
How a lung gene is linked to post-COVID symptoms as per genetics study
Why some people develop long COVID while others recover quickly remains unclear. A recent genome-wide association study published in Nature Genetics analysed genetic data from six major global ancestries to investigate whether inherited differences play a role.
A diverse study
The study, conducted under the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative at the Germans Trias i Pujol research institute in Spain, used a Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) to identify genetic risk factors for long COVID. GWAS scans the genome for small 'spelling mistakes'— also known as single-nucleotide polymorphisms — in the DNA sequence that appear more often in people with a condition than in those without. This method has helped uncover links to many complex and chronic disorders.
The analysis used data from 33 groups across 19 countries, making it one of the largest efforts to date in this area. The researchers first analysed data from 6,450 long COVID cases and over one million population controls. In this discovery phase, they identified a genetic signal near the FOXP4 gene. This signal was then tested in a separate replication cohort of more than 9,500 cases and nearly 8,00,000 controls, and the association was confirmed.
The researchers applied two definitions of long COVID: a strict one requiring test-confirmed infection and ongoing symptoms, and a broader one that included self-reported or clinical diagnoses. Controls were also defined strictly (infected but recovered) or broadly (general population without long COVID). This helped the team test whether its results held up across different clinical definitions.
Gene linked to long COVID risk
The analysis found a strong association between long COVID and a region on chromosome 6, near the FOXP4 gene. A specific variant in the region, called rs9367106, increased the risk of developing long COVID. People with the 'C' version of this variant were about 63% more likely to have long COVID symptoms than those without it.
Notably, FOXP4 increased long COVID risk even in people who weren't hospitalised, suggesting its effect is not tied solely to the severity of the initial infection. The variant's frequency also varied across populations. It appeared in about 1.6% of non-Finnish Europeans but up to 36% of East Asians. Because it was more common in some groups, its effects were easier to detect, even in smaller samples.
This highlights why genetic studies that include diverse populations are more reliable and globally relevant.
From lungs to immunity
To understand the connection between FOXP4 and long COVID, the researchers examined how active this gene was in different tissues and cell types and how its activity related to the condition.
The authors noted that the variant lies in a stretch of DNA that is especially 'active' in lung tissue, suggesting it may affect how lungs function. Using GTEx, a large gene activity database, they found that a nearby variant (rs12660421), often inherited with rs9367106, was linked to higher levels of FOXP4 expression in the lung. This made it more likely that the gene influences how the lungs respond to infection and injury.
Going further, the researchers checked which lung cells produced FOXP4 most strongly. They found high activity in type 2 alveolar cells, key players in keeping air sacs open, clearing fluids, and repairing tissue damage. These cells also help coordinate the immune response to respiratory viruses like SARS-CoV-2. The same genetic region has also been associated with lung cancer in earlier research, suggesting that FOXP4 may influence multiple lung-related conditions via shared biological pathways.
To test whether FOXP4 activity — and not just the genetic variant — might be linked to long COVID, researchers analysed blood samples from people who had recovered from the initial phase of infection. They found that individuals with moderately higher levels of FOXP4 had more than twice the odds of developing long COVID. This association persisted even outside the acute illness phase, suggesting a longer-term role for the gene.
Finally, a technique called co-localisation analysis showed a 91% probability that the same genetic signal affects both FOXP4 activity and long COVID risk, reinforcing the gene's biological importance.
India's genomic gaps
The study has important implications for India, given its large population, genetic diversity, and significant COVID-19 burden. Multiple waves of infection and unequal access to care mean many Indians may continue to face lasting symptoms, often undiagnosed or untreated due to limited awareness and clinical follow-up.
Indian studies suggest a wide range in long COVID prevalence: from 45% to nearly 80% depending on design, follow-up, and illness severity. One multicentre study across Hyderabad, Vellore, Mumbai, and Thiruvalla found that 16.5% of hospitalised patients self-reported symptoms like fatigue and breathlessness even a year after discharge.
Although the GWAS included participants from six ancestry groups, the authors said most datasets were of European origin. South Asian representation was limited or unclear. This is a broader issue across GWAS in general, many of which have focused on European populations. Thus, it remains uncertain how frequently the FOXP4 variant occurs in the Indian population or whether its effects are similar in local contexts, particularly given region-specific factors such as air pollution, metabolic risk, and healthcare variability.
India's growing genomic infrastructure is beginning to close foundational data gaps. The GenomeIndia Project has released genomic data on 10,000 individuals from diverse Indian populations. While the project is not focused on disease mapping, it provides a foundational catalogue of genetic variation across populations. This reference can support future studies, such as an India-specific GWAS on long COVID, thus building confidence in translating findings into clinical or diagnostic settings in local contexts.
Some limitations
This large-scale international study identifies FOXP4 as a genetic factor linked to long COVID, offering a new clue as to why some individuals experience prolonged symptoms after a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
However, the authors also note several limitations.
Most data were collected before widespread vaccination and the emergence of newer variants like Omicron, making it unclear if the findings apply to all populations today. They also caution that evolving definitions of long COVID may have led to misclassification in some cohorts.
Additionally, the overall genetic contribution to long COVID appears modest, suggesting that other factors, including immunity and pre-existing conditions, also play key roles.
As India continues to address the long-term effects of the pandemic, studies like this highlight the importance of including diverse populations in genetic research.
Such efforts can improve public health responses and help tailor care for those living with long COVID.
Anirban Mukhopadhyay is a geneticist by training and science communicator from Delhi.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
33 minutes ago
- India Today
Covid-19 no longer a barrier to organ donation, but here's what has changed
When Covid-19 first gripped the world in early 2020, it brought a wave of uncertainty, not just about treatment and prevention, but about other critical areas of healthcare, including organ someone who had recovered from Covid safely donate a kidney or liver? Would traces of the virus still linger in their body and harm a transplant recipient?Five years on, medical experts say the answer is 'Yes, people who have recovered from Covid-19 can safely donate organs,' says Dr. Ajeet Singh, Head of Critical Care Medicine at Aakash Healthcare. 'We have come a long way in understanding this virus and its effects. A donor who has recovered and tests negative poses no risk to the recipient.'A landmark study from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, US, backs this up. It found that kidneys from donors who had previously tested positive for Covid were safe for transplantation, with no traces of the virus being passed from donor to recipient."As a physician, during the early part of Covid-19 pandemic, concerns led to exclusions of the fear of viral transmission of Covid to the recipients through organs, possibility of persistent infection even after recovery and interruptions in viability of organs by inflammation or damage. There was high risk in immunosuppressed recipients, and residuals could not be ruled out by limited testing. Safety issues regarding health care workers and the shortage of resources were other causes of blanket bans," Dr. Vikas Agarwal, Director and HOD, Robotic Urology, Aakash Healthcare, tells this notion changed. An analysis by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) found that organ transplants from donors who had tested positive for Covid-19 had similar graft survival rates to those from donors without the India, a multicentre study on 31 kidney transplants from living donors who had recovered from Covid-19 reported no virus transmission or unusual complications in reviews have confirmed the safety of using COVID-recovered donors, provided they test negative before the transplant. In the case of heart and lung transplants, short-term safety data is reassuring, and long-term outcomes are already being THE PANDEMIC CHANGED ORGAN DONATION RULESDuring the peak of the pandemic, organ donation practices underwent a drastic shift. Many hospitals suspended donations from Covid-positive patients, and even those who had recovered, due to fear of possible transmission.'Initially, we were extremely cautious. Any donor with a Covid history was automatically ruled out,' says Dr. Rajiv Kumar Sethia, Director & Head of Urology, Kidney Transplant & Robotic Surgery at Asian adds, however, that that because research and "with all the safety checks we have in place today, organ donations from patients who have recovered from Covid-19 are completely safe.'advertisementHospitals now follow strict screening protocols to ensure donors are fully recovered and test negative before proceeding with a protocols require donors to undergo a SARS-CoV-2 PCR test using a nasopharyngeal swab, with a negative result obtained within three days before organ retrieval. Donors' symptoms, exposure history, and recovery from COVID-19 must also be carefully reviewed and immunosuppressed recipients, additional precautions are taken through universal microbiologic screening, including organ-specific tests such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for lung also check the donor's medical history, symptoms, and exposure to Covid, and make sure their recovery is well-documented."In high-risk cases, like for people with weakened immune systems, extra tests are done — including organ-specific checks such as a lung fluid test for lung transplants. In many cases, there is also a waiting period of 21 to 90 days after the donor's recovery before the transplant goes ahead," says Dr. Vikas and intestines, however, are bound to be more restrictive, as the risk of viral persistence is more. "For lung transplants, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is required in addition to regular swab tests, and a delay of six to seven weeks after recovery is recommended," adds Dr. kidneys, liver, and heart transplants, standard negative PCR testing is generally sufficient, with fewer additional transplants have minimal restrictions unless there is systemic infection. These guidelines continue to be updated as new evidence ONGOING TRANSPLANT GAPWhile this scientific clarity is good news, India continues to face a deep mismatch between the number of organs needed and those country performs the third-highest number of transplants in the world, after the US and China, but the per capita rate remains to The Lancet Regional Health – Southeast Asia, more than 2 lakh people in India develop end-stage kidney failure each year. Yet only about 11,000 kidney transplants are carried out annually, leaving thousands dependent on dialysis or without any Ajeet points to two major challenges: the shortage of organ donors and the difficulty of transporting organs to rural and smaller towns in time.'Most transplants in India still happen in private hospitals. We need stronger public systems where more people can access transplants without worrying about costs," he CULTURAL AND AWARENESS BARRIEREven when organ donation is medically possible, many families hesitate to donate a loved one's organs after death. In this, usually religious beliefs, lack of awareness, and fear of the process are among the biggest in small towns face a lot of hesitation when it comes to organ donations. We need better awareness and simpler legal procedures so that more people can come forward to donate," says Dr. Sunita Kapoor, Director & Laboratory Head at City X-ray Scan & TO LESSEN THE GAPTo bridge the gap between demand and availability, Dr. Sunita says that besides widespread awareness about the importance of deceased organ donation, we also need to simplifying the legal process for consenting to organ donation."Investing in public transplant infrastructure so that life-saving surgeries are not limited to those who can afford private care," she Covid-19 no longer stands in the way of safe organ donation, India still faces deep systemic, cultural, and logistical challenges in ensuring that life-saving organs reach the patients who need them most.- Ends


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Homeschooled Student Solves 40-Year-Old Math Theory, Gets Direct PhD Admission
Last Updated: Hannah has been offered a place in the University of Maryland's PhD programme in mathematics, bypassing the need for a high school diploma or college degree. Anyone can earn a PhD if they complete their degree and postgraduate studies, pass difficult entrance exams, and qualify at the top. However, a young woman who studied at home rather than attending school got the chance to pursue a PhD directly after solving a mathematical theory that had been a mystery for 40 years. Seventeen-year-old Hannah Cairo from the Bahamas achieved this remarkable feat. Hannah disproved the Mizohata–Takeuchi conjecture, a longstanding problem in mathematics within the realm of harmonic analysis, which studies how waves behave on curved surfaces. Many mathematicians had attempted to solve it over the years, but Hannah proved it wrong and provided a clear example to demonstrate why. Born in the Bahamas and homeschooled by her parents, who encouraged her to delve deeply into subjects of interest, Hannah chose mathematics. By age 11, she had mastered calculus and went on to study university-level subjects such as linear algebra, differential equations, and topology. She read books, took online classes, and occasionally had tutoring. During the COVID-19 lockdowns, Hannah joined the Chicago Math Circle online, where she engaged with problems more advanced than typical schoolwork. This introduced her to the questions and ideas that professional mathematicians grapple with. At 14, Hannah applied to the Berkeley Math Circle summer programme, stating on her application that she had already covered the advanced undergraduate math curriculum—a true claim. Her application was accepted, allowing her to join Berkeley's concurrent enrolment program and take university-level classes alongside graduate students, all while still officially in school. A professor named Ruixiang Zhang introduced Hannah to the Mizohata-Takeuchi conjecture, which predicted limits on how waves can focus on curved surfaces. While many students might have viewed it as a challenging puzzle, Hannah sought to create examples that defied the conjecture's rules, despite frequently encountering dead ends. Although Zhang doubted some of her ideas, Hannah persisted. Her breakthrough came with a seemingly simple idea: instead of trying to work within the pattern of the conjecture, she thought of creating an entirely different wave pattern. She developed waves that extended rather than intersected. After thorough testing, her example showed that the conjecture's predictions were completely incorrect. In February, Hannah published her research paper on arXiv. Some experts were astonished and congratulated her, while others were sceptical, questioning how someone so young could achieve such a feat. Consequently, Hannah was offered a place in the University of Maryland's PhD programme in mathematics, bypassing the need for a high school diploma or college degree. view comments First Published: August 13, 2025, 14:36 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
37,00,000 a year, 10,000 per day: The scaring figures of doge bite in India
Synopsis India's dog bite crisis is spiralling into a serious public health challenge, with numbers that experts describe as deeply alarming. In 2024 alone, the country recorded 37.17 lakh dog bite cases — averaging more than 10,000 incidents every single day. These figures reveal a widening gap between the Centre's goal of eliminating rabies by 2030 and the realities on the ground. PTI A dog barks at children playing in the rain on the Kartavya Path, in New Delhi. India's dog bite crisis is escalating at a pace that public health experts find deeply alarming. In 2024 alone, the country recorded 37.17 lakh cases, an average of over 10,000 dog bites every single day. This surge points to a growing gap between disease prevention goals and on-ground one looks at official rabies death figures, the contrast is startling. Government data for 2022 recorded just 21 rabies deaths. The WHO, using Indian government and other domestic sources, reported 305 deaths for the same year, as per The Times of India. Yet, WHO's modelling estimates 18,000–20,000 deaths annually in India -- more than 36% of global rabies fatalities. Most of these victims are children under 15, a group especially vulnerable to stray dog attacks. As per ToI analysis, dog bite cases dipped during the Covid years -- from 75.7 lakh in 2018 to just 17 lakh in 2021 -- but have surged again since, touching 37.2 lakh in 2024. Maharashtra leads the tally with 13.5 lakh cases between 2022 and 2024, followed by Tamil Nadu (12.9 lakh) and Gujarat (8.4 lakh).As per the latest available census data from 2019, Uttar Pradesh had the highest stray dog population in India at 20.6 lakh, followed by Odisha with 17.3 lakh. Maharashtra and Rajasthan each reported 12.8 lakh strays, while Karnataka had 11.4 lakh. A total of 26,334 dog bite cases have been reported in Delhi so far this year, official data accessed by PTI shown. Of these, 9,920 cases were recorded at Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) hospitals, while 15,010 cases were reported at its anti-rabies vaccination (ARV) data indicates that 68,090 dog bite cases were recorded in the city in 2024. As of July 31 this year, Delhi has reported 49 cases of rabies, according to the data. Between January 25 and June 25, more than 65,000 stray dogs have been sterilised and vaccinated. During the same January–June period, the capital saw 35,198 animal bite incidents in civic body has earlier announced plans to sterilise and vaccinate 97,994 dogs between April 2024 and December 2025. In comparison, 79,959 dogs were sterilised in 2023–24 and 59,076 in the preceding has emerged as one of the most worrying hotspots, logging 3.6 lakh dog bites and 42 rabies deaths in 2024 alone. In just the past six months, the state recorded 2.3 lakh incidents and 19 deaths. Kerala too has seen a sharp spike in to ToI , Gurgaon has an estimated 50,000 stray dogs but only two operational shelters, each with a capacity of 50 animals, and two more under construction. The Animal Birth Control Rules, 2023, which require sterilised dogs to be returned to their original locations, have meant that large-scale shelter infrastructure was never developed. In Ghaziabad, the last census counted 48,000 stray dogs. Noida's situation is more severe -- with no official census, estimates put the stray population as high as 1.5 lakh, but the city has only four private shelters. In the past seven months alone, Noida has reported 73,754 street dog bite is 100% preventable if victims receive prompt and complete post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Yet, India's combination of a vast stray population, patchy vaccination coverage, and poor public awareness continues to keep death rates Centre has pledged to eliminate rabies by 2030, aligning with global health goals. But with millions of dog bites annually and a fatality burden vastly underreported, experts warn that bridging the gap between policy and practice will require sustained vaccination campaigns, strict stray control measures, and public education drives. With inputs from ToI