Ace the test: How to boost credit scores
A high score unlocks a whole host of financial opportunities: Lower car payments, cheaper mortgages, or even approval for that new rental apartment or job you've been eyeing.
But here's something you may not know: Some parts of the country are doing better than others when it comes to boosting credit scores, reports Current, a consumer fintech banking platform.
The financial site WalletHub recently crunched the data, to find out which city cranked its collective credit up the most in a single year. The winner: St. Louis, with a 3.49% increase compared to last year, resulting in an average score of 652.
Runners-up included Des Moines, Iowa, with a 3.19% jump to 647; and Winston-Salem, N.C., with a 2.28% increase to 628.
That's exactly the kind of positive momentum you want: Even if your credit record is sparse because you're just starting out in life, or if it is on the low side because of missed payments, you are aiming to boost those scores over time and reap the rewards.
"If you get to a score like 760 or 780, then you're going to be getting best interest rates available," says Liz Weston, a personal finance columnist for the L.A. Times and author of the book "Your Credit Score: How To Improve the 3-Digit Number That Shapes Your Financial Future". "Even if you have bad credit, you can make it better."
Some states are doing better than others, too. WalletHub did a deep dive into which parts of the country are being most 'diligent' about their credit: That means whether people are paying their debts on time, the share of the population experiencing foreclosures or bankruptcies, and even whether residents are checking and correcting errors on their credit reports.
The winners: People in Massachusetts, Iowa, Vermont, Alaska, and Hawai'i.
So what's the big secret of these credit-boosting cities and states?
A number of factors go into analyzing credit records, to generate the 'FICO' score (thanks to the firm behind it, Fair Isaac Corp.) or the competing VantageScore, developed by the major credit agencies Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion.
A few key points to consider:
A solid payment history. Obviously, lenders want to see that a borrower is a reliable risk. So pay every bill on time, every time – you don't want to be a few days late, and you definitely don't want to be 30 or 60 days behind. In FICO's system, that history accounts for around 35% of your total score.
Mistakes do happen - bills get lost in the mail, due dates slip your mind - so scheduling payments beforehand is a smart strategy, especially when dealing with joint accounts. "Set up autopay to avoid missed payments and assign who's tracking what," says Doug Boneparth, president of Bone Fide Wealth in New York City and co-author (with wife Heather) of the upcoming book "Money Together". "Clear roles reduce stress and credit slip-ups."
A reasonable amount owed. Don't max out your credit lines, because that makes lenders nervous. Ideally, you want to keep what's called the 'credit utilization ratio' below 30%. So if you have available credit of $1,000, as an example, keep the amount borrowed below $300.
"There should be a nice big gap there," advises Weston. "Credit utilization below 30% is good, below 20% is even better, and below 10% is best."
Length of credit history. For young adults fresh out of high school or college, establishing credit is an uphill climb, because they just don't have proof of years of reliable debt payments.
One potential solution here: Leveraging the power of being an 'authorized user'. For teens or young adults, that means being named as a user on parents' cards (even if they're not actually making purchases). Couples, too, can "add each other as authorized users on credit cards with strong histories," says Boneparth. "One person's good credit can lift both scores over time."
Secured credit cards can help. A secured charge card essentially pulls spending power from the balance in your spending account, minimizing your risks of debt. In a nutshell, you can't spend more than what you have in your account, and as you spend, the funds are held in reserve to 'pay your bill' at the end of each month. Look for one without a minimum deposit requirement that reports these on-time monthly payments to the three major credit bureaus (TransUnion, Equifax, Experian) each month to help build your credit score.
It can be an effective way to build your credit history and minimize risks of debt.
No credit splurges. Open too many credit lines, too quickly, and lenders get skittish, because it could indicate you're in some financial trouble. It could also suggest identity theft, if a scammer has gotten hold of your information and is applying for numerous cards in your name. That's why the amount of new credit factors into 10% of your FICO score.
If you don't know what goes exactly into your credit score, this whole process can seem pretty mysterious. But when you do know, then you can get to work on making it better.
Says Weston: "Lenders just want to see smart, healthy credit habits."
This story was produced by Current and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
19 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump warned by top Senate Democrats to rethink advanced AI chip sales to China
Six Senate Democrats on Friday released an open letter asking President Donald Trump to reconsider his decision to allow tech giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices to sell AI semiconductor chips to China in exchange for 15% of revenue from the sales. The letter — signed by Senators Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Jack Reed, D-R.I.; Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.; Christopher Coons, D-Del.; and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. — was in response to an Aug. 11 announcement by Trump that Nvidia and AMD would pay the U.S. government a 15% cut of revenue from chip sales to China in exchange for export licenses. "Our national security and military readiness relies upon American innovators inventing and producing the best technology in the world, and in maintaining that qualitative advantage in sensitive domains. The United States has historically been successful in maintaining and building that advantage because of, in part, our ability to deny adversaries access to those technologies," the letter states. "The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm," the letter continues. Senators also warned that selling advanced AI chips — specifically Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 chips — to China could help strengthen its military systems, a claim that Nvidia denies. In a statement to CNBC, a Nvidia spokesperson said: "The H20 would not enhance anyone's military capabilities, but would have helped America attract the support of developers worldwide and win the AI race. Banning the H20 cost American taxpayers billions of dollars, without any benefit." The letter from Senate Democrats also requests a detailed response from the administration by Friday, Aug. 22, regarding the current deal involving Nvidia and AMD, as well as any similar arrangements being made with other companies. "We again urge your administration to quickly reverse course and abandon this reckless plan to trade away U.S. technology leadership," the letter states. A request for comment from the White House and AMD was not immediately returned. Despite Trump allowing chip sales to resume, it has already become clear that China isn't welcoming Nvidia back with open arms, instead urging tech companies to avoid buying U.S. companies' chips, according to a Bloomberg report. "We're hearing that this is a hard mandate, and that [authorities are actually] stopping additional orders of H20s for some companies," Qingyuan Lin, a senior analyst covering China semiconductors at Bernstein, told CNBC. In a separate report, The Information said regulators in China have ordered major tech companies, including ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent, to suspend Nvidia chip purchases until a national security review is complete. —


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Tax Cuts Promised by Trump Administration Across 50 States
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan Washington-based think tank, has produced a map forecasting the effects of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act on taxes across the United States, broken down to the county level. The White House's website reposted the map, noting that the Tax Foundation said Trump's package would "reduce federal taxes on average for individual taxpayers in every state" and create almost 1 million jobs. Newsweek contacted the Tax Foundation for comment on Saturday outside regular office hours. Why It Matters Trump signed his One Big Beautiful Bill, the centerpiece of his economic agenda, into law on July 4 after it narrowly passed both the House and Senate. The Congressional Budget Office has said the legislation will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. national debt, a forecast that contributed to a falling out between Trump and his previous close confidant Elon Musk. The One Big Beautiful Bill included sweeping tax cuts, reduced spending on Medicaid, and additional funding for the military and border security. It also raised the U.S. debt ceiling by $5 trillion. What To Know On Wednesday, the Tax Foundation published a study forecasting the effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill on taxes paid by the average American on a county-by-county basis between 2026 and 2035. This was accompanied by a map showing the breakdown by county over this period. Two days later, the White House published a news release welcoming the study, which included a screenshot of the Tax Foundation's map taken for 2026. According to the Tax Foundation, the average tax cut per American for 2026 will be $3,752 because of Trump's spending package. This is forecast to fall to $2,505 in 2030 as some measures expire before increasing again to $3,301 in 2035. A map produced by the Tax Foundation showing the effects of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill in 2026 on a county-by-county basis. A map produced by the Tax Foundation showing the effects of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill in 2026 on a county-by-county basis. Tax Foundation The states forecast to see the largest tax cuts in 2926 are Wyoming ($5,375), Washington ($5,372) and Massachusetts ($5,139). By contrast, the smallest cuts are expected in West Virginia and Mississippi—at $2,503 and $2,401, respectively. In its report, the Tax Foundation described the One Big Beautiful Bill as "the most significant legislative changes to federal tax policy since the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act," which was passed in Trump's first term. The president's One Big Beautiful Bill contained a number of tax cuts, including extending corporation and income taxes he imposed in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It also raises the cap on state and local tax deductions over the next five years to $40,000 for those making less than $500,000 per year, reduces tax on tips and overtime pay, and phases out some of former President Joe Biden's energy tax credits. The Tax Foundation also projected that the One Big Beautiful Bill would produce about 938,000 jobs "over the long run," including 132,000 in California and 81,000 in Texas. What People Are Saying White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said in the news release: "President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill is the largest, most consequential tax cut on the middle class ever. Now, the Tax Foundation—the leading nonpartisan tax policy nonprofit—confirms that. Between lower inflation, massive investments, and historic tax cuts, all Americans are reaping the benefits of the Trump Economy—and the Golden Age has just begun." What Happens Next While supporters of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill may be buoyed by the Tax Foundation's report, which suggests it will result in widespread tax reductions and job creation, critics are likely to continue raising concerns about its effects on the national debt and Medicaid cuts.

Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
Court blocks FTC investigation into Media Matters' alleged scheme against X
The court has blocked the Federal Trade Commission's investigation into Media Matters, the media nonprofit that previously published research showing that ads appeared on X alongside neo-Nazi and other antisemitic content. In 2023, Elon Musk's X filed a lawsuit against the media watchdog following an advertiser exodus. It accused Media Matters of "knowingly and maliciously manufactur[ing] side-by-side images depicting advertisers' posts on X Corp.'s social media platform beside Neo-Nazi and white national fringe content." Just this May, the FTC started looking into whether the nonprofit violated antitrust laws by allegedly colluding with advertising and advocacy groups to boycott X. In June, Media Matters sued the FTC, accusing it of unfairly targeting the group in retaliation for past criticisms of X. "The Federal Trade Commission seeks to punish Media Matters for its journalism and speech in exposing matters of substantial public concern — including how has enabled and profited from extremist content that proliferated after Elon Musk took over the platform formerly known as Twitter," the group said at the time. Now, Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan has granted a preliminary injunction in the nonprofit's favor. Sooknanan has agreed with the group that the FTC's investigation is "a retaliatory act" and has noted that it is "likely to succeed on its First Amendment retaliation claim." She wrote in her decision that such probes would deter other reporters from speaking again. "Indeed, the FTC's [investigation] has had its intended effect." Apparently, because of the probe, Media Matters has "decided against pursuing certain stories about the FTC, Chairman Ferguson, and Mr. Musk." "The court's ruling demonstrates the importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration," Angelo Carusone, the president of Media Matters, told The New York Times . "We will continue to stand up and fight for the First Amendment rights that protect every American." As the publication notes, courts had also blocked investigations into the group by the attorneys general in Texas and Missouri. Musk's lawsuits against the nonprofit, however, are still ongoing.