
Migrants, deported to Panama under Trump plan, detained in remote jungle camp
Advertisement
The group includes eight children, according to a person with knowledge of the situation who was not authorized to speak on the record. Lawyers have said it is illegal to detain people in Panama for more than 24 hours without a court order.
The Panamanian government has not made an official announcement about the transfer to the jungle camp.
In a broadcast interview Wednesday with the local news program Panamá En Directo, the country's security minister, Frank Ábrego, did not discuss the move. But he said that migrants were being held by Panama 'for their own protection,' and because officials 'need to verify who they are.'
The transfer is the latest move in a weeklong saga for a group of about 300 migrants who arrived in the United States hoping to seek asylum. The group was sent to Panama, which has agreed to aid President Donald Trump in his plan to deport millions of migrants living in the US without legal permission.
The agreement is part of a larger strategy by the Trump administration to export some of its most difficult migration challenges to other nations. The United States, for varying reasons, cannot easily deport people to countries like Afghanistan, Iran, and China, but by applying intense pressure, it has managed to persuade Panama to take some of them.
Advertisement
After being sent to Panama, the deported migrants are no longer subject to US law.
Costa Rica is also taking some deportees, including migrants originally from Central Asia and India, and has said it plans to repatriate them. A flight from the United States is expected to arrive in Costa Rica on Thursday.
Upon arrival in Panama City last week, the 300 or so migrants were taken to a downtown hotel, called the Decapolis, and barred from leaving, several of them told The New York Times in calls and text messages. A lawyer seeking to represent many of them, Jenny Soto Fernández, was blocked at least four times from visiting them in the hotel, she said.
At the hotel, the United Nations International Organization for Migration has been speaking with migrants about their options, according to the government, and offering flights to their home countries to those who want them.
Some, including a group of Iranian Christians and a man from China, told the Times that they risk reprisals if returned to their native countries and have refused to sign documents that would pave the way for their repatriation.
Under Iranian law, converting from Islam is considered apostasy and is a crime punishable by death.
On Tuesday morning, an article published by the Times attracted attention to the migrants' situation, and members of the Panamanian news media began surrounding the hotel.
That night, guards at the hotel told people to pack their bags, said Ghasemzadeh, one of the Christian converts from Iran. Several buses arrived, and guards led them aboard, as witnessed by a reporter working for the Times. Then the bus traveled out of Panama City, east and then farther east, to the province of Darién.
Advertisement
Two migrants used their cellphones to share their real-time location with the Times, allowing reporters to track their movements.
On the bus, at least one woman cried, according to a photograph sent by a person on the bus.
The camp where the 100 or so migrants will stay is called San Vicente and sits at the end of a jungle, also called the Darién, which links Panama to Colombia. The camp was built years ago as a stopover point for migrants coming north from Colombia through the Darién jungle and into Panama, a harrowing part of the journey north to the United States.
Now the Panamanian government is using it for deportees.
On Tuesday, Ábrego told reporters at a news conference that 170 of the 300 or so migrants had volunteered to be sent back to their countries of origin, journeys that would be arranged by the International Organization for Migration.
He described the decision to hold the migrants as part of an accord with the United States.
'What we agreed with the United States government is that they remain and are in our temporary custody for their protection,' he said.
On Wednesday, he said that 12 people from Uzbekistan and India had been repatriated with the help of the International Organization for Migration.
Officials also said Wednesday that one of the migrants in their custody, a woman from China, had escaped from the hotel.
In a message posted to the social platform X, the country's migration service asked for help in finding her, saying authorities feared she would fall into the hands of human traffickers.
Advertisement
'As a State security entity,' authorities wrote on X, 'our commitment is to combat illegal migration' while complying with 'national and international principles and regulations on human rights.'
The Panamanian government has previously said the migrants had no criminal records.
On Wednesday morning, from the Darién region, Ghasemzadeh described a sweltering encampment, overrun with cats and dogs.
Then, she sent a text message saying that authorities were confiscating all phones. Her last words: 'Please try to help us.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Gallego energizes Iowa voters amid 2028 speculation
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) energized Iowa voters at a town hall in Davenport over the weekend, delivering a message of hope while also using the setting to put the GOP on the defensive. 'When you're a politician that is choosing your voters, instead of being able to convince voters, you have a losing message, right?' Gallego told several hundred people, referring to the Texas redistricting battle playing out. Gallego also knocked President Trump for the country's still high grocery prices and for Republicans cutting food stamps, a reference to Trump's mega policy bill, which cut food stamps and Medicaid to offset costs of the bill. The Arizona Democrat said Americans were 'now sicker and poorer because of Donald Trump.' At the same time, Gallego also offered a message of hope while traveling in the state. 'There's no governing coalition until we start winning here,' the Arizona senator told The New York Times. 'And we know how to do it, I know how to get the message to do it. So I'm here to, most of all, encourage the Democratic Party, because they feel a little down right now here.' Gallego made several stops in the Hawkeye State, including a visit to the Iowa State Fair, amid growing speculation that he might be eyeing a bid for 2028. Iowa has traditionally been on the early presidential nominating calendar, though Democrats knocked Iowa from its early perch last cycle as former President Biden sought to put South Carolina first instead. 2024 Election Coverage Gallego is also expected to travel to New Hampshire later this month for several events, including 'Politics & Eggs' event, hosted by the New England Council and the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College. Both the Iowa State Fair and 'Politics & Eggs' event have long been testing grounds for rising political stars and potential White House hopefuls testing their message in early primary states. Gallego has said he's thought about running for the White House but maintained it's not his focus right now.

5 hours ago
Iran says talks with IAEA will be 'technical' and 'complicated' ahead of agency's planned visit
TEHRAN -- Talks between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency will be 'technical' and "complicated," the Islamic Republic's Foreign Ministry said Monday ahead of a visit by the nuclear watchdog for the first time since Tehran cut ties with the organization last month. Relations between the two soured after a 12-day air war was waged by Israel and the U.S in June, which saw key Iranian nuclear facilities bombed. The IAEA board said on June 12 Iran had breached its non-proliferation obligations, a day before Israel's airstrikes over Iran that sparked the war. The IAEA did not immediately issue a statement about the visit by the agency's deputy head, which will not include any planned access to Iranian nuclear sites. Esmail Baghaei, the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, told reporters there could be a meeting with Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, 'but it is a bit soon to predict what the talks will result since these are technical talks, complicated talks.' Baghaei also criticized the IAEA's 'unique situation' during the June war with Israel. "Peaceful facilities of a country that was under 24-hour monitoring were the target of strikes and the agency refrained from showing a wise and rational reaction and did not condemn it as it was required,' he said. Aragchi had previously said that cooperation with the agency, which will now require approval by Iran's highest security body, the Supreme National Security Council, would be about redefining how both sides cooperate. The decision will likely further limit inspectors' ability to track Tehran's program that had been enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on July 3 ordered the country to suspend its cooperation with the IAEA, after the U.S. bombed three major Iranian nuclear sites as Israel waged an air war with Iran, killing nearly 1,100 people, including many military commanders. Retaliatory Iranian strikes killed 28 in Israel. Iran has had limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West, and it is unclear how soon talks between Tehran and Washington for a deal over its nuclear program will resume. U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA had assessed Iran last had an organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. —


Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
The 12-day war with Israel set back more than Iran's nuclear program
Advertisement But you'd be wrong. Bayat, a senior fellow at the 'I am afraid that the war has made the situation of Iranian opposition, which has really big potential support in Iran, worse,' he told me in a recent interview. Other opposition figures, like Advertisement But Bayat represents As one exiled analyst put it, 'You cannot try to save your homeland by standing behind enemy tanks.' Despite his dismay with the attacks, Bayat — an expert on Iran's nuclear program — believes that the Trump and Netanyahu governments are mostly right that Iran's nuclear weapons 'No centrifuge can work right now in Natanz or Fordow,' he said of the machines that turn uranium into the enriched fuel needed for a weapon. 'The shockwaves alone would have put them out of commission, and without electricity the centrifuge will be also damaged. Nothing runs.' He added that he believes a third facility at Isfahan has been effectively destroyed and that the entire program has been set back by several years at least. That assessment, informed by his vast experience and contacts, is Advertisement Bayat notes that although Iran could quickly enrich its stockpile of 60 percent to build a bomb. Turning even highly enriched uranium gas into bomb-ready metal demands complex metallurgical and chemical processes. 'Afterward, the uranium must be shaped carefully to avoid accidental detonation, and sophisticated trigger systems — both conventional explosives and a nuclear neutron source — must be developed and precisely integrated. Finally, the assembled device would need to be tested and made deliverable,' he explains. Yet for all its successes, the attack wasn't needed, he asserts. He is convinced that Iran's nuclear program was really all about deterrence: That is, the regime believed the mere threat that it could acquire a nuclear weapon would prevent Israel, the United States, or any other country from trying to overthrow it. He is convinced that the regime would have been willing to negotiate a deal to stop, or at least suspend, its nuclear program in exchange for the end of crippling economic sanctions. 'I am convinced that the Islamic Republic didn't want to make a bomb in order to attack somewhere,' he told me. 'Even if they had a bomb, the regime is not suicidal. They want to stay in power and enjoy the wealth they daily steal. They know that if they attack Israel via nuclear bomb, Israel has the capacity to strike back.' He is particularly concerned that Israel might still attempt to overthrow the regime by assassinating Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the nation's supreme leader, and his top deputies. Israel, which in Advertisement The only way to displace the regime, Bayat argues, is for 'Iranians from within' to stand up and bring about a peaceful transition. 'The recent history has demonstrated that with bombs and destruction you cannot introduce freedom, democracy, and prosperity. I think there is a good chance for the Iranian citizens to overcome the despotic clerical regime in the coming times.' 'The only viable path forward is negotiation with the Trump administration — and ideally, direct talks with Israel," he said. 'Iran should renounce uranium enrichment, as it serves no real purpose and there are no nuclear weapons in the country, making 'denuclearization' a misnomer.' He contends that ending the enrichment program should be easier now because enrichment activities have been badly damaged and all but halted. Permanently ceasing the program could pave the way for sanctions relief, which the regime badly needs to repair Iran's sickly economy. 'Of course, such policy has to be accompanied with the recognition of Israel,' Bayat added. His faith that those negotiations will happen were shaken by recent remarks from the Advertisement 'I hope that, as usual, there is a difference between the public statements of the regime and its real handling of issues,' he said.