
6 Ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Could Limit Healthcare Access
The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' will hit Medicaid hardest with $790 million chopped from its budget.
Experts say these reductions will greatly impact health programs across the country, particularly those serving rural communities, children, and lower-income households.
The so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed by President Donald Trump in early July, will impact virtually every health-related program in the United States.
The bill, officially known as House Resolution 1, is expected to reduce federal spending on health-related programs by $1 trillion between now and 2034.
It's estimated that those cuts will cause at least 10 million people to lose health insurance coverage during the next nine years.
It calls for a reduction in funding for food assistance programs and rural hospitals, as well as reduced funding for Planned Parenthood services, which have been temporarily blocked by a federal judge.
Some of these impacts will take years to be felt. Other provisions, however, could directly affect people's lives in the next year or two.
'It is the biggest cut to our social safety net in history,' Liz Fowler, PhD, a distinguished scholar in Health Policy and Management at the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland, said in a news release from the college.
Here's a look at six key areas affected by spending reductions outlined in President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.'
Medicaid bears the brunt of the cuts
Federal funding for Medicaid is expected to be reduced by more than $790 billion over the next decade.
More than 70 million people currently receive Medicaid benefits, but various factors could significantly reduce this estimate.
Work requirements will mandate that most 'able-bodied' recipients between the ages of 19 and 64 will be required to work, receive work training, volunteer, or be in school for at least 80 hours per month while receiving benefits. The new work requirements take effect on January 1, 2027. As many as 5 million people could lose health insurance due to this requirement, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF).
More frequent eligibility checks will require states to verify beneficiaries' eligibility for Medicaid more often, causing some recipients to be removed from the program.
Immigration restrictions will reduce the number of foreign-born residents receiving benefits.
The cuts may also affect hospitals, as Medicaid is responsible for 20% of revenue at these medical facilities nationwide.
Experts also point out that people who are no longer on Medicaid will not seek preventive care and end up in hospital emergency rooms due to more serious medical issues.
'Cutting Medicaid means millions lose access to basic care, leading to sicker patients, overwhelmed ERs, and rising costs for everyone,' said Kanwar Kelley, MD, a specialist in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery, obesity medicine, and lifestyle medicine as well as the co-founder and chief executive officer of Side Health.
'Lack of access to preventive care leads to a sicker population, which leads to more medical expenses,' Kelley told Healthline.
Impacts to Medicare
Medicare is a federal program founded in 1965 that provides health insurance coverage to people 65 years and older. About 66 million Americans are enrolled.
Trump's bill does not directly mention Medicare cuts, but there are measures that could impact recipients.
Under a 2010 budget mechanism law known as PAYGO, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the Trump bill could trigger more than $500 billion in Medicare cuts between 2026 and 2034, KFF reports.
The Center for Medicare Advocacy notes the bill will also reduce the number of people eligible for Medicare. They say some non-citizens who meet Medicare eligibility requirements through work history or residency length will no longer be covered.
In addition, the bill imposes a nine-year ban on implementing improvements to Medicare Savings Programs that help lower-income Medicare beneficiaries pay for premiums and out-of-pocket costs.
Older adults who are enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare could hit with a double impact.
'The [bill] will affect this [older] age range by reducing access to care,' Kelley said. 'Creating restrictions based on work requirements and new regulations for exemptions will exclude many in this age group from qualifying. Those in this age range will have a harder time re-entering the workforce to continue their coverage.'
Fewer people enrolled in Obamacare
The bill will make it more difficult for people to join or remain in programs offered by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare.
This difficulty will be due to several changes. They include:
Requiring enrollees to update their information regularly. This may include updating income, immigration status, and other details each year.
Requiring individuals to manually reenroll every year during open enrollment. Last year, 10 million people were automatically reenrolled.
Shortening the open enrollment period by a month. That period will now end on December 15 rather than January 15. For the current plan year, 40% of people signed up after December 15.
Some immigrants will also no longer be eligible for ACA coverage.
In addition, financial assistance that helps people afford insurance in ACA marketplaces will be allowed to expire at the end of this year.
The Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University predicts these changes will cause ACA premiums to rise by 75% next year.
Kelley agrees that premiums will likely go up, causing a cascade of events.
'Removing or cutting these subsidies will lead to more expensive plans offered on the marketplace. By raising these prices, many will choose to live without health insurance and risk catastrophic medical debt,' he said. 'Making access to healthcare harder for individuals creates gaps in care for patients, which is crucial in screening for life-altering illnesses.'
Strains on rural hospitals
The bill does provide rural hospitals with $50 billion over the next five years to help reduce the effects from the cuts in Medicaid spending.
However, the Center for American Progress reports that funding will not be nearly enough to make up the difference.
The organization states that slightly more than 2,000 rural hospitals receive $12 billion per year in net revenue from Medicaid.
At some rural hospitals, Medicaid represents 40–50% of their revenue.
The organization added that children, non-elderly adults, and people with disabilities would be the people in rural areas most affected.
Kelley agreed that the effects could be far-reaching.
'This loss of funding will hit rural hospitals hard, leading to closures and increasing healthcare disparities in marginalized neighborhoods,' he said.
The Center for American Progress also notes that rural hospitals have low operating margins. They project that more than 300 rural hospitals could be at risk of closure.
'Rural communities already face challenges with adequate staffing and medically necessary equipment as they usually operate on tight margins with the subsidies,' Kelley said. 'Reducing the number of providers will lead to closures, which forces those in the community to travel farther for their regular and emergency care.'
Fewer families will receive food assistance
The bill would cut $120 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) over the next decade, according to estimates.
About 40 million people currently receive assistance from the SNAP program. The League of Women Voters projects the cuts could impact 22 million families.
Kelley said the impact is beyond just food.
'Food insecurity leads to bad health outcomes,' he said. 'Cutting programs directed at addressing hunger will lead to increased rates of obesity, diabetes, and poor nutrition in kids.'
'Hunger in children leads to poor educational outcomes. Cutting SNAP and other food programs will lead to children going to school hungry, seniors skipping meals, and families making decisions between food and other necessities, including health,' Kelley added.
Cuts to Planned Parenthood
The bill impacts Planned Parenthood operations by banning people from using Medicaid at healthcare non-profit facilities that provide abortion services outside of cases of rape, incest, or when the pregnant person's life is in danger.
Planned Parenthood estimates that the new law could close nearly 200 of its facilities. About 60% of those centers are in medically underserved communities.
In addition, the organization states that more than 1 million people could lose access to afford healthcare services such as STI testing and birth control.
Miller Morris, MA, MPH, is a women's health researcher and founder of Comma, a service focusing on menstrual health. She notes that a court injunction has temporarily blocked the bill's ban on Medicaid use at reproductive health clinics like Planned Parenthood.
However, she said if the provisions are eventually upheld, they could have far-ranging effects.
'If the court's injunction were to be lifted, the defunding of Planned Parenthood would mean fewer resources for all the preventative and primary care services they offer, leading to reduced access for millions of women, especially those in low-income and rural communities,' Morris told Healthline.
'This reduction in Medicaid funding will see catastrophic consequences for the millions of women who rely on Planned Parenthood and similar low-cost organizations for vital, life saving care,' she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I lost both parents to cancer. It taught me you have to lean into your grief.
Before my mom was diagnosed with esophageal cancer at 69, she was the epitome of good health. Her death less than five months later, in July 2024, was — and still is — a total shock. Grief comes in waves — long-lasting with a killer crash. Great for surfers, but not for us grievers. "So, Christine, I've got cancer," my mother calmly told me over the phone one February morning. I have no idea what I said next. All I can remember is what felt like lava slowly, painfully rising from the pit of my stomach up to my chest, where it just sat bubbling, searching desperately for somewhere to escape my body. A sensation I hadn't experienced for over 15 years, when I received a similar phone call from my father. What followed was the start of my double life, in which I split my time between my home in San Diego and Dublin, 5,199 miles away and the place my mom called home. Her treatment was supposed to be chemotherapy and maybe radiation before making a full recovery, but she never even got to that stage. She became an inpatient not long after that February phone call, and the following summer, on July 14, 2024, she died. My mother's death was — and still is — a total shock The thing about cancer is that you know death might be coming long before it arrives, or in my mom's case, not long at all. I tell myself this "advanced notice" is a good thing, a coping mechanism if you will. Before she got sick at 69, my mother was the epitome of good health — playing tennis and hiking the Irish Wicklow mountains weekly. The thought that something could harm her wasn't even on my radar. I had already lost one parent to cancer. The made-up rules of life that lived in my head said it simply was not possible to lose the other, and to the same disease, no less. The call that changed everything I was heading out the door when "mom" popped up on my phone. After weeks of a raspy voice and a doctor's appointment warning that "something sinister" was at play, my mom finally had a specialist consultation scheduled. I knew the call was coming, and unlike the far too many other times that I screened her call — how I wish now I had answered the phone to her more — this was one call I answered before it even got through the first ring. As soon as I picked up, I knew something was very wrong. Maybe it was her calm voice, procrastinating sharing the specialist's update by asking me how the weather was that day. Like me, my mom would often worry about the silliest of things that she'd dissect from every angle possible. Yet here she was calling me after an important appointment, sounding as calm as I'd ever heard her. Could everything be OK? No, because if it were, I'm sure the first thing she would've said was how bad she felt for wasting everyone's time. I gave my mom a few minutes of grace when it came to the chit-chat. I too, wanted to pretend for a few minutes longer that everything was fine, normal, and no one was dying anytime soon. That's when she told me the news: it was esophageal cancer. My double life between California and Dublin I'd spend three weeks in Ireland before escaping to California for a week, where I could avoid the pain of seeing my mom go through the symptoms that come with that horrible disease. Life would start to feel normal again, but reality would always sneak in. I'd see a message pop up on our family WhatsApp group — "Hey mom, heading into the hospital now" from my sister, or "Can you bring in tissues?" from my mom. Painful reminders that I wasn't there. Once my San Diego "break" was up, it was back to my Dublin life where I had quickly developed a new routine. Every morning, I would drive to the hospital and pick up two iced lattes (or hot, depending on the Irish weather that day) for my mom and me to enjoy together. My mom couldn't actually drink the coffee I bought her. She had a tracheostomy and no ability to swallow, so she would just sip the latte, slush it around her mouth, and spit it out. But she absolutely loved it. Don't tell my siblings, but I'm 99% sure it was the highlight of her day. We were simply doing what normal moms and daughters do — catching up over a coffee. I probably had more coffee catch-ups with her in those four-ish months than I had in years. Realizing that leaves a pit in my stomach. My mom passed away less than five months after that February phone call After the funeral, I returned to San Diego feeling relieved that I could settle back into a normal life. I could unpack my suitcase, and for the first time in months, put it away. That initial relief lasted for a few weeks, but my birthday hit a month later, and not waking up to a sweet birthday card or text from my mom was one of the first moments of reality setting in. My husband tells me that grief comes in waves — sometimes it's a small ripple that comes and goes, oftentimes when I'm not expecting it. Just the other day, I opened a Clarins moisturizer and boom, the grief hit. My mom used Clarins for as long as I can remember, and the smell of it took me right back to the master bathroom of her house in Dublin, where I'd bug her to borrow it while I was visiting because I would always forget to bring my own. I paused to take her in for that short moment, and then it was over. Sometimes the waves are the type a surfer dreams of — long-lasting with a killer crash. Great for surfers, not so much for us grievers. You have no idea how long the grief is going to last, and you can't get out of it. You just have to wait for the crash to come. I've listened to Calm's grief podcast series, I've read books like Edith Eger's "The Gift" exploring how to overcome grief, but there's no healing it. The sad reality is that there isn't a pretty bow you can wrap around death. You can't "hope" because the worst has already happened, but you can appreciate what you had. And if you're one of the lucky ones, you just have to pick up the phone next time you see "mom" pop up. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HeartFlow IPO success reflects market embrace of AI in medtech industry
HeartFlow's $364m initial public offering (IPO) signals market validation for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in a company's product portfolio, an expert says. Roundly exceeding its $300m expectations for the IPO, the Bain Capital-backed AI-based coronary artery disease (CAD) platform developer debuted with a a $2.2bn valuation on the Nasdaq on 8 August. HeartFlow's current products are HeartFlow Plaque analysis, which aims to provide clinicians with the ability to more accurately assess patients with arterial plaque buildup (atherosclerosis), and HeartFlow FFRCT analyses CT angiogram (CCTA). Typically used alongside Plaque Analysis, FFRCT creates detailed 3D models of the arteries to assess the impact of blockages on blood flow. Plaque Analysis received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance in 2022 and is claimed to be the only AI-based plaque quantification tool currently cleared by the agency. FFRCT received FDA clearance in 2014. To reach the IPO milestone, HeartFlow maintained a focus on testing its product offerings alongside physicians, generating real world evidence, taking on feedback and refining as needed, and ensuring they were truly ready to scale. HeartFlow also navigated the structural barriers of getting its product to market; again, real-world evidence – with over 3,000 peer-reviewed papers demonstrating its products' efficacy – spurred the company's commercialisation efforts. Medtech industry veteran, Brent Ness, CEO of Aclarion, who served as HeartFlow's chief commercial officer from 2014 to 2015, told Medical Device Network that HeartFlow's work on the underlying economic factors around its product, including working on contractual relationships with imaging centres to get them on board with the product, pre-reimbursement, have proven a key part of its success. 'Between FDA clearance and reimbursement, lots of technologies can't make it through that journey because there's no reimbursement, and therefore there's no adoption, and they run out of cash,' Ness explained. 'Part of the structural barrier stage of development involves getting the provider economics right and that market access work that needs to take place between the early payors and the key opinion leaders (KOL) advocating for the product. But payors aren't going to turn it on just because a KOL says so. 'This is why the shining jewel in HeartFlow's history has been their absolute commitment to leading with evidence.' AI's recognition in healthcare and its future According to Ness, the success of HeartFlow's IPO reflects the market validation of the overall rationale for using AI in imaging and the deployment of software-as-a-service (SaaS) based products as the 'raw material' underpinning the technology's ability to provide clinically actionable information and improve patient outcomes. Ness said this model is 'here to stay', having been 'completely validated by the market, which has recognised of its value, which obviously translates into revenue, and speaks to the long term success and viability of HeartFlow and the significant potential for other AI-based SaaS imaging developers.' To learn from HeartFlow's success, Ness views a critical role for SaaS-based AI software providers as being to try and shorten the timeframe between regulatory approval and reimbursement. 'The faster that new and novel technologies using AI can move through that Death Valley, the better it's going to be for patients, and the more money we're going to save as a collective society,' Ness said. 'The 'muscle' of these AI tools is proving to be valuable. It's got to be safe, and it's got to make sense economically, but we've got to figure out how to shorten that part of the journey.' "HeartFlow IPO success reflects market embrace of AI in medtech industry" was originally created and published by Medical Device Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Going Back to School Isn't a Mental Health Crisis
Why treating a normal transition like a crisis undermines resilience. Every August, the same ritual begins. Parents frantically Google "back-to-school anxiety tips." Schools send home preparation checklists. Mental health experts publish articles about the "inevitable" stress of returning to the classroom. We're told children are "bound to experience" anxiety, that the transition will be "jarring," and that we must watch for behavioral warning signs indicating distress. But what if all this well-intentioned preparation is backfiring? What if, by treating back-to-school as an inherently stressful experience requiring extensive emotional support, we're actually teaching our children to expect, and therefore experience, exactly that stress? The Expectation Effect in Action Research on the expectation effect reveals a powerful truth: our predictions about experiences often become self-fulfilling prophecies. When we expect pain during a medical procedure, we feel more pain. When we expect a social interaction to be awkward, it becomes awkward. And when we spend weeks preparing children for the "stress" and "anxiety" of returning to school, we're essentially training their brains to anticipate and create those very experiences. Consider the language saturating back-to-school messaging. Experts warn about the social and emotional "summer slide"—as if children regress during vacation. Middle school transitions are described as inevitably difficult, with parents advised to prepare for the shock of "multiple teachers for different subjects." We're told to monitor for "uncharacteristic sleep disturbances" and "increased defiance" as signs of back-to-school anxiety. The irony is striking: in our effort to protect children from stress, we're potentially manufacturing it. When Normal Becomes Pathological There's nothing inherently traumatic about getting a new teacher, walking between classrooms, or adjusting sleep schedules. Humans are remarkably adaptable creatures, especially children. For millions of kids throughout history, September simply meant returning to learning, no extensive emotional preparation required. Yet today's messaging suggests that without careful intervention, children will inevitably struggle. One recent article opens with a detailed case study of a nine-year-old "feeling anxious as the school year approaches," immediately priming readers to expect similar struggles in their own children. Parents are warned to watch for a laundry list of concerning behaviors: "headaches, nausea, fatigue" or children who "seek continual reassurance about what their school days will look like." We're pathologizing normal developmental experiences, turning routine adjustments into cause for concern. A child who seems quiet after the first day isn't just processing new experiences, they're showing "warning signs." A kid who takes time to warm up to their teacher isn't displaying normal social caution, they need "support strategies." The Confidence Gap When we constantly prepare children for difficulties they haven't yet encountered, we inadvertently communicate a lack of confidence in their abilities. The subtext of endless preparation is clear: "This is going to be hard for you. You probably can't handle it without help." Children are intuitive. They pick up on our anxiety, our excessive planning, our worried expressions during "practice runs" to school buildings. They internalize the message that going back to school is something to fear rather than anticipate or even look forward to. Research on academic mindset shows that children perform better when adults express confidence in their capabilities rather than constantly preparing them for failure. Yet our current approach does the opposite, it primes children to expect struggle and positions us as the experts on their emotional states rather than trusting them to navigate new experiences. The Rumination Trap When we encourage children to identify their negative feelings about school, monitor their anxiety levels, and prepare for social difficulties, we're inadvertently teaching them to ruminate by repeatedly focusing on potential negative outcomes. Put simply, excessive focus on potential problems increases their likelihood. Studies show that rumination is a key factor in developing anxiety and depression. By encouraging children to constantly examine their emotional states and prepare for difficulties, we're training them in a thinking pattern that's linked to poor mental health outcomes. One expert actually advises parents to watch for subtle behavioral shifts like a child having "a more difficult time falling asleep" or finding previously enjoyable activities "particularly challenging," essentially teaching hypervigilance about normal fluctuations in mood and behavior. What Actually Helps A more effective approach is to trust children's natural resilience and address problems if and when they actually arise, rather than creating elaborate systems to monitor and manage difficulties that may never materialize. This isn't an argument for negligent parenting or ignoring genuine difficulties. Some children do face real challenges with school transitions, and they deserve support. But for most kids, the best back-to-school preparation is surprisingly simple: 1. Express Confidence Instead of asking, "Are you worried about school?" try 'What are you looking forward to this year?" Rather than preparing for problems, communicate your belief in their capabilities. 2. Keep It Routine Treat back-to-school like any other seasonal transition. Adjust bedtimes gradually, buy supplies, meet the teacher. No drama required. 3. Model Calm Children regulate their emotions based on the adults around them. If you're anxious about their return to school, they will be too. If you're matter-of-fact and positive, they're likely to follow suit. 4. Trust the Process Most children adapt to new situations within days or weeks, regardless of preparation. Human beings are wired for adaptation—it's what we do best. Rewriting the Narrative Imagine if we approached back-to-school with the same energy we bring to other positive life transitions. Instead of articles about managing anxiety, what if we celebrated children's growth and new opportunities? Rather than preparing for problems, what if we focused on possibilities? The shift isn't just semantic; it's psychological. When we expect positive outcomes, we're more likely to achieve them. When we approach challenges with curiosity rather than dread, we build resilience rather than fragility. Our children are watching. They're learning not just academic subjects, but also how to approach life's transitions. Are we teaching them that new experiences are threats to be carefully managed, or adventures to be embraced? The Bottom Line Going back to school isn't a mental health crisis. It's September. Children have been doing it successfully for generations without extensive emotional preparation. Research on resilience shows that children are far more adaptable than our current anxiety-focused messaging suggests. By treating normal transitions as inherently problematic, we risk creating the very difficulties we're trying to prevent. The most powerful gift we can give our children isn't another coping strategy or anxiety management technique; it's our confidence in their ability to handle whatever comes their way. Solve the daily Crossword