Is it safe to travel to California? Latest advice after tsunami warning for US west coast
A wave of 3.6ft was observed at Crescent City as the tsunami reached California in the early hours of Wednesday morning local time.
Alongside mainland United States, Hawaii, Japan and several other Pacific islands have been placed under tsunami warnings or advisories following the quake, while damage and evacuations are reported in the Russian regions nearest the epicentre.
Here's what to know if you are travelling in or out of the west coast of the US as the tsunami hits the shoreline.
Where is the tsunami impacting?
The first tsunami waves reached the west coast of the US in the early hours of Wednesday local time, with the US National Weather Service (NWS) recording a number of waves in the Arena Cove and Monterey area in California. A wave of 3.6ft was later observed at Crescent City, according to the NWS.
The stretch of the west coast is currently under a tsunami advisory, from the British Columbia border down to the Mexican border. Alaska's peninsula is also under an advisory, from Chignik Bay to Attu.
Meanwhile, a red warning is in place for the Oregon/California border at Cape Mendocino in Humboldt County.
The NWS urged those located in coastal areas to move off the beach and out of harbours and marinas across the west coast.
"Do not go to the coast to watch. Be alert to instructions from local officials," the weather service added.
Evacuation orders have been issued for large parts of the US west coast with authorities ordering people to "take action now" and get away from the sea.
President Donald Trump urged people to 'STAY STRONG AND STAY SAFE!' in a post on his Truth Social account, which was also shared on X:
'Due to a massive earthquake that occurred in the Pacific Ocean, a Tsunami Warning is in effect for those living in Hawaii. A Tsunami Watch is in effect for Alaska and the Pacific Coast of the United States. Japan is also in the way. Please visit https://tsunami.gov for the latest information. STAY STRONG AND STAY SAFE!'
Hawaii was under a tsunami warning, but this has now been downgraded to an advisory after several waves hit the coastlines of the islands.
Further up the west coast into Canada, a tsunami advisory has also been issued for most of British Columbia.
UK government advice
The UK's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) has advised those along the West Coast to follow the guidance of the local authorities.
'An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 8.7 has struck the eastern coast of Russia in the Kamchatka Peninsula region,' the FCDO said in its latest update.
'A tsunami threat message has been issued by the Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre.
'If you are in the affected areas potentially affected by the earthquake or tsunami you should follow the advice of the local authorities.'
Are flights still running?
San Francisco International Airport, the nearest international hub to Crescent City where the largest wave has hit so far, appears to be operating as normal apart from a few cancellations to and from Hawaii.
Los Angeles International Airport also appears to be carrying on as scheduled, apart from cancelled Hawaii journeys, with the islands temporarily grounding flights in some of its airports.
Carriers such as Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines have issued a travel waiver for passengers, allowing them to change or cancel their trip amid the tsunami.
Can I cancel my holiday?
As the Foreign Office has not warned against non-essential travel to the US, there will be no special circumstances in place to be able to cancel a trip for a full refund.
The conditions for cancelling your trip will be dependent on your holiday provider, so it's best to contact them if you're looking to postpone.
There is no obligation for companies to refund bookings if you want to cancel, and you will not be able to claim on your travel insurance due to safety concerns unless government advice changes.
If you do have travel insurance, some policies include natural disaster cover for an event that prevents you from reaching your holiday destination. Check your insurance policies and speak to your insurer to see where you stand.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Disney gives surprising update on prices
Disney lovers are still pouring into the company's US theme parks — despite massive ticket price hikes. The boom in visitors to Disney World in Orlando and Disneyland near LA was key to a big jump in profits. One-day admission has doubled over the past decade, adding more than $100 per person, according to theme park site Mickey Visit. In the three months ending in June, Disney reported $5.3 billion in income, more than double Wall Street's forecast of $2.3 billion. Much of that came from its U.S. parks, where operating income jumped 22 percent to $1.7 billion. Disney World was the standout performer bringing in record revenue with guest spending up, chief financial officer Hugh Johnston told investors on Wednesday's earnings call. 'Consumers generally these days are willing to pay for value,' Johnston told the Financial Times. 'Our consumer still sees, especially with the investments we've been making with parks and cruise ships, a tremendous amount of value.' Prices will rise again next year too with admission costing roughly $10 more for tickets advertised on Disney's site. The maximum price for a one-day ticket to Disney's Animal Kingdom rose from $169 in 2025 to $179 in 2026. Disney's Hollywood Studios currently costs up to $184 but will rise to $199 next year - the highest increase of any ticket so far. The highest prices could still be yet to come, Disney expert Gavin Doyle, of Mickey Visit, explained. This is because Disney has not released the ticket prices for November or December 2026 yet. These are usually the busiest months of the year and have the highest priced tickets. Doyle expects one-day Magic Kingdom tickets for November and December to hit as high as $205 for 2026. 'These higher prices reflect expected demand for the most crowded days at Disney World throughout the year which is typically aligned with school breaks and holidays,' Doyle said of the price increases. Elsewhere the picture looked less rosy for the company with declines in its traditional cable TV networks which fell 15 percent compared to the same time last year. Prices for one-day tickets to Disney World will increase by roughly $10 next year The decline was offset by boost to its streaming services such as Disney+ which added 1.8 million new subscribers in the quarter. Disney hiked the prices for its plan by 25 percent in October, just a year after the last hike. Disney is also preparing to launch its sports network ESPN in a streaming package later this month. The company announced on Tuesday that it would also be selling a ten percent stake in the network to the National Football League (NFL).
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Canada isn't the trouble-free alternative to America you think it is
Canada is having a moment this summer with bookings by European holidaymakers reportedly surging by 32 per cent – and almost all of this increase comes at the expense of the United States. Travellers are avoiding the US because of its newly hostile environment, a steady stream of visitors reporting arbitrary, despotic US border officials, and even, this past week, a possible requirement for visitors to the US to pay a deposit to enter its borders. Canadians call their country's soaring popularity the Trump Bump. Canada is often seen as an idealistic antidote to this American era: a safe, welcoming destination with spectacular scenery, no xenophobia, no guns, universal friendliness and politeness, a sensible government, and no thorny visa or ESTA requirements. All of this is true, as my partner and I, as well as others, discovered last month – apart from the visa bit. Because what most people don't know – and flight booking sites and airlines mostly hide – is that Canada has a rigid Electronic Travel Authorisation (eTA) regime. And that if you don't have an eTA, which is a visa in all but name, your airline will turn you away at the airport, no exceptions. The Canadian eTA has existed since 2016, but wasn't enforced strongly at the start. The eTA is often issued online in a couple of minutes, much like the Australian version, which became the first in 1996. The Canadian immigration department says eTAs can take up to 72 hours to be issued. But for no given reason and with no way of speeding up your application, it can, in reality, take several days. Facts we weren't aware of when, in May, we booked a well-priced flight on Expedia to Calgary, flying Delta Air Lines via Minneapolis. It was only when we checked in the maximum 24 hours before the flight, that Delta warned us we needed to get the £4 eTA. We applied. My partner received hers within two minutes. Mine still hadn't come the next morning when we left for Heathrow. But having flown into Canada in 2018 without an eTA and driven in just last year without one, I assumed it was not mission-critical. However, Delta refused to let me board. They can be fined €9,000 for every passenger they carry not correctly documented to their destination, they explained – I didn't even have the option to leave the flight at Minneapolis (I have a US visa) and make my own way for the final leg. We went home despondent and with no option but to buy two new tickets. The cheap ones we had were non-transferable. My eTA arrived after 35 hours from the Canadian immigration department, with no reason given for the delay. I spoke with Expedia, who said visas and eTAs are not their responsibility, and that their small print warns that travellers to check for visa requirements themselves. It does indeed, if you can find it in the small print – but Expedia link you to a visa shop that charges £180 per person for the eTA – triple the rate of even other opportunistic commercial visa sites and 46 times the £3.93 charged by the official Canadian government eTA site. Since we fell foul of the eTA trap, we have, without trying hard, found two families merely from our small group of friends affected by it. The ex- Times journalist Michael Crozier, from north London, got caught out having also not been warned by his airline. He and his wife applied for the eTA at Spokane International Airport in the US. They were flying to Vancouver. Hers came in 20 minutes, but his took five hours – so they missed the flight. 'We booked the flight three months in advance, and it really wouldn't have been hard for the airline to warn people clearly that some will need this visa,' Crozier told me. 'We had no idea about it. The onus should be on the airlines and booking sites. What reason could they have for not flagging it up?' Simon Hewitt, from Hampton, almost lost his family holiday because he knew nothing about the eTA requirement. The Hewitts were booked to fly to Calgary earlier this week. He bought the tickets weeks ahead, but got no warning, again, from Expedia or from the airline, that an eTA was needed. Simon is the marketing manager for a large German company, well-travelled, and famously ultra-organised. After our disaster, I had warned him to apply. The family still had two weeks to get the documentation. His wife's and teenage kids' eTAs came within minutes, but his took 10 days. As the days went by, Hewitt tried to contact the Canadian immigration department. 'It was like a labyrinth,' he says. When I asked Expedia, Air Canada and British Airways why they don't simply flag up clearly that your flight to Canada cannot go ahead if you don't have an eTA, all predictably and wordily took the 'it's in the small print' approach. Expedia – who defended recommending a company that charges £180 per person to obtain the visa on your behalf as an 'optional, additional service' – showed that deep within its terms and conditions, they do link to the official Canadian government application site. I asked the government body, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, if they were having difficulties due to the influx of applications for eTAs this year. 'Most applicants get their eTA approval (via email) within minutes,' they replied. 'However, some applications need more time to be processed. For example, some applicants must submit official documents that take several days to obtain from the appropriate authorities in their country. To avoid travel delays, applicants should get their eTA before booking their flight to Canada.' I asked an experienced Canadian immigration barrister, Will Tao of Heron Law Offices near Vancouver, if he was hearing stories of chaos from within the immigration service. 'The system has always been mostly automated,' Tao says, 'I think they must have expanded the number of rules and flags, to triage more humans in the interventions and take into account their power of cancellation, which was expanded in January. But only the department can possibly confirm this.' 'They used to advertise eTAs as taking no more than 7 minutes. Go figure!' the lawyer adds. The strangest thing about the Canadian eTA, meanwhile, is that while it is supposedly to maintain their borders, it doesn't apply to land and sea entries to the country. The rationale, Tao says, is in the original proposal for the eTA, which says, 'It is not anticipated that travellers will switch their mode of transport to avoid the $7 fee.' Right. Regardless, a lesson. And one to remember: for all travellers in the coming year, the eTA issue is going to expand far beyond Canada. Australia and New Zealand have an eTA, but their systems are easy, efficient and quick. A new eTA system in Britain is up and running, but by all accounts, is running smoothly. From next year, British travellers will require an eTA to go into the EU. Canada has a relatively efficient bureaucracy. With the likes of many EU countries, the same can't be said.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
United halts flight departures across US over 'technology issues'
United Airlines has halted flights at major airports across the US over a "technology issue", according to the company. A ground stop was issued for the company's mainline flights from departure airports, causing issues at airports including Chicago, Denver, Houston, San Francisco and New Jersey, the US Federal Aviation Administration's website shows. "We expect additional flight delays this evening as we work through this issue," United told the BBC's US partner CBS News. "Safety is our top priority, and we'll work with our customers to get them to their destinations," the company said. The BBC has contacted United Airlines for comment. Flights that are already in the air will continue to their destination, the company told CBS News. It added that regional flights were not impacted but could be delayed because of traffic jams from the ground stops. Over 700 United flights had been delayed as of 21:00 EDT (2:00 BST), according to flight tracking site FlightAware.
