Homeschooled Student Solves 40-Year-Old Math Theory, Gets Direct PhD Admission
Hannah has been offered a place in the University of Maryland's PhD programme in mathematics, bypassing the need for a high school diploma or college degree.
Anyone can earn a PhD if they complete their degree and postgraduate studies, pass difficult entrance exams, and qualify at the top. However, a young woman who studied at home rather than attending school got the chance to pursue a PhD directly after solving a mathematical theory that had been a mystery for 40 years. Seventeen-year-old Hannah Cairo from the Bahamas achieved this remarkable feat.
Hannah disproved the Mizohata–Takeuchi conjecture, a longstanding problem in mathematics within the realm of harmonic analysis, which studies how waves behave on curved surfaces. Many mathematicians had attempted to solve it over the years, but Hannah proved it wrong and provided a clear example to demonstrate why.
Born in the Bahamas and homeschooled by her parents, who encouraged her to delve deeply into subjects of interest, Hannah chose mathematics. By age 11, she had mastered calculus and went on to study university-level subjects such as linear algebra, differential equations, and topology. She read books, took online classes, and occasionally had tutoring.
During the COVID-19 lockdowns, Hannah joined the Chicago Math Circle online, where she engaged with problems more advanced than typical schoolwork. This introduced her to the questions and ideas that professional mathematicians grapple with.
At 14, Hannah applied to the Berkeley Math Circle summer programme, stating on her application that she had already covered the advanced undergraduate math curriculum—a true claim. Her application was accepted, allowing her to join Berkeley's concurrent enrolment program and take university-level classes alongside graduate students, all while still officially in school.
A professor named Ruixiang Zhang introduced Hannah to the Mizohata-Takeuchi conjecture, which predicted limits on how waves can focus on curved surfaces. While many students might have viewed it as a challenging puzzle, Hannah sought to create examples that defied the conjecture's rules, despite frequently encountering dead ends. Although Zhang doubted some of her ideas, Hannah persisted.
Her breakthrough came with a seemingly simple idea: instead of trying to work within the pattern of the conjecture, she thought of creating an entirely different wave pattern. She developed waves that extended rather than intersected. After thorough testing, her example showed that the conjecture's predictions were completely incorrect.
In February, Hannah published her research paper on arXiv. Some experts were astonished and congratulated her, while others were sceptical, questioning how someone so young could achieve such a feat. Consequently, Hannah was offered a place in the University of Maryland's PhD programme in mathematics, bypassing the need for a high school diploma or college degree.
view comments
First Published:
August 13, 2025, 14:36 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
ADHD Medicines Reduce Suicide, Crime Risks in Sweeping Study
(Bloomberg) -- Drugs to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder were linked to a reduced risk of suicidal behavior, substance misuse and criminality in the first research of its kind. The findings come amid increasing debate around whether ADHD is being over-diagnosed and therefore over-treated with drugs like Ritalin. The research published in the British Medical Journal on Wednesday did not investigate whether patients are being accurately diagnosed, but it does provide evidence supporting medical treatment. ADHD is characterized by difficulties with concentration and impulse control. Roughly 5% of children and 2.5% of adults are estimated to have the condition, which is also associated with an increased risk of substance misuse and self-harm. The researchers wanted to test whether the risk changed with medication. The study design was meant to closely mirror a randomized clinical trial, considered the gold standard of research. The scientists looked at health registry data from almost 150,000 patients newly diagnosed with ADHD in Sweden. At a two-year follow-up, they found that patients taking medicine had a 17% reduction in suicidal behavior and a 15% drop in substance misuse. They also found declines in the risk for criminality and transport accidents. When looking at the recurrence of these behaviors, there were also benefits linked to the medication. While the trial cannot show direct causation and could be confounded by factors such as ADHD severity, it provides doctors with vital evidence showing that drugs can address and reduce important risks, according to one of the authors. 'These data should inform clinical guidelines, policies and current debates,' said Samuele Cortese, a professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at the University of Southampton. The benefit was greater for patients taking stimulant medications than non-stimulants in the study. Stimulants include drugs like Novartis AG's Ritalin, while non-stimulants include Eli Lilly & Co.'s Strattera. The study results echo other similar conclusions, but 'the large sample size, use of a national registry, and more sophisticated analysis give greater confidence in these results that findings aren't explained by something else other than medication use,' said Adam Guastella, a clinical psychologist who works at Sydney Children's Hospital at Westmead and the University of Sydney's Brain and Mind Center. He was not involved in the research. Prescriptions in England for ADHD medicines have increased 18% year on year since the Covid-19 pandemic, according to research published in the BMJ Mental Health this year. The surge is believed to be linked to greater awareness of the condition. More stories like this are available on
News18
18 hours ago
- News18
Homeschooled Student Solves 40-Year-Old Math Theory, Gets Direct PhD Admission
Last Updated: Hannah has been offered a place in the University of Maryland's PhD programme in mathematics, bypassing the need for a high school diploma or college degree. Anyone can earn a PhD if they complete their degree and postgraduate studies, pass difficult entrance exams, and qualify at the top. However, a young woman who studied at home rather than attending school got the chance to pursue a PhD directly after solving a mathematical theory that had been a mystery for 40 years. Seventeen-year-old Hannah Cairo from the Bahamas achieved this remarkable feat. Hannah disproved the Mizohata–Takeuchi conjecture, a longstanding problem in mathematics within the realm of harmonic analysis, which studies how waves behave on curved surfaces. Many mathematicians had attempted to solve it over the years, but Hannah proved it wrong and provided a clear example to demonstrate why. Born in the Bahamas and homeschooled by her parents, who encouraged her to delve deeply into subjects of interest, Hannah chose mathematics. By age 11, she had mastered calculus and went on to study university-level subjects such as linear algebra, differential equations, and topology. She read books, took online classes, and occasionally had tutoring. During the COVID-19 lockdowns, Hannah joined the Chicago Math Circle online, where she engaged with problems more advanced than typical schoolwork. This introduced her to the questions and ideas that professional mathematicians grapple with. At 14, Hannah applied to the Berkeley Math Circle summer programme, stating on her application that she had already covered the advanced undergraduate math curriculum—a true claim. Her application was accepted, allowing her to join Berkeley's concurrent enrolment program and take university-level classes alongside graduate students, all while still officially in school. A professor named Ruixiang Zhang introduced Hannah to the Mizohata-Takeuchi conjecture, which predicted limits on how waves can focus on curved surfaces. While many students might have viewed it as a challenging puzzle, Hannah sought to create examples that defied the conjecture's rules, despite frequently encountering dead ends. Although Zhang doubted some of her ideas, Hannah persisted. Her breakthrough came with a seemingly simple idea: instead of trying to work within the pattern of the conjecture, she thought of creating an entirely different wave pattern. She developed waves that extended rather than intersected. After thorough testing, her example showed that the conjecture's predictions were completely incorrect. In February, Hannah published her research paper on arXiv. Some experts were astonished and congratulated her, while others were sceptical, questioning how someone so young could achieve such a feat. Consequently, Hannah was offered a place in the University of Maryland's PhD programme in mathematics, bypassing the need for a high school diploma or college degree. view comments First Published: August 13, 2025, 14:36 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Fraudulent research is 'destroying trust in science'
Representative image Fraudulent scientific research is on the rise and is jeopardizing medical research, experts have warned. A new study has found that networks of bad actors work together to publish bogus research. The findings, published in the journal PNAS this week came from analyzing more than 5 million scientific articles published across 70,000 journals. "There are groups of editors conspiring to publish low-quality articles, at scale, escaping traditional peer review processes," said the study's lead author Reese Richardson, a social scientist at Northwestern University in the US. The research uncovered evidence of networks of scientific journal editors who frequently publish research that is flagged for integrity issues, and "brokers" who connect fraudulent authors to these editor networks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo "This kind of fraud destroys trust in science . It biases systematic and meta-analysis, it delays treatment and delays new research," said Anna Abalkina, a social scientist at the Free University of Berlin, who was not involved in the study. Scientific fraud is a growing issue New scientific research is published as research papers in research journals. There are tens of thousands of different research journals, each publishing different themes of research, and with different levels of scientific impact. These journals are platforms for researchers to share their findings, theories and ideas with peers and the broader public. "Historically, the scientific [publication] enterprise has been an engine for progress. It's given us vaccines, antibiotics, the internet, sterile surgery … everything that makes life comfortable for us now," said Richardson. But sham research is on the rise — as many as one in seven research publications contain fake data, by some estimates. Artificial intelligence is also fueling this research misconduct. Fraudulent studies contain fabricated data, unverified results, plagiarized research or manipulated images. "You can map out networks of image duplication that are thousands of articles wide," Richardson said. Bogus research damages scientific integrity Fake or poor-quality research is typically caught by journal editors or peer reviewers, but experts warn it is increasingly making its way to publication by groups of bad actors working together. Several high-profile instances of scientific fraud have been uncovered. During the COVID-19 pandemic, fraudulent research was used to make scientific and political judgments on the merits of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID infection. Experts linked the issue with "self-promotion journals" — where publication authors are often the editors of the very same journals in which they publish their studies. Even single fraudulent studies can cause lasting problems. For example, researchers found evidence of image manipulation in a landmark study about Alzheimer's disease. The paper was eventually retracted and the lead scientist resigned, but Abalkina said billions of dollars in research funding and years of research had already been invested from one bad study. "[It's] incredible what just one paper can do," Abalkina told DW. How to stamp out corruption in science? The study's senior author Luis Amaral of Northwestern University said it was "probably the most depressing project I've been involved with." "It's distressing to see others engage in fraud and in misleading others. But if you believe that science is useful and important for humanity, then you have to fight for it," Amaral said. Scientific publishing groups are aware of the issue and are working to create new methods to identify and retract fraudulent research. One major publisher, Springer Nature, retracted 2,923 articles from its publications in 2024. But retracting papers means that bad science has already made it to publication. Experts like Abalkina and Richardson said the issues ultimately come from how scientific research is valued. Scientific jobs and funding are dependent on scientific publication. "Where you're faced with a [lack] of resources and yet you're pressured to put out [publications], you're left with two options really: You either buy into scientific fraud, or your leave science. This is a situation that tens of thousands of scientists are in," said Richardson. That's why the best solution to fight fraudulent publications, he said, is to ditch all quantitative metrics of research assessment like counting publications and citations.
