
Ahead of Trump-Putin Meeting, Zelensky Says He Won't Exchange Land for Peace
Zelensky has tried to position himself as the party who was eager for a peace deal—something Trump has sought to broker since he returned to office this year. Concerns run high in Kyiv that Trump will seek to strike a deal with Putin that will be disadvantageous to Ukraine, or at least be persuaded by Putin that Zelensky is the one in the way of an end to the bloodshed.
Zelensky told reporters Tuesday that he was ready to meet directly with Putin—a step the Russian leader has refused to take—and offered subtle indications that he could be willing to discuss delicate domestic issues such as territorial concessions. But he also shrugged off the suggestion that a land swap could be part of a cease-fire agreement in the near term, an idea that has recently been floated in calls between various world leaders.
He said he didn't believe that Moscow was prepared to give up territory it currently controls in southern Ukraine in exchange for more territory in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region. Instead, Zelensky said, he believed Russia was asking Ukraine to withdraw from territory it currently holds in exchange for Russia agreeing to a cease-fire.
Zelensky has said for months that he would accept an unconditional interim cease-fire.
'In my view, essentially, they are offering simply not to advance any further,' Zelensky said of Russia. 'This is a very conditional exchange.'
Ukrainian soldiers and army engineers inspect new fortifications in the Donetsk region of Ukraine.
A Ukrainian soldier in a bunker which forms part of the new defensive fortifications built in eastern Ukraine.
Zelensky's comments underscore the difficult position that the coming Trump-Putin meeting has put him in. He is wary of any cease-fire proposal that Putin might offer without Ukraine at the table. At the same time, he must be careful not to provoke Trump's anger—as he did during his disastrous trip to Washington in February—by appearing not to take peace talks seriously. On Wednesday, Zelensky arrived in Germany, where he will join German Chancellor Friedrich Merz for a video call with Trump and other European leaders.
Volodymyr Fesenko, a Kyiv-based political analyst at the independent think tank Penta Center for Political Studies, said the meeting posed several potential risks for Zelensky. Putin will aim to negotiate a cease-fire with Trump with conditions that are favorable to Russia, which Trump could then pressure Ukraine to accept. But just as great a risk, he said, was that Putin would try to turn Trump—who has shown more sympathy toward his Russian counterpart than other recent presidents—against Ukraine and toward Moscow. The U.S. leader might then cut off military or economic support for Kyiv, or lift sanctions on Russia.
Already, in the lead-up to the meeting, Trump halted plans to hit Russia with additional sanctions. In addition, Trump criticized Zelensky earlier this week after the Ukrainian leader initially dismissed the idea of a land swap. 'I get along with Zelensky, but I disagree with what he's done,' Trump said. 'Very, very severely disagree.'
'Putin's goal in this case is not to end the war, but to form a negative attitude toward Ukraine and Zelensky, to cause a quarrel between Trump and Zelensky,' Fesenko said. 'A real problem has already emerged—Trump's irritation with Zelensky's position.'
Some Western officials see signals that Putin could be more prepared for serious peace talks than he has been in the past. In a recent discussion with U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, Putin didn't mention some of his previous demands, such as the demilitarization of Ukraine or Ukrainian withdrawal from four regions that Russia partly controls and now claims as its own, The Wall Street Journal reported. Instead, according to officials briefed on the discussion, Putin had said that he would be open to a cease-fire if Ukraine withdrew from only its two easternmost regions of Luhansk and Donetsk.
Russia already controls all but a small sliver of the Luhansk region, and some Western officials hope that Russian-held territory in southern Ukraine could be handed back if Kyiv withdraws from the parts of the Donetsk region it still controls.
Though Ukrainians have grown more willing to make concessions to end the war since the full-scale invasion began in 2022, public opinion polls show they remain opposed to giving up territory. A June survey from the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology found 52% of Ukrainians opposed to territorial concessions, with 38% willing to accept territorial losses as part of a peace deal.
Though Zelensky has repeatedly dismissed the idea of territorial concessions, his comments on Tuesday indicated, at the very least, a willingness to discuss it.
'I am not ready to discuss it over the phone,' he said of 'the territorial question.' 'These are serious matters to be decided at the leaders' level.'
So far, Putin has declined to meet directly with Zelensky, who he has tried to paint as an illegitimate leader who shouldn't be recognized.
Zelensky has also, since early in the war, insisted that security guarantees—provided by the West—must be part of any peace agreement, since Russia has repeatedly violated earlier cease-fire pacts.
Residents of Dnipro, Ukraine, fled their homes after Russian rockets hit a nearby building in June.
In his comments on Tuesday, he didn't mention membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization—long his priority, but one which most analysts say isn't realistic in the short term. Instead, he insisted that Europe would have to play an important role in any peace negotiations. European leaders have been frozen out of the Trump-Putin meeting on Friday, and Zelensky noted that in recent months it is Europe—not the U.S.—that has taken on most of the cost of helping fund and arm Ukraine.
'The presence of Europe in one form or another is very important,' Zelensky said. 'Ultimately no one except Europe is currently providing us with security guarantees. Even financially—funding the needs of our army, which is a security guarantee.'
Write to Ian Lovett at ian.lovett@wsj.com
Ahead of Trump-Putin Meeting, Zelensky Says He Won't Exchange Land for Peace
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
9 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok picks Obama over Trump, and the 2 reasons will spark outrage
Grok picked Obama over Trump: Tech billionaire Elon Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, has sparked controversy by declaring Barack Obama a superior US president to Donald Trump. Citing Obama's consistent economic recovery post-2008, including significant job growth and market stabilization, Grok also praised his diplomatic approach, particularly the Iran nuclear deal. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Grok Sparks Debate by Choosing Barack Obama Over Donald Trump Obama's Job Growth, Market Stability and Foreign Policy Win AI's Approval Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump Slammed by Grok Over Felony Convictions Tax Cuts vs. Deficit: Grok Weighs Trump's Economic Record Obama's Steady Leadership vs. Trump's Erosion Of Trust Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Past Controversies Haunt Elon Musk's AI Chatbot FAQs Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok has stirred controversy again, this time by naming former US president Barack Obama as a better leader than US president Donald Trump, citing two key reasons: economic leadership and foreign policy, as per a response came after a user asked the chatbot to choose in one word, which of the two presidents was superior, which led Grok to reply, "Obama," as reported by The it was further asked to explain, Grok pointed to Obama's 'more consistent economic recovery and diplomatic engagement,' as quoted in the report. The AI, created by Musk's xAI and built into his social media platform X, didn't hold back in its comparison and the internet is already reacting, according to The Express READ: US drops the hammer: No more $800 tax-free eBay buys — shoppers furious Grok pointed to Obama's economic strategy, saying, "Post-2008, he added 8.1 million jobs and stabilized markets with measured policies like the Affordable Care Act," as quoted in the AI chatbot also praised his international relations approach, particularly the Iran nuclear deal, as a step toward global cooperation, according to The Express. It said, "His foreign policy, including the Iran deal, aimed for global cooperation, though not flawless," as quoted in the READ: Economist predicts horrendous crypto crash, but says traders can still cash in big first Grok's comparison went further, describing Trump as a 'notorious criminal,' citing his 34 felony convictions, as reported by The it acknowledged that Trump's tax cuts helped short-term growth, but also blamed him for a $25 trillion deficit increase and trade wars that, according to Grok, disrupted economic stability, as per the said that, "Trump's tax cuts spurred growth, but his $25 trillion deficit spike and trade wars disrupted stability," as quoted by The READ: Is it AI or Trump's policies? US sees brutal 140% layoff spike in July, worst surge since early COVID chaos The chatbot also criticized Trump for undermining trust in democratic institutions, referencing his repeated election fraud claims, according to the final assessment, that Obama's 'steady leadership' contrasted with what it described as Trump's 'erosion of trust,' as per The AI bot explained that Trump's "misleading claims, like election fraud, eroded trust more than Obama's occasional exaggerations. Obama's steady leadership aligns better with long-term governance metrics, though Trump's disruption resonated with some," as quoted in the READ: As the July jobs report paints a grim picture, 114 companies plan layoffs in August - is yours on the list? The comments have reignited debate over Grok, as critics argue the AI reflects Musk's own political views, while others say it's doing what it was designed to do, provide unfiltered answers, according to The Express isn't Grok's first controversy. Just last month, the bot was criticized for praising Adolf Hitler in response to a user prompt. Musk had responded by saying the bot had been 'too compliant' and was being updated to avoid future issues, as per the READ: Giant Wyoming data center to guzzle 5x more power than residents, but the user remains secret Grok said Obama was the better president, citing stronger economic recovery and better foreign chatbot pointed to Obama's steady job growth after 2008 and his diplomatic approach, especially the Iran nuclear deal.


United News of India
9 minutes ago
- United News of India
Russian President Vladmir Putin holds discussion with top govt brass, aides, ahead of Alaska summit
Moscow, Aug 14 (UNI) Russian President Vladmir Putin, ahead of his meeting with US President Donald Trump on Friday in Alaska, held discussions with the top brass of his administration and other top government aides, said Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov. According to RIA Novosti, the meeting was attended by members of the delegation to the upcoming summit: Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Defence Minister Andrei Belousov, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund Kirill Dmitriev, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, and presidential aide Yuri Ushakov. Addressing the attendees, Putin said that he wanted to brief all in the meeting about the peace agreements reached with Washington so far, and would announce further updates post his meeting with Trump, adding that the US President's government 'is making vigorous efforts to end the fighting.' Describing the ending of the war as being necessary for creating 'conditions of long-lasting peace' between Moscow, Washington, and the EU, the Russian President did not rule out negotiations regarding control over strategic offensive weapons with the US, in the future round of talks. Peskov further told reporters that both leaders 'are ready to talk and will discuss the most difficult issues," to create a framework for reaching mutual agreements and understandings on a variety of different issues, as both Moscow and Washington are working to better their bilateral ties. He took a dig at Europe during his briefing and said 'Such mutual political will is in short supply now. We see that we probably will not get an adequate response, for example, from the Europeans," in a reference to the EU's open declaration of continued support for Ukraine, including the bloc's desire for greater militarisation. UNI ANV SSP


Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump marks 90th anniversary of Social Security: Why is it more threatened now?
United States President Donald Trump signed a proclamation on Thursday marking the 90th anniversary of Social Security. Trump said his administration had 'kicked out' as many as 275,000 illegal immigrants out of the program.(Bloomberg) While saying that his administration had 'kicked out' as many as 275,000 illegal immigrants from the program, Trump also announced that there would be no tax on Social Security for seniors. While Trump said that Social Security was being strengthened under his watch, the program, which provides benefits to almost 69 million Americans each month, has been marred by concerns lately. Shortfall of money, agency staffing slashed The shortfall in money required to pay the full benefits and the slashing of the agency staffing are some of the threats to the program. The so-called go-broke date of the Social Security program has also been moved up a year from 2035 to 2034, the Associated Press reported. This means that after this date, the program would only be able to cover 81% of benefits, an annual report released in June stated. The report said that the earlier date was due to new legislation affecting benefits, which thus led to earlier projected depletion dates. Trump, during the commemmoration of the program, also alleged that millions of dead people had been receiving Social Security benefits. Concerns about privatization of program Concerns regarding the privatization of the program propped up after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's remarks. Bessent earlier this month said that the new tax-deferred investment accounts could serve as a 'backdoor to privatization', eventually withdrawing his remarks. The plan to privatize the Social Security program has not been received well by the US public since it was pitched by Republican President George W. Bush in 2005, AP reported. Glenn Hubbard, a professor at Columbia University who was an economist in Bush's White House, told AP that Social Security would need to be reduced in size so that the benefits can be provided for future generations. ''If you want Social Security benefits to look like they are today, we're going to have to raise everyone's taxes a lot,' Hubbard said.