
Russia's summer offensive in Ukraine underwhelms – but Kyiv won't be celebrating
CNN —
For months the talk in Kyiv was of a much-anticipated Russian offensive that would aim to gobble up more of the Ukraine's eastern regions. So far, it's been underwhelming – but the Russians have made some gains and vastly reinforced their troop numbers in some areas.
Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to pursue territorial gains as ceasefire talks take a back seat. Last week he restated what has long been one of his key ways of justifying his unprovoked invasion.
'I consider the Russian and Ukrainian peoples to be one people,' he said. 'In this sense, all of Ukraine is ours.'
Even so, the Ukrainians have launched counterattacks in some areas and are rapidly developing a domestic weapons industry. And Russia's wartime economy is facing stronger headwinds.
Russian troops are trying to advance in multiple areas of the 1,200-kilometer (746-mile) frontline. Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Oleksandr Syrskyi said this week there are now 111,000 Russian troops in one part of the frontline alone – near the flashpoint city of Pokrovsk in Donetsk, where there are at least 50 clashes every day. That compares to about 70,000 Russian troops in the area last December, according to the Ukrainian General Staff.
Syrskyi also claimed that the Russian infiltration of the northern region of Sumy had been halted. The Institute for the Study of War – a Washington-based think-tank, says Ukrainian forces have regained some territory in Sumy and the pace of Russian advances there has slowed.
'We can say that the wave of attempts at a 'summer offensive' launched by the enemy from Russian territory is fizzling out,' Syrskyi claimed.
Residents walk at a street near a building damaged by Russian missile strikes, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Sumy, Ukraine June 13, 2025.
Sofiia Gatilova/Reuters
But it's a mixed picture. In recent days Russian infantry assaults have gained ground on the border of Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk regions. The Russian defense ministry claimed on Saturday that another village, Zirka, had been taken.
DeepState, a Ukrainian open-source analyst, asserted that Ukrainian 'defenses continue to collapse rapidly, and the enemy is making significant advances … with constant assaults' in that area.
The Kremlin has long insisted its campaign will continue until it holds all of the eastern Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. (It already occupies all but a sliver of Luhansk).
At the current rate of progress that would take many years. But with the Trump administration apparently less committed to driving ceasefire negotiations, the conflict seems likely to drag on through the end of the year and into 2026.
The three-dimensional battlefield is now an unlikely combination of ingenious drone-led special operations and very basic infantry assaults.
At one end of the spectrum, Ukraine's audacious attacks at the beginning of June on Russian strategic bombers used drones operated from trucks deep inside Russian territory – a mission that took out about a dozen aircraft used to launch missiles against Ukraine.
Ukraine's Security Service reported another drone attack Saturday that it clamed had caused extensive damage to a Russian airbase in Crimea.
By contrast, Russian soldiers on foot and motorbikes – sometimes in groups of a dozen or less – push into abandoned villages in eastern Ukraine, with drones for cover but no armor in site. It's an approach that is forcing a change in Ukrainian tactics: to smaller fortified positions. Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov said last week that defenses were being camouflaged to match the terrain and made smaller to avoid detection.
The Drone War
While infantry defend or take territory, drones continue to play a greater role in shaping the conflict. The Russians are churning out cheap, mass-produced drones designed to overwhelm air defenses and allow some of their missiles to get through. The Russians have increasingly used this tactic to hit Ukrainian cities, especially Kyiv, which has sustained considerable damage and higher civilian casualties in recent weeks.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Sunday that overnight '477 drones were in our skies, most of them Russian-Iranian Shaheds, along with 60 missiles of various types. The Russians were targeting everything that sustains life.'
The Russians use 'up to 500 (Iranian designed) Shaheds per night, combining them with ballistic and cruise missiles — aiming to exhaust our air defenses,' says Umerov.
A woman reacts at the site of an apartment building hit during Russian drone and missile strikes, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine June 23, 2025.
Thomas Peter/Reuters
Zelensky has reiterated pleas for more Patriot missile batteries and other western systems, which Trump said last week that the US 'should consider' because of large-scale attacks on Ukrainian cities.
Zelensky has said Ukraine is prepared to buy Patriots directly or through the fund established by the US-Ukrainian minerals deal.
Both sides are producing drones of all types at an astonishing rate. Ukraine's Security Service reckons Russia is producing nearly 200 Iranian-designed Shahed drones every day, and has an inventory of some 6,000, in addition to about 6,000 decoy drones. Over the last week, the Russians have used more than 23,000 small 'kamikaze' drones on the frontlines, according to the Ukrainian military's General Staff.
It's a never-ending race in design and production. Syrskyi said recently that Russia had developed an edge in fiber-optic-controlled drones, which are more difficult to track and intercept.
Drone warfare is a 'constant intellectual struggle — the enemy regularly changed algorithms, and Ukraine adapted tactics in response,' Umerov said. 'Solutions that showed high effectiveness at the beginning of the war have lost it over time as the enemy changed tactics.'
For its part, Ukraine is stepping up production of the long-range drones it has used to attack Russian infrastructure, such as airfields, refineries and transport. Umerov said 'tens of thousands' would be produced, in addition to more than four million battlefield drones this year.
The longer term
Both sides continue to build defense industries that allow them to keep fighting – even if the scale of Russian production far outstrips that of Ukraine. Russia's huge military conglomerate Rostec is producing an estimated 80% of the equipment used against Ukraine.
Its CEO Sergey Chemezov claimed at a meeting with Putin this month that Rostec's production has grown tenfold since 2021, and its revenues rose last year to an eye-watering $46 billion.
Russia's President Vladimir Putin (R) attends a meeting with Russia's state-owned defence corporation Rostec CEO Sergei Chemezov in Moscow on July 30, 2024.
Gavriil Grigorov/Pool/AFP/Getty Images
But there are darkening clouds on the horizon. Russia's military budget is some 40% of its total public spending – more than 6% of its GDP. That's stoked inflation, and Putin acknowledged last week that growth this year would be 'much more modest' to combat rising prices. He even suggested that defense spending would decline next year.
One senior Russian official, Maksim Reshetnikov, who is Economic Development minister, said that 'based on current business sentiment, it seems to me we are on the brink of transitioning into recession.'
The head of Russia's Central Bank, Elvira Nabiullina, disagreed with Reshetnikov but warned that financial buffers like the national reserve fund are nearly depleted.
'We must understand that many of these resources have been used up,' she told the St. Petersburg International Forum.
Putin himself acknowledged the risk, saying that while some experts predicted stagnation, it should 'not be allowed under any circumstances.'
While the longer-term prognosis for Russia may be gloomy – economically and demographically – it can continue in the short-term to fund an army of more than half-a-million men that's in Ukraine or close to its border, taking a few kilometers here and there. Despite hundreds of thousands of casualties, the Russian military can still generate forces far greater than Ukraine.
His eye still very much on the prize, Putin said last week: 'We have a saying … where the foot of a Russian soldier steps, that is ours.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


See - Sada Elbalad
3 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
EU Commits €270 Million to Armenia
Israa Farhan The European Union has pledged €270 million to Armenia under the Resilience and Growth Plan, aiming to bolster economic development, strengthen democratic institutions, and deepen EU-Armenia relations. The announcement was made by EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas during her official visit to Yerevan. The funding, set to be distributed through 2027, will support private sector growth, institutional reforms, and strategic regional cooperation. A key component of the plan includes a significant investment in Armenian independent media to counter disinformation and hybrid threats, in line with the EU's broader commitment to promoting democratic resilience. Kallas highlighted that the media support forms part of the EU's wider regional response to the consequences of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. The initiative aims to enhance information integrity and reduce external influence, particularly from Russia, in the South Caucasus region. In addition, discussions in Yerevan included Armenia's prospective involvement in the EU's Black Sea Strategy, an initiative designed to limit Russian geopolitical leverage and enhance regional connectivity and security. Kallas also confirmed that Brussels and Yerevan have reached a preliminary agreement on Armenia's future participation in EU foreign crisis management missions, signaling a step forward in Armenia's alignment with European defense and security frameworks. read more Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685 NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided News Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks News Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank News Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region News One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream News Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean Arts & Culture "6 Ayam" Sets Streaming Date


Egypt Independent
4 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Iran's supreme leader is facing his gravest challenge yet – and has few options left
CNN — For nearly four decades, Iranian Supreme Leader For nearly four decades, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has navigated internal dissent, economic crises and war, but the unprecedented strikes by Israel and the United States on Iran mark his greatest challenge yet. What he decides next will have huge significance for Iran and the rest of the Middle East. But such is the cost of the assault his options are few. It's a huge test for an 86-year-old in declining health with no designated successor. The extent of the damage inflicted on Khamenei's regime remains uncertain, but it struck at the heart of its power. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a key military force upholding the Islamic Revolution's ideals, suffered the loss of a string of seasoned commanders. Iran's nuclear facilities, where near-weapons-grade uranium was being enriched, were severely damaged, and key scientists driving the program's advancement were assassinated. Khamenei's regional armed proxy groups were already severely weakened by Israeli attacks, and billions spent on his regime's nuclear program were lost in 12 days – another economic wound at a time of sanctions and soaring inflation. So penetrating were the Israeli strikes that Khamenei delivered his speeches during the conflict from an undisclosed location, signaling lingering concern over his safety. He was not among the hundreds of thousands attending nationwide funerals for the assassinated military commanders and nuclear scientists on Saturday. And it was several days after the ceasefire took effect before the supreme leader delivered a defiant video message to the Iranian people. 'This president (Donald Trump) exposed that truth – he made clear that the Americans will only be satisfied with the total surrender of Iran, and nothing less,' Khamenei said. He also, predictably, declared victory over Israel and the US – a message that triggered a blunt response from Trump. 'Look, you're a man of great faith, a man who's highly respected in his country,' Trump said. 'You have to tell the truth. You got beat to hell.' Once a nimble leader who used political and economic maneuvering to secure his regime's survival, the aging Khamenei now governs an eroding and rigid state. With uncertainty surrounding his succession, the state of his nuclear program, and the strength of his proxy groups, he faces a critical choice: rebuild the same regime or open up in a way that could threaten his hold on power. No surrender Over the decades, Khamenei has confronted a relentless cascade of challenges that together have shaped his regime. Inheriting a nation that in 1989 was wrecked and isolated by war with Iraq, he faced the daunting task of resurrecting his fractured economy and society. He had to manage internal dissent and rivalries within Iran's complex clerical circles, confront unyielding international economic pressures, all while preserving the revolutionary ideals of sovereignty and independence. He has enforced harsh internal repression amid waning public support, notably when women's rights protesters demonstrated for weeks the death of a woman at the hands of the 'morality police,' and when mass protests erupted in 2009 over alleged electoral fraud. Exiled Iranian groups established 24/7 media outlets broadcasting anti-regime propaganda and separatist groups leaked the secrets of his nuclear program. Israel's spy agencies appear to have deeply infiltrated Iran, assassinating nuclear scientists and launching cyberattacks against Iran's infrastructure. But not once – until now – has he had the world's strongest military strike his country, and a US president talk about his possible assassination in a social media post. Israeli and American strikes on Iran, long-anticipated but widely doubted, marked only the second time since the 1979 Islamic Revolution that a foreign nation directly attacked the country, following Iraq's invasion under Saddam Hussein in the 1980s. Khamenei's main external leverage points – an advanced nuclear program and a network of proxy groups encircling Israel – are now paralyzed. Internally, Khamenei remains Iran's most powerful figure, backed by a loyal support base and institutions built to safeguard his authority. Yet, with Iran reeling from recent attacks and Khamenei in hiding, the aging leader may intensify repression to preserve the revolution's conservative ideals. 'Iranian doctrine was built around the projection of power in the region and the deterrence of adversaries, but the former is ebbed and the latter has failed. Set against a minimal goal – survival – the regime lives to fight another day, but no doubt it is weakened,' Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the International Crisis Group, said. Amidst the chaos, the Iranian regime must now address these internal and external problems, Vaez said, this requires 'more fundamental rethinking than Khamenei is likely to entertain.' 'Even if there is quiet on the military front, there must be a reckoning within the system and likely considerable finger-pointing behind the scenes. The intelligence failure has been comprehensive, upper echelons of the military have been wiped out, and Iran must still contend with deep challenges that preceded the war – an economy in difficult straits, deep social and political discontent,' Vaez said. Deep distrust Facing unprecedented pressure and dwindling options, Khamenei, who previously issued a fatwa forswearing the development of nuclear weapons, might consider weaponizing Iran's nuclear program as its best form of protection. Parliament last week signaled its intent to halt cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. Developing a nuclear bomb would be a major reversal in Iran's public stance – Israel says its offensive was aimed at stopping Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon, but Tehran has always insisted its program is peaceful. When asked if he would consider bombing Iran again if intelligence reports conclude that Tehran could enrich uranium at concerning levels, Trump said: 'Sure, without question, absolutely.' But Trump claimed 'the last thing' Iran is 'thinking about is a nuclear weapon.' President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation at the White House in Washington, DC, on June 21. Carlos Barria/Reuters One possibility for Khamenei is to seize an opportunity to harness the rare unity in Iran against Israel's strikes, for example, by introducing further reforms. In his speech, he reflected on the moment as one of collective strength. 'By God's grace, a nation of nearly 90 million stood as one – united in voice and purpose – shoulder to shoulder, without any divisions in demands or intentions,' he said. But as Vaez argued, Khamenei may have a limited appetite for a fundamental political and economic rethink. That conservatism may also preclude another option – embracing a warming neighboring region and pursuing a new agreement with Washington. Iran's Arab neighbors historically saw Iran's expansionist policies as a threat, but more recently have opted to repair ties with Tehran, and expressed a desire to cooperate to avoid costly conflict. But Khamenei's distrust of the West, deepened by Trump's unilateral abrogation of a nuclear treaty in his first term and Israel's unprecedented strikes this month – launched two days before an Iranian delegation was due to hold a new round of talks with the US – leaves uncertainty over how he will approach any upcoming negotiations. In an intensifying attempt to bring Tehran back to the negotiating table, the Trump administration has discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program, easing sanctions, and freeing up billions of dollars in restricted Iranian funds, CNN reported this week citing four sources familiar with the matter said. Trump denied the report. But if Trump wants a deal with Iran, his unorthodox public messaging to Khamenei, including implicitly threatening his assassination, could ultimately derail the talks, Iranian officials said. 'If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers,' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted to X on Friday. In his latest speech, the supreme leader projected an image of unyielding resilience, signaling to the United States and Israel – both nuclear powers – that military action alone cannot dismantle his damaged yet still fortified, republic. But with unclear succession to his rule, and the loss of his powerful leverages, he now faces the task of guaranteeing the survival of the Islamic Republic he inherited.


Egypt Independent
4 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Why Trump's strikes on Iran will leave North Korea more determined than ever to keep its nukes
Seoul, South Korea CNN — As American B-2 bombers streaked over Iran, targeting facilities tied to Tehran's nuclear ambitions, policymakers and analysts in East Asia were already grappling with a critical question: What signal does this send to North Korea, a country whose nuclear arsenal is far more advanced than Iran's? Experts warn Washington's military actions may harden Pyongyang's resolve to accelerate its weapons program and deepen cooperation with Russia, as well as reinforcing its leader Kim Jong Un's belief that nuclear arms are the ultimate deterrent against US-enforced regime change. Despite yearslong efforts to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program, the Kim regime is thought to possess multiple nuclear weapons, as well as missiles that can potentially reach the United States – meaning any potential military strike on the Korean Peninsula would carry vastly higher risks. 'President Trump's strike on Iran's nuclear facilities will undoubtedly further reinforce the legitimacy of North Korea's longstanding policy of regime survival and nuclear weapons development,' said Lim Eul-chul, a professor of North Korean studies at South Korea's Kyungnam University. 'North Korea perceives the recent US airstrike as a preemptive military threat and will likely accelerate efforts to enhance its own capability for preemptive nuclear missile attacks,' said Lim. The Fordow enrichment facility in Iran after it was hit by US strikes, on Sunday. Maxar Technologies That acceleration, analysts caution, could come through Russian assistance, thanks to a blossoming military relationship the two neighbors have struck up in the wake of Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. Since its formal establishment in 2024, North Korea's strategic partnership with Russia has become a vital economic and military lifeline for Pyongyang amid ongoing Western sanctions. 'Based on the strategic alliance between North Korea and Russia, Pyongyang is likely to move toward joint weapons development, combined military exercises, technology transfers, and greater mutual dependence in both economic and military terms,' Lim said. North Korea has sent more than 14,000 soldiers and millions of munitions, including missiles and rockets, to aid in Russia's invasion, according to a report by the Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team (MSMT), an initiative made up of 11 United Nations members. In return, Russia has provided North Korea with various valuable pieces of weaponry and technology, including air defense equipment, anti-aircraft missiles, electronic warfare systems and refined oil. These actions 'allow North Korea to fund its military programs and further develop its ballistic missiles programs, which are themselves prohibited under multiple (UN Security Council resolutions), and gain first-hand experience in modern warfare,' the report found. Iraq, Libya, Iran and the lessons of US-led intervention In Kim's eyes, recent US military actions in Iran follow a troubling logic: countries without nuclear weapons, from Iraq and Libya to Iran, are vulnerable to US-led intervention, said Victor Cha, Korea chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. North Korea, having already tested six nuclear devices and developed long-range missiles, sees its arsenal as non-negotiable. According to Cha, Washington's airstrikes against Tehran's nuclear assets will likely leave a lasting impression on the Kim regime. 'The strikes on Iran will only reaffirm two things for North Korea, neither of which play well for US policy,' he said. 'One: the US does not have a use-of-force option for North Korea's nuclear program like they had in Israel for Iran. Two: the strike only reaffirms in Kim Jong Un's mind his conviction to pursue and maintain a nuclear arsenal.' And the contrast between Iran and North Korea is stark, particularly in terms of nuclear capabilities. 'Pyongyang's nuclear program is much more advanced, with weapons possibly ready to launch on multiple delivery systems, including ICBMs,' said Leif-Eric Easley, an international security professor at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, referencing intercontinental ballistic missiles which can travel around the globe, far further than any missiles Iran possesses. 'The Kim regime can threaten the US homeland, and Seoul is within range of many North Korean weapons of various types,' he added. Iran, by contrast, has not yet developed a deliverable nuclear weapon and its uranium enrichment had remained short of the threshold for weaponization, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency's latest assessment. It had also pursued years of diplomacy with the US and Western powers over its nuclear program, diplomacy that was supposedly still in play when Trump ordered B-2 stealth aircraft to drop 'bunker busting' bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. A missile flies during what North Korean state media described as a test-launch of a strategic cruise missile, designed to demonstrate the readiness of various nuclear capabilities, off the west coast of the Korean peninsula, on February 26, 2025, in this photo released by North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency. KCNA/Reuters A matrix of deterrents North Korea is believed to possess between 40 and 50 warheads, along with the means to deliver them across the region and potentially to the US mainland. 'An attack on North Korea could provoke the risk of full-scale nuclear war,' Lim of Kyungnam University warned. He added that under the US-South Korea alliance treaty, US military action against North Korea would also require prior consultation with the South Korean government, a step that carries political and legal implications. There are also external powers to consider. Unlike Iran, North Korea has a formal mutual defense treaty with Russia, 'which allows Russia to automatically intervene in the event of an attack,' Lim underscored. This matrix of deterrents – nuclear capability, US regional alliances, and Russian backing – likely insulates Pyongyang from the kind of unilateral military action Washington exercised in Iran. In the end, said Lim, the strike on Iran might not serve as a deterrent to proliferation but as a justification. 'This attack will deepen North Korea's distrust of the US,' he said, 'and is expected to act as a catalyst for a shift in North Korea's foreign policy, particularly by strengthening and deepening military cooperation with Russia.'