
Middle class under fire? Jay Kotak slams Rs 50,000 bank minimum balance rule, warns of impact on 90% of Indians
Jay Kotak has criticised ICICI Bank's sharp hike in the minimum average balance for new savings accounts, warning it forces most middle-class Indians to lock away nearly all their monthly income to avoid penalties. From 1 August 2025, new urban and metro account holders must keep Rs 50,000, up from Rs 10,000. The Reserve Bank of India says such thresholds are a bank's decision.
Agencies Middle class under fire? Jay Kotak slams Rs 50,000 bank minimum balance rule, warns of impact on 90% of Indians Jay Kotak, son of veteran banker Uday Kotak, has voiced strong concern over steep hikes in minimum average balance requirements for savings accounts, recently announced by ICICI Bank. Without naming the bank, Kotak said such rules ignore India's income reality.'Every Indian must access our financial sector. Ninety percent of India makes less than Rs 25,000 a month. A Rs 50,000 minimum balance implies a sum equal to around 94% of Indians' monthly income is to be left with the bank at all times, else a fee!' he wrote on X.Kotak described the middle class as those earning below Rs 25,000 per month, noting that anyone above that earns more than 90% of the country. He argued that requiring almost an entire month's income to sit idle just to avoid charges was impractical. He also promoted digital-first banking, saying, 'For banks, the physical cost to serve is high, which is why digital-first banking is the future.' — jay_kotakone (@jay_kotakone)
ICICI Bank has announced that new customers opening savings accounts from 1 August 2025 will face higher monthly average balance requirements. Metro and urban branches: Rs 50,000 (previously Rs 10,000)
Semi-urban branches: Rs 25,000 (previously Rs 5,000)
Rural branches: Rs 10,000 (previously Rs 5,000) The revised rules do not apply to existing customers unless the bank notifies them. Salary accounts and Basic Savings Bank Deposit Accounts will continue to have zero-balance terms.
For those who do not maintain the new minimum, ICICI Bank will charge 6% of the shortfall or Rs 500, whichever is lower.
The bank has also revised cash transaction limits. Customers get three free deposits a month; each extra deposit costs Rs 150. Monthly deposits over Rs 1 lakh will attract Rs 3.5 per Rs 1,000 or Rs 150, whichever is higher. Third-party deposits and withdrawals are capped at Rs 25,000 per transaction.Cash deposits through machines outside business hours, if above Rs 10,000 in a month, will incur an extra Rs 50 fee on top of standard charges.ATM use at non-ICICI machines in Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata, Bengaluru, and Hyderabad will cost Rs 23 per financial transaction and Rs 8.5 per non-financial transaction beyond the first three free transactions.Reserve Bank of India Governor Sanjay Malhotra has clarified that the central bank does not regulate minimum balance requirements.
'The Reserve Bank of India has left it to the banks to decide the quantum of minimum average balance,' he said at a financial inclusion event in Gujarat. 'Some banks have capped it at Rs 10,000, others at Rs 2,000, and some have done away with it altogether. This issue does not fall under the regulatory domain.' ICICI Bank's move comes as several public sector banks, including SBI, Punjab National Bank, Canara Bank, and Indian Bank, have dropped penalties for non-maintenance of minimum balance to widen access. SBI started the trend by removing such charges entirely.Private sector banks have largely retained penalty structures, typically charging 6% of the shortfall or Rs 500 per quarter. Many have also reduced interest rates on savings deposits in recent months to protect margins.This divergence signals a growing gap between private and public sector strategies on financial inclusion and customer retention.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
a few seconds ago
- First Post
'Trump is hurt, humiliated... his best friend insulted him': Indian-origin Maga venture capitalist
Indian-origin MAGA venture capitalist Asha Jadeja Motwani has listed five things Donald Trump wants from India, saying the US President feels 'hurt and humiliated' after the ceasefire row and could lower tariffs if ties improve. Indian-origin venture capitalist Asha Jadeja Motwani has said that US President Donald Trump is 'hurt, humiliated and shocked' after feeling 'insulted' by a close ally over what she described as the 'ceasefire fiasco.' In a series of posts on social media platform X, Motwani, who has publicly aligned herself with the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement, urged India to extend warmth towards Trump to help mend ties, saying this could pave the way for a reduction in US tariffs on Indian goods. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Will Trump reduce the tariffs on India? Yes! But this is dependent on how fast we melt him,' she wrote, adding that India should project itself as a 'peacebuilder' between Russia and Ukraine and engage in proactive public relations in the West. She also suggested that major Indian business houses could announce investment commitments in the US ahead of Trump's expected visit for the Quad summit. Will trump reduce the tariffs on India? Yes! But this is dependent on how FAST we melt him. He is hurt, humiliated and shocked that his best friend insulted him in public on the ceasefire fiasco (justified or not). He will come around, but SHOW him the warmth that we genuinely… — Asha Jadeja Motwani 🇮🇳🇺🇸 (@ashajadeja325) August 13, 2025 In another post, Motwani claimed to know what Trump 'wants from India,' and listed five expectations: A massive investment pledge from India's top business houses, ranging from $100 billion to $500 billion, in the US economy. Closure of deals for the purchase of Stryker and Javelin defence systems. Increased energy imports from the US and reduced dependence on Russian crude. Public thanks to Trump for his 'behind-the-scenes work' on controlling Chinese military equipment and support in Pakistan. More overt friendliness towards Trump, with Indians being 'more expressive' to show their affection. Below is a list of things Trump wants from India. How do i know? It is up to you to guess. But before I list them, kudos to the Indians for moving in the right direction fast.. the announcement backing the Trump Putin talks is a great first step along with Modi's conversation… — Asha Jadeja Motwani 🇮🇳🇺🇸 (@ashajadeja325) August 13, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Motwani said these steps, along with 'niceness and agility,' could help bring US tariffs on Indian goods down to 'closer to 20%.' Ending her posts with 'Jai Hind' and blessings for both nations, she stressed: 'Be nice to Trump. He knows we love him, but we must show it more actively.' In another post, Motwani listed what she claimed were Trump's key expectations from India including a massive investment pledge from Indian conglomerates worth $100 billion to $500 billion in the US, closing deals on Stryker and Javelin defence systems, increasing US energy purchases, reducing reliance on Russian crude, and openly thanking Trump for behind-the-scenes support on China and Pakistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD She emphasised that being 'nice' to Trump and expressing affection more actively was essential. 'American culture is different from India. Be more expressive,' she said, ending her posts with 'Jai Hind' and blessings for both nations. President Trump earlier this month slapped 25 per cent additional tariff on India over the purchase of Russian oil. With this 25 per cent tariff, India will face at least 50 per cent tariffs among the highest in the world. This 25 per cent tariff over the purchase of Russian oil is on top of the 25 per cent tariff that Trump had previously imposed on India on July 31 as part of the broader rollout of tariffs on more than 60 countries.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
Delhi court summons Samir Modi in defamation case by GPI directors
A Sessions Court in Delhi on Thursday summoned Samir Modi in defamation proceedings filed against him by independent directors of Godfrey Phillips India (GPI), Nirmala Bagri and Atul Kumar Gupta. The court held that there was, prima facie, 'sufficient evidence' to summon Samir Modi, and directed the trial court to proceed as per law in the defamation case. Bagri and Gupta had initiated defamation proceedings against Samir Modi, alleging that his statements to the media had damaged their reputations. The trial court had rejected the defamation plea on 19 May, after which the directors filed a revision petition in the Sessions Court. On Thursday, the Sessions Court set aside the trial court's order and summoned Samir Modi. In May 2024, Samir Modi had alleged that his mother, Bina Modi, and other directors of GPI had 'orchestrated an attack' on him during a board meeting. He had also alleged that he was assaulted by the personal security officer (PSO) of his mother, who is the chairperson and managing director of the company. Samir Modi was removed from GPI's board at a meeting on 7 August last year after fellow directors did not support his reappointment. In his place, the company appointed Charu Modi, daughter of Bina Modi and sister to Samir and Lalit Modi. The younger son of KK Modi and Bina Modi lodged a first information report (FIR) with Delhi Police on 27 June 2024, accusing his mother, her PSO, and GPI directors of causing him 'grievous hurt'. The dispute comes against the backdrop of a contentious succession battle over an estimated Rs 11,000-crore inheritance following the death of family patriarch KK Modi in 2019. Samir Modi, one of KK Modi's three children and brother of former Indian Premier League (IPL) chief Lalit Modi, has challenged his mother's management of the family's affairs in the Supreme Court.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
a few seconds ago
- Business Standard
FedEx, UPS, DHL executives may face fresh scrutiny in antitrust case
Top India executives of FedEx, UPS, Aramex and DHL are set to be cross-examined in coming weeks by a book publishers' group which accused them of price collusion, a new twist in an antitrust probe that cleared the courier companies of wrongdoing last year, a document shows. Allowing a complainant to interrogate companies is not common in Indian antitrust cases. It means the final findings of the antitrust investigation could change and create new challenges for the courier majors, and the case will be prolonged by several months, antitrust lawyers and government sources said. Many foreign and domestic companies are bullish about the Indian courier and parcel delivery market, which is expected to grow 11 per cent a year to $14.3 billion by 2030, bolstered by a boom in online shopping, research firm Mordor Intelligence says. In December, Reuters reported the Competition Commission of India (CCI) found "no evidence" of courier firms sharing commercial information amongst themselves. The 2022 cartel case, whose details remain confidential in line with rules, was triggered when the Federation of Indian Publishers alleged collusion on prices and discounts by delivery firms. The CCI has now found merit in a complaint by the publishers' group which argued it must be allowed to cross-examine the delivery company executives as investigators only relied on oral submissions to give the companies a clean chit. The federation "has demonstrated sufficient cause establishing necessity and expediency of conducting such cross-examination," the CCI noted in a May 28 internal order that was reviewed by Reuters. The order said the executives to be questioned were Subhasish Chakraborty, Managing Director of India's DTDC Express; R.S. Subramanian, Managing Director of DHL Express India; Suvendu Choudhury, a vice president of FedEx in India; Percy Avari, general manager of Aramex in India, and Abbas Panju, India managing director of UPS Express. None of the executives responded to requests for comment. DHL said in a statement it operates in full compliance with all laws and is "cooperating fully with the CCI", but could not comment on specifics. The CCI, as well as other companies - DTDC, U.S.-based FedEx and UPS, and Dubai's Aramex did not respond to Reuters queries. The Federation of Indian Publishers also did not respond. It represents many Indian publishers like and Rupa Publications, as well as some foreign groups like Pan Macmillan. 'RARE' CROSS-EXAMINATION Sending the case back to the CCI investigators could become an irritant for the logistics industry, which has faced scrutiny since 2015, when France levied a $735 million fine on 20 companies, including FedEx and DHL, for secretly colluding to increase prices. In India, cross-examination of companies by the complainant "is rare," said Gautam Shahi, a competition law partner at Indian law firm Dua Associates. "Such cross-examination may reveal new facts and the conclusions of the earlier investigation report may come into question. It may change the direction of the case," he said. The CCI investigations unit will now oversee the cross-examination proceedings in coming weeks and submit a report to top antitrust officials for a review, four sources familiar with the matter said. The Federation of Indian Publishers had alleged that courier companies acted together to determine charges, and also did not reduce the fuel surcharge they charged when jet fuel prices dropped. The 202-page investigation report shared with the companies privately last year, and seen by Reuters this week, notes that 36 notices were sent to 15 courier firms during 2023-24 to gather details of their businesses, with UPS submitting the most responses - 13. The CCI report concludes no email correspondence surfaced that showed "any collusive/concerted activities" among rivals. The Federation of Indian Publishers has also successfully argued it wants to point out several anomalies in the earlier recorded statements of company executives, which were ignored by investigators, noted the CCI order that allowed the cross-examination.