Manipur government formation: 44 MLAs ready to stake claim, says BJP leader after meeting governor
NEW DELHI: BJP legislator Thokchom Radheshyam Singh on Wednesday claimed that 44 MLAs in Manipur are prepared to form a new government, following a meeting with Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla at Raj Bhavan.
Singh, accompanied by nine other MLAs, said the group had conveyed to the governor their readiness to form a government in line with public sentiment, news agency PTI reported. "We informed the governor that 44 MLAs are ready. We also discussed possible solutions to the ongoing issues in the state," he said.
"Letting the governor know that we're ready is akin to staking a claim. The central BJP leadership will take the final call.
Speaker Th Satyabrata has met all 44 MLAs individually and collectively. There is no opposition to forming a new government," he said.
— ANI (@ANI)
Manipur has been under President's Rule since February after chief minister N Biren Singh stepped down amid criticism over the handling of ethnic violence between Meiteis and Kuki-Zo communities. The conflict, which erupted in May 2023, has led to over 250 deaths and displaced thousands.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Undo
Of the 60 seats in the Manipur Assembly, one is currently vacant. The BJP-led coalition includes 32 Meitei MLAs, three Manipuri Muslim MLAs, and nine Naga legislators—totaling 44. The Congress holds five Meitei seats. The remaining 10 legislators are Kukis, including seven BJP rebels, two from the Kuki People's Alliance, and one Independent.
The political developments come amid renewed unrest in the Meitei-dominated Imphal Valley following an incident in Gwaltabi on May 20, where security personnel allegedly concealed the state's name on a government bus windshield. Meitei groups have demanded an apology from the governor and the resignation of the chief secretary, DGP, and security advisor.
Tensions have persisted since May 2023, with Meitei groups insisting on preserving Manipur's territorial integrity, while Kuki-Zo representatives push for a separate administration in the hill districts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Judge blocks Trump's move to stop international Harvard students from entering US — Will other universities follow suit?
Judge halts Trump's order barring international Harvard students — what this means for US student visas Judge halts Trump's order on Harvard's international students — what does this mean for the future of student visas? A federal judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's proclamation aimed at preventing international students from entering the US to study at Harvard University. The ruling comes amid an escalating legal battle between the Trump administration and the prestigious institution. US District Judge Allison Burroughs issued a temporary restraining order, stopping the government from enforcing the proclamation, citing concerns that the policy could cause "immediate and irreparable injury," as reported by the ABC News. Judge blocks Trump's proclamation citing potential harm The proclamation, signed by President Trump, invoked the Immigration and Nationality Act to bar foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard for at least six months. It also directed the secretary of state to consider revoking visas of current international students enrolled at Harvard. In her order, Judge Burroughs prohibited the government from "implementing, instituting, maintaining, enforcing, or giving force or effect" to the proclamation. This legal move followed a lawsuit refiled by Harvard challenging the proclamation on grounds that it violates the First Amendment and misuses federal law. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Harvard's lawyers argued the president's actions were not taken to protect US interests but instead represented "a government vendetta against Harvard," as reported by the ABC News. They claimed the moves were retaliatory, targeting Harvard for exercising its constitutional rights to reject government control over its governance, curriculum, and faculty ideologies. A continuing feud between Harvard and the Trump administration This ruling builds on a previous decision by the same judge that blocked the Trump administration's attempt to revoke Harvard's ability to enroll international students through the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Although the Department of Homeland Security initially tried to revoke the program, the court issued a temporary order blocking that move. President Trump justified his proclamation by claiming Harvard refused to provide information about international students, was "extensively entangled with foreign countries," and engaged in discriminatory admissions practices. The proclamation also pointed to rising crime rates and called for investigations into potential misconduct by foreign students. "I have determined that the entry of the class of foreign nationals described above is detrimental to the interests of the United States because, in my judgment, Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers," the proclamation stated, as reported by the ABC News. What does this mean for the future of student visas? The judge's decision protects Harvard's international students for now but raises broader questions about the future of student visa policies in the US. The administration's confrontational stance toward Harvard may signal possible restrictions for other institutions, raising concern across campuses nationwide. Legal experts believe this ruling could set a precedent safeguarding universities from similar government actions. However, the Trump administration has yet to clarify if it will appeal or pursue other measures. With the ongoing legal battles, international students and universities are closely watching the outcome. The decision could have far-reaching implications for immigration policy, academic freedom, and the US's role as a global education leader. As quoted by the ABC News, "This fight is about more than visas. It's about the protection of free speech and institutional autonomy." The case continues to unfold, shaping a critical conversation about immigration and education in the US. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump and Musk break up, and Washington holds its breath
Maybe it was always going to end this way, with two billionaires angrily posting about each other on social media, fingers flying across pocket-sized screens as their incandescent feud burned hotter by the minute. But even if the finale was predictable, that didn't make it any less shocking. After long months when Donald Trump and Elon Musk appeared united in their chaotic mission to remake Washington , their relationship imploded this week like a star going supernova. It began with Musk complaining about the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, which the president at first took in stride. Eventually Trump let slip that he was disappointed in his former adviser, prompting Musk to unleash a flood of insults and taunts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bhagawatipara Apartment Prices May Be Lower Than You Think (Take a Look) Apartments for rent | Search Ads Learn More Undo Also Read: Deport 'illegal alien' Elon Musk and 'seize SpaceX': Trump ally Steve Bannon demands probe into Tesla CEO's immigration status He accused Trump of betraying promises to cut federal spending, shared a suggestion that the president should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about his association with infamous pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Perhaps most viciously, Musk insisted that Trump wouldn't have won last year's election without his help. Live Events Trump, not one to slouch from a fight, could hold back no longer. He posted that Musk had been "wearing thin," that he had "asked him to leave" his administration, that the tech titan had "gone CRAZY." Maybe, Trump threatened, he should save taxpayer money by canceling government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. Bad blood with high stakes On and on it went, as liberals savored the spectacle of their most despised political opponents clawing at each other's digital throats and conservatives reeled at the prospect of having to pick sides. Laura Loomer, a right-wing provocateur and conspiracy theorist, saw an opportunity to position herself as the voice of reason. "This fight should be taken offline," she said - on social media, of course. The question now is whether Trump and Musk find some way to step back from a battle that is tearing apart one of the most consequential relationships in modern American politics. If they don't, there's little telling how far the fallout could spread from a collision between the world's most powerful man and its wealthiest. At stake are the future of Musk's companies, including electric automaker Tesla and rocket manufacturer SpaceX; government programs that rely on the billionaire entrepreneur's technology; legislation for advancing tax cuts and Trump's other priorities in Congress; Republican chances in next year's midterm elections; and an entire political ecosystem that has orbited around Trump and Musk's deteriorating partnership. "It's like India and Pakistan," said Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke of Montana, referring to two nuclear-armed nations that recently skirmished along their border. "It just escalates and neither one of them seem to back down and understand the strength of each other." Opposites attracted (for a time) Trump and Musk were always an odd pairing, with contrasting world views and deep generational and stylistic differences. Trump, 78, comes from old-school New York real estate and never appears in public without a suit and tie unless he's on the golf course. Before running for president, he became a household name as a reality television star. Musk, 53, is an immigrant from South Africa who struck it rich in Silicon Valley. In addition to running Tesla and SpaceX , Musk owns the social media company X. He's fashioned himself as a black-clad internet edgelord, and his wealth vastly outstrips Trump's. Also Read: Elon Musk to start new political party amid feud with Trump? Tech mogul drops big hint on X But Trump and Musk are kindred spirits in other ways. They're experts at generating attention who enjoy stirring the pot by riling up their opponents. Each has sought more power to accomplish existential quests. Trump assails the federal "deep state" that resisted him during his first term, while Musk warns about the country going bankrupt from excessive spending and promotes an interplanetary future powered by his rocket technology. Musk endorsed Trump after the Republican candidate was nearly assassinated in Butler, Pennsylvania, and he began spending millions to support him. His social media megaphone was a powerful addition to Trump's comeback campaign, magnifying his efforts to court tech leaders and young, very online men. Trump rarely tolerates sharing the spotlight, but he seemed enamored with his powerful backer, mentioning him in stump speeches and welcoming him onstage at rallies. After the election, Musk was a fixture around Mar-a-Lago, posing for photos with Trump's family, joining them for dinner, sitting in on meetings. Instead of growing tired of his "first buddy," Trump made plans to bring Musk along to Washington, appointing him to lead a cost-cutting initiative known as the Department of Government Efficiency. Cracks emerge Musk tried to establish himself as the president's omniscient and omnipresent adviser. He held court in Cabinet meetings, slept over in the Lincoln Bedroom and helped himself to caramel ice cream from the White House kitchen. The federal bureaucracy practically trembled before Musk, who oversaw layoffs and downsizing with his team of acolytes and engineers embedded in various agencies. Musk appeared thrilled at his opportunity to tinker with the government and exulted in his bromance with Trump, posting on Feb. 7 that he loved the president "as much as a straight man can love another man." Trump returned the favor on March 11, allowing Musk to line up Tesla vehicles on the White House driveway as his company was struggling with declining sales. Trump made a show of choosing a cherry red electric car for himself. But cracks were emerging, especially as Trump pursued tariffs that could raise costs for Musk's businesses. Musk said Peter Navarro, the president's trade adviser, was "truly a moron" and "dumber than a sack of bricks" on April 8. The billionaire entrepreneur, who had never before worked in public service, seemed to be souring on government. He suggested there wasn't enough political will, either in Congress or in the White House, to adequately reduce spending. Trump started signaling that it was time for him to leave even though Musk said he would be willing to stay. Shortly before announcing his departure, Musk said he was "disappointed" by legislation that Trump called the "big beautiful bill" because it would increase the deficit. The measure includes tax cuts, more money for border security and changes to Medicaid that would leave fewer people with health insurance. "I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful," Musk said. "But I don't know if it could be both." The criticism didn't prevent Trump from giving Musk a send-off in the Oval Office, where he presented his outgoing adviser with a ceremonial key. "Elon is really not leaving," Trump said. "He's going to be back and forth." Musk said, "I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser to the president." The implosion comes hard and fast It's hard to imagine that now. Musk escalated his attacks on the legislation Tuesday, calling it a "disgusting abomination," and Trump tried to fend off the criticism. "He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next," the president said Thursday in the Oval Office during a meeting with the German chancellor. It was. Musk quickly took to X to vent his anger at Trump, saying his tariffs "will cause a recession in the second half of this year" and accusing him of lying. He also said it was "very unfair" that the legislation would eliminate tax incentives for electric vehicles. Trump fired back in real time as he tried to maintain momentum for his legislation, which faces a difficult debate in the Senate. "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago," the president posted. "This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress." Meanwhile, some of Trump's allies plotted revenge. Steve Bannon, a former Trump adviser who hosts an influential conservative podcast, said the president should direct the U.S. government to seize SpaceX. He also encouraged Trump to investigate allegations that Musk uses drugs and "go through everything about his immigration status" in preparation for potential deportation. "We'll see how good Elon Musk takes a little of that pressure," Bannon said, "because I happen to think a little of that pressure might be coming."
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
'RCB fans are indebted': Tejasvi Surya's sarcastic salvo at Siddaramaiah, Shivakumar after Bengaluru stampede; Virat Kohli gets a mention
NEW DELHI: Bharatiya Janata Party MP Tejasvi Surya on Friday took a dig at the Congress-led Karnataka government over the Bengaluru stampede, which claimed the lives of 11 people. Surya mockingly credited chief minister Siddaramaiah and deputy CM DK Shivakumar for Royal Challengers Bengaluru's long-awaited IPL trophy, while reacting to the chaos and political drama following victory celebrations and stampede. 'We, RCB fans, are indebted to CM Siddaramaiah and DCM DK Shivakumar for winning us the IPL after 18 years. They displayed incredible cricketing and leadership skills on the field and brought our club this long elusive glory,' Tejasvi wrote on X. The tweet, dripping with sarcasm, further said: "We are also very upset about Virat Kohli, other players and the RCB Management for poor arrangement of the security measures at the program organised to honour CM & DK and their families for winning us the trophy.' 'Good that RCB Management is arrested and police commissioner is suspended. They are primarily responsible for security in Bengaluru,' Tejasvi wrote. Ending his post with another sharp punchline, the BJP MP said: 'Anyways, CM and DKS can now go back to Chinnaswamy Stadium to start practising for their next IPL season.' Meanwhile, the Karnataka government removed MLC K Govindaraj from his role as political secretary to chief minister Siddaramaiah. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo An official notification issued by the state government confirmed the development: 'The appointment of K Govindaraj as Political Secretary to the Chief Minister is hereby revoked with immediate effect. Accordingly, K Govindaraj is hereby relieved from the post with immediate effect.' Govindaraj, who was reportedly involved in organising the event, faced criticism over the lack of planning and coordination at the high-profile celebration. The chief minister has also taken stern administrative action, suspending Bengaluru Police Commissioner B Dayananda and four senior police officials for lapses in crowd control and public safety. The state government is under pressure from both the public and opposition parties to fix responsibility for the tragedy and ensure such lapses are not repeated.
