How India & Pakistan could spark nuclear war killing 125million as warring neighbours urged to step back from armageddon
INDIA and Pakistan are being urged to step back from armageddon as a nuclear war between the two rivals could kill 125million people.
The fighting neighbours traded rocket and artillery attacks in an overnight blitz leaving dozens dead and fears of all-out conflict.
9
The Pakistani military's medium range ballistic missile Hatf V (Ghauri) taking off during a test fire in 2010
9
Indian soldiers stand on the border with Pakistan
9
Footage emerged of Indian rockets fired at Pakistan
9
Pakistan's leader labelled the strikes an "act of war" and his country claimed to have shot down Indian fighter jets.
Now, fears are abound that fighting could escalate to the use of nuclear weapons and kill tens of millions.
Peace campaigners like the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons are "gravely concerned" and have called for the two sides to step back from the brink.
India and Pakistan only have small stockpiles of nuclear weapons compared to Russia or America - but they have a viscous rivalry and longstanding feud over Kashmir.
New Delhi is estimated to have 180 nuclear warheads and can deliver them through land, sea, or air.
Islamabad was last officially thought to have 170 weapons but could have grown that arsenal to around 200.
Colonel Philip Ingram, a former British Army commander, said the West will be particularly nervous about a nuclear conflict.
Ingram said: "Western intelligence in particular will be focused on the readiness and the outloading of nuclear stocks inside both Pakistan and India and monitoring what's happening to them very closely indeed.
"The worrying thing about these two nations is that the tensions are very real.
"The nuclear weapons are not there to protect them against attack from China or Russia or anyone else.
India 'launches airstrikes on Pakistan' in escalation between countries
"It's focused purely on each other."
Ingram said escalation to using nuclear weapons could happen rapidly and powers like the US would step in to try and prevent their use.
He said: "The US Secretary of State, flying into India and Pakistan, would carry out shuttle diplomacy between the two."
But that might not be enough to overcome the animosity between the two enemies and their desire to escalate the conflict.
One key rung on the escalation ladder would be troops crossing the border in a wider invasion, causing
BILLIONS COULD DIE
A 2019 academic article predicted how a nuclear war could start between the two countries featuring chilling echoes of what is happening today on the subcontinent.
Following a terror attack in 2025, the authors predict in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that skirmishes would at first erupt before the Indian Army decided to invade Pakistan.
Pakistani generals then panic and decide the only way they could repulse an attack is with nuclear weapons.
9
Pakistani Army soldiers and people attend the funeral of the victims of the Indian missile strike in Muridke, Punjab province
Credit: EPA
9
Members of the Pakistan Central Muslim League take part in an anti-India demonstration in Peshawar
Credit: AFP
9
At first Pakistan nukes its own territory to wipe out the invading Indian tanks and soldiers.
Sensing a knockout blow, New Delhi decides to launch nukes on Pakistani airfields, army bases, and nuclear weapons depots.
Pakistan responds by nuking Indian naval bases and army garrisons - some in cities - and uses its entire arsenal.
India then fires some 70 nukes on Pakistan, leaving 100 bombs in its arsenal to continue to deter China.
The authors predict up to 125million people would die in the horrifying nuclear exchanges.
But the environmental impacts of some 250 nuclear bombs exploding could kill many more, by creating a global famine.
Billions could be killed as temperatures drop several degrees around the world and a global food shortage hits.
WE'VE BEEN HERE BEFORE
Most experts, including Ingram, think India and Pakistan will choose to deescalate the conflict.
Ingram said: "I think this is something that will blow over relatively quickly, because I think both nations recognize the implications of what's going on, but that doesn't mean that the tension is going to simmer down.
"We might see more skirmishes in coming days and weeks."
Tensions have been simmering for decades and the two countries have been at war at least three times before.
9
The attacks came amid soaring tensions between the two countries
9
Pakistanis gather around the debris of an Indian jet
Credit: Alamy
In 2019, India conducted airstrikes on Pakistan after border skirmishes erupted out of Kashmir tensions - but the sides deescalated after that.
India's Ministry of Defence said the strikes against the camps were in retaliation to a "barbaric" mass shooting in Kashmir last month, when 26 people were killed by gunmen.
A spokesperson said: "These military strikes were designed to deliver justice to the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack and their families."
In an article for the Atlantic Council, Alex Plitsas assessed strikes so far seemed calculated to allow the other side to save face.
Plitsas said: "By publicly framing the strikes as counterterrorism-focused and avoiding sovereign Pakistani targets, New Delhi sought to limit retaliatory pressure on Islamabad."
Pakistan has, meanwhile, kept its rhetoric cautious and vowed it has the
The US, China, Britain, and UN have all called for peace.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a post on X: "I echo @POTUS's comments earlier today that this hopefully ends quickly and will continue to engage both Indian and Pakistani leadership towards a peaceful resolution."
CONFLICT COULD HELP CHINA
Ingram said the conflict risks pushing Pakistan into the arms of the "Axis of Evil" - the alliance between Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.
Ingram said: "It wouldn't surprise me if we're seeing Pakistan supplying some capability to Russia."
Ingram said China could use the conflict as a way of testing its weapons on the battlefield to prepare for an invasion of Taiwan.
He said: "China could stimulate a refocus of Western attention, you know, back to Pakistan, India, possibly North and South Korea, while China is focusing on Taiwan.
"China would love to do that. It's within their playbook. It's the sort of tactics they'd use."
Pakistan would likely not start sending weapons to support Russia's invasion of Ukraine as it needs to stockpile ammunition and guns for its own battles.
Ingram said: "But I think we'll see closer relations building up, and they could come into this grouping that we are loosely referring to as the axis of evil.
"And it's worrying that continues to grow."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
5 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
AI, drones and missile defence investment part of UK new defence plans
There should be room for a 'small uplift' in the number of full-time Army soldiers, and personnel in back-office roles released to 'front line roles' under the recommendations of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR). Defence Secretary John Healey has pledged to 'create a British Army that is 10 times more lethal' through software and long-range weapons, and committed to delivering 'the best kit and technology into the hands of our frontline forces'. The 'transformation' signalled by the SDR marks the 'most profound change for about 150 years in how you think about armies, navies and air force,' one of the authors of the review, General Sir Richard Barrons, said on Monday. The military have been told that 'an immediate priority' should be a 'shift towards greater use of autonomy and artificial intelligence', while the Army should be prepared to operate with 'a 20-40-40' mix between crewed systems, 'reusable' tech such as drones, and 'consumables' such as rockets, shells and missiles. Mr Healey has also pledged to 'protect the UK homeland' with 'up to £1 billion new funding invested in homeland air and missile defence'. Last month the Defence Secretary announced that casualties from drones in the war between Russia and Ukraine outnumber those inflicted by artillery, as he estimated that '70%-80% of battlefield casualties are now caused and inflicted by drones.' Sir Keir Starmer said that the UK will move to 'war fighting readiness', ahead of the review which he said would create a 'battle-ready, armour clad' nation. He also said he was '100% confident' the plans in the new strategic defence review – including extra attack submarines, £15 billion on nuclear warheads and thousands of new long-range weapons – could be delivered on current funding plans. The report has been produced in the context of the Government's pledge to increase defence spending earlier this year, but ministers have been warned that the 'turbulent times' we are living in mean that 'it may be necessary to go faster'. 'The plan we have put forward can be accelerated for either greater assurance or for mobilisation of defence in a crisis,' the authors say. 📍BAE Systems, Glasgow, today. Local opportunities, skilled work, community pride. That is what our transformation of defence will deliver. — UK Prime Minister (@10DowningStreet) June 2, 2025 Speaking in Scotland earlier on Monday, the Prime Minister said: 'When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready, and frankly show them that we're ready to deliver peace through strength.' The Government has pledged to accept all 62 recommendations in the review, which says that there is 'no scope' to reduce the number of regulars in the Army, RAF or Navy. The authors envisage 'an increase in the total number of Regular personnel when funding allows' with a 'small uplift in Army Regulars as a priority'. Mr Healey told the Commons that he wants to 'increase the British Army to at least 76,000 full-time soldiers in the next Parliament'. The report also advocates an expansion in the cadet forces by 30% by 2030, with an overall of 250,000 signed up in the longer term. According to the MoD, as of April 2024 there were 'over 139,000 young people and 26,000 adult volunteers' across cadet units in the UK. Grasping AI and automation technology could also see thousands of military personnel and civil servants in jobs such as HR and finance 'move into front-line roles'. The review has been undertaken by former commander of the joint forces command General Sir Richard, alongside defence adviser Dr Fiona Hill, and former Nato general secretary Lord Robertson of Port Ellen. The report also lays bare the potential impacts on the UK's way of life in the event of a war. The authors say that as well as attacks on military bases in the UK and overseas, there could be missile attacks targeted at military and critical national infrastructure in the UK, as well as increased cyber attacks. There could also be attempts to disrupt the economy – particularly industries that support the armed forces – as well as efforts to manipulate false information and to try and undermine social cohesion. Members of staff watch Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a visit to BAE Systems in Govan, Glasgow, to launch the Strategic Defence Review (Andy Buchanan/PA) Britain is already subject to 'daily' attacks, according to the review, 'targeting its critical national infrastructure, testing its vulnerabilities as an open economy and global trading nation'. The review comes as the UK and allies are facing changing threats across the globe, amid Russia's continuing war in Ukraine. The authors warned that 'the international chessboard has been tipped over' and the 'certainties of the international order we have accepted for so long are now being questioned'. US President Donald Trump has been pushing for European countries to dramatically increase their defence spending rather than relying on Washington to subsidise the cost of their security. He has called for a 5% spending target, while Nato general secretary Mark Rutte has reportedly asked for members to spend 3.5% on their militaries by 2032 with a further 1.5% on defence-related projects. The Government will increase defence spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product from April 2027 with an ambition – but no firm commitment – to increase it to 3% during the next parliament. Introducing the review, Sir Keir said that 'a step change in the threats we face demands a step change in British defence to meet them'. 'We also need to see the biggest shift in mindset in my lifetime,' he said. 'To put security front and centre, to make it the fundamental organising principle of Government.'
The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish councillors defect to Reform during Farage trip
Instead, Mr Farage posted a photo on X of himself meeting activists at the party's campaign headquarters on Quarry Street. By the time journalists — instructed to gather at the Premier Inn car park for a 2.15pm press call — made their way to the office, Mr Farage had already left for the airport. Labour branded the Reform leader a "coward". READ MORE: The no-show came just hours after a fiery press conference in Aberdeen, where Mr Farage made his first campaign appearance in Scotland in several years. There, he wrongly claimed The Herald had shared details of the event with protesters — a claim dismissed as 'ridiculous' by the title's editor, Catherine Salmond. Mr Farage boarding his private jet (Image: James Chapelard) Answering questions from journalists, he defended a widely condemned campaign video accused of being both racist and misleading. The advert, posted on Facebook and Instagram earlier this month, used edited footage from a 2022 speech by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, who had called for greater South Asian representation in politics. Reform's version added captions suggesting Mr Sarwar had pledged to 'prioritise' the Pakistani community — a phrase he did not use. Mr Farage insisted the speech was 'sectarian in nature', and accused Mr Sarwar of having 'a record of obsession' with race. He cited a 2020 Holyrood speech in which the Labour leader noted that most senior figures in Scotland's public sector — judges, headteachers, council bosses — were white. 'Reform UK do not talk about race at all,' Mr Farage said. 'Our chairman, Zia Yusuf, is Scottish-born, but comes from parents who come from the Indian subcontinent. We think everybody should be treated equally. We object, very strongly, to the segmentation of people into different types.' He added: 'I think that speech he gave was sectarian in its very nature — 'we are the South Asian community, we are going to take over the country and take over the world'. We believe what he said was a form of sectarian politics and we do not like it one little bit.' (Image:) The by-election, triggered by the death of SNP MSP Christina McKelvie in March, takes place on Thursday. The SNP is favourite to retain the seat, but both Labour and Reform believe they have momentum. However, on Monday, Mr Farage conceded victory was 'improbable'. 'If we win this by-election, it would be the biggest earthquake Scottish politics has ever seen,' he said. He insisted Reform could still place second and 'shake up' Scottish politics. During the visit, he also announced two new defections to his party: Duncan Massey, a former Conservative councillor in Aberdeen, and Jamie McGuire, who previously represented Labour on Renfrewshire Council. Mr McGuire is the first Scottish Labour councillor to defect to Reform. Mr Farage also used the trip to Aberdeen to criticise UK and Scottish government net zero targets and current energy policies, claiming they were destroying jobs in the oil and gas sector. 'Parts of Scotland, England and Wales are literally deindustrialising before our very eyes,' he said. 'The madness of this is almost completely and utterly beyond belief.' Mr Farage also suggested he would scrap the Barnett formula — the mechanism used by the UK Treasury to allocate Scotland's block grant — describing it as 'out of date'. 'What I would like to see is a Scottish Government that is able to raise a bit more of its own revenue and a Scottish economy that has actually got genuine growth — and I do not believe that can happen without this sector [oil and gas] booming,' he said. 'I think, you know, the Barnett formula goes back to the 1970s. Is there an argument it should be looked at again? Of course there is. 'But I mean, frankly, if you look at welfare dependency, if you look at educational standards… the £50 billion this year — roughly what the figure is going to be — going to Scotland, it is not going to reduce in the short term until Scotland actually starts to have an economy that is thriving, and right now it is going in completely the wrong direction.' Mr Farage also claimed criticism from SNP leader John Swinney amounted to 'anti-Englishness'. READ MORE: Meanwhile, Mr Sarwar — speaking to journalists in Hamilton — addressed the abuse he has faced throughout his career, including recent attacks from Reform. 'To be honest, it only motivates me and drives me, and makes me want to work even harder,' he said. Mr Sarwar, who grew up in Glasgow as the son of Mohammad Sarwar, the UK's first Muslim MP, said some of the rhetoric being used today was reminiscent of what his family faced in the 1990s and 2000s. 'I think what gives me a bit more perspective is there were similar kinds of attacks, not identical, but similar, when I was growing up and my father was trying to be a politician — when he was trying to get elected as the country's first Muslim MP — and there were threats, there was abuse, there was violence at that time,' he said. 'I think that probably has added resilience for me, and therefore it is water off a duck's back. 'I think the challenge is, where I feel a wee bit of guilt and where I feel a wee bit of trepidation, is the impact it has on my kids.' Mr Sarwar said that during his father's time in office, 'there were things that I accepted as normal that were not normal' — things he fears his own children may now have to accept. 'I am doing it for them,' he added, 'in the sense that I genuinely fear about what the future of Scotland is unless we get some fundamental change.' He also took aim at Mr Farage's campaign visit, saying: 'Today, the chief clown Nigel Farage finally found his way to Scotland and showed just how totally out of touch with our country he is. 'Nigel Farage turned up, admitted he cannot win the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, and pledged to cut funding for Scotland's NHS and public services. 'Nigel Farage is a dangerous clown and the people of Scotland see right through him.' From l-r, Davy Russell, Eilidh Mclay, Anas Sarwar (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire)An SNP source described the Reform leader's visit as a 'disaster'. They said: 'Nigel Farage does not care about Scotland. 'He comes here for a day-trip, admits he wants to cut Scotland's budget, dodges media scrutiny and cannot even be bothered to campaign. It has been a complete disaster. 'The SNP campaign has taken our message of delivery and hope to the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, where the media have always been allowed access to scrutinise politicians. That is democracy." Scottish Labour's Jackie Baillie said: 'Nigel Farage has bottled it proving what we have known for years - he is a coward. 'Farage's day saw him admit he can't win the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, announce that he would slash funding for Scotland's NHS and public services, and then do a runner. 'Clown." On the ground in Hamilton town centre, voters expressed mixed views on the candidates. Joshua Irwin, 17, a first-time voter, said he would not be backing Reform. 'I do not like what they stand for,' he told The Herald. 'Anything from Reform that comes into the house goes straight to the bin.' However, he remained undecided between the SNP and Labour. Chef Liam Riley, 27, said he was minded to support Reform, despite backing independence in 2014. 'I do not like what is happening to Hamilton. There is nothing here. No opportunities. I just want to leave the UK,' he said. While he still supports independence, he feels no progress has been made. 'I am also concerned about immigration. I think it needs to be managed better.'
The National
8 hours ago
- The National
Scotland (dis)graced with a visit from Labour and Reform UK
SCOTLAND was (dis)graced on Monday with visits from two right-wing British nationalist party leaders preaching nostrums and claiming that only they can defeat the SNP in the Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse Holyrood by-election due to be held on Thursday. Prime Minister Keir Starmer was speaking at the BAE Systems shipyard in Govan, Glasgow where his big announcement was warfare not welfare. Speaking to the BBC, Starmer insisted it was "right" to axe the universal Winter Fuel Payment for pensioners as he announced plans to build 12 new nuclear submarines, six new munitions factories, thousands more long-range weapons including missiles and drones, and will spend £15 billion on its nuclear warhead programme. However, Starmer ducked questions about how all this was going to be paid for, although he predictably refused to countenance tax rises on the rich, insisting: "You can't tax your way to growth." No doubt we will be in for yet more of those "tough choices" which are only ever tough on the poor, the disabled, and the elderly. It's also a racing certainty that Starmer's grand and headline grabbing announcement today will go the way of all his other grand and headline grabbing announcements and what will actually be delivered will be so heavily watered down that it will bear little resemblance to what he announced today. In this instance that's perhaps not such a bad thing because if the UK really does need to boost its defence footprint it is in conventional defence, not the practically useless UK nuclear programme. Starmer continued the usual Labour habit of hiding from the Scottish press, taking questions only from The Sun and The Courier, refusing to take a question from The National or any other Scottish publication. Starmer will not be visiting the Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse Holyrood constituency to back his party's hapless candidate in this week's by-election, despite Starmer's assertion that only Labour can beat the SNP in the seat. It's another tacit admission that Labour has more or less thrown in the towel. And another bare-faced liar in Aberdeen... Meanwhile in Aberdeen another bare faced British nationalist liar was courting publicity. Nigel Farage was in the city to welcome another former Tory councillor to his party. Farage used the occasion to double down on his party's now infamous race-baiting social media advert targeted at voters in this week's Holyrood by election which falsely accused Labour's Scottish leader Anas Sarwar of saying he'd prioritise the Pakistani community. In Aberdeen, Farage out and out lied, asserting entirely baselessly that Anas Sarwar had made a speech in which he claimed the South Asian community are "going to take over the country and take over the world". As evidence of Sarwar's supposed "obsession" with race, Farage referred to a speech made in Holyrood by Sarwar in 2020 in which he claimed that Sarwar had complained that all positions of power in Scotland are held by white people. Like in the speech made by Humza Yousaf during the same Holyrood debate, Sarwar was highlighting the paucity of minority ethnic representation in positions of authority in Scotland. The speech to which Farage was referring made no references to how the South Asian community are "going to take over the country and take over the world". Farage made all that up. For once, BBC Scotland actually called out Farage's lies, but he predictably continued to double down. The incident not merely illustrates the vile race-baiting nature of Farage's gutter politics, this wasn't a dog whistle to racists, it was a fog horn. In another example of how out of touch and clueless Farage is when it comes to Scotland, he accused The Herald, an anti-independence newspaper which has recently carried a number of opinion pieces favourable to Reform UK, of helping to organise the protest by anti-racism campaigners which was held outside the venue where his press conference was taking place. Of course, it's comfortable for Farage to assert that demonstrations against him are organised by "the elites." It plays into his fictitious outsider schtick. The reality is that the majority of people in Scotland don't need "the elites" to tell us to loath Farage, we have eyes and ears and are perfectly capable of being revolted by him and his politics all by ourselves. Farage also hinted that he's prepared to scrap the Barnett formula which determines how much money is provided by Westminster in the annual block grant to Holyrood. Asked about whether he would get rid of the Barnett formula, Farage said the mechanism was 'out of date'. He added: 'What I'd like to see is a Scottish Government that's able to raise a bit more of its own revenue and a Scottish economy that's actually got genuine growth and I don't believe that can happen without this sector [oil and gas] booming. 'I think, you know, the Barnett formula goes back to the 1970s. Is there an argument it should be looked at again? Of course there is.' Farage also said that 'welfare dependency' would not be reduced by the UK Government's allocation to the Scottish Parliament this year. Responding to Farage's comments, Labour's Anas Sarwar said: 'Today the chief clown Nigel Farage finally found his way to Scotland and showed just how totally out of touch with our country he is. 'Nigel Farage turned up, admitted he can't win the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election and pledged to cut funding for Scotland's NHS and public services. 'Nigel Farage is a dangerous clown and the people of Scotland see right through him.' After speaking in Aberdeen, Farage headed to Hamilton to back his party's candidate in this week's by election. He was met by more protesters and ended up dodging the public and the press entirely. People need to be perfectly clear, a vote for Reform is not a vote for anything new, disruptive, or ground changing. It's not a vote for working class representation. It's a vote for Thatcherism on steroids and for Tories who left the Tory party because it wasn't cruel, nasty, and racist enough.
