Why Team Trump Revoked Over 6,000 Visas In Latest Crackdown On Immigration
The Department of Homeland Security said the Sikh man, identified as Harjinder Singh from India, was issued a commercial driver's license by the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), despite his illegal status. The finding gave DHS ammunition to target Democrats for aiding illegal immigration in America. "How many more innocent people have to die before Gavin Newsom stops playing games with the safety of the American public,' DHS posted.
Who Was Targeted
Among the visas cancelled by the Trump administration, around 4,000 were because the visitors broke the law, with the vast majority being for assault, according to officials.
Driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs and burglary were other offences that resulted in visa cancellations.
About 200 to 300 visas were also revoked on grounds of terrorism. The permits per cancelled, citing a rule about visa ineligibility under the State Department's Foreign Affairs Manual. The rule identifies ineligibility grounds generally as "engaging in terrorist activities" and "having certain links to terrorist organisations."
While the Trump administration did not specify what they meant by "support for terrorism", the DHS has targeted some students who have protested in support of Palestine. The government has argued that student visa and green card holders are subject to deportation over their support for Palestinians and criticism of Israel's conduct in the war in Gaza, calling their actions a threat to US foreign policy and accusing them of being pro-Hamas and antisemitic.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said he has revoked the visas of hundreds, perhaps thousands of people, including students, because they got involved in activities which he said went against US foreign policy priorities.
Why Students Targeted
Since coming to power, the Trump administration has adopted a particularly hard-line approach toward student visas as part of its immigration crackdown, tightening social media vetting and expanding screening.
Directives from the State Department this year have ordered US diplomats abroad to be vigilant against any applicants whom Washington may see as hostile to the United States and with a history of political activism.
State Department officials have also been asked to screen for those "who advocate for, aid, or support designated foreign terrorists and other threats to national security; or who perpetrate unlawful anti-Semitic harassment or violence".
President Donald Trump has clashed with several top-level U.S. universities, accusing them of becoming bastions of antisemitism following large-scale student protests advocating for Palestinian rights amid the Gaza war. In his clash with Harvard, Trump has frozen funding for investigations and threatened to remove the university's tax-exempt status, prompting several European nations to increase research grants to attract talent.
Trump's critics have called the effort an attack on free speech rights under the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
a few seconds ago
- India.com
How did Trump 'expose' Putin's 'exclusive' offer on the ceasefire? What is THE plan?
New Delhi: Monday, 19 August, was a crucial day as US President Donald Trump and European leaders discussed the probabilities of reaching a ceasefire on the Russia-Ukraine war that has been going on since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. After the meeting, it was revealed that Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky are ready for a peace summit. US President Trump said that after a 'very good' meeting with European and Ukrainian leaders at the White House, he spoke to his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, on the phone. After the meeting, Trump wrote on his Truth social network that everyone is very excited about the possibility of a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire. What was the agenda of the meeting? Trump hosted a multilateral meeting at the White House to come to a logical and fruitful conclusion to the efforts being made to stop the Russia-Ukraine war and ensure security guarantees for Ukraine. The meeting was attended by seven European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Georgia Meloni, Finland President Alexander Stubb, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. How did Trump 'expose' Putin's plan to the world? Meanwhile, Trump inadvertently said something that 'exposed' Putin's plan to the world. Ahead of the meeting, a hot mic recorded Trump telling Macron that he thinks the Russian president wants to make a deal. In a conversation between the two leaders, Trump said, 'I think he (Russian President Vladimir Putin) wants to make a deal. I think he wants to make a deal for me, you understand?' Zelensky ready to meet Putin Zelensky confirmed to reporters outside the White House that he was ready for bilateral talks with Putin. Meanwhile, a Kremlin ally in Moscow said Putin was open to the 'idea' of direct talks with Ukraine. The USA and Russia could not reach a ceasefire during Trump's summit with Putin on August 15, held in Alaska.
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Dressing up for the bully: What Volodymyr Zelenskyy's ‘suit' says about appeasement in the age of Trump
If the art of managing Donald Trump is an exercise in deference, the European leaders gathered in Washington DC this week to discuss an end to the Ukraine-Russia conflict could be said to have achieved some level of mastery. Conversation at the summit hummed along, with a certain degree of cordiality evident in the exchanges, even if there were misgivings about the terms of the 'peace' proposed by the US President. Sufficient gratitude was expressed by all the guests for the host's attempts to end the three-year-long war. And, most notably, as observers of every political hue pointed out, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy wore a suit (or something like one, but we will get to that). Given that Zelenskyy's refusal to dress 'appropriately' was blamed for playing a part in how poorly his February visit to the White House had gone, this could be seen as progress. Six months ago, Trump had been visibly irked by Zelenskyy's appearance in his army green sweatshirt and cargo pants, greeting him with the sarcasm-laden observation, 'Oh, you're all dressed up'. The military-inspired outfit has come to be closely associated with the Ukrainian president since the Russian invasion in 2022, a variation of which he wore each of the five times he met President Joe Biden in Washington during this time. Under the Trump presidency, however, the attire has only caused irritation, being described earlier this year as 'disrespectful to the highest office of the country' by Brian Glenn, a member of the White House press pool who works for the MAGA outlet Real America's Voice. The February episode was, in a way, a clash between two men with an intuitive understanding of spectacle, who know well how to dress to speak to their respective constituencies. Both Zelenskyy and Trump have showbiz history; the former, before he became president in 2019, had been a successful comedian and actor, noted for his lead role in the series Servant of the People (which is also believed to have inspired his political career). The change in his wardrobe, following the Russian invasion in February 2022, reflected his new position as a wartime leader, designed to show solidarity with his country's armed forces — in a December 2022 interview, he told The Financial Times' Christopher Miller that he would go back to wearing a suit and tie (and shave off his beard) only after Ukrainian victory in the war. Trump, the first reality TV star to become US president, also uses costumery to send out a message, garbing himself in the colours of the American flag — blue suit, red tie, white shirt — as a display of his brand of patriotism. This particular combination has, indeed, become something of a uniform for other notable members of the administration, particularly Vice President J D Vance and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth (the women in Trump's orbit have their own 'uniform' of stiff, immaculately waved hair, body-hugging sheath dresses and, frequently, a small gold crucifix around the neck). Under a president who values loyalty above all else, such fealty in costume is a significant non-verbal indication of allegiance to the man himself. Which is why Zelenskyy's decision to suit up for his second meeting with Trump at the White House has been seen as a conciliatory gesture, signalling a great willingness to appease. As to whether the all-black, tie-less outfit with military elements qualifies as a suit at all — there has been considerable debate over this question at least since June 25, when the Ukrainian president attended a dinner before the NATO summit wearing the same outfit. It sparked a massive controversy on Polymarket, a cryptocurrency platform used for betting, where punters were asked to place their money on whether or not Zelenskyy would wear a suit before July. The dispute, with over $200 million at stake at one point, flared up when, after photos of the NATO dinner emerged, the gamble went the way of those who had betted against Zelenskyy wearing a suit. Those who had taken a punt on the opposite position claimed market manipulation and threatened lawsuits. Some sort of final word on the matter came from Derek Guy, editor of the menswear blog Put This On, who said that while the suit met the technical definition of a suit — in that it featured a jacket and pair of pants cut from the same cloth — the military-inspired details like the shape of the collar, lapels and the four patch pockets meant that it did not fit the social expectations of a suit. Ultimately, of course, all that really mattered was that Trump loved the 'suit'. In the Oval Office before the press, with fulsome praise this time from Glenn — 'you look fabulous' — the President touched his Ukrainian counterpart on the shoulder and said, 'I said the same thing.' Perhaps not the ceasefire that the beleaguered Zelenskyy had hoped for, but the only one he's likely to get.
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Trump admin turns up the heat as Treasury secretary calls India's Russian oil purchase ‘unacceptable'
Ratcheting up pressure on India, another Trump administration official has criticised the country for its ties with Russia. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC in an interview that 'Indian arbitrage of Russian oil is unacceptable,' underlining Washington's stand that New Delhi was fuelling Moscow's 'war machine,' Reuters reported. 'This … Indian arbitrage – buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product has just sprung during the war – which is unacceptable,' he said. The US earlier this month slapped 50 per cent tariffs on India, half of them for buying Russian oil, catapulting the country to one facing the highest import duties among Washington's trade partners. New Delhi called the tariff action 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable', and said it would take 'all actions necessary' to 'protect its national interests'. India is the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil and meets 88 per cent of its oil demand from imports. Before Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Moscow's share in New Delhi's oil imports was less than 2 per cent. That has now risen to nearly 40 per cent. Higher tariff revenue to be used to pay down federal debt Bessent said that he expected a substantial increase in tariff revenues from the $300 billion he forecast earlier this year, with the money to be used to start paying down the US federal debt, Reuters reported. He declined to give a specific new revenue forecast, but said he and President Donald Trump were 'laser-focused' on paying down the debt. 'I've been saying that tariff revenue could be $300 billion this year. I'm going to have to revise that up substantially,' he said. India should start 'acting' like strategic partner: Trump aide Bessent's comments came close on the heels of White House trade advisor Peter Navarro saying that India needed to start acting like a strategic partner of the US if it wanted to be treated like one. 'India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs,' he wrote. Navarro also claimed in an opinion piece in the Financial Times that India was 'now cozying up to both Russia and China'. Navarro wrote: 'Here's how the India-Russia oil mathematics works. American consumers buy Indian goods. India uses those dollars to buy discounted Russian crude. That Russian crude is refined and resold around the world by Indian profiteers in league with silent Russian partners — while Russia pockets hard currency to fund its war machine in Ukraine. As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence.'
