logo
National Technology Day: All you need to know about India's nuclear might for UPSC exam

National Technology Day: All you need to know about India's nuclear might for UPSC exam

Indian Express11-05-2025

Take a look at the essential events, concepts, terms, quotes, or phenomena every day and brush up your knowledge. Here's your knowledge nugget for today on National Technology Day, focused on India's nuclear journey from a broader perspective.
India celebrates National Technology Day annually on May 11 to commemorate the successful nuclear test at Pokhran in 1998, which marked India's significant achievements in science and technology and emphasised its pivotal role in solidifying the nation's position as a global leader in technological innovation. In this context, let's know about the history of India's nuclear tests, associated personalities and India's nuclear doctrine.
1. On May 11, 1998, three very special technological advances were showcased by India's scientists and engineers — Operation Shakti, also known widely as Pokhran-II nuclear tests; the successful test firing of Trishul missile; and the first test flight of the indigenously developed aircraft Hansa.
2. The euphoria of demonstrations of these technologies was such that the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee added 'Jai Vigyan' (Hail Science) to Lal Bahadur Shastri's popular slogan of 'Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan' (Hail the soldier and the farmer).
3. Former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee also designated May 11 as National Technology Day in India to commemorate the historic Pokhran-II nuclear tests. The following year, on May 11, 1999, the Council for Technology organised the inaugural celebration of National Technology Day.
4. India is currently among eight countries in the world that have a publicly known nuclear weapons programme.
At the time of India's independence, the country's leaders were opposed to fully embracing nuclear weapons. Just two years before in 1945, the world had witnessed the horrific nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Mahatma Gandhi called the use of nuclear weapons morally unacceptable. His protege and India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, was also sceptical, but kept the door open for future consideration.
1. This future beckoned early, as India's defeat in the 1962 Sino-Indian War and and China's subsequent nuclear bomb test at Lop Nor in 1964 gave rise to legitimate fears about national security. Things were further accelerated, when in 1965, India went to war with Pakistan once again, with China openly supporting Pakistan this time.
2. Also, post 1974, Pakistan had actively started acquiring nuclear weapons. China was sharing technology and materials with Pakistan, and it was public knowledge. Effectively, India was faced with two nuclear capable adversaries, and needed to take steps towards building self-sufficiency.
1. By the 1970s, India was capable of conducting a nuclear bomb test. Bhaba's successor at the DAE, Vikram Sarabhai, had worked to significantly broaden India's nuclear technology and now the question was more of political will, especially in context of a global order extremely wary of nuclear proliferation.
2. On May 18, 1974, with support from Indira, India carried out its first nuclear test at the Pokhran test site. Pokhran-I, codenamed Operation Smiling Buddha, would be billed as a 'peaceful nuclear explosion', with 'few military implications'.
3. However, the world was not willing to buy India's version of the story. There was near-universal condemnation and countries like the US and Canada imposed significant international sanctions on India. These sanctions would be a major setback for India's nuclear journey, and majorly decelerate its progress.
1. Beyond international sanctions, India's nuclear journey was also hobbled by domestic political instability. The Emergency of 1975 and Prime Minister Morarji Desai's opposition to nuclear weapons brought the programme to a grinding halt.
2. After a few years of domestic turmoil when the political will to conduct nuclear testing was wanting, in 1998, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) led by the BJP came to power under the leadership of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. One of the key promises in its manifesto was to 'induct nuclear weapons' into India's arsenal.
3. In March 1998, Pakistan launched the Ghauri missile – built with assistance from China. Two months later, India responded with Operation Shakti.
4. Notably, while the 1974 tests were ostensibly done for peaceful purposes, the 1998 tests were the culmination of India's nuclear weaponisation process. Consequently, the Indian Government declared itself as a state possessing nuclear weapons following Pokhran-II.
5. While the tests in 1998 also invited sanctions from some countries (like the US), the condemnation was far from universal like in 1974. In context of India's fast-growing economy and market potential, India was able to stand its ground and thus cement its status as a dominant nation state.
Shekhar Mande ( former director general of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) explains–
1. 'Since 1998, the country has continued steadily in its journey of technological developments. Among the visible examples of India's impactful technological progress are the digital payment gateways that have democratised financial transactions like never before, and exemplify India's leadership in the world in this area.
2. Lesser-known milestones that have quietly been achieved are making of indigenous BioJet fuels, mapping of subsurface water channels for sustainable use of water, making of indigenous light combat aircraft, development of variety of crops by traditional methods of breeding, digitisation of many aspects of trade, and moving firmly towards a Hydrogen economy.
3. The recent push for infrastructural development, including promotion of use of domestic and industrial waste in it, and its spectacular results, are already making headlines. By steadily reducing energy dependence on natural resources and by promoting renewable energy, India is already in the league of nations where carbon footprint in the energy sector is likely to reduce dramatically.
4. Challenges, however, remain in many areas, including urban infrastructure and planning, containing air, water and soil pollution, slowing down rural to urban migrations, diversification of agricultural produce, judicious use of water resources, and promotion of AI/ ML technologies in all industrial segments.'
1. On January 4, 2003, when Vajpayee was India's Prime Minister, the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) met to review the progress in operationalizing the country's nuclear doctrine. An official release issued that day summarized the decisions that were being put in the public domain.
2. Among the major points in the doctrine was 'a posture of No First Use', which was described as follows: 'Nuclear weapons will only be used in retaliation against a nuclear attack on Indian territory or on Indian forces anywhere'. However, the doctrine made it clear that India's 'nuclear retaliation to a first strike will be massive and designed to inflict unacceptable damage'. Also, 'in the event of a major attack against India, or Indian forces anywhere, by biological or chemical weapons, India will retain the option of retaliating with nuclear weapons'.
The doctrine also said:
* Nuclear retaliatory attacks can only be authorised by the civilian political leadership through the Nuclear Command Authority. The Nuclear Command Authority comprises a Political Council and an Executive Council. The Political Council is chaired by the Prime Minister.
* India would not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states.
* India would continue to put strict controls on the export of nuclear and missile related materials and technologies, participate in the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty negotiations, and continue to observe the moratorium on nuclear tests.
* India remains committed to the goal of a nuclear weapons free world, through global, verifiable and non-discriminatory nuclear disarmament.
1. The NPT is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to foster the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of disarmament.
2. In 1968, the NPT came into existence. The treaty defines nuclear-weapon states as those that have built and tested a nuclear explosive device before January 1, 1967 – the US, Russia (formerly USSR), the UK, France and China – and effectively disallows any other state from acquiring nuclear weapons.
3. While the treaty has been signed by almost every country in the world, India is one of the few non-signatories.
Consider the following countries: (UPSC CSE 2015)
1. China.
2. France
3. India
4. Israel
5. Pakistan
Which among the above are Nuclear Weapons States as recognized by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1, 3, 4 and 5 only
(c) 2, 4 and 5 only
(d) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
(Sources: Leaps India has taken, and what remains to be done, Nuclear scientist Anil Kakodkar explains: How Pokhran happened, 25th anniversary of Pokhran-II: India's journey to become a nuclear power, India's doctrine of Nuclear No First Use)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for April 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at Manas Srivastava 🚨
Roshni Yadav is a Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express. She is an alumna of the University of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, where she pursued her graduation and post-graduation in Political Science. She has over five years of work experience in ed-tech and media. At The Indian Express, she writes for the UPSC section. Her interests lie in national and international affairs, governance, economy, and social issues. You can contact her via email: roshni.yadav@indianexpress.com ... Read More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

R&D? Rarely
R&D? Rarely

Time of India

time12 hours ago

  • Time of India

R&D? Rarely

Dependence in critical areas makes the nation vulnerable. Strategic interest must prevail over economic sense Germany's crude reserves are so small, they won't last three months in an emergency. So how did Hitler wage war for five years? By turning coal into petrol. Over 92% of the Luftwaffe's aviation fuel was synthetic. As the world grapples with China's rare earth curbs, there's a useful lesson here. While the rare earths crisis that started with China's export curbs on April 4 may be blowing over – Trump announced on Truth Social yesterday, 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China' – it will have a once-bitten-twice-shy effect. Over the past few weeks, Western carmakers have considered producing cars minus some components that use rare earths. At home, Maruti's had to scale back production plans for its first EV due to a global shortage of rare earth magnets. As our second Op-Ed explains, these magnets contain about 25% of a rare earth element called neodymium. It's one of the so-called 'light' rare earths that are available in India, but we don't produce enough of it because cheap Chinese supplies made investment in this area unattractive. While you can make motors without rare earths, other devices like TV screens, computers and MRI machines can't do without them. That's why India needs to build a large rare earths industry. And with the world's fifth largest rare earth reserves, it's well-placed to do so. Likewise, it needs to end its dependence on China for 70% of active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs, because while buying from the cheapest supplier makes economic sense, it's a strategic risk. The aim must be to reduce dependence because dependence, especially in critical products, is vulnerability. About 90% of our crude is imported. An electric future will take care of that, but not if it means 100% dependence on China for lithium batteries. To find alternatives – like Germany's WW-II 'synfuels' – we need big investments in R&D, which is not our strong suit. As a nation, we invest only 0.6% of our $4tn GDP in research. China invests 2.4% of $18tn, US 3.5% of $29tn. And our private sector is even stingier, accounting for only a third of the national R&D spend, as against 70% in US and S Korea. The rare earth crisis is a brief distraction, the real issue is India's rare investment problem, and it needs national attention now. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.

Clearance for Metro Phase-II sought with Parliamentary Standing Committee
Clearance for Metro Phase-II sought with Parliamentary Standing Committee

The Hindu

time19 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Clearance for Metro Phase-II sought with Parliamentary Standing Committee

Hyderabad At the Parliamentary Standing Committee meeting of Housing and Urban Affairs in New Delhi on Wednesday, Bhongir MP Chamala Kiran Kumar Reddy made a strong case for the urgent sanction of Hyderabad Metro Phase-II. The MP highlighted that Hyderabad Metro Phase-I, sanctioned in 2010, is currently the second-largest Metro network in the country, after Delhi, with three corridors spanning 69 km. Despite the demand, the city is still awaiting the green signal for Phase-II, which proposes five corridors covering 76.4 km at an estimated cost of ₹24,269 crore, he said. He said that a formal request was placed before the committee to expedite the sanction detailing the approved funding pattern. He said that the Government of India's share will be ₹4,230 crore while Telangana Government will spend ₹7,313 crore, and the remaining ₹11,693 crore will be raised through debt. Mr. Reddy reminded that the Government of India approved Metro projects in 20 cities between 2012 and 2024, Chennai Metro Phase-II with ₹63,240 crore and Bengaluru Metro Phase-III with ₹15,611 crore. 'Hyderabad deserves a similar level of support,' he said.

Siddaramaiah writes to Maharashtra Chief Minister defending decision to increase Almatti dam height
Siddaramaiah writes to Maharashtra Chief Minister defending decision to increase Almatti dam height

The Hindu

timea day ago

  • The Hindu

Siddaramaiah writes to Maharashtra Chief Minister defending decision to increase Almatti dam height

Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has written to Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis defending Karnataka's decision to increase the height of the Lal Bahadur Shastri reservoir on the Krishna at Almatti. He has argued that Karnataka has the right to increase the dam height even without waiting for the Union government to publish the Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal award. This is in response to Mr. Fadnavis' letter on May 9 that objected to Karnataka planning to increase the dam height. The Maharashtra government had urged Karnataka to 'reconsider the plan to increase the height of Almatti dam from the present level of 519.6 metres to full reservoir level (FRL) of 524.256 metres to protect the safety of people from floods in Kolhapur and Sangli districts in Maharashtra.' Unfounded fears In the letter, Mr. Siddaramaiah said that Maharashtra's fears of flooding owing to the Krishna backwaters are unfounded. KWDT-I headed by Justice R.S. Bachawat, and subsequently the KWDT-II headed by Justice Brijesh Kumar, had looked into the issue and ruled that Karnataka could not be denied the right to increase the dam height, in 2013. 'Karnataka planned the construction of the Almatti dam up to FRL 524.256 m back in 1969. The KWDT-I headed by Justice R.S. Bachawat, and subsequently the KWDT-II headed by Justice Brijesh Kumar have not imposed any restrictions on the height of the Almatti dam,' the letter said, pointing out that objections of both Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra had been overruled after considering the views of experts. While Andhra Pradesh had demanded that the dam height be restricted to 515 m, Maharashtra demanded it be kept at 512 m. The Chief Minister noted in the letter that even though there is no backwater effect, a three-tier Inter-State flood co-ordination committee had been established by both the States to prevent any inadvertent mismanagement in the regulation, the integration, and the coordination of flood monitoring. 'I may also recall that the Vadhere committee of technical experts, appointed by the Maharashtra government, had gone into the alleged flooding in 2019 and blamed it on encroachment, since these encroachments are narrowing the channels in Sangli and Kolhapur districts,'' he said. Money spent Karnataka has spent nearly ₹20,000 crore to create infrastructure for the utilisation of the additional allocation of 173 tmcft of water besides the allocation of 729 tmcft under the KWDT-I decision. Even Maharashtra has reportedly spent on infrastructure to utilise the additional 85 tmcft of surplus water allocated to it, the letter noted. Mohan Kataraki, senior advocate at the Supreme Court who has argued for Karnataka in water disputes, said: 'By this letter, Karnataka has clarified its stand not only on submergence issue but also on its right to raise the Almatti dam height to FRL 524.256 m even without waiting for publication of the award by the Union government under Section 6(1) of the Inter State Water Disputes Act of 1956.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store