Who are the candidates running for NYC mayor against Eric Adams?
A crowded field of candidates want to capitalize on the scandal-plagued incumbent mayor's rock-bottom popularity and make the move to Gracie Mansion.
Most are Democrats fighting to distinguish themselves in the upcoming June 24 primary, where the ranked-choice winner will challenge the newly independent Adams, Republican Curtis Sliwa and another independent candidate, Jim Walden.
12 Mayor Eric Adams is running for re-election as an independent candidate.
Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post
But even that potential four-person race is in flux, as political rumors abound that some heavyweight Democratic candidates may try to mount November election bids on another party line if they lose the primary.
Here's a look at the major mayoral hopefuls by party affiliation.
DEMOCRAT
Andrew Cuomo
Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo is trying to make his political comeback by becoming New York City's next mayor.
The pugnacious Cuomo, 67, is the frontrunner in the crowded primary race, drawing scores of endorsements despite his string of scandals — including the sexual harassment claims that toppled his governorship and criticism over his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.
12 Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo is attempting to make a political comeback in the Democratic mayoral primary.
Stephen Yang
The thrice-elected Democrat's campaign has hinged heavily on a 'Rose Garden' strategy — opting for polished and low-key appearances rather than old-school forums with his fellow candidates.
The debate on Wednesday will be the first time the conservative-leaning political scion appears side-by-side with his fellow mayoral hopefuls.
Zohran Mamdani
Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani has been the talk of the town since pulling off a historic grassroots fundraising and canvassing effort.
His campaign — which has zeroed in on young, white, ultra-left New Yorkers — brought the 33-year-old Queens Assemblyman's bid for mayor from a long-shot bid to Cuomo's biggest threat.
12 Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani speaking at the United Federation of Teachers Annual Meeting in Manhattan on May 17, 2025.
Robert Miller
Mamdani, 33, has been slammed for his refusal to acknowledge Israel having a right to exist as a Jewish state and his involvement in the 'BDS' movement, which seeks to divert US funding to Israel. He's also raised eyebrows with his pie in the sky policy proposals, such as city-owned grocery stores and free bus service — that would cost taxpayers some $10 billion.
Born in Uganda and raised in the Upper West Side, Mamdani has served New York state as a lawmaker since 2020. He's received major endorsements from the Working Families Party, tenant orgs and fellow progressive lawmakers.
Brad Lander
City Comptroller Brad Lander has centered his campaign on showcasing his long record of progressive policies and bashing Cuomo.
The career lefty has consistently polled third behind Mamdani, and his campaign is still a hopeful one.
12 City Comptroller Brad Lander speaking outside of Manhattan Federal court at a press conference on congestion pricing on May 27, 2025.
LP Media
Originally from Missouri, now-Brooklynite Lander has been on the New York political scene since 2009. He's snagged a major endorsement from influential players like the Working Families Party and United Auto Workers.
As one of only two Jewish candidates in the running, Lander, 55, has struggled to resonate with either side of the Israel-Palestinian conflict due to a more center-left stance.
Adrienne Adams
The City Council's speaker – and no-relation foe to the mayor – entered the Democratic primary at the 11th hour as many poohbahs grew worried about former Gov. Andrew Cuomo's candidacy.
Adrienne Adams, 64, snagged the endorsement of Cuomo foe Letitia James, the state's attorney general, as she pitched a record of competent, drama-free public service from her council position.
12 City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams at a Pride Kick Off Mayoral Forum on May 31, 2025.
Leonardo Munoz
A progressive Democrat from South Jamaica, Queens, she is the first black councilperson to be elected speaker.
Politicos reckon she could be the candidate with the best shot at pulling black New Yorkers away from Cuomo, who is polling in first place among that demographic group.
Scott Stringer
A fixture in New York City's political scene, Scott Stringer — who served two terms as the city comptroller until 2021 — is on his second run for mayor.
The Manhattan Democrat has taken a slightly more moderate stance this time around — shifting from some of his left-leaning policies at recent forums.
12 Former Comptroller Scott Stringer attending a mayoral candidate forum organized by New York Immigrant Coalition and CUNY on April 16, 2025.
Stephen Yang
Stringer, 65, is known to do well with the wealthier crowd — and has collected endorsements from Congressman Jerry Nadler, the West Side Democrats and more.
Zellnor Myrie
Brooklyn State Sen. Zellnor Myrie was an early entrant in the race for the city's highest office.
A progressive from Brooklyn, Myrie, 38, has run a relatively low-key campaign centered on consistent public forums, ads and Cuomo-bashing.
12 Brooklyn State Sen. Zellnor Myrie at the New York Post office on May 15, 2025.
Matthew McDermott
Myrie — who has served his Crown Heights district, where he was born and raised, since 2018 — has a few more moderate policy ideas around real estate and policing than his fellow liberal peers.
He's been endorsed by the Working Families Party, along with some prominent politicians.
Jessica Ramos
Pro-labor progressive state Sen. Jessica Ramos has snagged some impressive endorsements but hasn't been able to translate them into campaign finances.
Born and raised in Elmhurst, Queens, Ramos, 39, has been another outspoken voice for the lefty agenda in the mayoral race.
12 State Sen. Jessica Ramos answering a question at the United Federation of Teachers Annual Meeting.
Robert Miller
She has served in the state senate representing parts of Queens since 2019 after she defeated the now-late senator Jose Peralta, who was part of the defunct Independent Democratic Conference that teamed up with Republicans to pass legislation.
Due to missing key fundraising requirements, Ramos will not be joining the leading candidates debate on June 12.
Michael Blake
The Rev. Michael Blake is a former aide to ex-president Barack Obama who described himself as a 'visionary moderate leader with progressive policy leanings.'
Blake — who served in the state Assembly from 2015 to 2021, before switching over to political consultancy — is known for his sharp tongue and centrist policies.
12 Democratic mayoral candidate Rev. Michael Blake attending a Knicks playoff game in Boston on May 15, 2025.
David McGlynn
The South Bronx reverend, 42, joined the race last fall by ripping Adams for allegedly cozying up to 'incoming fascist president' Donald Trump.
Along with Ramos, he also did not meet fundraising requirements for next week's debate, so Wednesday will be voters' only chance to see him on the debate stage.
Whitney Tilson
Whitney Tilson hails from the world of hedge funds and finance — and notably has only been formally endorsed by mega-financier Bill Ackman.
Tilson, 58, is a conservative Democrat who warns of the far left in his ad campaigns, which bash Mamdani and his socialist supporters.
12 Former hedge fund manager Whitney Tilson petitioning for the Democratic primary at the Board of Elections headquarters in Manhattan on April 3, 2025.
William Farrington
A Harvard-educated former fund manager from Connecticut, Tilson brands himself as the antithesis to the career pols running against him.
INDEPENDENT
Jim Walden
Centrist Jim Walden will be directly taking on Adams in the independent category of the ballot in November.
Walden, 59, made a name for himself as a big-time attorney who now brands himself as the 'apolitical' candidate in the mayoral race.
12 Independent mayoral canndiate Jim Walden speaking at the Mental Health Mayoral Candidate Town Hall on May 1, 2025.
Kevin C Downs forThe New York Post
He rose to prominence prosecuting mobsters — and he's even repped Cuomo during legal troubles — though he has yet to gain any substantial ground in this race.
REPUBLICAN
Curtis Sliwa
The boisterous, red beret-wearing Curtis Sliwa is running solo on the Republican ticket for mayor.
The radio host and crime-fighting activist, 71, told The Post he thinks he has a real shot at the mayoralty this year due to the fractured nature of the Democratic party.
12 Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa is running for the Republican nomination for mayor.
Paul Martinka
Though a dedicated member of the GOP, the Guardian Angels founder has consistently distanced himself from the Trump administration since entering the political ring.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
How redistricting in Texas and other states could change the game for US House elections
WASHINGTON — Redistricting usually happens after the once-a-decade population count by the U.S. Census Bureau or in response to a court ruling. Now, Texas Republicans want to break that tradition — and other states could follow suit. President Trump has asked the Texas Legislature to create districts, in time for next year's midterm elections, that will send five more Republicans to Washington and make it harder for Democrats to regain the majority and blunt his agenda. The state has 38 seats in the House. Republicans now hold 25 and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant after the death of a Democrat. 'There's been a lot more efforts by the parties and political actors to push the boundaries – literally and figuratively – to reconfigure what the game is,' said Doug Spencer, Rothgerber Jr. Chair in Constitutional Law at the University of Colorado. Other states are waiting to see what Texas does and whether to follow suit. The rules of redistricting can be vague and variable; each state has its own set of rules and procedures. Politicians are gauging what voters will tolerate when it comes to politically motivated mapmaking. Here's what to know about the rules of congressional redistricting: Every decade, the Census Bureau collects population data used to divide the 435 House seats among the 50 states based on the updated head count. It's a process known as reapportionment. States that grew relative to others might gain a seat at the expense of those whose populations stagnated or declined. States use their own procedures to draw lines for the assigned number of districts. The smallest states receive just one representative, which means the entire state is a single congressional district. Some state constitutions require independent commissions to devise the political boundaries or to advise the legislature. When legislatures take the lead, lawmakers can risk drawing lines that end up challenged in court, usually for violating the Voting Rights Act. Mapmakers can get another chance to resubmit new maps. Sometimes, judges draw the maps on their own. By the first midterm elections after the latest population count, each state is ready with its maps, but those districts do not always stick. Courts can find that the political lines are unconstitutional. There is no national impediment to a state trying to redraw districts in the middle of the decade and to do it for political reasons, such as increasing representation by the party in power. 'The laws about redistricting just say you have to redistrict after every census,' Spencer said. 'And then some state legislatures got a little clever and said, well it doesn't say we can't do it more.' Some states do have laws that would prevent midcycle redistricting or make it difficult to do so in a way that benefits one party. Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., has threatened to retaliate against the GOP push in Texas by drawing more favorable Democratic seats in his state. That goal, however, is complicated by a constitutional amendment that requires an independent commission to lead the process. Texas has done it before. When the Legislature failed to agree on a redistricting plan after the 2000 census, a federal court stepped in with its own map. Republican Tom DeLay of Texas, who was then the U.S. House majority leader, thought his state should have five more districts friendly to his party. 'I'm the majority leader and we want more seats,′′ he said at the time. Statehouse Democrats protested by fleeing to Oklahoma, depriving the Legislature of enough votes to officially conduct any business. But DeLay eventually got his way, and Republicans replaced Democrats in five seats in 2004. In 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should not get involved in debates over political gerrymandering, the practice of drawing districts for partisan gain. In that decision, Chief Justice John Roberts said redistricting is 'highly partisan by any measure.' But courts may demand new maps if they believe the congressional boundaries dilute the votes of a racial minority group, in violation of the Voting Rights Act. Washington Rep. Suzan DelBene, who leads House Democrats' campaign arm, indicated at a Christian Science Monitor event that if Texas follows through on passing new maps, Democratic-led states would look at their own political lines. 'If they go down this path, absolutely folks are going to respond across the country,' DelBene said. 'We're not going to be sitting back with one hand tied behind our back while Republicans try to undermine voices of the American people.' In New York, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul recently joined Newsom in expressing openness to taking up mid-decade redistricting. But state laws mandating independent commissions or blunting the ability to gerrymander would come into play. Among Republican-led states, Ohio could try to further expand the 10-5 edge that the GOP holds in the House delegation; a quirk in state law requires Ohio to redraw its maps before the 2026 midterms. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he was considering early redistricting and 'working through what that would look like.'
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Paramount, Skydance expected to close deal on Aug. 7
Paramount and Skydance announced Friday that, with the Trump administration's approval, the highly anticipated merger between the entertainment giants is expected to take place next month. The Aug. 7 date, unveiled in a press release, comes after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Thursday allowed Skydance's acquisition of Paramount to move forward after the merger was first proposed last year. FCC Chair Brendan Carr in announcing the decision said he welcomed Skydance's commitment to remaining 'unbiased' in its journalism and willingness to promote 'a diversity of viewpoints across the political and ideological spectrum.' 'Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly,' Carr added. 'It is time for a change.' The move caps off months of turmoil between Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, and President Trump. Trump sued CBS's '60 Minutes' last year after he argued an interview it aired with former Vice President Harris was altered in her favor during the 2024 presidential election cycle. While the company fought the claims, including releasing a full transcript from the episode, it ultimately settled with the administration for $16 million. Those funds are set to go to Trump's eventual presidential library. The news outlet has also faced criticism in recent days after CBS made the decision to sunset 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' next May, after more than 30 years on air. Paramount said the move was based on finances, but critics have argued the settlement and Skydance deal were likely involved — and bribery allegations have been floated. Comedian Stephen Colbert, who has hosted the show since 2015, has been openly critical of the merger. Colbert blasted the network earlier this week for choosing to axe the show and thanked those who have reached out in support, including Democrats, press freedom advocates and many of his late-night counterparts. He added that 'one key mistake' the network made when moving forward with the plan is that 'they left me alive.' Colbert also lashed out at Trump after the president said in a post online that he 'absolutely' loved that the comedian was getting 'fired.' 'How dare you, sir,' the host responded. 'Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism: 'Go f‑‑‑ yourself.'' Under the terms of the $8 billion merger, the company will become 'New Paramount' and will be led by Trump-ally and billionaire David Ellison, the son of tech tycoon and Oracle founder Larry Ellison.
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump says Japan will invest $550 billion in US at his direction. It may not be a sure thing
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is bragging that Japan has given him, as part of a new trade framework, $550 billion to invest in the United States. It's an astonishing figure, but still subject to negotiation and perhaps not the sure thing he's portraying. 'Japan is putting up $550 billion in order to lower their tariffs a little bit,' Trump said Thursday. 'They put up, as you could call it, seed money. Let's call it seed money.' He said 90% of any profits from the money invested would go to the U.S. even if Japan had put up the funds. 'It's not a loan or anything, it's a signing bonus,' the Republican president said, on the trade framework that lowered his threatened tariff from 25% to 15%, including on autos. A White House official said the terms are being negotiated and nothing has been formalized in writing. The official, who insisted on anonymity to detail the terms of the talks, suggested the goal was for the $550 billion fund to make investments at Trump's direction. The sum is significant: It would represent more than 10% of Japan's entire gross domestic product. The Japan External Trade Organization estimates that direct investment into the U.S. economy topped $780 billion in 2023. It is unclear the degree to which the $550 billion could represent new investment or flow into existing investment plans. What the trade framework announced Tuesday has achieved is a major talking point for the Trump administration. The president has claimed to have brought trillions of dollars in new investment into the U.S., though the impact of those commitments have yet to appear in the economic data for jobs, construction spending or manufacturing output. The framework also enabled Trump to say other countries are agreeing to have their goods taxed, even if some of the cost of those taxes are ultimately passed along to U.S. consumers. On the $550 billion, Japan's Cabinet Office said it involves the credit facility of state-affiliated financial institutions, such as Japan Bank for International Cooperation. Further details would be decided based on the progress of the investment deals. Japanese trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, upon returning to Japan, did not discuss the terms of the $550 billion investment. Akazawa said he believes a written joint statement is necessary, at least on working levels, to avoid differences. He is not thinking about a legally binding trade pact. The U.S. apparently released its version of the deal while Japanese officials were on their return flight home. 'If we find differences of understanding, we may have to point them out and say 'that's not what we discussed,'' Akazawa said. The U.S. administration said the fund would be invested in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, computer chips and shipbuilding, among other industries. It has said Japan will also buy 100 airplanes from Boeing and rice from U.S. farmers as part of the framework, which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said would be evaluated every three months. 'And if the president is unhappy, then they will boomerang back to the 25% tariff rates, both on cars and the rest of their products. And I can tell you that I think at 25, especially in cars, the Japanese economy doesn't work,' Bessent told Fox News' 'The Ingraham Angle.' Akazawa denied that Bessent's quarterly review was part of the negotiations. 'In my past eight trips to the United States during which I held talks with the president and the ministers,' Akazawa said. 'I have no recollection of discussing how we ensure the implementation of the latest agreement between Japan and the United States.' He said it would cause major disruptions to the economy and administrative processes if the rates first rise to 25% as scheduled on Aug. 1 and then drop to 15%. 'We definitely want to avoid that and I believe that is the understanding shared by the U.S. side,' he said. On buying U.S. rice, Japanese officials have said they have no plans to raise the current 770,000-ton 'minimum access' cap to import more from America. Agricultural Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said Japan will decide whether to increase U.S. rice imports and that Japan is not committed to a fixed quota. Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, has suggested that the Japanese agreement is putting pressure on other countries such as South Korea to strike deals with the U.S. Trump, who is traveling in Scotland, plans to meet on Sundayv with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to discuss trade. 'Whatever Donald Trump wants to build, the Japanese will finance it for him,' Lutnick said Thursday on CNBC. 'Pretty amazing.'
