'Billions of pounds' to be spent on new Manchester to Liverpool railway line
The government has committed to spending 'billions of pounds' on the project, according to reports. It comes after Andy Burnham urged the government to make a commitment towards the new train line when it announces its long-term spending plans next week.
The Manchester Evening News and Liverpool ECHO joined forces to back the project when the mayor pitched the plans last month.
READ MORE: Child arrested as investigation launched after 50 people rescued from major fire
READ MORE: Moment man realised the game was up after being confronted on his doorstep
According to the Financial Times, Rachel Reeves has now signed off plans to spend 'billions of pounds' on the major transport project.
The newspaper reports that the plans will be funded through a £113bn investment in transport projects agreed by the Chancellor.
Under the plans, express train would run every 10 minutes between Manchester Piccadilly and Liverpool Lime Street with services calling at Warrington as well as the airports in each city.
Journey times would also be slashed to just over half an hour each way.
The proposal also include building an underground station at Piccadilly and a new transport interchange at Manchester Airport.
Presenting the plans to cabinet ministers and senior civil servants last month, Mr Burnham said he wants the government commit to the new railway line as part of its 10-year Infrastructure Strategy which the M.E.N. understands is expected to be published next week.
Mr Burnham, and his Liverpool City Region counterpart Steve Rotheram, said the plans could help add £90bn to the economy.
At the time, Mr Burnham said: "What we would ask the government to consider is not to give everything we need right now.
"It's simply to say that in the 2030s - hopefully starting in the early part of the 2030s - they will commit in the infrastructure strategy to a window when this railway will be built."
Ms Reeves will deliver her Spending Review, setting out the government's multi-year budget, in Parliament next Wednesday (June 11).
The M.E.N. understands the 10-year Infrastructure Strategy, which will include transport plans will then be published the following day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Andy Burnham speaks out on taxi driver's £170 Manchester Airport fine
Andy Burnham has branded a taxi driver's £170 Manchester Airport fine 'harsh' and 'a little heavy-handed'. Cameras were installed at the Airport to automatically charge motorists earlier this year, removing the need for payment barriers so traffic can flow more smoothly. Drivers have until midnight the following day to pay the £5 drop-off or £6.40 pick-up fee. When it was rolled out in March, Sue West, Manchester Airport's landside operations director, said: 'We're always looking for ways to make our passengers' lives easier. READ MORE: Manchester mum on Cyprus holiday turns on fellow hotel guests READ MORE: Drug dealers targeting Brits in Tenerife arrested on strip where Jay Slater partied To see planning applications; traffic and road diversions and layout changes; and more, visit the Public Notices Portal HERE 'By removing barriers in our drop-off and pick-up zones it will speed up the process and make it feel seamless – and it will stop people from going into more expensive pay brackets while they wait at the barriers.' But calling into the mayor's regular BBC Radio Manchester Neil, a private hire driver, said he registered his taxi and debit card to Manchester Airport's payment system, so drop-off fees he is charged while working are paid automatically. However, Neil told listeners he upgraded his taxi to a new car and forgot to update the registration plate on Manchester Airport's system. He didn't notice his mistake before the payment cut-off, so was issued a £100 fine. But Neil said the first letter 'went astray' and debt collectors have now contacted him demanding £170. Mayor Andy Burnham said the approach was 'a little heavy-handed' and revealed his office has had complaints about the new system. 'It's a system I do not control,' he said. 'It feels harsh in some ways, given they know you as an operator. 'I know there are other complaints about the system. I feel we need to work with the Airport so everyone understands the system. I think some people have been in a position where the change has come in and they know about it.' Manchester Airport was contacted for comment.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Cabbie's £170 Airport drop-off charge branded ‘harsh' by Mayor of Greater Manchester
Andy Burnham has branded a taxi driver's £170 Manchester Airport fine 'harsh' and 'a little heavy-handed'. Cameras were installed at the Airport to automatically charge motorists earlier this year, removing the need for payment barriers so traffic can flow more smoothly. Drivers have until midnight the following day to pay the £5 drop-off or £6.40 pick-up fee. When it was rolled out in March, Sue West, Manchester Airport's landside operations director, said: 'We're always looking for ways to make our passengers' lives easier. READ MORE: Manchester Airport introduces new drop-off parking process from today Manchester Airport Terminal 2 opens new security hall for travellers Manchester Airport's TimeSlot scheme to avoid queues at security 'By removing barriers in our drop-off and pick-up zones it will speed up the process and make it feel seamless – and it will stop people from going into more expensive pay brackets while they wait at the barriers.' Cabbie Neil called into the mayor's regular BBC Radio Manchester phone-in to ask for his views on the £170 charge, which he said is being pursued by debt collectors. Neil, a private hire driver, said he registered his taxi and debit card to Manchester Airport's payment system, so drop-off fees he is charged while working are paid automatically. However, Neil told listeners he upgraded his taxi to a new car and forgot to update the registration plate on Manchester Airport's system. He didn't notice his mistake before the payment cut-off, so was issued a £100 fine. But Neil told listeners the first letter 'went astray' and debt collectors have now contacted him demanding £170. Mayor Andy Burnham said the approach was 'a little heavy-handed' — and revealed his office has had complaints about the new system. 'It's a system I do not control,' he said. 'It feels harsh in some ways, given they know you as an operator. 'I know there are other complaints about the system. I feel we need to work with the Airport so everyone understands the system. I think some people have been in a position where the change has come in and they know about it.' Manchester Airport was contacted for comment.
CNBC
08-08-2025
- CNBC
The UK government won't admit it, but tax rises are coming — and there are no good options
The U.K. government is loathe to admit it, but economists say it's highly likely that the Treasury will have to hike taxes in the fall if it is to bung a black hole in the public finances that it has effectively created for itself. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) is the latest economic think tank to warn that taxes would have to rise later this year if British Chancellor Rachel Reeves is to meet her self-imposed "fiscal rules." These rules target both a balanced or budget surplus by the end of the decade — with the so-called "stability rule" requiring that day-to-day spending is funded by tax revenues rather than borrowing — and that debt, as a proportion of GDP, should be falling by the end of this parliament (in 2029-30), aka the "investment rule." "The Government is not on track to meet its 'stability rule', with our forecast suggesting a current deficit of £41.2 billion in the fiscal year 2029-30," NIESR said in an economic outlook released Wednesday. "Substantial adjustments in the Autumn Budget will be needed if the Chancellor is to remain compliant with her fiscal rules," it added in the report. With the government having fixed its spending plans for the next couple of years in its recent Spending Review, "the only lever available is to raise taxation in a moderate but sustained way," the think tank said in the report titled "the Chancellor's Trilemma." The 'trilemma' refers to the bind Reeves finds herself in thanks to her own fiscal rules, tax and spending commitments made over the last year and the Labour Party's manifesto promise to not raise taxes on "working people." "Simply put, the Chancellor cannot simultaneously meet her fiscal rules, fulfil spending commitments, and uphold manifesto promises to avoid tax rises for working people. At least one of these will need to be dropped – she faces an impossible trilemma," NIESR said. It's worth noting that NIESR's forecast for the budget deficit could be even higher, at around £51.1 billion, if Reeves wants to keep around £9.9 billion's worth of fiscal "headroom" that the Treasury had planned for, but which has been slowly eroded after U-turns on welfare reforms and winter fuel payment cuts for pensioners. "For the Chancellor to really shift the dial and build a reasonably sized buffer against her fiscal rules, she will have to look at either raising VAT or raising income taxes. VAT is the least distortionary tax but is also the most regressive. So, rises in income tax rates are likely to be the best answer, as we have previously argued," NIESR said, but added that there were few palatable options for the chancellor. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer was asked about the NIESR report on Wednesday, and the suggestion that tax rises would be necessary, but said he did "not recognise" the figures. Nonetheless, he declined to rule out hiking VAT, income tax and corporation tax in the fall, Sky News reported. "Some of the figures that are being put out are not figures that I recognise, but the budget won't be until later in the year, and that's why we'll have the forecast then and we'll set out our plans," he said. NIESR said Chancellor Reeves faces "unenviable decisions" for the Autumn Budget, when she will unveil taxation and spending plans for the year ahead. "Unfortunately, the most politically acceptable choices for tax increases would either raise very little revenue or would have large distortionary effects, or both," the think tank said, suggesting some measures — such as extending income tax thresholds — would "particularly affect poorer households." Other measures, such as cutting the current £20,000 tax-free cash ISA allowance, or increasing the rate of capital gains tax, could disincentivize saving, the think tank warned. The government could also reverse cuts to employees' national insurance contributions (NICs) but "while this would generate significant revenue over the parliamentary term," it would again breach the manifesto pledge not to raise taxes on working people, and could have strong "distortionary effects via discouraging job creation and so would likely increase unemployment." When Reeves announced her government budget last fall, she unveiled a £70 billion boost to public spending to be funded by higher borrowing and £40 billion in tax rises, which mostly hit British businesses. At the time, she insisted it was a one-off move, telling lawmakers that "we're not going to be coming back with more tax increases, or indeed more borrowing." Reeves could potentially adjust corporation tax rates and allowances which could also raise significant tax revenues, but this would run contrary to her previous pledge to cap corporation tax at 25% for the lifetime of the parliament. It would also likely have a negative effect on business confidence, which has already taken a hit after a hike to employer NICs that took effect in April.
