GNU at war with itself: One year on, ANC-DA coalition faces mounting cracks and public distrust
The GNU has all the hallmarks of a marriage on the rocks. This includes a lack of trust, public display of disrespect and contempt for each other, and lack of commitment.
Image: IOL Graphics
One year after South Africa entered uncharted political territory with the formation of a Government of National Unity (GNU) following the ANC's 40 per cent showing at the polls, a fragile coalition is already showing deep fault lines — both within and without.
Formed in the wake of the May 2024 general elections — where the African National Congress (ANC) fell to 40.2% of the vote, losing its parliamentary majority for the first time in 30 years — the GNU was heralded as a pragmatic response to a fragmented electorate.
Instead, it has become a lightning rod for political tension, public distrust, and rising opposition fire.
The ANC, long dominant in South African politics, turned to the Democratic Alliance (DA), which secured 21.81% of the vote, along with smaller parties such as the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) and the United Democratic Movement (UDM), to form a broad coalition.
But it was a union born of necessity, not ideological harmony.
In an opinion piece published by IOL, political analyst, Professor Sipho Seepe, said the ANC's failures were fuelling DA's anti-transformation agenda.
The persistent bickering between the ANC and DA is to be expected. The GNU is, after all, a marriage of inconvenience. Neither party has ever expressed love for the other.
The GNU has all the hallmarks of a marriage on the rocks. This includes a lack of trust, public display of disrespect and contempt for each other, and lack of commitment.
Both parties have tried to argue that the GNU was born out of necessity.
A political analyst, Professor Dirk Kotze, said the GNU therefore has a serious challenge ahead of it.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In an opinion piece, Kotze said the GNU concept was caught in different political realities.
'The biggest exception is the ANC which is most divided on the GNU – take for example the ANC's ministers who are defending the GNU in comparison with the stance of Panyaza Lesufi who is supporting it vocally but not acting by it,' he said.
He described Zille and ANC secretary-general, Fikile Mbalula's fights as the GNU's doom-and-gloom.
President Cyril Ramaphosa, the DA, Patriotic Alliance, and Freedom Front Plus are the GNU's most vocal supporters, he said, adding that other partners like the IFP, UDM, PAC and al-Jamaah are less visible but still very much inside the GNU camp.
Disputes erupted almost immediately over the allocation of ministerial positions.
The ANC initially offered the DA six cabinet posts, including critical portfolios like Basic Education and Home Affairs.
But DA leader John Steenhuisen demanded more, igniting weeks of wrangling that weakened public confidence.
DA Federal Council chair Helen Zille defended the coalition as a 'firewall' against an ANC-EFF-MK axis, saying, if we let a coalition of the ANC, MK, and EFF go into government, it would burn our hopes and dreams.
But the DA's continued friction with the ANC has made that firewall look increasingly unstable.
Meanwhile, opposition parties excluded from the GNU have seized the moment to stoke dissent.
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), led by Julius Malema, have labeled the DA 'the enemy,' while MK Party leader Jacob Zuma has accused the ANC of betraying the liberation struggle by partnering with former adversaries.
Tensions have escalated on economic fronts. The GNU's recent decision to raise Value-Added Tax (VAT) to fund expanded social programs was met with sharp resistance from the DA, which voted against the national budget — a stunning move for a governing partner.
The EFF, in turn, hailed the budget rejection as a symbolic victory against neoliberalism.
Credit ratings agency Fitch has flagged the GNU's internal instability and warned that any future overtures toward the EFF or MK Party could threaten South Africa's economic trajectory.
The policy uncertainty and ideological divisions within the coalition raise red flags for investor confidence and fiscal discipline, it said in a recent note.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
27 minutes ago
- The South African
Floyd Shivambu's future in doubt ahead of MK-or-break address
Speculations are rife regarding Floyd Shivambu's future at uMkhonto weSizwe (MK Party). This comes ahead of the party's press conference on Thursday, 19 June. The press conference is expected to touch on political developments in the country. It follows the MK Party leader, Jacob Zuma's decision to remove Shivambu from the position of secretary-general. Taking to X, Shivambu shared a press invite without the official green and yellow MK colours. The post's caption read: 'Those who have worked with us know that the guiding dictum and principle is guided by Amilcar Cabral, who says, 'Hide nothing from the masses of our people. Tell no lies. Expose lies whenever they are told. Mask no difficulties, mistakes, failures. Claim no easy victories'.' The former Economic Freedom Fighter (EFF) member also added that it is his DNA to speak the truth because it is revolutionary. Shivambu thereafter shared another post with the official MK colours. Many social media users believe that Floyd Shivambu might be returning to the Red Berets. However, a key question gaining traction online is whether EFF leader Julius Malema would be willing to welcome the former party member back. EFF member of parliament, Sixolise Gcilishe responded to the questions and said: 'Juju will sadly forgive Floyd, because he is a man with a beautiful heart. He's forgiven people who have done worse to him. People who threatened his family and swore to bury him alive. He will forgive him[Floyd Shivambu]. But what he will not do is bring him back in the EFF. Unfortunately…' Others are also suggesting that Shivambu may start his own party. During the MK Party's launch of its youth division, the political party's president said those who want to leave the party are welcome to do so. According to TimesLive, Zuma said if members want to start their own party, they should go ahead. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Parliament demands criminal probe into Minister Nkabane over SETA scandal
MPs want Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane to be probed for misleading Parliament and manipulating the selection process to benefit ANC allies into SETA board appointment saga Image: GCIS In a dramatic escalation of the SETA board appointment scandal, members of Parliament have called for a criminal investigation into Higher Education Minister Dr Nobuhle Nkabane, accusing her of misleading Parliament and manipulating the selection process to benefit politically connected allies. The portfolio committee has urged the committee leadership to formally complain in terms of the Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliaments and Provincial Legislatures Act. The move could pave the way for unprecedented legal action against Nkabane over a controversial board appointment process riddled with allegations of cronyism and political interference. At the heart of the storm is Nkabane's refusal—until recently—to reveal the names of the five-member panel responsible for selecting new SETA board chairpersons. Though she eventually disclosed most of the names under mounting pressure, MPs say she omitted a critical individual and accuse her of lying to Parliament about the panel's independence. Democratic Alliance (DA) MP Karabo Khakhau has reported Nkabane to the Ethics Committee for allegedly misleading Parliament over the independent panel that recommended the chairpersons. 'Affidavit signed and commissioned. Nkabane must appear before the Ethics Committee for lying to Parliament and, by extension, the people of RSA,' she said in a post on X. This is after Khakhau demanded full disclosure of the final names, accusing the minister of deliberately withholding it and misleading the committee. ANC MP, David Kgabo, added fuel to the fire, describing the so-called independent panel as effectively an extension of the director-general's office, raising serious questions about the integrity of the process. Committee chairperson, Tebogo Letsie, confirmed that the committee would pursue legal avenues in line with parliamentary rules governing dishonesty before the legislature. "We will not be complicit in attempts to undermine parliamentary oversight," he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading On Tuesday, Letsie welcomed the submission of a letter containing the names of panel members appointed to oversee the selection and recommendation of board chairpersons for SETA. The panel members, as stated by the minister, are: - Advocate Terry Motau (chair), though he did not attend the committee meetings. - Asisipho Solani. - Nelisiwe Semane. - Mabuza Ngubane. - Rhulani Ngwenya. This controversy follows a heated backlash in May when Nkabane's list of recommended appointees to the SETA boards included a series of politically connected figures—among them, Buyambo Mantashe, son of Mineral Resources Minister Gwede Mantashe; former KwaZulu-Natal premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube; KwaZulu-Natal transport head Siboniso Mbhele; and ANC Johannesburg deputy regional secretary Loyiso Masuku. Despite repeated requests, Nkabane initially refused to reveal who selected these appointees, deepening suspicions of political patronage and triggering calls for transparency and accountability. The selection process has since been abandoned, but MPs insisted the damage to institutional credibility demands consequences. As Parliament weighs its next move, the scandal has thrust issues of transparency, political interference, and ministerial accountability back into the national spotlight, raising the stakes not just for Nkabane but for the integrity of South Africa's public institutions. IOL Politics

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Business Leadership SA slams Transnet's new wage agreement as leadership failure
Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA) has criticised Transnet's new wage agreement with unions Image: Leon Lestrade/ Independent Newspapers Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA) has criticised Transnet's new wage agreement with unions, calling it a failure of leadership and warning that it undermines the country's economic recovery. Last week IOL reported that Transnet concluded a three-year wage agreement with its recognised unions, SATAWU and UNTU, securing a 6% annual salary increase for workers over the next three years. The deal also includes increases to key benefits such as pension contributions, medical aid, housing allowances, and the 13th cheque. According to the state-owned freight and rail company, the deal came after the "conclusion of a conciliation process led by the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration (CCMA)". BLSA President Busiswe Mavuso criticised Transnet's decision to provide an above-inflation increase to workers, saying that the agreement overlooks the country's weak economic growth, rising debt, and Transnet's poor performance record. "I was astounded to see the news last week of Transnet's capitulation to union strike threats, agreeing to give workers 6% pay rises in each of the next three years. This agreement represents a failure of leadership on both sides – militant unions holding the country hostage with strike threats, and management caving to their demands without a fight," Mavuso said. She added that the increases come at a time when inflation is running at 2.7%, and the economy is expected to grow by only 1.4% this year. 'While South African businesses slash costs and workers face retrenchments, Transnet workers will get pay rises that are double the inflation rate, funded by taxpayers already struggling to make ends meet.' Mavuso also pointed to Transnet's operational inefficiencies, citing an estimate from Professor Jan Havenga of Stellenbosch University that poor logistics performance is costing the South African economy R1 billion per da. In a letter following the wage agreement reached last week, SATAWU defended the agreement by emphasising that it accepted the CCMA's proposal for a 0.5% increase in the third year, which would raise the final year's increase to 6%. 'Our correspondence dated 21 May 2025 stated that the union was prepared to accept the additional 0.5% increase,' the union said. SATAWU also argued that the final agreement reflected existing provisions and legal frameworks already in place between Transnet and organised labour. "When comparing the original retrenchment clause and the one contained in the final wage offer, it is evident that there is no significant difference, but only a reformulation of existing provisions. The only notable amendment in the final collective agreement is the additional 0.5% increase in Year 3".