
Bay Area Council summit to feature former Donald Trump mouthpiece Kellyanne Conway
"I hope we do create a little controversy," Bay Area Council CEO says of inviting former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway to speak at signature event.
Story Highlights Kellyanne Conway to speak at Bay Area Council summit.
Event features Democratic leaders alongside Trump-affiliated figure.
Summit aims to create controversy and debate different viewpoints.
While inviting some of the biggest Democrats in California and the Bay Area to speak at a signature event, a prominent local business group is also bringing in a recognizable figure from Donald Trump's orbit.
Trump's 2016 campaign manager and former senior adviser Kellyanne Conway is scheduled to speak at the Bay Area Council's 2025 Bay Area-Silicon Valley Summit on May 27. According to the agenda, she will share 'what motivates the president, what more we can expect and what makes MAGA tick.'
GET TO KNOW YOUR CITY
Find Local Events Near You
Connect with a community of local professionals.
Explore All Events
Conway's name stands out among the other guests invited to speak to hundreds of business leaders who are expected to attend the event. After all, Conway is more often expected at events like next month's meeting of the National Grocers Association meeting in Washington, D.C., where she'll serve up plenty of red meat as the keynote speaker.
Her appearance in conversation with TMG Partners CEO Michael Covarrubias may make waves, but the Bay Area Council's leadership isn't afraid of that.
'We've created controversy before with these programs. I hope we do create a little controversy," Jim Wunderman, CEO of the Bay Area Council, told the Business Times in an interview Wednesday. "It's healthy to have debate, to share different points of view, to get people who don't think the same. There's nothing more dull than getting a bunch of people who all say the same thing.'
Bay Area Council members, like business leaders elsewhere, are trying to navigate turbulent tariff policies and other changes underway in the early days of Trump's second term.
'President Donald Trump has exploded out of the gate of his second term with a staggering and dizzying array of directives, executive orders and other moves aimed at shrinking and dramatically remaking government, reordering global economic power dynamics, punishing opponents and isolating traditional allies. And he's just getting started,' according to the summit agenda.
Conway's fans and critics alike will want to keep their expectations in check: She's only scheduled to speak for 40 minutes.
Her talking points will likely be much different than the other invited guests. The mayors of the Bay Area's three largest cities — San Francisco's Daniel Lurie, San Jose's Matt Mahon and Oakland's Barbara Lee — have been invited to participate in a panel on whether their cities have finally turned the corner. Signs of the turnaround include a slowdown in San Francisco's population loss and indications that return-to-work policies may be succeeding in San Francisco.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has also been invited to speak, and the summit will also feature a conversation with Derek Thompson, co-author of 'Abundance,' a recently published book that looks at how anti-growth Democratic policies have hindered the ability to address major societal problems.
'There's a general view that's emerging that the policies that have come out of the Democratic-led institutions have led to an inability to proceed on the very things we say that we want to do,' Wunderman said. 'We say we want to produce jobs, we want to produce housing, we want to make a better society with more opportunity for people, and we're not achieving that.
'It's because of our own policies, laws and regulations, which have become collectively impossible to negotiate for so many,' Wunderman said. 'We're losing investment, jobs and economic possibilities that really should go to California.'
Wunderman lamented the loss of tax dollars California sends to Washington, only to find the money being put to work in other states.
'Our tax funds are paying for Arizona to succeed. It's just crazy,' Wunderman said.
The summit also features a timely panel on issues surrounding higher education, which have grabbed headlines as President Trump takes on diversity initiatives and other policies at leading universities. Stanford University President Jonathan Levin and UC Berkeley Chancellor Rich Lyons will speak on a panel moderated by Janet Reilly, chair of the UC Board of Regents.
'Two of the greatest universities on the planet … may be facing some of the most challenging times in their illustrious history, with an anti-intellectual fervor sweeping the nation and criticism of some universities as elite, liberally biased, privileged and out-of-touch with the problems of the world,' according to the summit program.
Largest Bay Area Business Advocacy Organizations
Revenue
Rank Prior Rank Organization
1
5
Multiplier
2
2
Community Initiatives
3
3
San Francisco Tourism Improvement District Management Corp. View this list
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
a few seconds ago
- Axios
Trump, Murdoch agree to pause WSJ case deposition until after dismissal ruling
President Trump and Rupert Murdoch reached a deal Monday to postpone the media mogul's deposition in a libel lawsuit related to the Wall Street Journal publishing a report on an Epstein birthday book, per court filings. Why it matters: Trump's lawyers had raised concerns about Murdoch's age and health when they asked a federal court in Florida last week to expedite the 94-year-old's deposition, but the deal postpones this until after the outlet's upcoming motion to dismiss the case. Now, neither Murdoch nor the 79-year-old Trump are likely to be deposed for months, per Politico's Josh Gerstein, who first reported on Monday's filing in Miami. Zoom in: "Until Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Complaint is adjudicated, the Parties agree not to engage in discovery," according to the filing. If the WSJ's motion to dismiss Trump's lawsuit is denied, Murdoch would appear in person for a deposition within 30 days of such a ruling. Murdoch must provide a sworn declaration about his current health condition within three days of a court order approving the agreement and the Australian-born mogul has agreed to provide regular updates on his health, per the filing. Driving the news: Trump is suing Murdoch, the WSJ, its owner Dow Jones, its parent company News Corp. and others over the Journal report last month about a " bawdy" birthday letter" that the outlet said bore the president's name.


Boston Globe
31 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Texas dispute highlights nation's long history of partisan gerrymandering. Is it legal?
Who is responsible for gerrymandering? In many states, like Texas, the state legislature is responsible for drawing congressional districts, subject to the approval or veto of the governor. District maps must be redrawn every 10 years, after each census, to balance the population in districts. But in some states, nothing prevents legislatures from conducting redistricting more often. In an effort to limit gerrymandering, some states have entrusted redistricting to special commissions composed of citizens or bipartisan panels of politicians. Democratic officials in some states with commissions are now talking of trying to sidestep them to counter Republican redistricting in Texas. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up How does a gerrymander work? Advertisement If a political party controls both the legislature and governor's office — or has such a large legislative majority that it can override vetoes — it can effectively draw districts to its advantage. One common method of gerrymandering is for a majority party to draw maps that pack voters who support the opposing party into a few districts, thus allowing the majority party to win a greater number of surrounding districts. Another common method is for the majority party to dilute the power of an opposing party's voters by spreading them among multiple districts. Why is it called gerrymandering? The term dates to 1812, when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill redrawing state Senate districts to benefit the Democratic-Republican Party. Some thought an oddly shaped district looked like a salamander. A newspaper illustration dubbed it 'The Gerry-mander' — a term that later came to describe any district drawn for political advantage. Gerry lost re-election as governor in 1812 but won election that same year as vice president with President James Madison. Advertisement Is political gerrymandering illegal? Not under the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court, in a 2019 case originating from North Carolina, ruled that federal courts have no authority to decide whether partisan gerrymandering goes too far. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: 'The Constitution supplies no objective measure for assessing whether a districting map treats a political party fairly.' The Supreme Court noted that partisan gerrymandering claims could continue to be decided in state courts under their own constitutions and laws. But some state courts, including North Carolina's highest court, have ruled that they also have no authority to decide partisan gerrymandering claims. Are there any limits on redistricting? Yes. Though it's difficult to challenge legislative districts on political grounds, the Supreme Court has upheld challenges on racial grounds. In a 2023 case from Alabama, the high court said the congressional districts drawn by the state's Republican-led Legislature likely violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting the voting strength of Black residents. The court let a similar claim proceed in Louisiana. Both states subsequently redrew their districts. What does data show about gerrymandering? Statisticians and political scientists have developed a variety of ways to try to quantify the partisan advantage that may be attributable to gerrymandering. Republicans, who control redistricting in more states than Democrats, used the 2010 census data to create a strong gerrymander. An Associated Press analysis of that decade's redistricting found that Republicans enjoyed a greater political advantage in more states than either party had in the past 50 years. Advertisement But Democrats responded to match Republican gerrymandering after the 2020 census. The adoption of redistricting commissions also limited gerrymandering in some states. An AP analysis of the 2022 elections — the first under new maps — found that Republicans won just one more U.S. House seat than would have been expected based on the average share of the vote they received nationwide. That was one of the most politically balanced outcomes in years.


San Francisco Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump pressures China and India to stop buying cheap Russian oil
U.S. President Donald Trump is pushing China and India to stop buying oil from Russia and helping fund the Kremlin's war against Ukraine. Trump is raising the issue as he seeks to press Russian President Vladimir Putin to agree to a ceasefire. But cheap Russian oil benefits refiners in those countries as well as meeting their needs for energy, and they're not showing any inclination to halt the practice. Three countries are big buyers of Russian oil China, India and Turkey are the biggest recipients of oil that used to go to the European Union. The EU's decision to boycott most Russian seaborne oil from January 2023 led to a massive shift in crude flows from Europe to Asia. Since then China has been the No. 1 overall purchaser of Russian energy since the EU boycott, with some $219.5 billion worth of Russian oil, gas and coal, followed by India with $133.4 billion and Turkey with $90.3 billion. Before the invasion, India imported relatively little Russian oil. Hungary imports some Russian oil through a pipeline. Hungary is an EU member, but President Viktor Orban has been critical of sanctions against Russia. The lure of cheaper oil One big reason: It's cheap. Since Russian oil trades at a lower price than international benchmark Brent, refineries can fatten their profit margins when they turn crude into usable products such as diesel fuel. Russia's oil earnings are substantial despite sanctions The Kyiv School of Economics says Russia took in $12.6 billion from oil sales in June. Russia continues to earn substantial sums even as the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations has tried to limit Russia's take by imposing an oil price cap. The cap is to be enforced by requiring shipping and insurance companies to refuse to handle oil shipments above the cap. Russia has to a great extent been able to evade the cap by shipping oil on a 'shadow fleet' of old vessels using insurers and trading companies located in countries that are not enforcing sanctions. Russian oil exporters are predicted to take in $153 billion this year, according to the Kyiv institute. Fossil fuels are the single largest source of budget revenue. The imports support Russia's ruble currency and help Russia to buy goods from other countries, including weapons and parts for them.