logo
African man enrages netizens as he eats chicken inside ISKCON's Govinda restaurant in London: ‘Hindus have to act rough'

African man enrages netizens as he eats chicken inside ISKCON's Govinda restaurant in London: ‘Hindus have to act rough'

Mint21-07-2025
An African-British man has stirred a controversy online as he 'shamelessly' ate chicken at London's Govinda restaurant, a well-known pure vegetarian restaurant operated by ISKCON. Enraged by the act, netizens have called for Hindus to unite and start acting rough and tough.
In the viral video being widely criticised, the man can be seen walking into the restaurant and asking the staff if they serve meat at their purely vegetarian outlet.
However, after they informed him that the restaurant only served vegetarian food, the man pulled out a takeaway box of KFC chicken and began eating it at the counter. He is also seen offering the chicken to the staff and customers.
The video has triggered strong reactions from social media users, who have called it a blatant disrespect of the restaurant's spiritual and cultural values. Amid calls for action against the man, several users also questioned why the Hindus did not stand up for themselves.
'Such behaviour is entirely inappropriate and disruptive, showing a complete disregard for the sanctity of the space and the feelings of those present. It highlights a troubling lack of empathy,' said a user.
'Hindus can run away from India but will still get pushed around. We need to have shatrubodh and community unity. Then push back strongly,' a user said, adding, 'Hindus have to act rough and tough.'
'This is the problem with Hinduism. Your benevolence is being taken as weakness,' said another user.
Another added, 'Anyone can come and insult the religion, why can't Hindus stand up for themselves and form a deep state of their own in the US just like the Jews did to influence US policies and decision making?'
'So why did not the COWARDLY HINDUS give him a SOUND THRASHING, eh?' asked an angry netizen.
'Walking into a temple canteen with chicken isn't rebellion — it's cultural illiteracy served with zero self-respect,' another added.
A few users also used Lord Krishna references while calling for an action against the man.
'Devotees should follow Lord Krishna's policy. Namely, being nice to sādhus, and kicking butt of all such dushtas. This blanket unconditional humility and submissiveness didn't work in Dwāpara, and definitely won't work in Kaliyuga. (It didn't work in Tretā either, btw)' a user said.
'Slit his throat right there. Even LORD Shri Krishna said... If they want WAR give them WAR,' added another.
A user also claimed that the act was purely done for a few likes on social media, and said, 'These are insects in the society, doing anything to get engagement on social media and look cool. This is a virus that is going to destroy generations to come.'
'Apart from horrendous, what is he trying to do and why? Is he offended that people can be vegetarians? Or are people waiting to use or misuse someone that doesn't know what they're doing?' asked another user.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minister Mahadevappa sparks row, says Tipu Sultan laid KRS dam foundation
Minister Mahadevappa sparks row, says Tipu Sultan laid KRS dam foundation

New Indian Express

time41 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Minister Mahadevappa sparks row, says Tipu Sultan laid KRS dam foundation

MANDYA; Karnataka Social Welfare and Mysuru district in-charge minister HC Mahadevappa sparked a controversy on Sunday, claiming that Tipu Sultan, not Maharaja Nalwadi Krishnaraja Wadiyar, who first laid the foundation for the Krishna Raja Sagar (KRS) dam. His remarks came on August 3, the death anniversary of Wadiyar — who is widely credited for his visionary contributions to Mysuru's development, including the construction of KRS dam. After laying the foundation stone for the Dr BR Ambedkar Bhavan in Srirangapatna, Mahadevappa said, 'Tipu Sultan laid the foundation stone, but no one dares to acknowledge this. There is clear evidence of this on the main gate of KRS dam.' He said, 'Those who don't understand history cannot create history. Tipu was a secular ruler. There's a mosque and a temple next to each other. Allahu Akbar is heard in the mosque, and temple bells ring at the same time. Tipu listened to both with calmness and acceptance.' Praising contributions of the ruler, Mahadevappa said said he abolished the exploitative Devadasi system, resisted giving land to the rich, made Gubbi and Harihara commercial centres and introduced sericulture to India. 'Tipu was a great freedom fighter who fought the British. The palace of Mysuru kingdom was located in Srirangapatna,' he said.

BJP reaffirms support to de-notified nomadic tribes in Andhra
BJP reaffirms support to de-notified nomadic tribes in Andhra

New Indian Express

time41 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

BJP reaffirms support to de-notified nomadic tribes in Andhra

VIJAYAWADA: BJP AP president PVN Madhav reaffirmed the party's commitment to the welfare of de-notified nomadic tribes during a roundtable conference in Vijayawada, held ahead of the 75th Vimukti Divas (Liberation Day). Addressing tribal leaders, Madhav said only the Narendra Modi-led government has allocated a dedicated budget for these communities, which have been historically marginalised due to colonial-era policies. He recalled that these tribes, despite participating in India's freedom struggle, were branded as criminals by the British in 1871, resulting in decades of persecution. Their liberation began on August 31, 1952, and gained momentum under former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, whose commission highlighted the cultural significance of these communities. 'The commission clearly stated that India's rich cultural heritage owes much to these nomadic tribes,' Madhav said. Since 2014, the Modi government has prioritised their recognition and welfare, he added. Highlighting local challenges, Madhav noted that many de-notified tribes in Andhra Pradesh still lack voting rights, contributing to their continued socio-economic struggles. He said the BJP has conducted studies to address this issue and is formulating plans to protect identity and dignity. As part of the 75th Vimukti Diwas celebrations, Madhav announced a month-long series of 'Spoorthi' programmes across all districts, culminating in a grand event on August 30. BJP MLA Dr Parthasarathi, former IAS officer Dasari Srinivas Rao, State General Secretary Bitra Shivannarayana, and OBC Morcha State President Rongala Gopi Srinivas were also present.

What is the Sykes-Picot Agreement? how 1916 treaty influences modern Palestinian recognition moves
What is the Sykes-Picot Agreement? how 1916 treaty influences modern Palestinian recognition moves

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

What is the Sykes-Picot Agreement? how 1916 treaty influences modern Palestinian recognition moves

Understanding the Sykes-Picot Agreement's historical impact British Foreign Secretary David Lammy recently announced his government would recognize Palestinian statehood if Israel does not agree to a cease-fire with Hamas, stating Britain acted with the "hand of history on our shoulders." French officials similarly invoked historical precedent when France took comparable steps a week earlier, referencing Charles de Gaulle's calls for Israeli-Palestinian conflict resolution based on mutual state recognition. Also read: Canada to join France, Britain in supporting Palestinian statehood by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Specialist Down Jackets for Ultralight Adventures Trek Kit India Learn More Undo Neither official mentioned the Sykes-Picot Agreement, the secret 1916 treaty between Britain and France that carved up Levantine territories from the declining Ottoman Empire into European spheres of control. What was the Sykes-Picot Agreement? The Sykes-Picot Agreement established British and French control zones across territories that encompass modern-day Israel, Lebanon, Syria, and Palestinian territories. Historians cite the agreement as an example of Western imperial overreach that created arbitrary borders cutting across religious, ethnic, and tribal communities. Many Arabs view the Sykes-Picot Agreement as a betrayal that created lasting regional instability and conflict in the Middle East. Historical context behind current recognition moves Eugene L. Rogan, professor of modern Middle Eastern history at Oxford University, emphasized the agreement's continued relevance. Live Events "The history is so relevant," Rogan said. "It shows there's always a chance for historical actors who screwed up in the past to make up for their mistakes." Also read: UK to recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel acts The current Gaza crisis, including humanitarian concerns over aid restrictions and civilian casualties, has influenced recent decisions by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and President Emmanuel Macron more than historical considerations. The Balfour Declaration connection Speaking at the United Nations, Lammy referenced another century-old document: the Balfour Declaration, issued in 1917, one year after the Sykes-Picot Agreement. The declaration endorsed "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people" while including provisions protecting "civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine." After 21 months of Israeli military operations in Gaza, Lammy argued Britain has a responsibility to act on behalf of Palestinians. "His argument is that it's time to make good on the second half of that promise," Rogan said, whose books include "The Arabs: A History." "At the time of the Balfour Declaration, Britain had a worldwide empire, which in 1917, they could not imagine losing. David Lammy is operating in a post-colonial, post-E.U. Britain. But he's using history as a legitimating factor." British strategic motivations beyond the Sykes-Picot framework Britain's support for a Jewish homeland was primarily strategic rather than moral, according to Rogan. London sought a client community in Palestine to prevent enemy control of territory that could threaten the British-controlled Suez Canal. Britain later retreated from its pro-Zionist position due to difficulties reconciling Jewish statehood with Arab world relations. The 1939 White Paper proposed creating a Jewish homeland within a majority-Arab Palestinian state, limiting Jewish immigration to 75,000 over five years. Israeli perspective on recognition timing Michael B. Oren, Israeli-American historian and former Israeli ambassador to Washington, argued that current recognition moves would prolong rather than end the Gaza conflict. Also read: Why is Britain recognising a Palestinian state, and which other countries have done the same? "Israel was not created because of the Balfour Declaration; it was created in spite of the Balfour Declaration," said Oren, author of "Six Days of War: June 1967 and the Making of the Modern Middle East." Oren characterized British and French recognition moves as attempts by post-colonial powers to maintain regional relevance. "These are former Middle Eastern powers that want to feel like Middle Eastern powers," Oren said. "There's a pathetic quality to it." France's complex history beyond Sykes-Picot France ceded Palestinian claims under the Sykes-Picot Agreement but maintained regional influence through other means. From 1945 to 1967, France served as Israel's primary Western supporter, providing Mirage fighter aircraft and nuclear technology that formed the foundation of Israel's undeclared nuclear program. French support stemmed partly from shared decolonization experiences. Facing Algerian nationalist uprising in 1954, backed by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, France viewed Israel as a counterweight to Nasser's influence. President Charles de Gaulle reversed French policy in 1967, imposing arms embargos on Israel after military strikes against Egypt and shifting focus toward Arab states. Gérard Araud, former French ambassador to Israel (2003-2006), recalled lasting diplomatic tensions from this policy shift. "I felt there was always a sense of 'Don't trust the French,'" Araud said. Contemporary international recognition dynamics More than three-quarters of the United Nations' 193 member states will recognize Palestinian statehood following recent commitments from Britain, France, Canada, and Malta to support recognition at September's UN General Assembly. France faces significant domestic political risks in supporting Palestinian recognition, given its large Jewish and Muslim populations and history of Islamist terrorist attacks, according to Araud. Also read: Trump says Canada's Palestine statehood stance may hurt trade deal Colonial legacy and modern limitations Recognition moves highlight Britain and France's diminished influence in regions they once controlled through agreements like Sykes-Picot. "Neither country understood that the age of colonialism was over," Araud said. "They behaved as if they were still all powerful. It's not the most glorious page of history for either country."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store