PREVIEW-Soccer-Colombia eye upset against giants Brazil in Copa America group finale rematch
July 24 (Reuters) - The stage is set for South American fireworks as defending champions Brazil face a determined Colombia side in Friday's Group B finale at the Women's Copa America in Quito — a enthralling rematch of the tournament's previous final.
While Brazil have already secured a semi-final berth with a perfect three wins from three, Colombia sit second with seven points and know that even a draw or a narrow defeat could be enough to join them in the next round.
But 'Las Cafeteras' have even bigger ambitions, as upsetting the reigning champions would propel them past Brazil to the top of the group.
"It will be a very mental, very physical game, but we are motivated, Colombia and Real Madrid forward Linda Caicedo told reporters. "We know who Brazil are, but we're growing and hungry to win."
Colombia arrive in confident mood after thrashing Bolivia 8-0 in their last outing, building momentum following a goalless draw with Venezuela and a 4-1 win over Paraguay.
Coach Angelo Marsiglia's side will lean heavily on the attacking threat of Caicedo and Chelsea striker Mayra Ramirez, who labelled the encounter "a final."
"Against Brazil it's always a 'Clasico' or another final," Ramirez said. "We have to treat it like a final and hope it goes our way.
"We are psychologically prepared to face Brazil. We came here to compete in all six games and we have to get the three points tomorrow for our team."
Meanwhile, Brazil's Duda Sampaio insisted their approach remains unchanged despite having already secured qualification.
"That's our identity. We press until the last minute no matter the score or the opponent," she said after Tuesday's 4-1 win over Paraguay. "Colombia are a great team and will really test us."
The eight-time winners have been inspired by captain Marta, who came out of international retirement to support a younger generation. Like Colombia, they have conceded just one goal so far while rotating their squad through dominant performances.
"Colombia are always a tough opponent. This is a 'Clasico'," said Yasmim, who scored two free-kick goals against Paraguay, echoing the sense of rivalry that promises to make Friday's showdown unmissable. (Reporting by Janina Nuno Rios in Mexico City, ediitng by Pritha Sarkar)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ben Stokes ridicules ‘injury replacement' debate, Gautam Gambhir hits back: 'Imagine if we had to play with 10 people'
Team India head coach Gautam Gambhir and England captain Ben Stokes appear to be at opposite ends of the spectrum regarding the idea of allowing injury replacements in Test cricket. The topic became a hot topic after Rishabh Pant fractured his foot while batting on Day 1 of the Manchester Test and was in no position to keep the wickets. Dhruv Jurel was allowed to keep the wickets as cover for Pant, but the injured star had to come out to bat in pain as no substitution was allowed for injured players. Ben Stokes, Gautam Gambhir differ on injury replacement player debate.(Reuters and PRI Image) Stokes bluntly ridiculed the idea of injury replacement and suggested that if it came into effect, then the team would start exploring loopholes in it for their benefit. 'I think it is absolutely ridiculous there is a conversation around an injury replacement. There would be too many loopholes for a team to go through. You pick an 11 for the game, injuries are part of it. I think that conversation should be shut down,' said Stokes in the post-match press conference. 'I'm all for injury replacement': Gambhir On the other hand, Gambhir had a completely different take on this, suggesting there's no harm in permitting injury replacements—as long as the decision is made after a thorough evaluation by the umpires and match referee. 'Absolutely, I'm all for it, if the umpires and the match referee sees and feels that there's a major injury. It's very important to have this rule, where you can get a substitute. That is, if it's very visible, there's nothing wrong in doing that. Especially in a series like this, where it's been such a closely fought series, in the previous 3 Test matches," Gambhir said. 'Imagine if we would have had to play with 10 people, 10 men against 11. How unfortunate would this be for us," he added. A concussion substitute was introduced in the wake of Australian opener Phil Hughes' untimely death in 2014 after being hit on the head but there is no such provision in case of any other serious injury. Meanwhile, the differing perspectives of two prominent cricket personalities have sparked a renewed debate over the direction Test cricket should take—whether it must adapt to prioritise player safety or risk diluting the essence of the game's traditional format.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 hours ago
- First Post
Hussain, Atherton and Manjrekar tear into Stokes for farcical antics at end of Manchester Test: 'He behaved like a spoiled kid'
Ben Stokes' farcical antics at end of Manchester Test against India on Sunday was called out by Nasser Hussain, Mike Atherton and Sanjay Manjrekar as the England captain was accused of behaving like a 'spoiled kid'. read more Ben Stokes is facing criticism from all corners for his antics towards the end of fourth Test between India and England at Manchester. Images: Reuters/Sanjay Manjrekar on X England captain Ben Stokes is facing criticism from former cricketers, including Nasser Hussain, Mike Atherton and former India batter Sanjay Manjrekar, for his antics towards the end of the fourth India-England Test at Manchester on Sunday. England would have hoped to steamroll India and canter to a series win on Day 5, but a dogged Shubman Gill, who scored 103, and a gritty partnership between Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar, who both scored hundreds and put up an unbeaten 203 runs for the fifth wicket stand, crushed England's dreams. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With India on 386/4 and a draw looking imminent, Stokes offered handshakes to Jadeja and Washington as he wanted an early end to Day 5, but the Indian batters, who were very close to their respective centuries, including a first one for Sundar, refused to take the offer. This enraged Stokes, who even questioned Jadeja if he wanted to get to his hundred against a part-time bowler like Harry Brook. Also Read | Ben Stokes reveals reasoning behind early handshake offer to Jadeja and Sundar Jadeja was on 89 not out when the incident happened, while Sundar was on an unbeaten 80. Nonetheless, the match continued after Indian batters refused to settle for a draw and quickly went on to complete their centuries before finally shaking hands with the England players. Hussain, Atherton slam Stokes' antics on Day 5 of Manchester Test Former captain Hussain was one of the prominent names from the England cricket fraternity who criticised Stokes for his antics towards the end of Day 5 after India initially refused to take a draw. He disapproved of bringing in Brook to bowl and defended the Indian batters' desire to reach their hundreds. 'I didn't have a problem with it. I mean, I know England seemed to have a problem with it,' Nasser Hussain said on Sky Sports. 'They're a little bit tired — tired bowlers, tired legs — they wanted to get off. The two lads had worked hard to get into the 80s and 90s; they wanted Test match hundreds. 'Stokes didn't have to bowl Brook, and it looked a bit silly at the end there, but we make far too much of these things. They played well, they deserved a draw, they deserved to be there at the end. Watch the incident here: STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'All credit to India. It's only England's second-ever draw under this Bazball regime — the other one on this ground as well, because of rain. This one was a draw simply because England couldn't roll over the two left-handers, who were brilliant.' Also Read | From Eden Gardens 2001 to Old Trafford 1990, revisiting India's greatest rescue acts in Test cricket Former England captain Atherton, in his column in The Times, called the finish a 'farce' while labelling the draw result as a victory for India. The headline of his column read: 'India escape with draw that will feel like a victory as Test ends in farce.' 'With the final match beginning on Thursday, this result will feel more like a victory for India, because not only did they escape with a draw entirely through their own merits, they forced England's bowlers to endure two hard days in the field,' Atherton wrote. Manjrekar accuses Stokes of behaving like a 'spoiled kid' Former Indian cricketer Manjrekar accused Stokes of behaving like a spoiled kid for showing frustration over the game not being closed at his will. 'In the end, what we saw was actually the frustration of a team that is used to dominating at home. Very rarely has there been a draw – it has happened twice in the Bazball era. And you've got to say that it was the first time that Ben Stokes had to change his principle of winning the toss and batting first was against India, and this draw without a weather intervention has come against India. India have done a lot of things that have put Ben Stokes off, and the kind of style and leadership that he has,' Manjrekar said on JioStar after the match. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Also Read | Steely determination of Indian batting lineup runs England ragged at Old Trafford, keeps Test series alive 'In the end, what you saw was Ben Stokes frustrated, not used to the kind of result. And finally, I will say this. He was a bit of a spoiled sport and behaved like a spoiled kid. Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar had batted for hours, and getting this close to a hundred, there was no way they were going to accept. Ben Stokes will rue what he has done. But it tells you exactly how frustrated England are, and all this is only because of the kind of fight this new-age Indian batting has put up.'
Hindustan Times
8 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
'Ben Stokes behaved like a spoiled kid... a spoilsport': England captain taught a lesson after India turn down his offer
A match that should have been celebrated for the brilliance of two of India's finest all-rounders guiding their team to a remarkable escape will, unfortunately, be overshadowed by controversy, marred by England's questionable tactics and the actions of their captain, Ben Stokes. When India lost two wickets with no runs on the board on Saturday, Day 4 of the 4th Test against England at Manchester, Shubman Gill was probably starting at the bottom of the barrel, with India thinking of ways to end the series with a morale-boosting win at The Oval. After all, with five sessions to go, England smelled blood and were favourites to secure the first-ever Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy. Ben Stokes' act has ticked off many(Reuters) That is, until four individual men decided to thwart England's dreams of taking an unassailable lead. KL Rahul and Gill started India's show of grit before Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar piled on the misery for England, crushing their Bazball mentality on the ground with an epic draw. In India, draws are not celebrated much, especially in the last 10 years, but this one, like Sydney 2021, is nothing short of a win. Also Read: India refuse to 'shake hands' with England after Ben Stokes offers to call off Manchester Test; Jadeja, Crawley argue But the win was adulterated with a huge tablespoon of sourness, led by Stokes. With 90 minutes left for the official end to the day's play, Stokes apparently had enough and walked up to India to shake hands, hoping Jadeja and Sundar would agree. However, he didn't realise that although a draw was the only result possible from that point onward, both batters were close to completing their centuries. India's refusal ticked Stokes off, throwing open, once again, the spirit of the game debate. Sanjay Manjrekar, like many, was not impressed with Stokes' conduct, giving the England captain a brutal reality check. Also Read: 'If you really wanted to score a century…'; What Ben Stokes told Ravindra Jadeja as England 'make a mockery of the game' "In the end, what we saw was actually the frustration of a team that is used to dominating at home. Very rarely has there been a draw – it has happened twice in the Bazball era. And you've got to say that it was the first time that Ben Stokes had to change his principle of winning the toss and batting first was against India, and this draw without a weather intervention has come against India. India have done a lot of things that have put Ben Stokes off, and the kind of style and leadership that he has," Manjrekar said on JioStar after the match. Also Read: Ben Stokes reveals why he wanted India to stop batting and accept draw with Jadeja, Sundar nearing 100s "In the end, what you saw was Ben Stokes frustrated, not used to the kind of result. And finally, I will say this. He was a bit of a spoiled sport and behaved like a spoiled kid. Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar had batted for hours, and getting this close to a hundred, there was no way they were going to accept. Ben Stokes will rue what he has done. But it tells you exactly how frustrated England are, and all this is only because of the kind of fight this new-age Indian batting has put up." Also Read: Shubman Gill stands by Jadeja, Sundar with unapologetic post-match reaction after duo refuses Ben Stokes' handshake The stump mic picked up the entire conversation between Stokes, Jadeja and a couple more members of the Indian team. It's common practice for teams to mutually shake hands when the only possible outcome is a draw. India's lead had already crossed 100, and with six wickets remaining, neither batter looked like getting out. It was evident that India wanted to bat till at least Jadeja and Sundar's milestones. Would you have done the same thing? Manjrekar questions Stokes Besides, England had been on the field since yesterday morning, with their bowlers having very little to show for their effort; the team was tired and worn out, mentally and physically. However, what happened after the incident was a low blow. Harry Brook sent down lollipop deliveries, almost gifting free runs to Jadeja and Sundar to complete their centuries. It was this more than anything else, that would not impress Stokes when he looks back at it years from now. "The only argument Stokes could have had was that if India had promised him 15 or 30 minutes earlier that if and when the time comes, we would be happy to shake hands. That didn't happen. If that is the case and he found India not agreeing because two of their batters were nearing 100s, I can understand the frustration. There was no way India was going to take up that offer. Ben Stokes should have known that. Would he have done the same thing with two of his batters approaching 100s, putting up such a fight. I doubt whether he would have said let's shake hands," pointed out Manjrekar.
