' in Trump-Paramount Settlement, Deflects When Asked About PSAs Megyn Kelly, Charlie Kirk Drag Liberal Media for Blaming Sydney Sweeney Blowback on MAGA: 'Gaslight Us in Real Time' | Video Leguizamo, a Tony- and Emmy-winning actor and comedian, went on Instagram Friday to share some choice words for the former 'Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman' star. 'What kind of loser volunteers to be an ICE officer?' Leguizamo asked. 'What a moron. Dean Cain, your pronouns are Has/Been.' You can watch the video below: Both Superman and Cain have reentered the public eye in recent months. In July, 'Superman' (2025) director James Gunn spoke about the Man of Steel's immigrant origins, calling the story of Superman 'the story of America,' and one of 'basic human kindness.' Cain took offense to this framing. 'I'm rooting for it to be a success, but I don't like that last political comment,' Cain told TMZ in July. This started a conversation in July about whether Cain understands the origins of the character he portrayed for four years on 'Lois & Clark.' A clip began circulating online of a scene from the series where Cain's Superman is grounded by immigration officers due to his status as an alien. 'Dean Cain volunteered to be an ice agent!' Leguizamo said in the post. 'I got one word for you LOSER!' The post John Leguizamo Blasts Ex-Superman Dean Cain for Joining ICE: 'What a Moron' | Video appeared first on TheWrap. Solve the daily Crossword
New York Times
36 minutes ago
- New York Times
Zelensky Rejects Trump's Suggestion That Ukraine Swap Territory With Russia
President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on Saturday flatly rejected President Trump's proposal that a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia could include 'some swapping of territories' — a plan that would in effect mean ceding land to Moscow. 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier,' Mr. Zelensky said in a video address from his office in Kyiv, several hours after Mr. Trump's remarks. 'Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace,' Mr. Zelensky said. 'They will bring nothing. These are dead decisions; they will never work.' Mr. Zelensky's blunt rejection risks angering Mr. Trump, who has made a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia one of his signature foreign policy goals, even if it means accepting terms that are unfavorable to Kyiv. In the past, Mr. Trump has criticized Ukraine for clinging to what he suggested were stubborn cease-fire demands and for being 'not ready for peace.' Mr. Trump said on Friday that he would meet with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia on Aug. 15 in Alaska to discuss a possible peace deal, with potential land swaps likely on the agenda. 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' Mr. Trump said during an event at the White House. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.' Mr. Zelensky's stand reflects a widely held view in Ukraine against surrendering territory to end the war. A recent poll by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology found that a little more than half of Ukrainians believed that 'under no circumstances' should the country cede land, 'even if this makes the war last longer and threatens the preservation of independence.' Support for land concessions, however, has grown since Ukraine's failed 2023 counteroffensive, which underscored its inability to retake substantial territory. About 38 percent of the population thinks ceding land is acceptable now, according to the poll, up from just 10 percent about two years ago. Still, Mr. Trump's suggestion, which did not clarify which territories could be swapped, struck a raw nerve among some Ukrainians. Petro Poroshenko, Mr. Zelensky's predecessor, wrote on Facebook that 'Ukrainians are a nation that does not trade its own territories. Therefore, we cannot set a precedent where peace is achieved at the expense of concessions on the part of Ukraine,' he added. In rejecting Mr. Trump's proposal, Mr. Zelensky invoked Ukraine's constitution, which states that the Ukrainian territory is indivisible and inviolable. 'The answer to Ukraine's territorial question is already in the Constitution of Ukraine,' Mr. Zelensky said. 'No one will step back from this, nor will anyone be able to.' Mr. Zelensky said that Ukraine was 'ready, together with President Trump and with all our partners, to work for a real and, most importantly, lasting peace — a peace that will not fall apart because of Moscow's desires.'
