1 in 3 men admit to committing intimate partner violence, new national study finds
The Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) has found that building strong, affectionate bonds between fathers or father figures and their sons could cut the risk of IPV by nearly half (48 per cent).
The findings come from the Ten To Men Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health, the largest research project of its kind.
Since 2013-14, the study tracked around 16,000 boys and men, with another 10,000 added in 2023-24.
Factors that contribute to IPV
According to the report, men who had solid social support networks at all times in 2013-14 were 26 per cent less likely to report committing IPV by 2022.
The data also shows a strong link between mental health and domestic violence.
Men who experienced moderate or severe depressive symptoms in 2013-14 were 62 per cent more likely to report violent behaviour by 2022.
Even those with mild symptoms were 32 per cent more likely, and men who had suicidal thoughts or attempts were 47 per cent more likely.
However, the report stresses that most men dealing with depressive symptoms do not go on to commit domestic violence.
What the men said
The researchers defined intimate partner violence as including both emotional and physical abuse.
Participants in the study were asked whether they had ever made a partner feel frightened or anxious (emotional abuse), or if they had ever hit, slapped, kicked, or physically hurt a partner when angry (physical abuse).
By 2022, 35 per cent of men said 'yes' to one or both of those questions.
About nine per cent admitted to physically abusing their partner.
Father-son relationships impact violence
Perhaps one of the most important findings from the study is the influence that positive relationships with fathers and father figures have on boys' use of partner violence when they grow up.
Men who strongly agreed that they received affection from a father or father figure during childhood were 48 per cent less likely to ever use intimate partner violence compared to men who strongly disagreed.
This finding is especially relevant to Australia's national policies and programs focused on breaking the generational cycle of partner violence.
The research strongly suggests a need for violence prevention and early intervention with men at various stages of their lives.
Organisations such as The Fathering Project aim to help – empowering fathers and father figures to build stronger relationships with their children through evidence-based programs, groups and events.
Kati Gapaillard, CEO of The Fathering Project, told news.com.au, 'Father-son relationship plays a critical role in shaping how boys understand love, respect, and how to navigate conflict.
'When boys are raised by a father who is present, engaged, and treats those around them with respect, it influences children.'
'How a father manages conflict resolution sends a message to boys on how to respond in similar situations,' Ms Gapaillard continued.
'When boys grow up witnessing violence or control-based relationships – those patterns can become internalised as 'normal'.'
She said that the absence of a caring, present father can also leave a void where boys turn to harmful stereotypes of masculinity — ones that 'connect strength with control'.
The importance of emotional availability
Daniela McCann, Director of the Australian Association of Psychologists, agrees that these early family dynamics are crucial – and believes fathers can help break the cycle by being more emotionally available.
'When fathers are emotionally available, sons are more likely to develop a range of emotional self-regulation skills, empathy and coping skills because they have the language and tools modelled to them from a young age,' Ms McCann said.
'These are core skills for healthy relationships. In contrast, emotionally distant fathers may teach their sons to avoid vulnerability, which can undermine emotional connection and lead to reactive behaviours.'
Where to now?
Ms McCann believes in the value of practical interventions that can support fathers in building stronger bonds with their sons.
'There are some wonderful (culturally safe) mentoring programs which encourage positive father-son relationships,' she said, 'including the Pathways Foundation Pathways to Manhood program, Fathering Adventures, The Fathering Project, Caring Dads Program, Stronger Families and Dads Tuning in to Kids.
'These programs provide guidance for dads to break the cycle of authoritarian, emotionally distant parenting and help them build strong relationships with their children and partners,' she said.
Supporting men's mental health is also vital. Research has shown that men often struggle to seek help and support for their mental health, in part because of the stigma around needing to be 'resilient' and 'tough'.
Organisations like The Men's Table and The Man Box aim to help break down these rigid gender expectations and help men get the support they need.
The Ten to Men findings also highlight the importance of health and mental health practitioners being able to identify and work with people using violence, or at risk of using violence.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Ute driver charged with manslaughter over pedestrian deaths in Logan, south of Brisbane
A 41-year-old man from Regents Park has been charged with two counts of manslaughter, following a double fatal traffic crash on Sunday. Emergency services were call to Green Road at Regents Park south of Brisbane at about 11:15am after a crash involving a white ute and two pedestrians. A 33-year-old man and his four-year-old son died at the scene, after being struck by the ute. The driver of the ute was taken into custody and has since been charged. He is due to appear in Beenleigh Magistrates Court today. Police are calling for anyone with relevant information or vision of the ute prior to the incident, to come forward.

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Grow Early Education in Townsville rebrands while under investigation
A north Queensland childcare centre has rebranded amid investigations into complaints about supervision and alleged injuries to children. The ABC revealed earlier this month that Grow Early Education, operating in Townsville's Bushland Beach, had breached multiple regulations since opening in late 2023. Freedom of Information (FOI) documents revealed 19 breaches were substantiated by the Early Childhood Regulation Authority against the centre. Seven new complaints, as recent as March 2025, are still being investigated. This month, Grow announced that a "new chapter" was beginning and the centre would be called Imagine Childcare and Kindergarten, Bushland Beach. The childcare is run by the for-profit parent body, Imagine Education Australia. A Department of Education spokesperson confirmed the provider lodged an application with the regulatory authority requesting the name change. That application was approved on July 23. On social media this month, the centre wrote that every child deserved a safe, nurturing place where they were loved, supported and inspired to flourish. "Every family deserves to feel confident that their little one is in caring hands," the centre said. Investigations are ongoing into complaints about the centre. Seven complaints, as recent as March this year, alleged injuries to children and inadequate supervision. The Department of Education said it was concluding its investigations into a number of complaints about the service. One complaint had been finalised and a second complaint was set to be finalised last week, while it said other ongoing investigations were expected to conclude shortly. Imagine Education did not respond to the ABC's requests for comment on the rebranding. When previously asked about the breach history at the Bushland Beach centre, Imagine Education chief executive Bill Adler said parents could have full confidence the centre was operating in accordance with all regulations following significant changes.

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Qantas to be given penalty for unlawfully sacking hundreds during Covid-19 pandemic
Qantas is braced to find out how much it is expected to pay in penalties after it unlawfully sacked more than 1800 ground staff. The airline was found to have acted unlawfully three times when it fired 1820 staff in favour of outsourced contractors during the height of the Covid pandemic. While an earlier compensation hearing before Justice Michael Lee found Qantas should pay $120m to impacted workers, a further three-day hearing May sought to decide the additional penalty Qantas must pay for the 2020 decision. The maximum penalty Qantas can be ordered to pay is $121m, on top of the compensation fund that is now in the process of being administered to workers. Since Justice Lee reserved his decision in May, many sacked Qantas workers have anxiously awaited the final figure. On Monday, he is expected to reveal the full amount, which should be well into the millions. The Federal Court earlier found that Qantas had acted against protections in the Fair Work Act in its outsourcing and was partly motivated by a desire to prevent industrial action. The airline appealed the decision to the full bench of the Federal Court and later the High Court, both of which were unsuccessful. After losing the appeal, the union and Qantas went to mediation to determine how much Qantas would have to pay the outsourced workers for economic losses linked to lost wages. TWU secretary Michael Kaine told media ahead of the hearing the airline's decision to get rid of a 'loyal workforce' was 'appalling' and the 'biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian corporate history'. 'The penalty to Qantas must reflect this and send a message to every other company in Australia that you cannot sack your workers to prevent them from using their industrial rights,' he said. Meanwhile, Noel Hutley SC told the court in May that Qantas should pay the maximum penalty given its decision was the 'largest ever instance of the contravention of the Fair Work Act'. He said Qantas was faced with an 'once-in-a-lifetime opportunity' during the pandemic to save more than $100m per year by outsourcing workers and were driven by the 'temptation of the potential to produce a massive profit'. However, Qantas barrister Justin Gleeson SC said any penalty close to the maximum would be 'manifestly unfair'. 'Qantas has accepted the seriousness of its conduct,' he said. 'The court can and should impose a significant deterrent penalty. However, it is in effect a first contravention (of the Fair Work Act).' On the first day of the hearing, Qantas people manager Catherine Walsh took the stand and issued an apology on the airline's behalf. 'I want to reinforce that we are deeply sorry, and we apologise for the impact on the workers, the TWU (Transport Workers Union), to the court for their time and to the family and friends that felt the impacts, we are deeply sorry,' she said. However, the airline was later criticised for failing to call Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson during the hearing, and instead calling Ms Walsh, who was not employed by Qantas at the time of the sackings. 'One would have thought if you were truly contrite, you would put someone in the witness box who was there at the relevant time,' Justice Lee said. The TWU is seeking a large majority of the penalty and also argued affected workers should receive further compensation. The funds may otherwise will go directly to the Commonwealth.