Learn how to trade online with PipUp
In the fast-paced world of online trading, having a solid foundation is crucial. PipUp is designed to guide you through the complexities of trading, offering resources that help you set achievable goals and track your progress effectively. By leveraging PipUp's tools, you can create a structured plan that aligns with your financial objectives and risk tolerance, ensuring a disciplined approach to trading. As you continue to
Setting Clear Objectives with PipUp
Clear objectives are essential for any successful trading strategy. With PipUp, you can define specific goals that match your financial ambitions. Whether you're aiming to master new trading techniques, PipUp provides the framework to set and achieve these targets. By establishing quantifiable goals, you can measure your progress accurately and adjust your strategies as needed.
PipUp encourages realistic goal-setting, which fosters motivation and perseverance. When your objectives are attainable, you're more likely to stay committed to your trading strategy, even during challenging times. Regularly reviewing and refining your goals with PipUp ensures they remain relevant and aligned with your evolving experience and market conditions.
Breaking down larger goals into smaller milestones with PipUp can boost morale and provide a sense of achievement. Each milestone reached reinforces confidence in your trading abilities, encouraging continuous improvement and skill enhancement.
Understanding market dynamics is another crucial aspect of setting objectives with PipUp. The platform provides comprehensive market analysis tools that help you identify potential opportunities and risks. By incorporating these insights into your goal-setting process, you can develop more sophisticated trading strategies that account for various market scenarios. This data-driven approach enables you to create flexible objectives that can adapt to changing market conditions while maintaining focus on your long-term trading aspirations.
Tracking Performance with PipUp
Tracking your performance is vital for identifying areas of improvement. PipUp offers robust tools for keeping detailed records of your trades, allowing for an objective assessment of your performance over time. By analysing these records, you can identify patterns, recognise strengths, and address weaknesses in your trading approach.
PipUp's performance tracking tools help evaluate the effectiveness of your strategies under different market conditions. This analysis provides insights into what works best for you, enabling more informed decision-making. Regular performance reviews with PipUp highlight any deviations from your original plan, prompting timely adjustments to stay on track.
Embracing technology through PipUp enhances the efficiency of performance tracking. The platform offers comprehensive analytics and reporting features, making it easier to manage and evaluate your trades systematically.
Maintaining Consistency with PipUp
Consistency is key to long-term success in online trading. PipUp helps build discipline and reduces impulsive decisions driven by emotions or market hype. By adhering to your predefined trading plan with PipUp, you ensure that each decision aligns with your overarching objectives.
To maintain consistency, it is essential to cultivate patience and resist the urge to chase quick profits through speculative trades. PipUp encourages focusing on executing well-researched strategies that have proven effective over time. By sticking to your plan during both profitable and challenging periods, you develop resilience against market volatility.
Additionally, ongoing education plays a crucial role in sustaining consistency. PipUp provides resources like an
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
15 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Global EV sales up 21% in July as growth rate cools
Global electric vehicle (EV) sales grew 21% year-on-year in July, the slowest rate since January and down from 25% in June, as momentum in plug-in hybrid sales in China slackened, market research firm Rho Motion said on Wednesday. Why it's important China is the world's biggest car market and accounts for more than half of global EV sales, which in Rho Motion's data include battery-electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids. Its overall car sales growth slowed in July, with BYD, the world's largest EV maker, recording its third monthly drop in registrations. The relatively muted slowdown in overall EV sales, however, shows other markets are taking up some of the slack, with European sales benefiting from incentives aimed at speeding up decarbonisation. By the numbers Global sales of battery-electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids rose to 1.6-million units in July, Rho Motion data showed. China's EV sales growth, which averaged 36% a month in the first half, eased to 12% in July as the previously booming market was dampened by a pause in some 2025 government subsidy schemes for EV and plug-in hybrid purchases, Rho Motion data manager Charles Lester said. Chinese sales reached about one-million vehicles. European sales surged 48% to about 390,000 units, while North American sales climbed 10% to more than 170,000. Sales in the rest of the world jumped 55% to more than 140,000 vehicles. Key quote 'Despite regional variations, the overall trajectory for EV adoption in 2025 remains strongly upward,' Lester said. What's next?
Mail & Guardian
15 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Made in China 2.0: Innovation, influence and geopolitics
Made in China' no longer means cheap plastic knockoffs. By 2014 Xiaomi, with its sleek smartphones, was seen as the 'Apple of China'. Photo: File Not long ago, the words 'Made in China' conjured up images of flimsy plastic toys, dodgy electronics and counterfeit designer handbags. For much of the world, it was shorthand for cheap, low-quality goods that generally labelled China as the factory floor of the world, not its innovation lab. Today however, that label appears on drones filming Hollywood blockbusters, smartphones that are increasingly competing with the iPhone and electric vehicles rolling on roads globally. Even the apps we scroll, from Shein to Temu to TikTok, are Chinese creations that have woven themselves into the fabric of everyday life around the world. Somehow, between counterfeit products and next-generation gadgets, China stopped copying the future and started building it. The result? As China's products advanced and improved, so did perception. Not only of Chinese goods but of China itself. China's rise from mass producer to global tech giant did not happen overnight. In the 1990s and 2000s, the country was viewed as a producer of inferior knockoff products, which were mass produced in unregulated sweatshops. The perspective was largely driven by ' Although this market thrived in China and globally, foreign firms were frustrated by intellectual property theft. Chinese authorities, too, were concerned about the effect of the Shanzhai phenomenon, fearing that the country's global reputation would be permanently tarnished. But, by the 2010s, a subtle revolution was starting. Chinese firms began investing heavily in research and development of innovative industries, shifting from the typical low-end manufacturing to high-value tech industries. In 2013, Time magazine ran an article titled reflecting global scepticism. The author, Michael Schuman, argued that 'The country can no longer rely on just making lots of stuff; China has to invent things, design them, brand them and market them. Instead of following the leaders of global industry, China has to produce leaders of its own.' Schuman goes on to add, 'Few emerging nations in modern times have made the leap from assembler to inventor, copycat to innovator.' China did exactly that. By 2014, Xiaomi was commanding headlines as the 'Apple of China', delivering sleek smartphones at a fraction of the cost of its Western counterparts. In 2015, Beijing launched the 'Made in China 2025' initiative aimed at securing the country's position as a global powerhouse in high-value technology, as well as heavily investing in domestic companies, allowing them to compete both locally and globally. Consumer drone company DJI, which makes drones used in Hollywood blockbusters like Shogun and Dune: Part Two , emerged as a global leader in cutting-edge hardware. Today, Huawei smartphones can compete toe-to-toe with Apple on camera benchmark and network performance tests. BYD and Geely are And, perhaps most significantly, ByteDance's TikTok has revolutionised social media engagement with a powerful recommendation algorithm that Western platforms are struggling to recreate. Dominance in other fields, such as high-speed rail, 5G and solar technology infrastructure, shows that China is no longer catching up. It is setting the pace. The evolution, however, has not come without geopolitical tensions. As Chinese products become increasingly used and trusted by consumers globally, they generate soft power for their nation that very few governments can match. One does not need to subscribe to Beijing's ideology to rely on its ever innovative and reliable technology and that directly translates to influence. The rise of China in these industries means different things to different people. In the In the West, however, a strange contradiction unfolds. Citizens continue to embrace platforms like Shein and TikTok, while policymakers are increasingly hostile because of dependency and national security concerns. In some cases, fearing the ideological influence of China through these platforms, Western governments have responded accordingly. Concerns over possible espionage in Huawei's 5G hardware led several states, including the US, to This tension highlights a crucial reality that is happening in front of us — China's technological ascent is no longer just a commercial success story; it is a geopolitical one. As perceptions of China evolve, so will the strategies of nations. The next frontier of geopolitics will not be decided in summits or trade sanctions. It is happening in cyber ecosystems, in the global showrooms of app stores and online platforms. The more the world relies on Chinese tech, the more China's sphere of influence expands. The West may fear ideological influence and data breaches. The Global South may welcome the chance for connectivity and participation. But what is undeniable either way is a perception shift has taken root. Global consumers today, knowingly or not, are casting votes of confidence in China's technological future, and in doing so, are helping shape the map of global influence as we know it. Orefile Babeile is a second-year master's student of international relations at North-West University.
Mail & Guardian
06-08-2025
- Mail & Guardian
Trump's tariffs are illegal under international trade law
US President Donald Trump. Photo: Supplied The Trump administration's trade tariffs are illegal and fall outside the legal framework of international trade law. South Africa should call out the US government for violating basic principles of international law South Africa is subject to a 30% US tariff rate, announced during the so-called liberation day tariffs declaration on 2 April, and will take effect from 1 August. The South African economy is likely to be significantly affected by these tariffs, particularly the agricultural sector and vehicle industries. The specific regions that will be affected are the Eastern Cape vehicle corridor and citrus fruit small towns in the Western cape. The tariffs are eroding the rule-based international trade order by unilaterally imposing tariffs to balance American trade deficit with its trading partners. The United States, being one of the chief architects of the international trade system is now questioning the benefits of the rule based global trade order. The first assault of the global trade order was in 2017, when the US, under Trump, started blocking all new appointments to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) appellate body as the terms of its Judges were expiring. Trump started his trade war with China in early 2018, when he started setting tariffs and other trade barriers against China. Breach of the WTO rules Trade within the auspices of the WTO is rules-based and has been a source of international economic stability and success in many of the world's economies. Established through the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) of 1948 and subsequently the WTO in 1994, the rules-based international trade law has been founded on what is known as diffuse reciprocity. Diffuse reciprocity essentially negates formal numerical equality in tariffs within the context of the global trade system. This is because reciprocal tariffs are a fundamental rejection of the WTO rules. Throughout the years, the international trade system has been based on the principle of non-discrimination amongst the member countries of the WTO. Non-discrimination principle promotes universal equal treatment between the WTO member countries. This trade without discrimination is known as the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Treatment. The MFN is the first article of the GATT agreement, which regulates trade in goods. It requires a nation providing a trade concession to one trading partner to extend the same treatment to all. Therefore, countries cannot discriminate between their trading partners. For example, if country A offers a lower custom duty rate to country B, it has to extend the same treatment to others. Similarly, if a country imposes additional restrictions on the WTO member nation, it must do the same to all the other trading partners. A Generalised System of Preferences (GSP), Free Trade Agreements and Customs Union are some carve outs and exceptions to the MFN principle. For instance, the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) is an exception to the MFN rule under the WTO legal Framework. But it should be noted that although South Africa's membership in Agoa gives preferential access to the US market, economists have said that only 20% of our exports constitute the Agoa export. Therefore, most of the country's exports are not under the Agoa preferential access. Beginning on 1 August 2025, the US will continue to violate Article I of the GATT by unilaterally imposing 30% reciprocal tariffs on the South African government. For example, while the Indian exporters will now face 20% US tariffs, South Africa's exporters will face 30% tariffs on the same products. The US is also in breach of its commitment under Article II of the WTO's GATT agreement, which deals primarily with the schedule of concessions. This provision details the tariffs commitments the WTO member states have made to other countries. It mandates the WTO member countries to provide treatment not less favourable than the one provided under its schedule of concessions, including adhering to bound tariffs that a country has committed itself to. By unilaterally imposing reciprocal tariffs that are not agreed to by other member states of the WTO, the US violates its legal commitment that it has made under Article II of the WTO's GATT agreement. While the US is permitted under Article XX VIII of the GATT to unilaterally modify its tariff commitment under international trade law, this approach requires a negotiated compensation with the affected member states. The Trump administration has not adopted this approach. Furthermore, the reciprocal actions also undermine the WTO law principle of special and differential treatment accorded to least developed and developing countries, to which South Africa is one of them. The rationale behind the special and differential treatment principle is to allow least developed countries and developing countries to provide less than full reciprocity in their tariff obligations to developed countries. Criticism of the US reciprocal tariffs Many countries have criticised the US reciprocal tariffs for violating basic principles of international trade. China has openly criticised the US government saying that the US move disregards the balance of interest reached in multilateral trade negotiations over the years and the fact that it has long benefited greatly from international trade. China has instituted a WTO case against the US for breaching of its WTO obligations. The second critic of Trump is the Singaporean government. The country's prime minister recently remarked that the US appears to be withdrawing from the global leadership to a less predictable international trade system and the messier world. He said the era of rule- based globalisation and free trade is over. He has labelled the US new tariff regime as a repudiation of the MFN principle. Likewise, the Canadian government has challenged the legality of the US tariffs. It has retaliated to the US tariffs by imposing 25% tariffs on $30 billion of US imports and has plans to expand to $155 billion after consultation. In addition to this, Canada has filed a legal claim against the US by requesting WTO dispute consultations with the US concerning the imposition by the US of import duties on certain steel and aluminium products from Canada. The initiation of this dispute has been circulated to all the WTO member countries. The actions by these countries are justified. The US government should be held accountable for its erosion of international trade rules. The South African government has not condemned the Trump administration for its violation of international law; it has instead insisted on one-sided attempts to negotiate trade deals with the US government. South Africa's position therefore does not explicitly express its discontent with the US illegal tariffs, but it is hoping that its negotiation will yield some trade deals with the US. One wonders if the results of that trade deal itself will be compliant with the WTO trade rules, but this will be seen once the US tariffs decision on South Africa has taken effect. The South African strategy On 7 July, the South African president issued a statement attempting to push back on Trump's imposition of 30% tariffs, saying that they are an inaccurate view of US-South Africa's trade relations. He has argued that these tariffs are not an accurate representation of available trade data. But this is not enough. South Africa appears to be hesitant to publicly call out the illegal tariffs of the US government, possibly because such public condemnation of Trump tariffs would not be in the interests of South Africa. According to the joint statement by the ministers of international relations and trade, industry and competition, South Africa is seeking to secure favourable quota agreements and additional exemptions by ensuring that its industries still maintain access to the US market including sectoral cooperation. The joint statement has reiterated that the country is committed to the mutual beneficial trade relationship between the US and South Africa. Instead of calling the tariffs illegal and against international trade law, the joint statement expresses concerns over shared prosperity between the two nations and it acknowledges these tariffs as constituting barriers to trade. Other countries have continued to negotiate with the US government on this tariff issue while taking it to the WTO dispute settlement system. If South Africa were to take a similar approach, it would continue to negotiate with the US government while reminding it of its commitment to the global trade rules. Perhaps the South African government might argue that this will not yield any results, given that the WTO settlement body is dysfunctional. The other impediment is that the appellate body of the WTO is not currently functional, because the US has blocked the appointment and reappointment of its judges. But China and Canada have continued to file legal claims against the US government. They understand the use of the global trade rules to enforce their claims against the violator of the trade system. As it did with the International Court of Justice case against Israel, history should remember South Africa as a country that fought for the stability of the multilateral trade system, a fair system of international trade and revitalisation of the WTO dispute settlement system. Mmiselo Freedom Qumba is a lecturer at the University of Pretoria and an admitted attorney of the High Court of South Africa.
