Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 Hands-On: The Cover Screen Is No Longer Made for Ants
Starting at $1,100, the Z Flip 7 sports a 4.1-inch cover screen that fully spans edge-to-edge and wraps around the dual cameras (50-megapixel main and 12-megapixel ultra-wide). That's bigger than the 4-inch external display on the Razr Ultra—with slimmer bezels to boot. Besides being more expansive, the cover screen on the Z Flip 7 is also—for the first time on a Z Flip—120Hz with a brighter 2,600 nits of peak brightness (the Z Flip 6 had 1,600 nits).
The benefits of a larger cover screen are immediately clear: you can see more content. While Samsung still doesn't show the home screen of apps or even let you open apps on the cover screen by default (there are workarounds just a Google away), all those extra pixels will display more lines from Google's Gemini AI chatbot. Samsung strongly believes that Gemini further builds on top of the Z Flip's bite-sized widget interactions. Instead of getting sucked into apps on the cover screen, AI and widgets can help you do things in quicker and shorter bursts without having to open the Flip 7.
The foldable inner screen is slightly larger this time around at 6.9 inches versus 6.7 inches on the Z Flip 6, and it's marginally wider at 70.8mm versus 68.6mm. The camera punched into the inner screen is still a 10-megapixel shooter.
Upgrades that you can't see with the naked eye include a 3nm Exynos2500 chip (not a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) and a larger 4,300 mAh battery (up from 4,000 mAh). Inside, there's either 256GB of 512GB of storage paired with 12GB of RAM. Samsung says it's also made the aluminum frame tougher, waterproofed the circuitry (though it's still rated for IP48), and refined the hinge for better durability.
However, just like on the Galaxy S25 family of phones, Samsung's emphasizing its suite of Galaxy AI features. In addition to accessing Gemini right on the cover screen, you can point the camera at something and ask the chatbot for information about it. It's basically the same as Visual Intelligence on iPhones with Apple Intelligence. In the age of AI integration into our phones, I'm interested in seeing how useful having Gemini on command will be, especially with some of the agentic functions that use the AI perform things on your behalf. For example, creating a calendar event from a mention in a text message. How much can Gemini help me and how much time will I save having an AI as my personal assistant? I don't know, but I'm looking forward to finding out.
Samsung also introduced a 'Fan Edition' Galaxy Z Flip FE that starts at $900. This looks to be a mostly recycled Z Flip 6 at a lower price. It'll come in black or white with 128GB or 256GB capacities.
The Z Flip 7 and Z Flip FE are available for pre-order starting today and will be available starting on July 25.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Take the Google 45W Power Charger home for just $24.99
Ryan Haines / Android Authority The Google 45W USB-C Power Charger is rarely on sale, but today it is at an all-time low price on Amazon. The $5 discount takes it down to $24.99. If you've been thinking of getting one, this is a nice chance to score an actual deal on it. Buy the Google 45W USB-C Power Charger for $24.99 ($5 off) This offer is available from Amazon. It is a 'limited time deal' and a record-low price on a charger that is almost never on sale. You might want to get it while you can! Google 45W USB-C Power Charger Google 45W USB-C Power Charger More power! Critical to getting the most out of your Google Pixel 9 series smartphone, the new 45W USB-C charger delivers fast and efficient charging for your phone. See price at Amazon Save $5.00 Limited Time Deal! There are plenty of other great chargers. In fact, we just posted a couple of fantastic deals yesterday. If you want something more versatile and capable, take a look at those Anker and UGREEN charger deals. That said, we know many of you like going with big brand accessories. The Google 45W USB-C Power Charger is a pretty nice charger, especially if you own a Pixel phone or other Google devices. It can fast-charge all Pixel devices at max speeds. Of course, it doesn't work only with Google products, so it will also work great with any other device. It supports the USB PD 3.1 standard and PPS, so it should be able to fast-charge almost all devices out there. You get one USB-C port, so you can only charge one device at a time. That said, it does come with one of the nicest charger designs. It is simple, clean, and small. Go get yours while it is still on sale! If you want more options, here's our list of the best chargers available.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Coding has emerged as genAI's killer use case. But what if its benefits are a mirage?
Hello and welcome to Eye on AI…In this edition: Meta is going big on data centers…the EU publishes its code of practice for general purpose AI and OpenAI says it will abide by it…the U.K. AI Security Institute calls into question AI 'scheming' research. The big news at the end of last week was that OpenAI's plans to acquire Windsurf, a startup that was making AI software for coding, for $3 billion fell apart. (My Fortune colleague Allie Garfinkle broke that bit of news.) Instead, Google announced that it was hiring Windsurf's CEO Varun Mohan and cofounder Douglas Chen and a clutch of other Windsurf staffers, while also licensing Windsurf's tech—a deal structured similarly to several other big tech-AI startup not-quite-acquihire acquihires, including Meta's recent deal with Scale AI, Google's deal with last year, as well as Microsoft's deal with Inflection and Amazon's with Adept. Bloomberg reported that Google is paying about $2.4 billion for Windsurf's talent and tech, while another AI startup, Cognition, swooped in to buy what was left of Windsurf for an undisclosed sum. Windsurf may have gotten less than OpenAI was offering, but OpenAI's purchase reportedly fell apart after OpenAI and Microsoft couldn't agree on whether Microsoft would have access to Windsurf's increasingly fraught relationship between OpenAI and Microsoft is worth a whole separate story. So too is the structure of these non-acquisition acquihires—which really do seem to blunt any legal challenges, either from regulators or the venture backers of the startups. But today, I want to talk about coding assistants. While a lot of people debate the return on investment from generative AI, the one thing seemingly everyone can agree on is that coding is the one clear killer use case for genAI. Right? I mean, that's why Windsurf was such a hot property and why Anyshphere, the startup behind the popular AI coding assistant Cursor, was recently valued at close to $10 billion. And GitHub Copilot is of course the star of Microsoft's suite of AI tools, with a majority of customers saying they get value out of the product. Well, a trio of papers published this past week complicate this picture. METR, a nonprofit that benchmarks AI models, conducted a randomized control trial involving 16 developers earlier this year to see if using code editor Cursor Pro integrated with Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 3.5 and 3.7 models, actually improved their productivity. METR surveyed the developers before the trial to see if they thought it would make them more efficient and by how much. On average, they estimated that using AI would allow them to complete the assigned coding tasks 24% faster. Then the researchers randomized 246 software coding tasks, either allowing them to be completed with AI or not. Afterwards, the developers were surveyed again on what impact they thought the use of Cursor had actually had on the average time to complete the tasks. They estimated that it made them on average 20% faster. (So maybe not quite as efficient as they had forecast, but still pretty good.) But, and now here's the rub, METR found that when assisted by AI it actually took the coders 19% longer to finish going on here? Well, one issue was that the developers, who were all highly experienced, found that Cursor could not reliably generate code as good as theirs. In fact, they accepted less than 44% of the code-generated responses. And when they did accept them, three-quarters of the developers felt the need to still read over every line of AI-generated code to check it for accuracy, and more than half of the coders made major changes to the Cursor-written code to clean it up. This all took time—on average 9% of the developers time was spent reviewing and cleaning up AI-generated outputs. Many of the tasks in the METR experiment involved large code bases, sometimes consisting of over 100,000 lines of code, and the developers found that sometimes Cursor made strange changes in other parts of this code base that they had to catch and fix. But why did the developers think the AI was making them faster when in fact it was slowing them down? And why, when the researchers followed up with the developers after the experiment ended, did they discover that 69% of the coders were continuing to use Cursor?Some of it seems to be that despite the time it took to edit the Cursor-generated code, the AI assistance did actually ease the cognitive burden for many of the coders. It was mentally easier to fix the AI-generated code than to have to puzzle out the right solution from scratch. So is the perceived ROI from 'vibe coding' itself just vibes? Perhaps. That would actually square with what the Wall Street Journal noted about a different area of genAI use—lawyers using genAI copilots. The newspaper reported that a number of law firms found that given how long it took to fact-check AI-generated legal research, they were not sure lawyers were actually saving any time using the tools. But when they surveyed lawyers, especially junior lawyers, they all reported high satisfaction using the AI copilots and that they felt it made their jobs more a couple of other studies from last week suggest that maybe it all depends on exactly how you use AI coding assistance. A team from Harvard Business School and Microsoft looked at two years of observations of software developers using GitHub Copilot (which is Microsoft product) and found that those using the tool spent more time on coding and less time on project management tasks, in part because GitHub Copilot allowed them to work independently instead of having to use large teams. It also allowed the coders to spend more time exploring possible solutions to coding problems and less time actually implementing the solutions. This too might explain why coders enjoy using these AI tools—because it allows them to spend more time on parts of the job they find intellectually interesting— even if it isn't necessarily about overall time-savings. Finally, let's look at the third study, which is from researchers at Chinese AI startup Modelbest, Chinese universities BUPT and Tsinghua University, and the University of Sydney. They found that while individual AI software development tools often struggled to reliably complete complicated tasks, the results improved markedly when multiple large language models were prompted to each take on a specific role in the software development process and to pose clarifying questions to one another aimed at minimizing hallucinations. They called this architecture 'ChatDev.' So maybe there's a case to be made that the problem with AI coding assistants is how we are using them, not anything wrong with the tech itself? Of course, building teams of AI agents to work in the way ChatDev suggests also uses up a lot more computing power, which gets expensive. So maybe we're still facing that question: is the ROI here a mirage? With that, here's more AI news. Jeremy Before we get to the news, the U.S. paperback edition of my book, Mastering AI: A Survival Guide to Our Superpowered Future, is out from Simon & Schuster. Consider picking up a copy for your bookshelf. Also, if you want to know more about how to use AI to transform your business? Interested in what AI will mean for the fate of companies, and countries? Then join me at the Ritz-Carlton, Millenia in Singapore on July 22 and 23 for Fortune Brainstorm AI Singapore. This year's theme is The Age of Intelligence. We will be joined by leading executives from DBS Bank, Walmart, OpenAI, Arm, Qualcomm, Standard Chartered, Temasek, and our founding partner Accenture, plus many others, along with key government ministers from Singapore and the region, top academics, investors and analysts. We will dive deep into the latest on AI agents, examine the data center build out in Asia, examine how to create AI systems that produce business value, and talk about how to ensure AI is deployed responsibly and safely. You can apply to attend here and, as loyal Eye on AI readers, I'm able to offer complimentary tickets to the event. Just use the discount code when you The essay above was written and edited by Fortune staff. The news items below were selected by the newsletter author, created using AI, and then edited and fact-checked. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Employment woes are coming for startup talent
As doomsday predictions loom for what AI means for jobs, some AI employees find themselves on a shaky limb. Big tech companies are increasingly paying huge sums to pull away top talent — but avoiding the kind of acquisitions that reward those further down the org chart. The latest acqui-hire comes from Google, which paid $2.4 billion to license technology from startup Windsurf, hire its CEO, and cash out some of its venture backers. The search giant cut a similar deal for last year, buying out early investors to hire a key researcher. Silicon Valley is mad: 'This, in the long run, is very bad for startups,' threatening 'the social contracts between employees, startups, and investors,' Stratechery's Ben Thompson writes. 'The world needs little tech to win,' Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas told CNBC. (The rest of Windsurf is being acqui-hired by another AI coding startup, Cognition.) Venture capitalists, too, should be nervous. For now, Big Tech is cashing them out to keep the peace; Kleiner Perkins, which backed Windsurf, will reportedly get enough of Google's cash to triple its investments. But VCs are betting on young AI startups hoping they can replace Google, not be subsumed into it, and are swinging for bigger than 3x returns. — Rohan Goswami
