
The Senate's $40,000 SALT Deduction Signals Tax Relief For Homeowners
The Senate has narrowly passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by a 50-50 vote, with Vice President Vance breaking the tie. The bill now moves to the Joint Conference Committee for reconciliation of differences. However, one expected difference between the House and Senate versions of the bill —the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction — appears to have already been rectified. While the SALT deduction can be used for any state and local income taxes paid, the taxes paid on a home tend to be among the largest for taxpayers, suggesting this higher cap will be a welcome relief for home owners. This article discusses the SALT deduction and what this reconciliation means, assuming the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is ultimately signed into law.
SALT Deductions Before The Tax Cuts And Jobs Act of 2017
Before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the SALT deduction allowed taxpayers to claim unlimited itemized deductions for taxes paid to state and local governments. For instance, if the taxpayer paid $20,000 in taxes on their home during the year, they could then deduct the $20,000 from their income, thereby lowering their tax liability. Many taxpayers were limited on how much they could actually deduct due to complex alternative minimum tax rules that existed before 2017, as outlined by the Tax Foundation. However, the benefits were still very much present.
SALT Deductions After The Tax Cuts And Jobs Act of 2017
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 modified Section 164 of the Internal Revenue Code in two key ways, limiting the financial benefit of the SALT deduction. First, it capped the deduction at $10,000. This limit means that whether the taxpayer paid $10,000 or $100,000 in SALT, the deduction the taxpayer could take would only be $10,000. Second, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act increased the standard deduction from $13,000 in 2016 for married taxpayers to $24,000 in 2017. The combination of taxpayers having lower SALT deductions and a higher standard deduction resulted in far fewer taxpayers itemizing their taxes and utilizing the SALT deduction to their advantage.
To illustrate the impacts, consider two different married taxpayers. The first has $15,000 in SALT paid and no other itemized deductions. For this taxpayer, the onset of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act represented a significant win, as they went from having $15,000 in itemized deductions to a $24,000 standard deduction. Assuming the taxpayer was at the 32% tax bracket, the extra $9,000 in deductions increased their after-tax income by $2,880.
Now consider the second taxpayer, who has $50,000 in SALT deductions before 2017. If these deductions were now capped at $10,000 and they had no other itemized deductions, they would go from $50,000 in deductions to a $24,000 standard deduction. Assuming the same 32% tax bracket, the $26,000 in lost deductions increased their tax liability by $8,320.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act And A Larger SALT Tax Deduction
A key issue with the $10,000 SALT deduction cap was that it asymmetrically impacted taxpayers in higher-cost-of-living locations versus others. For instance, consider a taxpayer in New York City, which has some of the most expensive real estate in the world. That taxpayer is paying more in taxes on their home than a taxpayer in other major cities (such as Chicago, Houston, and Philadelphia), medium-sized cities (like Charlotte, Kansas City, and Denver), or even more rural areas for a similarly sized home. However, they all have the same cap on their SALT deductions.
This notion has led many members of Congress to request that the SALT deduction cap be increased in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. As I previously reported in Forbes, the House included a $40,000 deduction cap in its version of the bill, and this cap would increase annually to help offset the rising costs. However, the Senate introduced a version of the bill that would maintain a cap of $10,000. As I reported in a separate Forbesarticle, this was going to be a big sticking point during the Joint Conference Committee as the two sides appeared to be at odds with one another.
However, in a surprising turn, the difference is no longer present. In the Senate's passage of the bill, they have agreed to raise the SALT deduction cap to $40,000, as reported by CNBC. Their version of the bill also allows for an annual increase in the deduction. Both versions also agree that the cap would begin to phase out among taxpayers who earn over $500,000 in income, meaning that ultrahigh earners would still be able to deduct only $10,000.
In considering the two taxpayers from earlier, the first (which had $50,000 in SALT paid) would now be able to itemize their taxes again, utilizing the higher SALT deduction limit. The second (which had $15,000 in SALT paid) would continue benefiting from the higher standard deduction.
Two Key Differences On The SALT Deduction To Be Resolved
While it appears as though the two versions have converged, there are two key differences:
(1) Expiration Date
The Senate's version increases the SALT deduction cap for the years 2025 through 2028. In 2029 it will revert back to $10,000, at which time, Congress will need to decide to reenact the higher tax deduction. The House's version would extend several additional years through 2033.
(2) Alternative Minimum Tax Rules
The House's version of the bill includes provisions to limit tax deductions for ultrahigh earners, often referred to as the alternative minimum tax. The Senate version has a more taxpayer-friendly alternative minimum tax. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that this difference makes the Senate version of the bill 67% more taxpayer-friendly than the House version, as the Senate version will result in $325 billion in additional tax outflows for the Federal government. In contrast, the House version will only result in $200 billion in additional tax outflows.
While these differences can and will be addressed in the Joint Conference Committee, it is essential to note that the primary details appear to have been resolved. As the US taxpayers look forward to the prospects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act being signed into law on the 4th of July, the most recent revelation and agreement between the two chambers of Congress should be a welcome sign for homeowners seeking to make better use of their SALT deductions this coming tax season.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
16 minutes ago
- Fox News
Pentagon halts some weapons shipments to Ukraine over concerns about US stockpiles
The Pentagon has frozen some shipments of critical weapons to Ukraine, including Patriot missile interceptors and 155 mm artillery shells, at a pivotal moment in Kyiv's war with Russia, Fox News has confirmed. According to U.S. military officials tracking the shipments, the weapons were already staged in Poland before the order came down. The halt was driven by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby after a review of U.S. munitions stockpiles that showed dangerously low reserves, Politico first reported. "This was made to put America's interests first," White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said n a statement also shared with Fox News Digital. "The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran." Colby, a principal Trump defense official and architect of the 2018 National Defense Strategy, has long pushed for a hard shift toward countering China over continued involvement in Ukraine. Before rejoining the Pentagon, he led The Marathon Initiative and authored The Strategy of Denial, a widely cited blueprint for great power competition. According to Politico, the withheld arms include air defense munitions, precision-guided shells and Hellfire missiles used by Ukrainian F-16s. A senior defense official told Politico the Pentagon's review revealed that stockpiles of Patriot interceptors, precision-guided 155 mm shells and other critical munitions had dropped to levels deemed insufficient to meet U.S. contingency plans. The Army has already quietly quadrupled its procurement targets for Patriot interceptors, but defense analysts say replenishment will take time. Over the weekend, Russia launched its largest aerial attack of the war, nearly 500 drones and 60 missiles. Ukraine's air defenses, many U.S.-made, remain strained. After meeting with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy at the NATO summit, Trump said, "They do want to have the anti-missile missiles. … We're going to see if we can make some available." Remaining funds from the Biden administration are expected to run out in the coming months.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Silicon Valley investor Vinod Khosla predicts AI will replace 80% of jobs by 2030—and take much of the Fortune 500 with it
Tech entrepreneur and investor Vinod Khosla's prediction of AI automating 80% of high-value jobs by 2030 coincides with a reckoning for Fortune 500 companies. Khosla shared his predictions for the future in a wide-ranging interview on the Uncapped With Jack Altman podcast. As a venture capitalist and early investor in companies like Square and Instacart, Khosla offered advice for business leaders on navigating unprecedented changes ahead. Companies like Sears and Toys 'R' Us collapsed under digital pressure, but Khosla warns the 2030s will see a 'faster demise' of giants as AI rewrites industry rules. See below for an overview of Khosla's major predictions for AI, the economy, and more. Era of unprecedented disruption: Khosla describes the current technology cycle as 'crazy and frenetic,' stating, 'I've never seen a cycle like this…almost every job is being reinvented, every material thing is being reinvented differently with AI as a driver.' He compares the scale of change to the 1960s, noting, 'We're going to see this large change in such a short time, it's almost hard to imagine how society adjusts.' AI and the end of work: Khosla predicts, 'Within the next five years, any economically valuable job humans can do, AI will be able to do 80% of it…80% of all jobs can be done by an AI.' He believes by 2040, 'the need to work will go away. People will work on things because they want to, not because they need to pay their mortgage.' Disruption of the Fortune 500: He forecasts a dramatic acceleration in the demise of large incumbent companies: 'One of my predictions is the 2030s will see a faster rate of demise of Fortune 500 companies than we've ever seen…that transition won't happen from existing companies. Somebody new will reinvent this.' Health care: 'If all medical expertise is free…you have an unlimited number of primary care doctors, oncologists, gastroenterologists, mental health therapists…how would you redesign the health care system?' Khosla argues that entrenched interests and regulatory barriers will slow—but not stop—AI-driven transformation. Robotics: He predicts that 'almost everybody in the 2030s will have a humanoid robot at home…probably starting with something narrow like doing your cooking for you.' The main bottleneck is not hardware, but intelligence. Energy: Khosla is 'very bullish about energy,' especially fusion and super-hot geothermal, which he believes could make power 'cheaper than natural gas.' Societal and geopolitical implications: Khosla warns of the risks of authoritarian regimes using AI for both hard and soft power: 'By 2040 the biggest risk we might face…is China using [types of] AI—cyber AI, warfare AI—but also socially good AI, like free doctors to everybody on the planet…to embed their political philosophy.' Philosophy on venture and innovation: Khosla emphasizes founder-driven innovation: 'Innovation only—I can't think of very many large examples where large innovation came from somebody who was large or in the business…experts are terrible at predicting the future; they extrapolate the past. Entrepreneurs invent the future they want.' On risk and impact: 'Most people reduce risk to increase the probability of success. I do the opposite: Start with [the] high consequences of success. I don't care about the probability of failure.' Disclaimer: For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lindsey Graham gets GOP primary challenge from André Bauer, South Carolina's former lieutenant gov
CHAPIN, S.C. (AP) — Former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer is mounting a GOP primary challenge to Sen. Lindsey Graham, arguing the incumbent isn't conservative enough to represent the state. Bauer, a wealthy developer, is a longtime backer of President Donald Trump. His candidacy sets up a midterm grudge match with Graham, a four-term senator whose relationship with Donald Trump has undulated through the years, but who has Trump's endorsement for reelection. Bauer has described himself as 'a real, America First conservative' intent on representing what he sees as South Carolina conservatives' true values. 'I think Graham's been there too long, and he votes like it,' Bauer told The Associated Press Tuesday night. 'I'm guaranteed, I'm conservative, and I don't think he is." Republicans dominate South Carolina's statewide-elected positions, meaning that the most intense political competition takes place in GOP primaries. Graham has faced previous primary challenges from the right, with opponents accusing him of kowtowing to Democrats on issues from immigration to climate change. But he also hews to Republican priorities on national security; ahead of last month's U.S. strike on Iranian facilities, Graham called for Trump to 'go all-in' in backing Israel and destroying Iran's nuclear program. Graham kicked off his reelection campaign in February, and at least one other Republican has also announced a primary challenge. He has already secured Trump's endorsement. This week, Graham's campaign announced that Chris LaCivita, a co-campaign manager of Trump's 2024 bid, would serve as a senior adviser. On Tuesday, Abby Zilch, spokeswoman for Graham's campaign, noted that the senator had earned Trump's 'complete and total endorsement,' adding that Bauer 'has spent his career chasing titles to feed his ego.' Bauer said he understood Trump's need to use Capitol Hill relationships to advance his legislative priorities, like the tax cuts and spending bill that came before the Senate Budget Committee — which Graham chairs — before passing the chamber earlier Tuesday. 'Trump's got to work and get his bills passed,' Bauer said. 'Lindsey's chairman of a major committee. ... I get what you have to do." Bauer has backed Trump since before his win in South Carolina's 2016 GOP primary. At his 2024 campaign's South Carolina launch event, Trump called Bauer — who served on his state leadership committee — 'a friend of mine, somebody that could I think run for almost any office and win.' Bauer served in the South Carolina legislature before, at 33, he was elected the youngest lieutenant governor in the country in 2002. After two terms, he mounted an unsuccessful 2010 gubernatorial bid, finishing last in a four-way GOP primary ultimately won by Nikki Haley. Two years later, Bauer ran for Congress, losing a GOP runoff to eventual Rep. Tom Rice in South Carolina's newly created 7th District. Asked how much of his own money he would commit, Bauer declined to give a figure, saying he would 'put skin in the campaign' and looked forward to returning to the trail. 'I'm going to cover this state like the dew covers Dixie,' Bauer said. 'I think you're going to see a movement.' ___ Kinnard can be reached at