
Florida spends $4 million on new ‘ideology-free' college accreditor
The State University System's Board of Governors on Friday approved a roadmap for establishing the Commission for Public Higher Education, a new accrediting agency backed by university systems from five neighboring red states: North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, South Carolina and Texas.
Florida plans on launching a six-month test run of the new accreditation process with six universities this December, according to the agency's business plan approved unanimously by the Board of Governors in the Friday meeting. The organization aims to secure the U.S. Department of Education's stamp of approval for the accreditation by June 2028. The agency must have at least two years of experience operating as an accreditor before it can seek recognition from the U.S. Department of Education.
Florida's GOP-dominated Legislature is backing the venture with a $4 million start-up injection. The agency is anticipating that participating university systems will dedicate similar contributions, per the business plan.
Accreditation, which colleges must obtain in order to receive federal student financial aid funding, is meant to act as a quality-control measure for institutions. But critics of the current system say the process is cumbersome and lacks mechanisms for universities to provide input on evaluation criteria.
Once a niche subject rarely discussed outside of academic policy wonk circles, accreditation is an increasingly hot topic among conservatives. Some Republicans say accreditors stifle innovation and force left-wing ideology upon institutions.
A 'secret weapon'
Prominent GOP officials seeking to shake up accreditation are deploying wartime rhetoric. President Donald Trump has threatened to wield the accreditation system as a 'secret weapon' to force schools to adopt policies favored by conservatives. When DeSantis announced Florida's new accrediting agency last month, he said the accreditation establishment had colluded to form 'juntas.'
For the governor, seizing control of accreditation is one of the final frontiers in his quest to reshape Florida's higher education landscape, aiming to root out what he sees as rampant left-wing orthodoxy on college campuses. Republican state lawmakers under DeSantis have pushed for laws banning diversity, equity and inclusion spending at state universities and scrubbing 'identity politics' from general education courses.
DeSantis' has said one of his biggest gripes with accreditors is that they threaten to yank accreditation from schools without DEI initiatives. But the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges — the longtime accreditor of Florida's 40 public universities and colleges — is the only one of the seven southern accreditation agencies that mandate DEI criteria.
Discussions between Florida and the University of North Carolina system began last year, Florida university system chancellor Ray Rodrigues told the Miami Herald in an interview, because of shared concerns over SACSCOC's supposed political overreach. In 2023, the accreditor began investigating UNC-Chapel Hill to determine whether it violated accreditation criteria when it established the School of Civic Life and Leadership — an academic unit meant to promote civil discourse — without faculty input.
Florida's beef with SACSCOC goes back farther. In 2021, the agency raised concerns after the University of Florida initially barred professors from offering expert testimony in a voting rights lawsuit against the state. (The university later reversed course.) That same year, SACSCOC dinged the Board of Governors for considering then-Education Commissioner Richard Corcoran — a sitting board member at the time — for the Florida State University presidency. (Corcoran has served as president of New College of Florida since 2023.)
For administrators, the accreditation process can be cumbersome. It involves hosting campus visits and filling out lengthy spreadsheets. Robert Shireman, a former Obama-era Education Department official, described the process as the higher-ed equivalent of filing taxes.
'If you feel like you're a good college, it can be annoying,' said Shireman, who currently serves on the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity, which advises the U.S. Secretary of Education on accreditation.
According to Shireman, accreditation critics across the political spectrum have raised concerns that accrediting agencies are sluggish and lack mechanisms for universities and colleges to have a say in how they are evaluated. SACSCOC, for instance, is overseen by a 77-member board that meets twice a year.
The CPHE's board is far leaner, initially consisting of six members selected directly by participating university systems, according to the agency's business plan — a composition that Shireman said may allow the agency to more nimbly make decisions.
Unusual structure
In terms of organizational structure, the agency will operate as a nonprofit with the Florida Board of Governors acting as its sole member. That's unusual for an accrediting agency, Shireman said. Accreditors typically operate as nonprofits, but are rarely managed by state agencies and act independent of the institutions it holds accountable.
Whether or not the agency could maintain the independence necessary to be seen as legitimate emerged as a key concern during Friday's board meeting. Kimberly Dunn, the board's faculty representative, suggested barring the agency from accrediting Florida's public universities until it had established independence.
Not everybody is on board with the accreditation overhaul. Robin Goodman, an English professor at Florida State University, told state board members on Friday they were pushing for 'a solution in search of a problem.'
Florida's current accreditation setup, Goodman said, was working perfectly fine and was helping universities climb national rankings. She called the DeSantis' DEI concerns a 'non-evidence based claim' and raised concerns about whether the governor would use CPHE as a Trojan Horse for injecting conservative ideas into curricula.
'That just seems like a bad decision and will make our universities not as great as they are now,' Goodman told board members.
Dunn, the faculty representative, said it was important to ensure the agency's accreditation criteria didn't impose or restrict certain content in curriculum. Rodrigues, the university system chancellor, responded that Florida can't establish an accreditor that 'removes left wing ideology and replaces it with right wing ideology.'
'The point of this is to have an accreditor that's not involved in ideology at all,' Rodrigues said. 'It's completely focused on academic excellence [and] quality education.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We are at war': Democrats reach breaking point over Republican threats in political map arms race
Democrats have spent years issuing warnings over Republican threats to redraw the political maps that could determine the balance of power for years to come. Now, they're prepared for 'war.' After protracted legal battles to unwind Donald Trump's executive actions and unsuccessful attempts to derail the president's agenda in Congress, Democrats appear to have reached a breaking point and are ready to do some map-making of their own, reluctantly preparing to fight fire with fire. They have repeatedly stressed that the GOP's gerrymandering imperils American democracy. But Democratic officials across the country are now embracing the idea, reasoning that years-long legal challenges and public pressure over illegal voter suppression are no longer enough to keep up with the GOP's power trip. 'All's fair in love and war,' New York Governor Kathy Hochul said Monday as she signaled efforts to draw up new maps in her state 'as soon as possible.' 'This is a war. We are at war,' she added. 'And that's why the gloves are off, and I say, 'Bring it on.'' Trump is looking to avoid a repeat of his first term, when Democrats flipped the House at the midpoint and largely stalled his agenda from advancing through Congress. This time around he wants Republican-led states to redraw their congressional districts to ensure the GOP remains in power in 2026. Last month, the president commanded Texas Republicans to do a 'simple redrawing' of the state's congressional maps, the heavily-contested boundaries that establish districts for each member of the House of Representatives. Texas Governor Greg Abbott had summoned state lawmakers to the state capitol in Austin for an emergency session to do just that. Days after Trump's demands, Texas Republicans put together a map that gives them five more seats in the House. On August 1, the Texas House redistricting committee held the only public hearing on the proposal. Republicans voted it out of committee the next morning on a party-line vote, setting up a quick vote in the full state House of Representatives, which Republicans control. 'I'm not beating around the bush,' Texas state Rep. Todd Hunter told the committee. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' Contra Abbott and the Justice Department, he admitted the map was being redrawn 'for partisan purposes.' Committee chair Cody Vasut also admitted the move was purely about 'improving political performance.' But by the time Texas Republicans were prepared to vote on the new maps on August 4, Texas Democrats had already left the state. Nearly 60 Democratic members of the state House have fled elsewhere, breaking quorum to derail a vote and promising to stay away from Texas for the duration of Abbott's 30-day session. Texas Republicans subsequently ordered arrest warrants and directed state marshals to haul Democrats back to the capitol — a largely symbolic maneuver confined by state lines. It's also expensive; missing members are racking up $500 in daily penalties for every day they miss work. But for Democrats, it's a high-profile act of obstruction that puts Republicans on notice. 'This is not a decision we make lightly, but it is one we make with absolute moral clarity,' Democratic state Rep. Gene Wu said from Illinois after leaving the state with several Texas Democrats. Wu, the state's Democratic caucus chair, said the GOP has put forward a 'racist, gerrymandered map' that 'seeks to use racial lines to divide hard-working communities that have spent decades building up their power and strengthening their voices.' Governor Abbott has done so 'in submission of Donald Trump, so Donald Trump can steal these communities' power and voice,' Wu continued. 'We will not be complicit in the destruction of our own communities.' The developing war over congressional maps follows a series of Supreme Court decisions that have gradually chipped away at the Voting Rights Act and constitutional guardrails to protect against racial gerrymandering, or carving up electoral maps to prevent racial minorities from electing their preferred candidates. Federal courts have generally blocked the creation of congressional districts that 'crack' or 'pack' communities of color to dilute their voting strength. After Texas redistricted in 2021, voting rights advocates challenged the new maps in court, arguing that state lawmakers drew up racially gerrymandered districts that discriminated against minority voters. Currently, Texas has nine districts where no one racial or ethnic group has a majority; in eight of them, Black, Hispanic and Asian voters combined create a so-called "coalition district' majority. Trump's Department of Justice claims that three of those districts are unconstitutional 'coalition districts' — which constitutional law scholars and voting rights advocates say is a deliberately bad-faith reading of the law. Trump's demands to redraw maps in the middle of the decade, largely to hold on to power to avoid any political blowback in 2026, could trigger what Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin has called 'a race to the bottom' nationwide. Former attorney general Eric Holder, who chairs the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, has spent the last several years fighting off partisan gerrymanders, including Democratic-led maps. But in the wake of Trump's threats, Holder is now telling Democratic officials to embrace what leverage they have and be 'unabashed in our desire to acquire power.' 'This midcycle redistricting ploy in Texas, and potentially in other states, is something that has to be met in the moment,' Holder told The New York Times. 'Our commitment to fairness didn't blind us to this new reality, and I think that we've got to take these extraordinary steps, with the hope that we can then save democracy and ultimately heal it. If you give Donald Trump unchecked power for two years beyond 2026, given what they've done in six months, I just wonder what kind of shape will the nation be in come Jan. 20, 2029.' The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee has also called on Democratic state legislatures to 'pursue redistricting mid-cycle,' but Democrats don't hold 'enough legislative majorities to win an all-out, state-by-state battle.' Republican state legislatures oversee 55 Democratic congressional seats. Democratic state legislative majorities, meanwhile, oversee only 35 GOP districts. 'All options must be on the table — including Democratic state legislatures using their power to fight back and pursue redistricting mid-cycle in order to protect our democracy,' committee president Heather Williams said in a statement. Republicans are preemptively trying to stop Democratic states from joining the fight. Republican Rep. Kevin Kiley of California wants to 'stop a damaging redistricting war from breaking out across the country,' brushing up against demands from his party leaders for the by-any-means-necessary battle to preserve, and expand, the House majority next year. California Governor Gavin Newsom, whose state holds a whopping 52 House seats, has also planned retaliatory map-making to target vulnerable Republican seats in the state. Other Democratic-led states are expected to follow, potentially blowing past the guidance from independent redistricting commissions that are designed to prevent lawmakers from crafting partisan, racist and otherwise discriminatory maps. Hochul has considered disbanding New York's commission altogether. 'I'm tired of fighting this fight with my hands tied behind my back,' she said this week. 'When we say we cannot use that power to the fullest, we're abdicating the responsibility we all have. Republicans take over the legislature? They can have it. Until then, we're in charge, and we're sick and tired of being pushed around.' Republicans only have Trump to blame, she said. 'The playing field has changed dramatically, and shame on us if we ignore that fact and cling tight to the vestiges of the past,' she said. 'That era is over. Donald Trump eliminated that forever.'


San Francisco Chronicle
10 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The Latest: Texas Democrats prevent state redistricting by leaving the state
Texas Democrats on Monday prevented their state's House of Representatives from moving forward, at least for now, with a redrawn congressional map sought by President Donald Trump to shore up Republicans' 2026 midterm prospects as his political standing falters. After dozens of Democrats left the state, the Republican-dominated House was unable to establish the quorum of lawmakers required to do business. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has made threats about removing members who are absent from their seats. Democrats counter that Abbott is using 'smoke and mirrors' to assert legal authority he doesn't have. In California, Democrats encouraged by Gov. Gavin Newsom are considering new political maps that could slash five Republican-held House seats in the liberal-leaning state while bolstering Democratic incumbents in other battleground districts. The move is intended to undercut any GOP gains in Texas, potentially swinging House control and giving Democrats a counterweight to Trump on Capitol Hill. In rejecting jobs report, Trump follows his own playbook of discrediting unfavorable data When the coronavirus surged during Trump's first term, he called for a simple fix: Limit the amount of testing so the deadly outbreak looked less severe. When he lost the 2020 election, he had a ready-made reason: The vote count was fraudulent. And on Friday, when the July jobs report revisions showed a distressed economy, Trump had an answer: He fired the official in charge of the data and called the report of a sharp slowdown in hiring 'phony.' Trump has a go-to playbook if the numbers reveal uncomfortable realities, and that's to discredit or conceal the figures and to attack the messenger — all of which can hurt the president's efforts to convince the world that America is getting stronger. 'Our democratic system and the strength of our private economy depend on the honest flow of information about our economy, our government and our society,' said Douglas Elmendorf, a Harvard University professor who was formerly director of the Congressional Budget Office. 'The Trump administration is trying to suppress honest analysis.' Defending Texas GOP's mid-decade redistricting, Trump says 'We are entitled to five more seats' President Trump defended Texas Republicans' decision to redraw the state's congressional map mid-decade, pointing to Democratic-led states where he says Republicans are underrepresented. 'They did it to us,' Trump said in a TV interview Tuesday. But in many of the states Trump referenced — including California — partisan lawmakers are not in charge of drawing district lines. During the same interview, Trump also lashed out at Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who welcomed Texas Democrats to his state after they left to block a vote on the new map. Trump called Pritzker 'probably the dumbest of all governors.' Trump says 'I'd like to run' for president again Touting his 2024 win and 'the best poll numbers,' Trump told CNBC that 'I'd like to run again.' But asked by the hosts if he will, Trump replied, 'Probably not.' The back-and-forth came as Trump heralded his 2024 win in Texas, a record he said 'they say won't be beaten unless I run again.' And Trump threatens to raise tariffs on India within 24 hours Trump said on CNBC that higher tariffs could be coming for India. Last week, Trump said the U.S. said it would impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. 'I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours because they're buying Russian oil, they're fueling the war machine,' Trump said Tuesday. 'And if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy.' The 25% tariffs were part of a flurry of trade activity that included a series of executive actions regarding Brazil, copper and shipments of goods worth less than $800, as well as a reduced 15% tax on imports from South Korea, including its autos. Trump threatens eventual 200% tariffs on pharma The U.S. president said imported pharmaceutical drugs could eventually face tariffs as high as 200%. 'We want pharmaceuticals made in our country,' Trump said in the CNBC interview. Trump said tariffs on pharmaceuticals will be 'initially small,' but that he would hike it to 150% or 200% over the subsequent year and a half. The president also said he would announce tariffs on semiconductors and computer chips. Trump says EU will pay 35% tariffs if $600B investments don't come through Trump told CNBC hosts that 35% tariffs will kick in with the European Union if they don't make good on promised investments in U.S. goods. The president was asked what 'teeth' were in deals to force European officials to make good on their pledges. Trump initially said the EU was paying $650 billion but then rounded the figure down to $600 billion. 'We're a rich country again,' Trump said, adding that the $600 billion investment can go in 'anything I want.' Trump floats 'Kevin and Kevin' for Fed chair The president said he was considering four people for Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's replacement. Among the top on his list are his current economics director, Kevin Hassett, and former Fed governor Kevin Warsh. 'I think Kevin and Kevin, both Kevins are very good,' Trump said during an interview on CNBC Tuesday morning. He said two other people were in consideration. Not one of them: current Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who has indicated to Trump that he wants to stay where he is. 'It'll be one of four people,' he said. 'We're going to make a decision soon.'

USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump says he ‘probably' won't run for a third term in 2028
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump says he'd like to run for a third term but is unlikely to pursue one. This is his firmest indication yet that he is not looking to change or bypass the Constitutional limit set out in the 22nd Amendment to compete for president in 2028. When asked in a CNBC interview whether he would "run again," Trump said, "No. Probably not." "Probably not," he said a second time with a laugh. The Constitution restricts presidents to two terms in office. Trump is on his second, non-consecutive term, having previously led the nation from 2017 to 2021. Allies of Trump, such as former political adviser and far-right podcaster Steve Bannon, have said the Republican should try to seek a third term, and Trump has repeatedly teased the possibility since returning to office in January. In his Aug. 5 interview with CNBC, he said he'd like to run again, even as he indicated he did not plan to mount another campaign. "I'd like to run, I have the best poll numbers, I've ever had. You know why? Because people love the tariffs," Trump said.