logo
The Bipartisan Push for a Women's History Museum

The Bipartisan Push for a Women's History Museum

Politico25-07-2025
Happy Friday! Thanks for keeping up with Women Rule. Reach out to us: ecordover@politico.com and klong@politico.com. Let's jump right into it.
Both the Democratic and Republican Women's Caucuses sent a joint letter to House Appropriations Committee leaders Monday seeking full funding for the construction of the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum.
The museum was authorized with bipartisan support by the House and Senate in December 2020, and in March 2024, members of the DWC and RWC released a joint statement reaffirming support for building the museum and the need for such an institution to address 'critical gaps in our national story.'
'It's time that women's contributions to our great nation's history receive the recognition they deserve,' the letter reads.
It's the first bipartisan statement from the caucuses this year and comes amid sharp partisan divides over women's issues like reproductive health and gender ideology — as well as an unprecedented push by the presidential administration to influence museums. In March, President Donald Trump signed an executive order, 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' decrying the 'corrosive ideology' at American museums and falsely claiming 'the forthcoming Smithsonian American Women's History Museum plans on celebrating the exploits of male athletes participating in women's sports.'
'There are no transgender exhibits on their online museum, and they have no intention of having transgender exhibits in their museum when it's built,' Republican Women's Caucus Vice Chair Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) tells Women Rule.
'Museums should not have political tilts,' Malliotakis says. 'We want to make sure that the museum is reflective of women's history. … Making sure the museum's not woke … that it is representative of everyone and it properly reflects our history.'
Democratic Women's Caucus Chair Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-N.M.) tells Women Rule she hopes the museum would uphold 'the same thing that we expect of all of our Smithsonian institutions, that they exist independent of political pressure. We know that that's not necessarily the case right now.'
She says she's more focused on just securing funding for the museum now, and that 'our focus is not on [the potential political influence on the museum], because that's … something that will be taken up later.'
As Leger Fernandez sees it, the museum would positively influence the efforts for women's rights such as access to reproductive health care.
She says the museum could, for example, 'look at how we over history have brought down the number of deaths from childbirth, how midwives were very essential in bringing down the number of deaths from childbirth … we know that when women don't get care, we have higher likelihood of maternal morbidity and mortality. So this is an example of how women need care.'
Leaders of both caucuses say collaboration on the museum will pave the way for more bipartisan collaboration on women's policy.
Leger Fernandez tells Women Rule that she plans to have a meeting with RWC leadership to discuss collaboration on women's issues. 'That's an example of how we are not just going to be focused on the Women's History Museum, we're going to be looking at the issues that we face now,' she says.
'I think it's something that really brings Republicans and Democrats together and it has brought a lot of the women within Congress together, specifically,' Malliotakis says of the museum.
'Our nation's history has been shaped by strong, trailblazing women whose stories deserve to be told. Sharing those stories is the first step in honoring their monumental accomplishments. I'm proud to be a part of the effort to make the Smithsonian's American Women's History Museum a reality. This museum will stand as a tribute to their legacy and a source of inspiration for generations to come,' Republican Women's Caucus Chair Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) says in a statement to Women Rule.
Both Leger Fernandez and Malliotakis say they are confident that the museum will get the funding it needs, with support from both parties. They plan to locate it on the National Mall alongside the other Smithsonian museums.
In related news this week, the House Natural Resources Committee on Wednesday unanimously advanced the bipartisan World War II Women's Memorial Location Act, authorizing the National Mall as the site for the memorial honoring the women who served on the homefront during World War II.
MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here.
POLITICO Special Report
Republicans Make a Last Gasp in Virginia as Winsome Earle-Sears Looks to Shake Up Her Campaign by Brakkton Booker for POLITICO: 'Virginia GOP gubernatorial nominee Winsome Earle-Sears is set to announce staff changes later this week, according to three people familiar with campaign personnel decisions — an attempt to turn things around as her campaign lags in polling and fundraising.
Earle-Sears, Virginia's lieutenant governor, is attempting to become the first Black woman ever elected governor in the nation's history, and the first Virginia Republican in nearly 30 years to succeed a sitting GOP governor. Democrats and Republicans alike see the governor's race as an important bellwether ahead of the 2026 midterms and an appraisal of President Donald Trump's first few months back in office.'
A Separatist Movement Is Brewing in Canada — But Don't Count on a 51st State by Mickey Djuric for POLITICO: 'Many Canadians are furious with President Donald Trump, aghast at his trade war and his calls to annex their country. Then there's Danielle Smith, premier of Alberta.
'We have a longstanding relationship with the Americans that goes back over 100 years, and it's going to last 100 years or more,' she says in an interview with POLITICO Magazine. Smith's approach may be distinct in part because she's a Conservative who meets regularly with Trump administration officials.'
Judges Oust Trump Ally Alina Habba as New Jersey's Top Prosecutor by Ry Rivard and Daniel Han for POLITICO: 'Federal judges declined to keep President Donald Trump's former personal attorney as New Jersey's top federal prosecutor, exercising an arcane statute to rebuff the Trump administration's wishes.
New Jersey district court judges voted to not let interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba stay on the job after her 120-day interim term expires, instead picking prosecutor Desiree Leigh Grace, according to a court order posted to the judiciary's website.'
Number of the Week
Read more on that here.
MUST READS
U.S. Olympic Officials Bar Transgender Women from Women's Competitions by Juliet Macur for The New York Times: 'The United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee quietly changed its eligibility rules on Monday to bar transgender women from competing in Olympic women's sports, and now will comply with President Trump's executive order on the issue, according to a post on the organization's website.
The new policy, expressed in a short, vaguely worded paragraph, is tucked under the category of 'USOPC Athlete Safety Policy' on the site, and does not include details of how the ban will work. Nor does the new policy include the word 'transgender' or the title of Mr. Trump's executive order, 'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports,' referring to it instead as 'Executive Order 14201.''
The Administration Wants Military Women to Know Their Place by Tom Nichols for The Atlantic:
'President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth seem to be on a mission to erase women from the top ranks of the U.S. armed forces. Last week, they took another step along this path by removing the first female head of the United States Naval Academy, in Annapolis, Maryland.
The Naval Academy was founded in 1845, but didn't admit its first class of women until 1976. The head of the school is known as the superintendent, and Annapolis would not get its first female admiral in that position until 2024. Now the first woman to serve as the 'supe' has been reassigned and replaced by a man, and for the first time in the academy's history, the role went to a Marine.'
Uber Is Testing a Women-only Driver Service. Here's How It Works. by Frances Vinall for The Washington Post: 'Uber will soon introduce a new ride-hailing feature in the United States that allows women to request female drivers, and gives women drivers the option to only accept trip requests from women.
The feature, called 'Women Preferences,' could help address long-standing safety concerns, as ride-sharing services have grappled with issues including assault. Uber said it was responding to feedback from women riders and drivers, offering them 'more choice, more confidence, and more flexibility.'
Quote of the Week
Read the full story here.
on the move
Danielle Sassoon is now a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. She previously was U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, from which she resigned in protest of Justice Department leadership. (h/t POLITICO Playbook)
PhRMA's public affairs team has added Elise Shutzer as VP (previously at ExxonMobil), Cait DeBaun as chief of staff (previously at American Beverage Association) and Kristen Booze as senior director (previously at the FDA). (h/t POLITICO Playbook).
Allyson Jones-Brimmer has been appointed executive director of the Northeast Dairy Producers Association, per Morning Agriculture. She has served as the group's vice president of regulatory and legislative affairs since November 2023. (h/t POLITICO Influence)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We Must Protect American Courtrooms From Foreign Interference
We Must Protect American Courtrooms From Foreign Interference

Newsweek

time4 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

We Must Protect American Courtrooms From Foreign Interference

In most American courtrooms today, a party in court could be financed by foreign interests (and other unrelated third parties) without the other party ever knowing it. This alternate funder may be an investor hoping for uncorrelated returns, a wealthy donor with personal or business interests in the case, or an affiliate of an adversarial nation seeking to undermine U.S. competitiveness. The third-party litigation funding industry operates in the Wild West. Any outside group can pay the bills for a party in a legal dispute. They do this often in exchange for a percentage of an eventual settlement. Absent a handful of states that have passed disclosure laws affecting their own state court systems, the vast majority of state and federal courts do not require parties to disclose who's paying their legal costs—not to other parties and not even to the presiding judge. A stone sign for the United States Court House in downtown Los Angeles, Calif. is pictured. A stone sign for the United States Court House in downtown Los Angeles, Calif. is pictured. Getty Images But disclosure is critical and not just for transparency's sake. Incentives matter in the courtroom. The American civil litigation system is premised on fairness, impartiality, and the pursuit of justice. If a party's funders have hidden motives that stray from the desire to fairly resolve a dispute, trust in the system is put at risk. Foreign sources of litigation funding introduce a whole new set of perverse incentives. A foreign funder may finance a case in order to gain access to sensitive intellectual property or even to evade sanctions that prohibit transactions or investments in U.S. capital markets. Also, since litigation funders have their own monetary and non-monetary goals, the funder may push its client to demand steeper settlement terms than the client would otherwise consider. These are not hypothetical situations. In 2024, Bloomberg Law reported that a group of sanctioned Russian billionaires created an investment fund to back bankruptcy lawsuits in New York and London thus allowing the oligarchs to steer (launder) tens of millions into western financial institutions. In another instance, China-based technology firm PurpleVine financed several intellectual property lawsuits against Samsung. This was discovered by a lone overseeing judge in Delaware who luckily requires litigation financing disclosure in his courtroom. Had the case not crossed his desk, the defendants may never have known that their case was hardly a mere legal challenge but, in actuality, a case with national security importance. Foreign donors may also fund lawsuits that advance their personal agendas. Last year, Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) filings revealed that an Australian mining billionaire was paying the legal bills for a coalition of environmental nonprofits in their lawsuit against ExxonMobil. The billionaire, Andrew Forrest, runs a mining empire that he aims to convert into a clean-energy provider—demonstrating both ideological and anticompetitive reasons to target an American oil major that he would not otherwise have standing to sue. This backdoor litigation is getting foreign companies and even foreign governments into American courtrooms they otherwise wouldn't be able to access. Since the third-party litigation funding industry is entirely unregulated, each of these examples only came to light by accident: strong investigative reporting; a lone judge's standing transparency order; and a buried FARA filing. But in each instance, the discovery of foreign funding changed both public perception and legal strategy. Routine civil suits became vehicles for money laundering, corporate espionage, and personal grievance. Unregulated third-party litigation financing is a crucial vulnerability for American competitiveness and national security. In order to secure a just and fair civil justice system, it's only common sense that parties should know who they're up against. We must act quickly as this "hidden party" industry is growing at a pace stressing the non-existent regulatory regime. One estimate values the global market at $17.5 billion in 2025, and it is forecasted to grow to $67.2 billion by 2037. Naturally, it's also becoming more complex. Opportunistic actors are developing secondary markets—a "stock exchange for lawsuits"—which, if left unregulated as well, will only create new avenues for foreign actors to distort the civil justice system and surreptitiously move capital. Regulators can be certain that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and other adversarial nations have taken notice of this influx of cash into the industry. The CCP may be responsible for a significant part of this cash flow, but we cannot be sure. Under the current system, neither national security officials nor legal professionals have any way to discern the source of billions of dollars propping up civil suits from behind the curtain. A number of bills in state legislatures and in Congress have been introduced to require disclosure of any third-party litigation financing—of foreign funding in particular. This is a welcome development. Lawmakers in Washington and in statehouses across the country should move with alacrity and act on this issue before American companies, our justice system, and our capital markets are subjected to further foreign meddling. Former Representative Michael Patrick Flanagan (R-Ill.) previously represented the 5th District of Illinois in the U.S. House of Representatives and sat on the Committee on the Judiciary. An attorney, he previously served in the U.S. Army and retired at the rank of captain. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Musk-linked PAC spends big to promote newly enacted megabill
Musk-linked PAC spends big to promote newly enacted megabill

Politico

time4 minutes ago

  • Politico

Musk-linked PAC spends big to promote newly enacted megabill

President Donald Trump pounds a gavel presented to him by House Speaker Mike Johnson after he signed his signature bill at the White House on July 4, 2025. | Evan Vucci/AP By Gregory Svirnovskiy 08/04/2025 05:55 AM EDT Building America's Future, a PAC that has been supported by Elon Musk, is shelling out more than a million dollars to promote recent White House wins, including a GOP domestic policy package the Tesla CEO and former Trump administration employee once called 'a disgusting abomination.' The 30-second ad, titled 'Independence,' is set to run nationally on Fox News and will congratulate President Donald Trump on the passage of Republicans' 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' which extends his 2017 tax cuts alongside other GOP wins at the expense of nearly $1 trillion in coming Medicaid cuts. 'This Independence Day, President Trump and Congress made the working family tax cuts law,' the spot, which is to debut Monday, will say. 'Freeing Americans from taxes on their tips and overtime, doubling the child tax credit, and cutting taxes for seniors. Republicans know that our country is better off when working families keep more of what they earn. Now, they will.'

Fewer Than 1,000 Trump Gold Cards Will Be Sold—Experts
Fewer Than 1,000 Trump Gold Cards Will Be Sold—Experts

Newsweek

time5 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Fewer Than 1,000 Trump Gold Cards Will Be Sold—Experts

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. While Trump administration officials have said that more than 70,000 people have expressed interest in the Trump "gold card" visa, some industry experts suggest the number of sales may be significantly lower. Latitude Managing Director Chris Willis told Newsweek, "In the end, less than 1,000 Trump Cards will be sold—far below the standards for a golden visa program." Newsweek has contacted the U.S. Commerce Department for comment. Why It Matters The gold card proposal, introduced in February, would grant U.S. residency to foreign nationals who invest $5 million in the United States. The fast-track pathway targets high-net-worth individuals looking for a route to American citizenship. Since returning to office on January 20, President Donald Trump has enacted sweeping changes to U.S. immigration policy and has moved to limit other immigration pathways, with his administration pausing the processing of some green card applications and ending the temporary legal status of certain migrant groups. A person in Shanghai, China, holds a smartphone displaying the website for registering interest in the new U.S. gold card visa on June 12. A person in Shanghai, China, holds a smartphone displaying the website for registering interest in the new U.S. gold card visa on June 12. Wang Gang/VCG via AP What To Know Since Trump announced the gold card visa program, it has drawn criticism, with experts calling it too expensive. "The key flaw with the Trump Card is that it's overpriced. The Trump administration is overestimating the value of American citizenship," said Latitude CEO Eric Major, who founded HSBC's Global Investor Immigration Services. Latitude, a global advisory firm, advises wealthy clients on dual passports and gold visas worldwide. "A required $5 million donation—not even an investment—is at least five times higher than comparable pathways in Europe," Major told Newsweek. "Without a proper legal basis, the Trump Card lacks legitimacy in the eyes of the market," he added. A key feature of the proposed visa is that recipients would be taxed solely on income they earn in the U.S., rather than on their worldwide income. The program faces several obstacles, Major said. To create such a pathway, the U.S. would need to significantly revise the Internal Revenue Code. This would include establishing a new classification of taxpayers that is separate from citizens, green card holders and those meeting the substantial presence test. These groups are currently taxed on worldwide income. Such changes cannot be made through executive order. It would require legislation passed by both chambers of Congress. According to the global investment migration firm Henley & Partners, interest in U.S. residency programs among wealthy individuals has increased, driven in part by renewed attention to established initiatives such as the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program following the gold card announcement. The EB-5 program, created in 1990, requires applicants to pay fees ranging from $100,000 to $200,000 to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, invest between $800,000 and $1 million, and create a minimum of 10 jobs for American workers. In June, the administration launched a website where foreign nationals can register their interest in the program. Registration is open to anyone. What People Are Saying Latitude CEO Eric Major told Newsweek: "The Trump Card, as currently presented, appears to have been launched for political branding. Even though they appear to have received close to 70,000 registrations, this reflects expressions of interest only. No formal applications have been processed, and the scheme still faces severe legal and legislative uncertainty, including whether Congress will approve the new visa category." Abigail Jackson, a White House spokesperson, previously told Newsweek: "President Trump is a businessman and innovator who is always looking for new ways to bring investment back to the United States and encourage legal immigration." David Lesperance, the managing partner at Lesperance & Associates, told Newsweek: "I doubt if the Trump Card will ever see the light of day." What Happens Next While individuals and businesses can register their interest in the visa on details about official application procedures and the vetting and approval processes have not been announced.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store