Renukaswamy murder case: SC hearing on bail plea of Darshan adjourned to tomorrow
Darshan, who was arrested in connection with the brutal murder of Renukaswamy, is currently out on bail granted by the Karnataka High Court. The state government moved the Supreme Court questioning the High Court's decision to grant bail to the popular actor. The petition was scheduled to be heard today but was deferred after Darshan's senior counsel Siddharth Dave requested more time.
Speaking to the media, Dave explained, 'Senior advocate Kapil Sibal was to appear for Darshan, but he had to attend to another matter today. I received this case only last night, so it was not possible to prepare arguments overnight. Therefore, I requested an adjournment of one or two days, which the Supreme Court accepted. The matter will now be heard on Thursday, July 24.'
Dave added that he would not be arguing about the grounds for Darshan's arrest but would focus on the merits of the bail itself. Legal experts believe the Supreme Court's observations could have a crucial impact on the actor's fate.
Earlier, the Supreme Court had questioned why Darshan's bail should not be cancelled and observed that the High Court had not exercised sufficient caution while granting it. If the apex court cancels the bail, Darshan could face re-arrest, which would severely disrupt the production of his upcoming film Devil.
In total, 17 people have been granted bail in the Renukaswamy murder case, including prime accused Pavithra Gowda (A1) and Darshan (A2). The Karnataka government has specifically sought the cancellation of bail for seven of the accused, including Darshan and Pavithra.
As the high-profile case continues to grab headlines, all eyes are now on the Supreme Court's next move. A final decision on the bail plea is expected when the matter comes up again this Thursday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Supreme Court cancels DHFL's Dheeraj Wadhawan's bail, orders surrender in 2 weeks
The Supreme Court on Tuesday cancelled the bail granted to former Dewan Housing Finance Limited (DHFL) promoter Dheeraj Wadhawan in a multi-crore loan scam case. The bail, initially granted by the Delhi High Court on medical grounds, was revoked after the Supreme Court reviewed a report from the medical September 9, 2024, Wadhawan was granted bail by the Delhi High Court, which ruled that he qualified as a 'sick person,' warranting his release on medical grounds. However, a recent assessment by the Supreme Court led to a reversal of this decision. Wadhawan has been directed to surrender within two weeks, with assurances that jail authorities will provide the necessary medical Wadhawan, alongside his brother Kapil, was arrested in connection with a significant financial fraud case. The two were accused of defrauding a consortium of 17 banks, amounting to Rs 34,000 crore, marking it as one of the largest bank loan scams in India. The Wadhawan brothers were charged with engaging in a criminal conspiracy, misappropriation of public funds, and breach of trust. Allegations include manipulating records and diverting funds through circular transactions to generate personal media reports about fund diversion in January 2019, DHFL came under scrutiny. A consortium of banks appointed KPMG to conduct an audit, revealing fund diversions disguised as loans to DHFL-linked entities. The audit unveiled that Rs 29,100 crore was disbursed to 66 entities associated with DHFL promoters, with a significant portion of these funds invested in land and being arrested in 2022, Dheeraj Wadhawan was presented before a special court in Mumbai, leading to his judicial custody. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had filed charges citing financial irregularities and fund diversions within DHFL, leading to the eventual judicial proceedings against the Wadhawan brothers.- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
SC rejects plea challenging declaration of ISIS as terrorist organisation
The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a petition challenging two government notifications declaring the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and associated ideological expressions as terrorist organisations under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967. A Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi was hearing the petition filed by Saquib Abdul Hamid Nachan. Petitioner alleged wrongful arrest The petitioner claimed that he and his son were wrongfully arrested for alleged links to ISIS. The bench, however, noted that these grievances could only be addressed through appropriate proceedings before the competent criminal court. The court also clarified that it was not inclined to entertain a blanket challenge to the government notifications dated February 2015 and June 2018, issued under Section 35 of the UAPA. Amicus curiae, senior advocate Mukta Gupta, submitted that the two notifications violated the petitioner's fundamental right under Article 25 of the Constitution by misinterpreting religious terms such as 'caliphate' and 'jihad', equating them with terrorism. She argued that the declarations lacked supporting material or adherence to any procedure akin to that prescribed for declaring 'unlawful associations' under Section 3 of the UAPA. 'He says the word 'caliphate' is wrongly interpreted. That violates his fundamental right of religion. He has given substantial portions indicating what, according to the Quran, is the meaning of caliphate and jihad,' Gupta submitted. However, the bench rejected this argument, stating that such terms must be interpreted in the context of the alleged terrorist activity and not purely from a religious or scriptural standpoint. 'When the notification used the word 'caliphate', it is in relation to terrorist activity. So it has to be read in that context,' Justice Bagchi observed. No mechanism to review terrorist declarations under Section 35 Gupta further highlighted that while the UAPA provides for a tribunal to review the banning of unlawful associations, there is no equivalent review mechanism under Section 35, which governs the designation of terrorist organisations. She also informed the court that the petitioner had been arrested after filing the writ petition, and that his son had previously been detained by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on similar allegations. In response, Justice Surya Kant noted that the petitioner could pursue bail or other legal remedies through the appropriate criminal forum. 'He can always avail his remedy before the appropriate forum,' he said. Plea not a constitutional challenge The bench concluded that the petition appeared to be an attempt to secure relief in ongoing individual criminal proceedings, rather than a genuine constitutional challenge to the notifications. 'It seems to us that instead of a challenge to the impugned notifications, the remedy for the petitioner and his son lies in approaching the appropriate forum,' the court said in its order, while disposing of the petition.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Kannada Actor Santhosh Balaraj Passes Away At 34 After Bout Of Jaundice
Following his father's footsteps, Santhosh Balaraj took forward the family's cinematic legacy, carving a space for himself in Kannada cinema with a series of impactful performances The Kannada film industry is in mourning following the death of actor Santhosh Balaraj, who passed away on Tuesday morning at the age of 34. Known for his roles in action thrillers like Kariya 2 and Gunpa, Santhosh had reportedly been battling jaundice for several weeks. Despite ongoing medical treatment, his condition worsened and he died at around 9:45 am in a private hospital in Bengaluru. He was admitted to the ICU in his final days. Santhosh Balaraj was widely regarded as one of the rising stars. His sudden death has triggered an outpouring of grief across the industry and among fans, many of whom followed his work closely and believed he was on the cusp of a major breakthrough. He was the son of well-known Kannada filmmaker Anekal Balaraj, who produced the 2003 cult film Kariya, which starred Darshan in the lead role. Anekal Balraj himself had died in a tragic road accident in 2022. Following his father's footsteps, Santhosh took forward the family's cinematic legacy, carving a space for himself in Kannada cinema with a series of impactful performances. Santhosh lived with his mother and was unmarried. Known for his humility and dedication to his craft, his death has come as a shock to friends, colleagues, and fans alike. His breakout role came in 2015 with the film Gunpa, directed by Prabhu Srinivas. The action thriller was a box office success and cemented his image as a dependable lead actor in the genre. Gunpa drew parallels to Kariya, the very film that brought his father fame, both in tone and treatment, and was seen as a symbolic continuation of the cinematic tradition he inherited. Earlier, in 2012, Santhosh starred in the romantic drama Olvin Ole, alongside Neha Patil. Directed by Teshi Venkatesh, the film showcased a different side of his acting range. In 2013, he appeared in Janam, playing the lead role of Kanteerava, a man in love with Kaveri amid fierce family opposition. The film, directed by Chakravarthy, was praised for its storyline and emotional depth. His final appearance was in Kariya 2, a 2017 action gangster film that carried the weight of his father's legacy and his own stardom. Though he had fewer releases in the years that followed, he remained an admired figure in the younger generation of actors. First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
