Martin Lewis explains how to claim car finance mis-selling compensation as FCA predicts payouts worth up to £950
The Financial Conduct Authority is launching a compensation consultation which will determine how much is paid out to millions of people who paid more interest than they knew about.
A Supreme Court ruling on Friday (1 August) found that lenders are not liable for hidden commission payments in car finance schemes, a decision which means most of the claims will not go ahead, but only the most serious claims will be eligible for compensation.
But many cases in a separate strand of the car finance mis-selling case, which was not part of the Supreme Court ruling, are still likely to receive payouts, Mr Lewis explained.
Am I eligible for the compensation scheme?
Mr Lewis explains that there are 'two strands' of the car finance mis-selling case. Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCAs), which Mr Lewis says will be the main form of compensation to come out of the consultation, were not involved in the Supreme Court case, he said.
'The one most people have complained about wasn't involved in the Supreme Court decision, although it was on hold just in case anything in that decision caused a wobbler for DCAs,' Mr Lewis added.
DCAs were banned in January 2021, so anyone with a personal contract purchase (PCP) or Hire Purchase (HP) deals before then, is likely to have unknowingly agreed to one.
'It is when you went to a car broker or dealer and it increased the amount of interest that you were charged to increase the amount of commission without telling you,' Mr Lewis explained.
Those who had PCP or HP deals are 'likely to get compensation under this scheme'.
But Mr Lewis notes that those who had 0 per cent interest, or whose commission was very small, are unlikely to receive compensation. But he says that for most people, the compensation will be in the hundreds of pounds.
The other strand of the mis-selling case is the one element of the Supreme Court case which was upheld by the court - with the other two being dismissed.
This refers to commissions which were 'manifestly unfair', Mr Lewis explained, adding that it is harder to define because it was done on a case-by-case basis. Factors in the payout may even include how vulnerable you are - and whether it is therefore seen as more unfair for the commission to have been so high.
As this is done case-by-case and it is not a blanket issue like the DCA cases, it is unclear how the compensation scheme will work for these, Mr Lewis said.
What should I do next?
For those that are unsure whether they are eligible, Mr Lewis advises putting in a complaint to see whether you had a DCA.
'If you're one of those people who have already had a letter saying that your car finance firm, after you complained, won't deal with it until December this year, that will almost certainly be delayed until next year,' he said.
The FCA is advising consumers who believe they may have paid too much should complain now, and advise against using Claims Management Firms (CMC) or law firms, which could cost up to 30 per cent of any compensation fees received.
Lenders will have to contact customers, and either automatically pay out consumers or consumers will have to opt into a scheme for compensation, meaning receiving compensation will be 'very simple to do', Mr Lewis explained. Therefore, CMCs and law firms could take 30 per cent of the compensation without doing any work.
Mr Lewis' money advice website MoneySavingExpert offers a free tool which will do a template complaint for you for DCAs.
How much could I be compensated?
The FCA estimates that most individuals making claims will receive 'less than £950 in compensation per agreement'.
The final cost of a compensation scheme will depend on the final design which it takes, the FCA added in its statement earlier today. The first payments are forecast to be made in 2026.
For DCA cases, the maximum you could receive is all of the commission you paid, Mr Lewis said. It is more likely you will be paid the higher interest rate you were charged minus the standard interest rate.
A simple interest - meaning the interest is calculated on the original amount of the loan - of roughly 3 per cent per year will be added on top of the payout, Mr Lewis added.
'The very high likelihood is that many people who had a discretionary commission arrangement where they were charged more interest than they should have been will get back a chunk of that in the hundreds of pounds at some point in 2026,' he said.
But the expert warned that the industry could 'fight this hard', before he urged industry members to accept the 'fair compromise'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The man who helped to shape the futures of Bournemouth and Southampton
In the history of Victorian enterprise, few figures cast as long a shadow over the development of England's south coast as Charles Castleman. A solicitor by profession, but a visionary railway magnate by ambition, his legacy is intrinsically linked to the vast network of iron that transformed the sleepy Dorset and Hampshire landscapes, most notably shaping the destinies of both Southampton and Bournemouth. His story is one of determination, strategic foresight, and the profound, often unexpected, impact of infrastructure on nascent communities. Born in 1807 in Wimborne Minster, Dorset, Charles Castleman's early life was rooted in the legal profession that ran in his family. One of just three of his ten siblings to survive to adulthood and pursue a career, he established himself as a respected solicitor with offices in Wimborne and Ringwood. Yet, his gaze extended beyond the confines of legal documents to the broader horizon of regional development. He foresaw the immense potential of connecting the rapidly growing town of Southampton with the agricultural heartlands of Dorset and beyond, bridging geographical divides with the revolutionary power of the railway. Castleman's most enduring achievement, and the primary nexus of his connection to Southampton and Bournemouth, was his tireless promotion and eventual construction of the Southampton and Dorchester Railway. Proposed in 1844 and triumphantly opened in 1847, this line was affectionately, and sometimes critically, known as Castleman's Corkscrew. The meandering route, designed to minimise construction costs and leverage existing land ownership, snaked through the landscape, touching towns like Brockenhurst, Ringwood, and Wimborne, before reaching Dorchester. Southampton stood as the vital eastern terminus of Castleman's ambitious project. For centuries, Southampton had thrived as a significant port, a gateway to the world. Castleman recognised that a direct railway link to the west would solidify its position, facilitating the rapid movement of goods, people, and mail, thereby enhancing its commercial viability and strategic importance. He held meetings in Southampton, rallying support for the ambitious undertaking that would directly benefit Southampton's economy and expand its hinterland influence. While there is no evidence to suggest he held significant property, other business ventures, or political office within Southampton itself beyond his role with the railway, his impact was profound. He provided the vital connection that allowed Southampton to fully participate in the railway age, bolstering its status as a premier English port. Read more: Bournemouth stonemason stopped bones being stolen from grave Cherished park in Bournemouth shaped by centuries of shared ownership Memories of a much-loved pub that was demolished to make way for flats However, it is perhaps in relation to Bournemouth that Castleman's influence, though initially indirect, proved most transformative. When Castleman first conceived his railway in the 1840s, Bournemouth was barely a blip on the map – a tiny, embryonic settlement boasting a mere 200 residents. Consequently, "Castleman's Corkscrew" famously bypassed Bournemouth, charting a course further inland through Wimborne and Ringwood. The idea of diverting a costly railway line for such an insignificant hamlet would have been commercially illogical. Yet, the irony of history placed Castleman at the very heart of Bournemouth's dramatic rise. Though the original line eschewed the coastal village, the very existence of the regional railway infrastructure he pioneered created the conditions for Bournemouth's spectacular growth. As the mid-Victorian era progressed, the appeal of seaside resorts surged, and Bournemouth, with its pines, sandy beaches, and clean air, became an increasingly attractive prospect. The demand for better transport links grew exponentially. In 1870, thanks to the groundwork laid by Castleman's vision and the subsequent expansion of the railway network, a direct branch line finally reached Bournemouth. This development, followed by a more direct route in 1888, utterly revolutionised the fledgling resort. Suddenly, visitors from London and other major cities could access Bournemouth with relative ease, transforming it from a quiet coastal hamlet into one of England's most celebrated holiday destinations. While Castleman himself did not directly invest in Bournemouth property or establish businesses within the town, his foundational work on the regional railway system was the essential catalyst for its explosive development. His "corkscrew" may have missed it, but it unwound the future for Bournemouth. Charles Castleman's life, ending in 1876 in Bishopstoke (now Eastleigh), just outside Southampton, reflects the era of rapid industrial and social change he helped to engineer. Read more: Why New Forest residents could hardly believe their eyes What you didn't know about one of Bournemouth's most iconic buildings The story of Talbot Village's aristocrat founders take on the 'bad and unworthy poor' As a Justice of the Peace and even a Prison Inspector, he was a man of civic duty, but it was his railway vision that truly made a lasting impact. He was not just building railways - he was building the future of these now-thriving communities.
Wall Street Journal
10 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
In Battle to Save Sacred Land From Mining Giants, Apaches Hope for a Miracle
OAK FLAT, Ariz.—In the Western Apache religion, this preserve of stunning rock formations and ancient oak groves for centuries has served as a spiritual refuge. Now its use as a site for tribal prayer and rituals may be nearing an end. After years of legal battles that ultimately reached the Supreme Court, plans made by two of the world's most valuable mining companies to develop the area into a giant copper mine appear more likely to proceed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Government asks body to consult on axing ‘discriminatory' minimum wage age bands
The Government has said it is pushing forward with plans to look at removing 'discriminatory' age bands for the national minimum wage as it extended the remit of the Low Pay Commission (LPC). It said the advisory body will consult with employers, trade unions and workers on narrowing the gap between the minimum wage rate for 18 to 20-year-olds, and the so-called national living wage – the UK minimum wage for workers 21 years and older. The LPC will also be required to put forward 'recommendations on achieving a single adult rate in the years ahead'. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'To ensure the right balance is struck between the needs of workers, business affordability and the wider economy, the LPC is being asked to consult on several issues before recommending the new rates.' Last year, Labour committed to removing these age bands to create a 'genuine' national living wage, as part of efforts to bolster employment rights. Currently, the national living wage for workers aged 21 and older is £12.21. Meanwhile, the minimum wage for workers aged between 18 and 20 is £10. There is also a minimum wage for those aged under 18, and apprentices, of £7.55. The Government said the change to the LPC remit will also ensure it actively considers the cost of living in its recommendations for changes to the minimum wage which are next applied from April 2026. The LPC, which was founded in 1997, provides recommendations to the Government each October regarding how it believes the minimum wage should be changed. The Government ultimately sets minimum wage rates for the following April after this advice. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: 'Low pay drags down living standards for our workers and in turn hurts our high streets and local businesses. 'This Government's plan for change will put money back in people's pockets, with this new remit marking the next step in considering how we ensure a fair deal for our lowest-paid workers while maintaining a competitive economy that boosts businesses and their employees alike.' Baroness Philippa Stroud, chairwoman of the LPC, said: 'We are pleased to receive our remit from the Government. 'Already, since the beginning of the year, we have spent significant time speaking with workers and employers to understand the pressures in the economy and the effects of the most recent increases in the minimum wage. 'We have held a successful call for evidence and received detailed submissions from all sides.'
