
National Technology Day: All you need to know about India's nuclear might for UPSC exam
India celebrates National Technology Day annually on May 11 to commemorate the successful nuclear test at Pokhran in 1998, which marked India's significant achievements in science and technology and emphasised its pivotal role in solidifying the nation's position as a global leader in technological innovation. In this context, let's know about the history of India's nuclear tests, associated personalities and India's nuclear doctrine.
1. On May 11, 1998, three very special technological advances were showcased by India's scientists and engineers — Operation Shakti, also known widely as Pokhran-II nuclear tests; the successful test firing of Trishul missile; and the first test flight of the indigenously developed aircraft Hansa.
2. The euphoria of demonstrations of these technologies was such that the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee added 'Jai Vigyan' (Hail Science) to Lal Bahadur Shastri's popular slogan of 'Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan' (Hail the soldier and the farmer).
3. Former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee also designated May 11 as National Technology Day in India to commemorate the historic Pokhran-II nuclear tests. The following year, on May 11, 1999, the Council for Technology organised the inaugural celebration of National Technology Day.
4. India is currently among eight countries in the world that have a publicly known nuclear weapons programme.
At the time of India's independence, the country's leaders were opposed to fully embracing nuclear weapons. Just two years before in 1945, the world had witnessed the horrific nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Mahatma Gandhi called the use of nuclear weapons morally unacceptable. His protege and India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, was also sceptical, but kept the door open for future consideration.
1. This future beckoned early, as India's defeat in the 1962 Sino-Indian War and and China's subsequent nuclear bomb test at Lop Nor in 1964 gave rise to legitimate fears about national security. Things were further accelerated, when in 1965, India went to war with Pakistan once again, with China openly supporting Pakistan this time.
2. Also, post 1974, Pakistan had actively started acquiring nuclear weapons. China was sharing technology and materials with Pakistan, and it was public knowledge. Effectively, India was faced with two nuclear capable adversaries, and needed to take steps towards building self-sufficiency.
1. By the 1970s, India was capable of conducting a nuclear bomb test. Bhaba's successor at the DAE, Vikram Sarabhai, had worked to significantly broaden India's nuclear technology and now the question was more of political will, especially in context of a global order extremely wary of nuclear proliferation.
2. On May 18, 1974, with support from Indira, India carried out its first nuclear test at the Pokhran test site. Pokhran-I, codenamed Operation Smiling Buddha, would be billed as a 'peaceful nuclear explosion', with 'few military implications'.
3. However, the world was not willing to buy India's version of the story. There was near-universal condemnation and countries like the US and Canada imposed significant international sanctions on India. These sanctions would be a major setback for India's nuclear journey, and majorly decelerate its progress.
1. Beyond international sanctions, India's nuclear journey was also hobbled by domestic political instability. The Emergency of 1975 and Prime Minister Morarji Desai's opposition to nuclear weapons brought the programme to a grinding halt.
2. After a few years of domestic turmoil when the political will to conduct nuclear testing was wanting, in 1998, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) led by the BJP came to power under the leadership of Atal Bihari Vajpayee. One of the key promises in its manifesto was to 'induct nuclear weapons' into India's arsenal.
3. In March 1998, Pakistan launched the Ghauri missile – built with assistance from China. Two months later, India responded with Operation Shakti.
4. Notably, while the 1974 tests were ostensibly done for peaceful purposes, the 1998 tests were the culmination of India's nuclear weaponisation process. Consequently, the Indian Government declared itself as a state possessing nuclear weapons following Pokhran-II.
5. While the tests in 1998 also invited sanctions from some countries (like the US), the condemnation was far from universal like in 1974. In context of India's fast-growing economy and market potential, India was able to stand its ground and thus cement its status as a dominant nation state.
Shekhar Mande ( former director general of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) explains–
1. 'Since 1998, the country has continued steadily in its journey of technological developments. Among the visible examples of India's impactful technological progress are the digital payment gateways that have democratised financial transactions like never before, and exemplify India's leadership in the world in this area.
2. Lesser-known milestones that have quietly been achieved are making of indigenous BioJet fuels, mapping of subsurface water channels for sustainable use of water, making of indigenous light combat aircraft, development of variety of crops by traditional methods of breeding, digitisation of many aspects of trade, and moving firmly towards a Hydrogen economy.
3. The recent push for infrastructural development, including promotion of use of domestic and industrial waste in it, and its spectacular results, are already making headlines. By steadily reducing energy dependence on natural resources and by promoting renewable energy, India is already in the league of nations where carbon footprint in the energy sector is likely to reduce dramatically.
4. Challenges, however, remain in many areas, including urban infrastructure and planning, containing air, water and soil pollution, slowing down rural to urban migrations, diversification of agricultural produce, judicious use of water resources, and promotion of AI/ ML technologies in all industrial segments.'
1. On January 4, 2003, when Vajpayee was India's Prime Minister, the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) met to review the progress in operationalizing the country's nuclear doctrine. An official release issued that day summarized the decisions that were being put in the public domain.
2. Among the major points in the doctrine was 'a posture of No First Use', which was described as follows: 'Nuclear weapons will only be used in retaliation against a nuclear attack on Indian territory or on Indian forces anywhere'. However, the doctrine made it clear that India's 'nuclear retaliation to a first strike will be massive and designed to inflict unacceptable damage'. Also, 'in the event of a major attack against India, or Indian forces anywhere, by biological or chemical weapons, India will retain the option of retaliating with nuclear weapons'.
The doctrine also said:
* Nuclear retaliatory attacks can only be authorised by the civilian political leadership through the Nuclear Command Authority. The Nuclear Command Authority comprises a Political Council and an Executive Council. The Political Council is chaired by the Prime Minister.
* India would not use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapon states.
* India would continue to put strict controls on the export of nuclear and missile related materials and technologies, participate in the Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty negotiations, and continue to observe the moratorium on nuclear tests.
* India remains committed to the goal of a nuclear weapons free world, through global, verifiable and non-discriminatory nuclear disarmament.
1. The NPT is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to foster the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of disarmament.
2. In 1968, the NPT came into existence. The treaty defines nuclear-weapon states as those that have built and tested a nuclear explosive device before January 1, 1967 – the US, Russia (formerly USSR), the UK, France and China – and effectively disallows any other state from acquiring nuclear weapons.
3. While the treaty has been signed by almost every country in the world, India is one of the few non-signatories.
Consider the following countries: (UPSC CSE 2015)
1. China.
2. France
3. India
4. Israel
5. Pakistan
Which among the above are Nuclear Weapons States as recognized by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)?
(a) 1 and 2 only
(b) 1, 3, 4 and 5 only
(c) 2, 4 and 5 only
(d) 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
(Sources: Leaps India has taken, and what remains to be done, Nuclear scientist Anil Kakodkar explains: How Pokhran happened, 25th anniversary of Pokhran-II: India's journey to become a nuclear power, India's doctrine of Nuclear No First Use)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for April 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at Manas Srivastava 🚨
Roshni Yadav is a Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express. She is an alumna of the University of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, where she pursued her graduation and post-graduation in Political Science. She has over five years of work experience in ed-tech and media. At The Indian Express, she writes for the UPSC section. Her interests lie in national and international affairs, governance, economy, and social issues. You can contact her via email: roshni.yadav@indianexpress.com ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
PM inaugurates two highways worth Rs 11,000 cr to decongest Delhi
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday inaugurated the Delhi section of the Dwarka Expressway and Urban Extension Road-II worth nearly Rs 11,000 crore to reduce traffic congestion in the national capital and its surrounding areas. The two projects have been developed under the government's comprehensive plan to decongest the capital, with the objective of improving connectivity, cutting travel time, and reducing traffic in Delhi and its surrounding areas. These new projects are expected to significantly reduce travel time from Sonipat, Rohtak, Bahadurgarh and Gurugram to IGI Airport when completely operational.


New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
BJP plans ‘Spoorthi Mahasabha' in Vijayawada for upliftment of nomadic tribes
GUNTUR: The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) will organise a 'Spoorthi Mahasabha' in Vijayawada on August 30 to highlight the struggles, culture, and aspirations of nomadic, semi-nomadic, and denotified tribes. Announcing this at a press conference here on Sunday, BJP State spokesperson Valluru Jayaprakash Narayana said the programme would reflect the party's commitment to uplift marginalised communities. He noted that during former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's tenure, efforts began to document the population of nomadic groups, while Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government had introduced the SEED scheme, set up the DNT Commission, and honoured achievers from these communities with Padma awards. Such initiatives, he said, instill pride and confidence and aim to provide housing, education, and recognition for their heritage. BJP district president Cherukuri Tirupati Rao said the convention would be held in a celebratory mode like a festival, showcasing the community's history, sacrifices, and demands before society and government. The programme will feature cultural performances, processions, and the felicitation of artists, activists, and award winners, alongside the presentation of a roadmap to address long-pending issues. The Mahasabha will be held with the slogan 'Nomads are the heirs of values and bridges of culture.' Leaders called upon elders, youth, and women across AP's nomadic communities to participate and make the event a success. Several BJP leaders and community representatives were present.

The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
How ‘honour' killings in India are reinforced and legitimised
Caste in India is not an individual problem — it is a deeply rooted social phenomenon. Caste survives and thrives not just because individuals insist on it, but because families, communities, and entire social structures continue to enforce and legitimise it, knowingly or otherwise. At the heart of this caste endurance lie social customs passed down and protected within households. Children grow up internalising boundaries — who to talk to, who to marry, who to avoid — long before they can even articulate why. As a result, the caste system remains one of the most resilient social frameworks in India. 'Honour' killings One of the biggest threats to the rigidity of caste has been social justice interventions. When marginalised communities, particularly Dalits, gain access to quality education and secure meaningful employment, it opens the gates for their integration into mainstream society. With that, a foundational shift begins. No longer confined to the margins, the oppressed now begin to interact with caste-Hindu society on an equal footing — in workplaces, colleges, cities, and most importantly, in relationships. This has created a new frontier of social tension: romantic unions that cross caste lines, especially those involving Dalit men and dominant caste women. These unions represent not just love or rebellion but a direct challenge to centuries-old caste hierarchies. And for many conservative families, that challenge is intolerable. States like Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Maharashtra, and Kerala — where Dalit communities have seen relatively greater empowerment — also record higher rates of inter-caste marriages. According to the India Human Development Survey (IHDS-II), the national rate of inter-caste marriages stands at around 5%, but States with empowered Dalit populations show higher numbers. Ironically, these are also the States with increased incidents of honour killings. This paradox reveals a disturbing truth: honour killings occur not where casteism is strongest, but where it is most threatened. In States where the oppressed still maintain their 'status quo,' violence is less — not because casteism is absent, but because it remains unchallenged. Thus, caste-based violence is not a sign of persistent hierarchy alone, but of hierarchy under siege. Tamil Nadu's caste paradox When caste killings happen, democratic voices among the public are strong in Tamil Nadu as the State boasts a strong and vibrant civil society. At the same time, caste is glorified on social media. Due to the anonymity such platforms offer, some accounts go so far as to defend caste killings. How do we understand this paradox? Perhaps in Tamil Nadu, while people possess a collective consciousness against casteism, shaped by decades of social justice politics, individual attitudes may not always align in the same way. The State's anti-caste culture is collectively progressive but individually conflicted. In public, caste violence is rejected but in private conversations, WhatsApp groups, and through anonymous posts, caste continues to dictate social preferences, marriage alliances, and 'honourable behaviour.' This paradox does not mean that Tamil Nadu's anti-caste movement is a failure. It means that one is living in a liminal space — between tradition and transformation. What we see on social media is not just caste pride, it's also the fear of losing inherited power and the anxiety of cultural change. On family and caste There's a popular belief that the caste system survives mainly because of political parties or caste-based organisations. While these certainly reinforce caste divisions in the public sphere, they are not the roots of the system. Caste survives because it is protected and transmitted within the family. Through everyday customs, rituals, marriage arrangements, social expectations, and inherited prejudices, caste becomes part of a child's consciousness long before they can question it. This is why caste has remained transgenerational, even in the face of rising education, urbanisation and exposure to new ideas. However, the psychological and cultural importance of the 'family' itself is changing, especially among adolescents. Around the world, particularly in countries like South Korea and Japan, we are seeing dramatic shifts: marriage rates are falling, fertility rates are at historic lows, and the traditional family unit is losing its central place in people's lives. Instead, new models of relationship — open partnerships, cohabitation, single living, and self-parenting — are emerging. India's urban youth are slowly reflecting this trend too. Many adolescents today are increasingly prioritising individual growth, emotional well-being, and autonomy over traditional family obligations. As the value of the family unit weakens, so too does the primary mechanism through which caste is enforced and reproduced. In other words, if the family becomes less central in shaping relationships and social norms, caste may lose its strongest and oldest vehicle of survival. This doesn't mean that caste will disappear overnight. But it suggests that the cultural infrastructure that sustains it is slowly being dismantled — not by revolution, but by changing lifestyles, shifting emotional priorities, and evolution of the self. Caste in India is at crossroads. On one hand, we see violent reactions and online glorification. On the other, we witness strong democratic voices against honour killings and a new generation slowly withdrawing from social values. Tamil Nadu symbolises this contradiction in its most vivid form — a State where both the loudest resistance to casteism and the quietest internal caste pride coexist. But it also offers hope: if this contradiction is acknowledged, addressed, and challenged, especially through engagement and digital counter-narratives, we may finally move toward a society where caste loses its grip not only on our systems, but on our hearts and minds. Sivabalan Elangovan is Professor and Head, Dept of Psychiatry, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute.