logo
‘The Last Of Us' Season 2, Episode 5 Recap And Review: It's In The Air

‘The Last Of Us' Season 2, Episode 5 Recap And Review: It's In The Air

Forbes12-05-2025

The Last Of Us
Credit: HBO
'On him that takes revenge, revenge shall be taken; and by a real evil he shall dearly pay for the goods that are but airy and fantastical. It is like a rolling stone which, when a man hath forced up a hill, will return upon him with a greater violence, and break those bones whose sinews gave it motion.'
~ Jeremy Taylor (1613–1667)
'Revenge is like the sweetest joy . . . .'
~ Tupac Shakur (1971 - 1996)
Neil Druckmann, the creator of both The Last Of Us games and co-showrunner of the HBO adaptation, once said that the first game was about love, and the second was about hate. That's a pretty good way to summarize the two games, and the shift in tone from Season 1 of HBO's post-apocalyptic series into Season 2 and beyond. Spoilers ahead.
Two really big, really important things happen in tonight's harrowing episode of The Last Of Us. First off, we learn that the cordyceps plague is evolving. Where it once required a bite for someone to become infected with the fungus, now spores carried in the air can infect humans. This is super interesting because in the games, this was always the case. The cordyceps were 'nerfed' for the show, presumably because Pedro Pascal didn't want to wear gas masks all the time, having spent so much time hiding his face for The Mandalorian.
Now that Joel is dead, face-hiding is less of an issue. I'm half-joking, of course, but it is curious to me that they've reintroduced air-born plague spread in Season 2. It makes sense. It's a lot more dangerous and terrifying if you can get sick and turn just from breathing in spores. But it's a little odd to make such a drastic change for the first season, only to walk it back in Season 2. Then again, it certainly adds a new layer of threat, and a very dramatic turn as we approach the Season 2 finale.
The second big moment comes at the end of the episode, when Ellie (Bella Ramsey) breaks off from Dina (Isabela Merced) and Jesse (Young Mazino) to lead the Scars on a merry chase while they make it back to safety. Dina has been shot in the thigh by an arrow and Ellie has to do something to save her, especially now that she knows she's pregnant. Once she gets away, Ellie heads to the hospital on her own to track down Abby (Kaitlyn Dever).
Only, she doesn't find Abby. She finds Nora (Tati Gabrielle) instead. Nora was one of the Wolves who joined Abby in her Joel-killing, and one of the names on Ellie's kill list. Ellie finds her and demands to know where Abby is, but Nora won't give her friend up. At first, she pretends to feel awful about what happened to Joel, but it's just a distraction. She uses her little ruse to get away, though Ellie goes chasing after her, even as other Wolves come to Nora's aid.
Nora
Credit: HBO
The problem Nora runs into is that she rushes down a hall to the elevators – an area that's supposed to be sealed off after the Wolves discover that the basement levels are filled with air-born cordyceps spores. When the other Wolves realize this, they back off, terrified, and leave Nora to her fate. They understandably reason that it's too late for both Nora and her pursuer. Nora thinks that, too, when Ellie finds her.
She's in rough shape, coughing, dragging herself along, the sickness already taking hold. When she sees Ellie, she's smug about it, telling her that they're both doomed. Then she realizes that Ellie is the immune girl, the one from Salt Lake. She tells her what Joel did, the people he killed and why, and Ellie just tells her 'I know.' Ellie has a singular purpose here. Where is Abby? When Nora won't tell her, she finds a metal pipe. When Nora still won't tell her, she introduces her to the metal pipe, beating her savagely.
I'm really glad that the show didn't shrink from the sheer brutality of this moment, even though the circumstances are different from the game, obviously, since the cordyceps were always an air-born threat there, and here it's presented as a new evolution. This is a major turning point for Ellie. She's not theoretically on a revenge quest now. She's fully locked in, unleashing awful violence against someone who has no way of fighting back. This will almost certainly take a terrible toll on her.
Dina and Ellie
Credit: HBO
The rest of the episode is mostly about Ellie and Dina trying to track down Abby. Dina is good with math, good at triangulation and so forth, and figures out the best way for them to make the approach. We learn a bit more about her backstory also, and why her tragic childhood makes her so amenable to helping Ellie out with her own revenge quest. It's a nice touch, giving Dina more depth and her reasons for accompanying Dina even more grounding.
Unfortunately, the route they pick is far, far more deadly than they anticipated. The building they come to isn't just infested, it's crawling with evolved clickers, the 'smart ones' like the one Ellie was bitten by back outside of Jackson. They're quickly overwhelmed. Thankfully, Jesse shows up just in the nick of time. And as silly as that is, on a certain level, as most 'just in the nick of time' moments are, they really wouldn't have made it out otherwise. He comes in guns blazing and the three escape, though the Wolves are in hot pursuit.
They flee into the park and this, it just so happens, is where wolves fear to tread. Soon, they see torches in the night. Strange whistles on the night air. They watch as the Scars appear in their goofy robes (sorry, the Scars are just so cheesy to me) and then watch as they disembowel one of their enemies in some kind of ritual sacrifice. You can really see why the Wolves are joining these friendly religious zealots. They get such a warm welcome!
Things go badly and the Scars somehow notice our heroes, shooting Dina and rushing after the three of them. This is when Ellie and the others break apart. By the end of the episode, we can only hope that Dina and Jesse made it back to the theater alive.
The Scars
Credit: HBO
All told, another solid episode with some great action and terrifying zombie scenes. I wish I didn't feel so down about the Seraphites, but as I've noted before, they're just way too much like one of the silly factions in The Walking Dead for my taste. A premium HBO show like this should have more nuance. I'm not even against a religious faction, but I'd prefer something a bit less cartoonish and a bit more grounded. These are basically the Amish on PCP.
Still, I really like that the air-born plague is back in play and the final scene with Ellie and Nora was brutal and stomach-churning. I'm curious to see how this impacts Ellie. I have a few other questions:
We learn that Jesse and Tommy followed our heroes, setting out a day after them which is why they've caught up to them. Jesse tracked them to the hospital using the maps they left at the theater ( a bit far-fetched, but I'll allow it). Will we see Tommy again this season? We have two more episodes, so this seems likely.
A bigger question is whether we see Abby. I've seen six episodes of this season, and I'm still only guessing when I say that I think we'll see her next in the finale. I think this is where a very big moment will take place that will set Abby up as a much more central character for Season 3. I suspect that we will see Tommy and Abby around the same time at the end of this season, but that's just a theory.
If this plays out like I think it will, then expect a lot more Kaitlyn Dever in Season 3 and a possibly diminished role for Ellie, not to mention her comrades in arms. Again, I wonder how this plays with the audience, especially since non-gamers are still coming to terms with the loss of Joel.
I discuss this episode and the 'review-bombing' of the show in my video below:
In any case, overall I thought this was yet another strong offering in what has been a much better second half of the season than the first. What did you think of this episode? Let me know on Twitter, Instagram, Bluesky or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Posted Jun 10, 2025 at 8:43 PM EDT 0 Comments
Posted Jun 10, 2025 at 8:43 PM EDT 0 Comments

The Verge

time28 minutes ago

  • The Verge

Posted Jun 10, 2025 at 8:43 PM EDT 0 Comments

Tesla asks its remaining fans to make 90 second ads. You might recognize this TeslaVision campaign seeking fan-submitted ads as a callback to the Project Loveday contest from 2017 (that was the year the Model 3 started shipping, but the new Roadster and Semi did not). Beyond the request for free advertising labor amid an ongoing brand crisis and political quagmire, Tesla's 2025 request is also designed to try to flood social media, requiring posts on YouTube, X, and Instagram by July 17th to maybe win a Model Y and a trip to Gigafactory Texas.

Dakota Johnson has one, non-negotiable dating deal-breaker
Dakota Johnson has one, non-negotiable dating deal-breaker

Fox News

time35 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Dakota Johnson has one, non-negotiable dating deal-breaker

Dakota Johnson is sharing her dating deal-breaker. On Monday, the 35-year-old actress appeared on "Today" with Chris Evans to promote their upcoming movie, "Materialists," in which Johnson plays a professional matchmaker and the Marvel star portrays her ex-boyfriend. During the episode, host Craig Melvin asked the duo, "If either of you were to engage with a real-life matchmaker, what would be one non-negotiable for you?" While Evans, 43, shared that any potential interest "must love dogs," his co-star had a more blunt reply. "Like, not an a------," Johnson said to laughter from Evans, Melvin and the audience. "That's concise," Evans quipped with a smile. "There it is. Nail on the head." Johnson might be back in the dating pool after she reportedly split from Chris Martin after eight years together. During an interview June 4 with the Los Angeles Times, Johnson sparked speculation that she and Martin had called it quits as she shared her view on relationships. "For a long time we've all been so quick to judge relationships or how they should happen, how they should exist in the world. When people should get married. Divorce is bad. All these things that actually, if you think about it, why is divorce bad?" " the "Fifty Shades of Grey" star said. "Why do people have to get married or at a certain age or only once? Why? It doesn't matter," Johnson added. Later that day, People magazine reported that Johnson and Martin had ended their on-and-off again relationship and the split appeared to be permanent. "It feels final this time," a source told the outlet. Johnson and the Coldplay frontman have been dating since 2017. Martin was previously married to Gwyneth Paltrow for 10 years. The former couple, who share children Apple, 21, and Moses, 19, announced their separation as a "conscious uncoupling" in 2014. Their divorce was finalized in 2016 but the two have remained on good terms. In December 2020, Johnson and Martin sparked engagement rumors when the "Madame Web" actress stepped out sporting a large emerald ring on her left ring finger. A source told People magazine in March 2024 Johnson and Martin "got engaged years ago but were in no rush to get married." In August 2024, a representative for Johnson denied rumors the pair had decided to part ways. "The reports are not true," Johnson's spokesperson told Fox News Digital. "They are happily together." At the time, a source told People magazine Johnson and Martin's relationship was "going strong." "They've had ups and downs, but now they're definitely back on," the insider shared. The actress previously spoke with Elle U.K. and shed some light on her low-profile relationship with the "Fix You" singer. "We've been together for quite a while, and we go out sometimes, but we both work so much that it's nice to be at home and be cozy and private," Johnson said in 2021. When asked how she and Martin manage to maintain a private relationship, Johnson added, "Most of the partying takes place inside my house."

‘Surviving Ohio State' Review: HBO's Sexual Abuse Doc Is Thorough and Persuasive, but Lacks a New Smoking Gun
‘Surviving Ohio State' Review: HBO's Sexual Abuse Doc Is Thorough and Persuasive, but Lacks a New Smoking Gun

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Surviving Ohio State' Review: HBO's Sexual Abuse Doc Is Thorough and Persuasive, but Lacks a New Smoking Gun

The latest entry in a genre one wishes weren't so burgeoning is HBO's Surviving Ohio State, following in the sadly necessary footsteps of documentaries about sexual abuse in the athletic departments at Michigan State (Athlete A and At the Heart of Gold) and Penn State (Happy Valley). When Surviving Ohio State was announced, anticipation hinged on the participation of producer George Clooney and the possibility that exploring the abuses of Dr. Richard Strauss and alleged negligence by authority figures at Ohio State might topple Jim Jordan, Ohio Congressman and Trump lapdog. More from The Hollywood Reporter Broadway Box Office: 'Good Night, and Good Luck' and 'Othello' End Runs on New Highs 'A Tree Fell in the Woods' Review: Josh Gad and Alexandra Daddario in an Uneven, Occasionally Insightful Relationship Dramedy Jim Sheridan's 'Re-creation' Puts One of Ireland's Most Troubling Murder Cases Back on Trial If your interest in Surviving Ohio State revolves entirely around Jim Jordan-related schadenfreude, you can probably skip it. Jordan, who refused to participate in the documentary for self-evident reasons, comes across as heartless and negligent, but the doc lacks any sort of smoking gun likely to dissuade his dedicated constituents, who have known about all of these allegations for each of the last three times they've voted for him. Jordan, unfortunately, also proves to be a distraction to the filmmakers, especially in the documentary's second half. Caught up in the they-said/he-said-in-previous-statements disagreements, director Eva Orner largely fails to explore the institutional side of the scandal. I shouldn't come away from a documentary like this fixated on the name of a single assistant wrestling coach (one who was not and has not been accused of anything criminal) and completely unable to name the Ohio State president, athletic director and key administrators under whose watch these abuses occurred. For the first half of its 108-minute running time, Surviving Ohio State is, as its title suggests, a compelling examination of the survivors of abuse and the mechanisms through which large-scale abuse can occur at a major university. Per a 2019 independent investigation, from 1978 to 1998 Dr. Richard Strauss abused at least 177 male students at Ohio State. Strauss had particularly close ties to a number of Buckeyes sports programs, including fencing, hockey and the wrestling team, coached by Russ Hellickson, with two-time NCAA champ Jordan as his primary assistant. The accusations from athletes involved Strauss' inappropriate examinations, his tendency to take regular, extended showers in several athletic locker rooms, and grooming behavior escalating ultimately into rape. For some of that time, Strauss worked at the Student Health Center and thus had access to the entire student body, and although he was relieved of certain of those duties after complaints, he retired from Ohio State entirely on his own terms. A group of wrestlers from the mid-90s are Orner's primary points of entry, and this group of survivors proves crucial to both the strongest aspects of the documentary and the distraction that leaves it less effective than it could be. At least a half dozen of those wrestlers tell their stories to the camera, accompanied by filler re-enactments — a shower head spurting water, the hallway leading to a medical examination room — that add very little. The stories themselves are candid and graphic, the haunted men today contrasted with vintage footage of wrestling matches and the various athletes in their high-achieving youth. Well aware of skepticism from online trolls who have wondered how veterans of a combat sport could allow this sort of 'victimization,' the men talk about the surprise and shame that led them not to respond in the moment and to remain silent about the incidents for decades. It's the film's way of setting up the psychology of male survivors and, perhaps more than that, of explaining why the OSU scandal hasn't received the instant attention and sympathy that greeted revelations from generations of female gymnasts about Michigan State and United States national team doctor Larry Nassar. The truth is that Jordan's involvement has contributed to what visibility the Ohio State situation has had. All of the wrestlers present in this documentary have made it clear that Strauss' behavior wasn't a secret, and that the coaches all knew about the inappropriate showers and concerns about the examinations, taking little action in Hellickson's case and no action in Jordan's case. Jordan has belligerently and vehemently denied that he knew anything at all, which makes him at best an oblivious caretaker of young men. The wrestlers, plus at least one referee with a story of his own, are completely persuasive, and Orner is able to give a sense of pervasive rumors about Strauss' creepiness. But that's been the story since these allegations against Strauss came out back in 2018 — and other than one small, thoroughly speculative detail about Jordan's actions well after the scandal broke, no new information is provided and no dots connected regarding Jordan or Hellickson or anything else. The frustration of Surviving Ohio State is how fixated it becomes on Hellickson and Jordan and unnamed figures at the university — Hellickson and the board of trustees, like Jordan, declined to provide any response — without that smoking gun or that key piece of dot-connecting. Given how potent the survivor interviews are and how negligible the details are on the systemic failures, Surviving Ohio State would have been better with more focus on the former and less unsubstantiated insinuation — however persuasive — about the latter. The documentary is extremely effective at giving voice to those survivors and providing context and understanding for their silence — and that's extremely important, especially alongside those documentaries about what happened at Penn State and Michigan State. It may not be as sensational and buzzy as bringing down a major university or a sitting congressman, but since Surviving Ohio State won't do either thing, it's worth praising the potency of what it does well. Best of The Hollywood Reporter 13 of Tom Cruise's Most Jaw-Dropping Stunts Hollywood Stars Who Are One Award Away From an EGOT 'The Goonies' Cast, Then and Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store