logo
How bugs and beet juice could play roles in the race to replace artificial dyes in food

How bugs and beet juice could play roles in the race to replace artificial dyes in food

Yahoo28-04-2025

ST. LOUIS (AP) — As pressure grows to get artificial colors out of the U.S. food supply, the shift may well start at Abby Tampow's laboratory desk.
On an April afternoon, the scientist hovered over tiny dishes of red dye, each a slightly different ruby hue. Her task? To match the synthetic shade used for years in a commercial bottled raspberry vinaigrette — but by using only natural ingredients.
'With this red, it needs a little more orange,' Tampow said, mixing a slurry of purplish black carrot juice with a bit of beta-carotene, an orange-red color made from algae.
Tampow is part of the team at Sensient Technologies Corp., one of the world's largest dyemakers, that is rushing to help the salad dressing manufacturer — along with thousands of other American businesses — meet demands to overhaul colors used to brighten products from cereals to sports drinks.
'Most of our customers have decided that this is finally the time when they're going to make that switch to a natural color,' said Dave Gebhardt, Sensient's senior technical director. He joined a recent tour of the Sensient Colors factory in a north St. Louis neighborhood.
Last week, U.S. health officials announced plans to persuade food companies to voluntarily eliminate petroleum-based artificial dyes by the end of 2026.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called them 'poisonous compounds' that endanger children's health and development, citing limited evidence of potential health risks.
The federal push follows a flurry of state laws and a January decision to ban the artificial dye known as Red 3 — found in cakes, candies and some medications — because of cancer risks in lab animals. Social media influencers and ordinary consumers have ramped up calls for artificial colors to be removed from foods.
A change to natural colors may not be fast
The FDA allows about three dozen color additives, including eight remaining synthetic dyes. But making the change from the petroleum-based dyes to colors derived from vegetables, fruits, flowers and even insects won't be easy, fast or cheap, said Monica Giusti, an Ohio State University food color expert.
'Study after study has shown that if all companies were to remove synthetic colors from their formulations, the supply of the natural alternatives would not be enough,' Giusti said. 'We are not really ready.'
It can take six months to a year to convert a single product from a synthetic dye to a natural one. And it could require three to four years to build up the supply of botanical products necessary for an industrywide shift, Sensient officials said.
'It's not like there's 150 million pounds of beet juice sitting around waiting on the off chance the whole market may convert,' said Paul Manning, the company's chief executive. 'Tens of millions of pounds of these products need to be grown, pulled out of the ground, extracted.'
To make natural dyes, Sensient works with farmers and producers around the world to harvest the raw materials, which typically arrive at the plant as bulk concentrates. They're processed and blended into liquids, granules or powders and then sent to food companies to be added to final products.
Natural dyes are harder to make and use than artificial colors. They are less consistent in color, less stable and subject to changes related to acidity, heat and light, Manning said. Blue is especially difficult. There aren't many natural sources of the color and those that exist can be hard to maintain during processing.
Also, a natural color costs about 10 times more to make than the synthetic version, Manning estimated.
'How do you get that same vividness, that same performance, that same level of safety in that product as you would in a synthetic product?' he said. 'There's a lot of complexity associated with that.'
The insects that could make 'Barbie pink' naturally
Companies have long used the Red 3 synthetic dye to create what Sensient officials describe as 'the Barbie pink.'
To create that color with a natural source might require the use of cochineal, an insect about the size of a peppercorn.
The female insects release a vibrant red pigment, carminic acid, in their bodies and eggs. The bugs live only on prickly pear cactuses in Peru and elsewhere. About 70,000 cochineal insects are needed to produce 1 kilogram, about 2.2 pounds, of dye.
'It's interesting how the most exotic colors are found in the most exotic places,' said Norb Norbrega, who travels the world scouting new hues for Sensient.
Artificial dyes are used widely in U.S. foods. About 1 in 5 food products in the U.S. contains added colors, whether natural or synthetic, Manning estimated. Many contain multiple colors.
FDA requires a sample of each batch of synthetic colors to be submitted for testing and certification. Color additives derived from plant, animal or mineral sources are exempt, but have been evaluated by the agency.
Health advocates have long called for the removal of artificial dyes from foods, citing mixed studies indicating they can cause neurobehavioral problems, including hyperactivity and attention issues, in some children.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says that the approved dyes are safe when used according to regulations and that 'most children have no adverse effects when consuming foods containing color additives.'
But critics note that added colors are a key component of ultraprocessed foods, which account for more than 70% of the U.S. diet and have been associated with a host of chronic health problems, including heart disease, diabetes and obesity.
'I am all for getting artificial food dyes out of the food supply,' said Marion Nestle, a food policy expert. 'They are strictly cosmetic, have no health or safety purpose, are markers of ultraprocessed foods and may be harmful to some children.'
The cautionary tale of Trix cereal
Color is powerful driver of consumer behavior and changes can backfire, Giusti noted. In 2016, food giant General Mills removed artificial dyes from Trix cereal after requests from consumers, switching to natural sources including turmeric, strawberries and radishes.
But the cereal lost its neon colors, resulting in more muted hues — and a consumer backlash. Trix fans said they missed the bright colors and familiar taste of the cereal. In 2017, the company switched back.
'When it's a product you already love, that you're used to consuming, and it changes slightly, then it may not really be the same experience,' Giusti said. 'Announcing a regulatory change is one step, but then the implementation is another thing.'
Kennedy, the health secretary, said U.S. officials have an 'understanding' with food companies to phase out artificial colors. Industry officials told The Associated Press that there is no formal agreement.
However, several companies have said they plan to accelerate a shift to natural colors in some of their products.
PepsiCo CEO Ramon Laguarta said most of its products are already free of artificial colors, and that its Lays and Tostitos brands will phase them out by the end of this year. He said the company plans to phase out artificial colors — or at least offer consumers a natural alternative — over the next few years.
Representatives for General Mills said they're 'committed to continuing the conversation' with the administration. WK Kellogg officials said they are reformulating cereals used in the nation's school lunch programs to eliminate the artificial dyes and will halt any new products containing them starting next January.
Sensient officials wouldn't confirm which companies are seeking help making the switch, but they said they're ready for the surge.
'Now that there's a date, there's the timeline,' Manning said. 'It certainly requires action.'
___
Dee-Ann Durbin contributed reporting from Detroit.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The #1 Nut to Help You Lose Weight, Recommended by Dietitians
The #1 Nut to Help You Lose Weight, Recommended by Dietitians

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The #1 Nut to Help You Lose Weight, Recommended by Dietitians

Nuts are high in calories and fat, so should you avoid them if you're trying to lose weight? Luckily, you shouldn't. Studies have shown that people who include nuts in their diets experience great metabolic health benefits. In fact, a review found that people who regularly eat nuts have less weight gain and a reduced risk of obesity. Registered dietitian Bianca Tamburello, RDN, with Fresh Communications, says, 'Nuts are a great food for weight loss because they're packed with healthy fats, which boost satiety, and protein and fiber to keep you full.' But she does note, 'Nuts are nutrient-dense and pack a good amount of calories per serving, but this is not a reason to avoid them. Be aware of portions and aim for one to two servings per day,' she adds. All nuts are wholesome foods perfectly packaged by nature, and each one provides health benefits. Yet, when it comes to weight loss, we'll have to go with almonds as the best nut to help you lose weight. Let's dive into the reasoning. If you're looking for a satisfying snack to improve your health while losing weight, look no further than almonds. With almonds, you know you'll be giving your body a boost of quality nutrients that may aid you in your weight-loss goals. Almonds are great for weight loss for several reasons. 'Fiber is an important nutrient in most diets, especially knowing the average American only eats about half of the daily recommended amount,' says Samantha MacLeod, M.S., RDN, a registered dietitian with Fresh Communications. 'If you are trying to lose weight, fiber can be important because it helps you to stay fuller and more satisfied for longer.' Two ounces of almonds contain over 7 grams of fiber. Additionally, high-fiber foods like almonds have been shown to help reduce inflammatory molecules in the body, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Fiber-rich foods like almonds are also associated with improved metabolism, a lower risk for heart disease and type 2 diabetes, better digestive function, and possibly even a lower risk of colon cancer. Almonds are high in anti-inflammatory plant compounds called flavonoids, polyphenols and proanthocyanidins. Research has found that almonds, particularly their skin, may have even more antioxidants than previously thought. Foods with anti-inflammatory benefits, like almonds, help support weight loss since evidence shows that excessive weight can lead to or can be caused by chronic inflammation. This increases your risk of metabolic conditions such as type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance. Data has also shown that eating almonds may help balance your microbiome, contributing to reduced inflammation. MacLeod also notes that the fiber in nuts can help keep blood sugar levels stable, which also helps reduce that inflammation. Your body is constantly rebuilding and maintaining your bones, muscles, cells and tissues, and it needs protein to do it. Tamburello notes that over-restricting food, a common mistake when losing weight, can lead to eating too much later on. Foods high in protein slow down digestion, keeping you full. Additionally, protein is key to maintaining your muscle mass. Muscle mass is a metabolically active tissue that helps increase your basal metabolic rate (BMR)—how many calories your body needs for basic functions. A higher metabolic rate leads to burning more calories. Two ounces of almonds have over 12 grams of protein, making them a great high-protein food to help you maintain your muscle mass. Almonds are a good choice if you're ready to include nutritious and delicious foods in your diet to help you lose weight, but any nut can help you with your goals. If you enjoy another nut more than almonds, feel free to make a swap. Other great options are: Cashews: Cashews haven't been studied as much as other nuts, but the existing studies show that eating cashews may help you maintain a healthy body composition. Participants in the studies had more muscle mass tissue and a lower fat mass, plus reduced inflammation in their blood vessels. Walnuts: Walnuts have consistently been shown to improve health markers that are beneficial for weight loss. Regular walnut consumption has been shown to improve the health of your microbiome because they are rich in polyphenols, which can help reduce inflammation, and fiber, which helps produce short-chain fatty acids—improving overall health. A healthy gut benefits all aspects of health, including aiding in weight loss efforts. Pistachios: These little green nuts can also support you on your weight-loss journey. One study found that the participants who ate pistachios daily saw decreased waist circumference (associated with visceral fat) and better blood pressure levels. The group eating pistachios also had higher blood plasma levels of antioxidants like lutein and beta carotene. Even though almonds and other nuts are high in calories, they have plenty of health benefits that can aid you in your weight-loss journey. MacLeod says, 'Generally speaking, nuts are high in fat and can be calorie-dense, but that does not mean you should exclude them from your diet if you are trying to lose weight!' And as we've seen here, the health benefits go beyond weight loss for overall health. Read the original article on EATINGWELL

Palestinians say Israeli fire kills 5 near aid sites. Israel says it fired warning shots
Palestinians say Israeli fire kills 5 near aid sites. Israel says it fired warning shots

San Francisco Chronicle​

time7 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Palestinians say Israeli fire kills 5 near aid sites. Israel says it fired warning shots

DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Israeli fire killed at least five people and wounded others as they headed toward two aid distribution points in Gaza run by an Israeli and U.S.-backed group, Palestinian health officials and witnesses said Sunday. Israel's military said it fired warning shots at people who approached its forces. The past two weeks have seen frequent shootings near the new hubs where thousands of Palestinians — desperate after 20 months of war — are being directed to collect food. Witnesses say nearby Israeli troops have opened fire, and more than 80 people have been killed, according to Gaza hospital officials. In all, at least 108 bodies were brought to hospitals in Gaza over the past 48 hours, the territory's Health Ministry said. Israel's military said it struck dozens of militant targets throughout Gaza over the past day. Four of the latest bodies were brought to Nasser Hospital in the southern city of Khan Younis. Palestinian witnesses said Israeli forces fired on them at a roundabout around a kilometer (half-mile) from a site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in nearby Rafah. Israel's military said it fired warning shots at 'suspects' who had advanced toward its forces and ignored warnings to turn away. It said the shooting occurred in an area that is considered an active combat zone at night. Al-Awda Hospital said it received the body of a 42-year-old man and 29 people who were wounded near another GHF aid distribution point in central Gaza. The military said it fired warning shots in the area at around 6:40 a.m. but did not see any casualties. A GHF official said there was no violence in or around its distribution sites, all three of which delivered aid on Sunday. The group closed them temporarily last week to discuss safety measures with Israel's military and has warned people to stay on designated access routes. The official spoke on condition of anonymity in line with regulations. Witnesses fear for their safety Witnesses said the shooting in southern Gaza occurred at around 6 a.m., when they were told the site would open. Many headed toward it early, seeking desperately needed food before the crowds arrived. Adham Dahman, who was at Nasser Hospital with a bandage on his chin, said a tank fired toward them. 'We didn't know how to escape," he said. "This is trap for us, not aid.' Zahed Ben Hassan said someone next to him was shot in the head. He said he and others pulled the body from the scene. 'They said it was a safe area from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m. ... So why did they start shooting at us?' he said. 'There was light out, and they have their cameras and can clearly see us.' The military announced on Friday that the sites would be open during those hours, and that the area would be a closed military zone the rest of the time. Children cried over their father's body at the hospital. 'I can't see you like this, Dad!' one girl said. Aid distributed inside Israeli military zones Gaza's roughly 2 million Palestinians are almost completely reliant on international aid because nearly all food production capabilities have been destroyed. The new aid hubs are run by GHF, a new group of mainly American contractors. Israel wants it to replace a system coordinated by the United Nations and international aid groups. Israel and the United States accuse the Hamas militant group of stealing aid. The U.N. denies there is systematic diversion. The U.N. says the new system is unable to meet mounting needs, allows Israel to use aid as a weapon by determining who can receive it and forces people to relocate to where aid sites are positioned. The U.N. system has struggled to deliver aid, even after Israel eased its complete blockade of Gaza last month. U.N. officials say their efforts are hindered by Israeli military restrictions, the breakdown of law and order and widespread looting. Experts warned earlier this year that Gaza was at critical risk of famine if Israel did not lift its blockade and halt its military campaign. Both were renewed in March. Israeli officials have said the offensive will continue until all hostages are returned and Hamas is defeated or disarmed and sent into exile. Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in return for Palestinian prisoners, a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal from Gaza. Talks mediated by the U.S., Egypt and Qatar have been deadlocked for months. Hamas started the war with its attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, when Palestinian militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took another 251 hostage. They still hold 55 hostages, fewer than half of them alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel has recovered dozens of bodies, including three in recent days, and rescued eight living hostages during the war. Israel's military campaign has killed over 54,800 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead but does not say how many civilians or combatants were killed. Israel says it has killed over 20,000 militants, without providing evidence. The war has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and displaced around 90% of its population. ___

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store