Fintech challenges due to new US policies: By Konstantin Rabin
The global fintech sector has faced unprecedented challenges lately due to rapid changes in U.S. policies. The second term of President Trump has been a bumpy road for financial markets and businesses worldwide. Frequent updates and announcements about tariffs and geopolitics shook markets as well as the global fintech environment. What is a good business idea one day, turns out completely useless on another. The Trump administration's deregulatory agenda, 'America First' and crypto-friendly stance promise to reshape fintech operations and cross-border transactions.
The State of the New U.S. Policy Landscape
The Trump administration is known for its anti-biden tone and many of Biden-era policies are about to reverse. As a result, the landscape can shift to different scenarios where some fintechs thrive while others struggle.
Deregulation accelerated
It is expected that the partial rollback of Dodd-Frank will be resumed which will reduce the compliance burden for fintech leading to more intense competition. This has the potential to lower entry barriers for new startups meaning more and more new fintech companies will be introduced, which will make the life of established startups more difficult as they have to face many competitors.
Cypro policies reversed
Trump promised to end the 'persecution' of crypto and it includes rescinding of SEC's Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 which was blocking bank crypto custody. It is no secret that the blockchain sector is home to a plethora of revolutionary startups especially fintech companies and this stance is very positive. However, this also introduces compliance challenges for crypto fintech startups which leaves uncertainty on the table.
Capital rules changed
The Basel III Endgame proposal will likely get scrapped easing capital requirements for banks partnering with fintechs. Also, CFBP rules on 'open banking' and nonbank payment supervision face revision which eliminates some challenges.
FX Volatility: The Silent Fintech Growth Killer?
Currency fluctuations have become extremely volatile lately due to tariff announcements. This can have profound effects on fintech startups that are directly involved with currencies. As commented by experts from Luxren Capital: 'Unstable FX rates pose existential risks for international fintech due to margin compression in volatile quarters - forcing them to choose between absorbing losses or increasing pricing on services.' Transferring costs to end-users makes fintechs less competitive to clients but due to foreign exchange volatility, this might be a reality for fintechs. This might seem like a little issue at first but financial technology companies are mostly involved with currencies and heightened volatility directly impacts their profitability and service quality.
Fintechs facilitating cross-border transactions and converting one currency into another are especially vulnerable to FX volatility caused by Trump's tariff announcements. This volatility is not just a treasury issue either as it can cascade into payment failure, and settlement delays, and negatively affect the company's reputation.
Trump's Tariffs
Both stock market and foreign exchange volatility are primarily caused by Trump's announcements regarding tariffs. Many startups experience serious turbulence as they face both stock price crashes and currency risks simultaneously coupled with increased competition in the sector. Tariffs directly affect the economy and companies that face higher costs are naturally prone to bankruptcy despite the President's pro-business stance.
Immigration barriers
Trump is also known for his anti-immigration rhetoric and policies. Trump's anticipated H-1B visa cuts can starve fintechs of 40% of their engineering talent, which has a serious impact. While AI can replace many of the jobs it can not keep up with the decline of this scale. Tariffs can also force fintech to establish elsewhere like Ireland and Mexico to acquire talent and maintain low costs.
Compliance fracturing
The U.S. regulatory landscape that consists of 50 state regimes plus federal agencies creates minefields for fintechs. Data privacy fragmentation becomes a real issue as Biden's 2024 Executive Order for unified biometric and genomic data rules might get revoked. There are also licensing inconsistencies across US states. Money transfer licenses which are required in 50 states cost fintechs 500k-2M dollars annually, which makes it difficult to launch new startups without strong capital support. The OCC's fintech charter is currently blocked and it could simplify this but faces opposition from state regulators, making fintech life difficult.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Man mistakenly deported to El Salvador brought back to US to face charges
His abrupt release from El Salvador is the latest twist in a saga that sparked a months-long standoff between Trump administration officials and the courts over a deportation that officials initially acknowledged was done in error but then continued to stand behind in apparent defiance of orders by judges to facilitate his return to the US. The development occurred after US officials presented El Salvador President Nayib Bukele with an arrest warrant for federal charges in Tennessee accusing Abrego Garcia of playing a key role in smuggling immigrants into the country for money. He is expected to be prosecuted in the US and, if convicted, will be returned to his home country of El Salvador at the conclusion of the case, officials said. 'This is what American justice looks like,' US attorney general Pam Bondi said in announcing Abrego Garcia's return and the unsealing of a grand jury indictment. Abrego Garcia's lawyers called the case 'baseless'. 'There's no way a jury is going to see the evidence and agree that this sheet metal worker is the leader of an international MS-13 smuggling conspiracy,' lawyer Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg said. Federal magistrate judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville, Tennessee, determined that Abrego Garcia will be held in custody until at least next Friday, when there will be an arraignment and detention hearing. The indictment of Kilmar Abrego Garcia that charges him with transporting people who were in the United States illegally (AP Photo/Jon Elswick) Abrego Garcia appeared in court wearing a short-sleeved, white, buttoned shirt. When asked if he understood the charges, he told the judge through an interpreter: 'Yes. I understand.' Democrats and immigrant rights groups had pressed for Abrego Garcia's release, with several politicians – including senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, where Abrego Garcia had lived for years – even travelling to El Salvador to visit him. A federal judge had ordered him to be returned in April and the US Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal by directing the government to work to bring him back. But the news that Abrego Garcia, who had an immigration court order preventing his deportation to his native country over fears he would face persecution from local gangs, was being brought back for the purpose of prosecution was greeted with dismay by his lawyers. The case also prompted the resignation of a top supervisor in the US attorney's office in Nashville, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel matter. Ben Schrader, who was chief of the office's criminal division, did not explain the reason for his resignation but posted to social media around the time the indictment was being handed down, saying: 'It has been an incredible privilege to serve as a prosecutor with the Department of Justice, where the only job description I've ever known is to do the right thing, in the right way, for the right reasons.' He declined to comment when reached by The Associated Press on Friday.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Tesla shares rebound slightly after $150bn wipe-out triggered by Musk's spat with Trump
Tesla shares were sent into freefall on Thursday after Elon Musk sounded off about Donald Trump and his policies on social media this week. The debacle saw roughly $150billion wiped from Tesla's market value in one of the worst days in months. While the electric car maker's share price tumbled 14 per cent on Thursday, it rebounded slightly on Friday following some indications tempers were cooling between the duo. Earlier this week, Trump threatened to cut off government contracts to Musk's businesses, including rocket firm SpaceX, which has contracts worth tens of billions of dollars with the US government. In response, Musk fired back and said: 'Go ahead, make my day.' The saga seemed to quieten somewhat on Friday as Musk broke his silence by agreeing with an X post that claimed he never attacked Trump personally. The initial feud was ignited over Musk's opposition to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill', before he launched into a series of attacks on the president and alleged he was 'in the Epstein files. Trump quickly branded Musk 'crazy' and said he has 'lost his mind'. The president also moved to sell his Tesla that he bought from Musk when their relationship was rosier in March, in a parting insult after saying he ousted Musk from his White House. US subsidies and contracts at Federal and state level are worth billions to Tesla, which also currently benefits from a $7,500 tax credit available for electric vehicle purchases. Tesla shares closed at $295.14 this week, down around 14 per cent on less than a week ago and down nearly a quarter on where they were six months ago. But the shares are still around 66 higher than they were a year ago. Tesla shares rose more than 60 per cent between the start of November when Trump was elected to the end of 2024. But investor pressure over Musk's controversial role in the White House ultimately led to him to stepping down from his unofficial 'DOGE' department, which had sparked protests and vandalism directed at Tesla. Tesla shares were on a run more recently, however, after Musk confirmed the group would be testing an autonomous, driverless 'robotaxi' service in Austin, Texas, this month. Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, said this week: 'Tesla shareholders are stuck in the middle of the battle zone as whatever happens to Musk will act as a proxy for the car company's share price. 'Trump has signalled he could terminate US government contracts with Musk's companies, causing Tesla's share price to crash 14 per cent in a day.' He added: 'Musk's outspokenness is becoming a liability for Tesla shareholders. 'He recently pledged to stay on as CEO for at least another five years, but if he cannot be restrained from stoking fires on the public stage, Tesla's board might have to think long and hard about his future with the business.' Neil Wilson, UK investor strategist at Saxo Markets, said on Friday: 'I spoke almost a year ago to Mark Spiegel of Stanphyl Capital in New York. 'He said it was just a matter of time before Musk and Trump fell out – the only question was who would shaft who first but his view was that sooner or later everyone "gets Musked". 'An ugly, name-calling, chest-thumping public brawl on Twitter between the richest guy in the world and the most powerful guy in the world – it's what the platform was made for. 'It's also whacked Tesla stock as bulls need to reassess their upside case for the carmaker. 'Both probably realise that this is doing each of them a lot of harm – Musk could lose billions of dollars in government contracts and tax credits, while Trump could see his 'big beautiful bill' fail to pass.'
Evening Standard
an hour ago
- Evening Standard
Trump announces US-China trade talks in London next week
Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Mr Trump said Mr Xi had agreed to restart exports of rare earth minerals and magnets to the US which China had slowed, threatening a range of manufacturers that relied on the critical materials.
