HYBE Chairman Finally Addresses Fraud Case: 'Will Fully Work With Investigators'
Bang Si-hyuk, founder and chairman of Hybe – the South Korean entertainment company which handles BTS, has been accused of indulging in fraudulent activities.
HYBE's chairman and founder, Bang Si-hyuk, has finally addressed the ongoing investigation involving alleged stock manipulation by him. Recently, he wrote an email to the employees of his company and assured them that he would fully cooperate with the investigators.
'Over the last year, much has been said and written about me in the press. Increasingly, I believe these events are causing confusion and concern for you, as well as our artists, fans, and partners," the email read, as reported by Forbes.
'I will return to Korea to fully and transparently work with investigators and put these allegations to rest," Bang, who is currently in the U.S, wrote. 'In particular, I feel a deep sense of regret knowing that our members and artists, who should be focused solely on their creative and professional goals, might be suffering because of this situation … I understand how my absence may have contributed to confusion and frustration," he added.
This comes days after South Korean police raided the Seoul headquarters of HYBE.
Why Is HYBE Under The Radar?
Bang Si-hyuk, founder and chairman of Hybe – the South Korean entertainment company which handles BTS, has been accused of indulging in fraudulent activities. As reported by allkpop, Bang has been accused of engaging in fraudulent and unfair trading under the Capital Markets Act.
The financial watchdog is investigating Bang over allegations that he misled investors by denying any plans for an IPO. With this, he encouraged them to sell their HYBE shares to a private equity fund (PEF) linked to him. This was around the time when HYBE was secretly preparing to go public. Therefore, when the company eventually did file for an IPO, Bang reportedly benefited through a 30% return-sharing deal with the PEF, a transaction not disclosed during the IPO process.
This means that if found guilty and the gains exceed 5 billion KRW (approximately $3.64 million), Bang could face life imprisonment or a minimum of five years in prison.
For the unversed, HYBE manages some of the biggest names in K-pop, including BTS, Tomorrow X Together, LE SSERAFIM, NewJeans, BOYNEXTDOOR, and KATSEYE.
First Published:
August 08, 2025, 08:49 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Akshaya entrepreneurs in Ernakulam suspend K-Smart services over low service charges
Akshaya entrepreneurs in Ernakulam district, affiliated to the Akshaya Welfare Association, have unofficially suspended K-Smart services in protest against what they allege is an abysmally low service charge unilaterally fixed by the State government without any consultation. On Friday (August 8, 2025), the association laid siege to the district project office and submitted a representation, along with their charter of rates, to the district project manager, who assured them that it would be forwarded to the State project office. The government had issued the order fixing service charges for K-Smart services on Wednesday (August 6, 2025). 'Unless the government decides to revisit the rates, we will go ahead and start charging service charges as per our charter from Saturday (August 9,2025). We cannot continue causing inconvenience to the public by suspending the delivery of K-Smart services,' said G.K. Sreeraj, secretary, Akshaya Welfare Association. Meanwhile, Minister for Local Self-Governments M.B. Rajesh clarified that K-Smart, the digital platform developed by the Information Kerala Mission for the Local Self-Government department, was designed to be user-friendly, enabling anyone with basic computer skills to access it. However, people continue to rely on Akshaya centres. There have been complaints about service charges varying across centres, with some allegedly collecting exorbitant fees. The K-Smart service charges were fixed in this context, Mr. Rajesh said. Since the launch of Project Akshaya 23 years ago, service fees have been revised only once—in 2018. Akshaya entrepreneurs have been up in arms ever since, citing the negligible revision, which they said did not reflect rising operational costs or the stiff competition from private citizen service centres. 'The sad part is that even the revised service charges for K-Smart services were fixed unilaterally and kept abysmally low,' said Mr. Sreeraj. He cited the example of the charge for changing building ownership—a process that involves scanning and uploading the title deed, possession certificate, consent letter from the previous owner, death certificate (if applicable), two pages of the Haritha Karma Sena register, and entering building details in both English and Malayalam. 'This laborious process takes up to 30 minutes, yet the service charge is just ₹50,' he rued. A similar situation exists with the service charge for marriage registration, said Mr. Sreeraj. The process involves entering the one-time password received by the bride, bridegroom, and two witnesses, uploading the Aadhaar cards and SSLC books of the couple, feeding in their personal details in both English and Malayalam, uploading the marriage certificate, and completing a video verification of the newly-wed couple. 'The entire process takes up to 45 minutes, yet the service charge is just ₹70 for the general category and ₹50 for the scheduled category—while the government fee for marriage registration itself is ₹120,' he pointed out.
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Using Google Maps is notoriously tough in South Korea. That may change soon
South Korea has a problem. In one of the world's most technologically advanced nations, navigating the landscape can be tough because Google Maps doesn't work effectively. On August 11, South Korean authorities will decide whether to finally grant Google's request to export the country's detailed mapping data to overseas servers. This will allow Google to give detailed directions and best routes to travel. The debate on whether approval should be granted has continued for nearly two decades. Local groups warn of domination from foreign companies, while those who back Google's request argue that restrictions harm tourism and innovation. It has also opened a debate on how democracies balance digital sovereignty with economic openness. South Korea is one of the few countries, along with China and North Korea, in which Google Maps fails to function properly. Instead, the digital landscape in South Korea is controlled by local 'portal' companies Naver and Kakao. These firms provide precise public mapping data that is stored on domestic servers in accordance with the law. Google already licenses the same data from local providers but is only able to display information like landmarks and local business. It cannot provide directions for users. Google contends that access to the data is essential for distributing and processing it across its global network of servers, enabling real-time navigation for billions of users worldwide, including those planning trips to Korea from overseas. The government has consistently refused permission, citing national security risks. Google argues that domestic competitors already utilise the mapping data it is requesting. It also claims to have removed sensitive locations from the map after a security review and has offered to will blur satellite imagery of any sensitive facilities, if required. Those opposing the clearance to Google hold a different view. As reported by The Guardian, The Korean Association of Spatial Information, Surveying and Mapping (Kasm), which represents 2,600 local companies, reports 90% opposition from 239 member companies surveyed, fearing market domination by the US tech company. 'The government must listen to industry concerns,' says Kim Seok-jong, chair of Kasm, warning of potential 'industry devastation'. The government has proposed a solution, suggesting that Google could gain access to detailed mapping data if it establishes local data centres like its domestic rivals. However, this would not address the problem of data being processed on Google's servers globally. The method of storing data in local data centres also poses risks. In 2022, millions of users lost access to Kakao's messaging, mapping, and ride-hailing services when a fire broke out at one of its data centres. The restrictions have drawn criticism from tourists who find it difficult to navigate the country. Tourist startups and tech advocates also argue that it will be difficult to build globally competitive services without access to internationally standard mapping tools. This isn't the first time Google has asked for permissions for mapping data. Previous government reviews in 2007 and 2016 both resulted in rejection. Washington's trade officer has listed South Korea's mapping restriction has a 'non-tariff trade barrier', further broadening US-Korea ties.
&w=3840&q=100){kind=logo}
First Post
6 hours ago
- First Post
Will South Korea allow Google to export map data? US mounts pressure ahead of summit talks
South Korea has postponed a decision on Google's request to export map data for 60 days, citing security concerns. The move comes amid US pressure to resolve the issue ahead of a possible leaders' summit this month. read more People stand in front of a Google logo during a media reception at the Google France headquarters ahead of the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris, France. File Image/Reuters In response to pressure from the United States to resolve what Washington views as a non-tariff obstacle during recent trade discussions, South Korea postponed a decision on Friday on Google's request for authorisation to export map data, according to its transport ministry. After completing a trade agreement in late July, South Korea and the United States are getting ready for a summit of their leaders, which might take place this month. However, it was unclear if the map issue would be brought up at the meeting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2016 and 2007, South Korea denied petitions by Google, whose parent is Alphabet, for permission to utilise map data on servers outside the nation, citing security concerns. In order to allow Google time to develop solutions that meet its security concerns, the National Geographic Information Institute of South Korea's Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport stated in a statement that it has chosen to delay the decision for 60 days. Google claims that after undergoing a security evaluation by a government body, there were no security issues with its mapping data on South Korea, which are publicly accessible and utilised by several businesses. However, the business stated that it is actively negotiating with the South Korean government over any further security measures that the authorities may seek, as well as plans to buy blurred images from government-approved local partners. South Korea, whose 1950-53 war with North Korea ended without a peace treaty, argues that if it allowed such data to leave the country, the locations of military facilities and other sensitive sites could be revealed. But the US said restrictions on cross-border data flows have long served as barriers to operating navigation services through Google Maps and Apple Maps, resulting in US companies losing out in the South Korean market. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD South Korea had not made concessions on the map issue and also on further opening up agriculture, despite early and intense bilateral talks, presidential adviser Kim Yong-beom had said. Google said the lack of data restricts its Google Maps services in Korea, causing major inconveniences to foreign tourists. Late last month, Transport Minister Kim Yoon-duk said South Korea needed to be 'very cautious' about granting map access, saying defence and public safety were prioritised over trade.
