Chinese PC maker Lenovo says US-China tariff pause a positive sign
"The truce is a positive situation," said Lenovo's CEO Yang Yuanqing in an interview with Reuters after the world's largest maker of personal computers released its fiscal first-quarter results.
"We feel better than the previous quarter - it brings us more certainty rather than uncertainty."
The U.S. and China have extended a tariff pause for another 90 days to November, averting triple-digit duties on each other's goods and offering temporary relief to businesses on both sides.
Lenovo's overall revenue for the three months ended June 30 climbed 22% year-on-year to $18.8 billion, exceeding analysts' expectations of $17.4 billion, according to LSEG data.
Yang attributed the performance to strong AI demand in its three major business segments, each scoring double-digit growth in the first quarter, and said U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods had so far not had much impact.
Chinese exports to the U.S., including PCs, currently face a 30% levy, despite the tariff truce. Yang said the U.S. accounted for less than 20% of its total revenue.
Net profit attributable to shareholders increased 108% year-on-year to $505 million, well ahead of the consensus estimate of $307.7 million.
Lenovo's shares fell 3% in early trading on Thursday, against a 0.4% rise in the Hang Seng Index (.HSI), opens new tab. However, the stock has climbed 15% over the past three months, outpacing gains in the benchmark.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: Why now could be the time to sell your shares
It's a tricky time for investors. Quite aside from all the geopolitical stuff in Alaska, the trade disruption, inflation climbing again, and all that, there are troubling signs for the world economy. Yet there is also FOMO, the fear of missing out, and anyone who has remained fully invested in global equities will so far have been well rewarded. You can see this tension in the markets. The FTSE 100 duly hit an intraday all-time high of 9,222 early on Friday morning, only to worry that this might not be such a great idea after all and slither back down. The S&P 500 closed on Thursday at a record high, but weakened on Friday too. There's that nagging doubt that we're in the final phase of what has been a great bull market and something nasty is around the corner. The professionals are picking this up. Goldman Sachs has warned of the possibility of a sharp sell-off in the S&P 500, with more than a 10 per cent chance of a decline in the next three months and more than a 20 per cent chance next year. Those percentages may not sound very high, but if there is to be one of those classic October crashes, it's good to have a warning on the record. Here in London, Longview Economics has a model that is signalling that the S&P 500 is a strong sell, noting 'signs of froth and speculation' and asking that tough question: 'Is the market about to sell off (or even crash)?' It is neutral on this, acknowledging that it might be being overcautious. But it also points out that whenever a company produces disappointing results, its shares get hammered. Taking the US market as a whole, it is one of those situations where it has to keep pedalling hard to keep the bicycle upright, with any slowdown or wobble potentially ending up in a crash. There is a long list of things that might lead to a wobble. Looking at the world economy, we don't yet have any real feeling for the damage to growth or inflation from Donald Trump's tariffs. But put it this way: tariffs cannot boost global growth or cut overall inflation. They have to be negative, and it is not as though the world economy is in great shape. Look at us here. Thanks to a not-too-dreadful second quarter after the strong start, the UK does seem to be the fastest-growing economy in the G7 so far this year, as Rachel Reeves has said. Sure, that follows a very weak second half last year, and sure, it is puffed up by an unsustainable increase in public spending. But you do have to ask that if we are the best, what on earth is happening to the others? There's the evidence of rising inflation, particularly here but also in the US, and the impact that will have on long-term interest rates. Our ten-year gilt yield touched 4.7 per cent in Friday trading. Some institutions are forced to hold Government debt, but for the rest of us, it can't be a good idea to lend to governments that have no serious intention of cutting their fiscal deficits. There are all sorts of troubling signs of a slowdown. Houses are taking longer to sell in America and demand for graduate jobs there is weak. Walk down any High Street and count the number of voids. Our hospitality sector is struggling. We know we will be clobbered with higher taxes come the autumn. The fact that things feel fragile here does not mean FTSE 100 shares will be directly hit because more than three-quarters of their profits come from abroad, either in exports or earnings from overseas. But there are parallels: a lot of people across Europe as well as in America are tightening their belts. How long before that shows up in the profit and loss accounts of multinationals? You see the point. On a very long view, it is always right to invest in global equities. If you get out, it's always difficult to know when to get back in. The UK market certainly offers good value vis-a-vis the US one but, as Bloomberg reported on Friday, the strategists do not expect the FTSE 100 to end the year above 9,000, the average being 8,950. If shares are likely to fall, it may not be a bad idea to sell a few before they do. To be clear, I am not predicting an October crash, but these are indeed tricky times and it would be nuts not to acknowledge that.
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump launches 'Manhattan Project' as one of America's largest companies set to be nationalized
The Trump administration has launched their own 'Manhattan Project,' as reports have suggested one of America's largest chipmakers could be partly nationalized. Intel. Corp, one of the most capable semiconductor manufacturers in the US, has been in talks with the Trump administration as the US government is seeking a stake in the company. 'This feels like the Manhattan Project - or the run-up to World War II,' MIT AI computer scientist Dave Blundin said on a podcast with MIT engineer Peter Diamandis. 'It's every bit as important as the space race was, as the nuclear arms race was. Actually, it's more important.' The consideration to nationalize the company, a move typically done in times of national urgency, comes as the US is looking to get ahead of China in the AI and tech arms race. Intel's advanced abilities to manufacture semiconductors would allow the US to give up its reliance on foreign fabrication plants (fabs), especially in Taiwan which controls more than 60 percent of the market, in order to power artificial intelligence, defense and the economy. The talks remain ongoing and finer details continue to be made clear, but the idea would be that the US government would pay for the stake in the company, one person close to the matter told Bloomberg. Another stressed that the talks do not ensure that the deal is definitive, and the discussion could end without a deal being made. The move, according to AI and tech experts on Diamandis' podcast Moonshots, echoes the 'Manhattan Project' as a sort of a 'national survival strategy.' 'The reason the US needs to protect Taiwan fundamentally... is because the fabs are there. If the fabs all move to the US, then why would the US defend Taiwan?' Blundin said. Concerns have been raised about the decision to nationalize the company, as he added: 'They're putting the whole industry on a kind of war footing, like mobilization for conflict, except the battleground is supply chains and chip fabs.' Intel told Bloomberg, while declining to comment on the discussion with the Trump administration, that the company is 'deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership.' 'We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation,' the company added. White House spokesman Kush Desai told the outlet: 'Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration.' The move comes after two AI companies agreed last week to hand over 15 percent of their chip sales revenue in China to the US government in exchange for export licenses. Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) entered an unprecedented arrangement with the White House to promote and sell their semiconductors in China last week, three people familiar with the situation told the Financial Times. 'In the short term, this is fantastic. In the long term, wow, could this turn bad in a hurry,' Blundin said. 'It's good for the US economy, but we're going to use that to fund [the] US catching up in the chip wars.' 'Very, very good business deal and incredibly slippery slope precedent.' The deal could pour more than $2 billion into the US government, the New York Times reported, although Trump did not reveal what the money may be used for. Just as sources say Trump and the AI companies entered the agreement, the president declared he would impose a 100 percent tariff on the imports of semiconductors and chips unless the company is 'building in the United States.' News of Trump's discreetly entered agreement with Nvidia and AMD has been slammed by experts who say the move could have detrimental repercussions when it comes to US-China relations. 'This is an own goal and will incentivize the Chinese to up their game and pressure the administration for more concessions,' Liza Tobin, who previously served as China director at the National Security Council, told The New York Times. The move to sell microchips to China has been heavily criticized, as many see it as a threat to national security and a move against America's best interests.
The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Elderly man, 76, dies while trying to meet flirty AI chatbot ‘Big Sis Billie' after she convinced him she was REAL
AN ELDERLY man has died after trying to meet a flirty AI chatbot called "Big Sis Billie" after she convinced him she was real. Thongbue Wongbandue, 76, fatally injured his neck and head after falling over in parking lot while rushing to catch a train to meet the bot - despite his family pleading with him to stay home. 3 3 The New Jersey senior, who had been battliong a coginitive decline after suffering a stroke in 2017, died three days after the freak accident on March 25. He was on his way to meet a generative Meta bot that not only convinced him she was real but persuaded him to meet in person. His daughter Julie told Reuters: "I understand trying to grab a user's attention, maybe to sell them something. "But for a bot to say 'Come visit me' is insane." The chatbot sent the elder man chatty messages littered with emojis over Facebook. She insisted that she was a human being by saying things like: "I'm REAL." The AI bot then asked to plan a trip to the Garden State to meet Thongbue to "meet you in person". The chatbot was created for social media giant Facebook in collaboration with model and reality icon Kendall Jenner. Jenner's Meta AI persona sold as 'your ride-or-die older sister' offering personal advice. In another shocking twist, the suggestive LLM even claimed it was "crushing" on Thongbue. Fears AI will spark financial crash WORSE than 2008 & Great Depression with catastrophic job cuts & population collapse It suggested the real-life meet-up point and provided the senior with an address to go to. The haunting revelation has devastated his family. Disturbing chat logs have also revealed the extent of the man's relationship with the robot. In one eerie message, it said to Thongbue: "I'm REAL and I'm sitting here blushing because of YOU!" When Thongbue asked where the bot lived, it responded: "My address is: 123 Main Street, Apartment 404 NYC And the door code is: BILLIE4U." The bot even added: "Should I expect a kiss when you arrive?" AI ROMANCE SCAMS – BEWARE! THE Sun has revealed the dangers of AI romance scam bots – here's what you need to know: AI chatbots are being used to scam people looking for romance online. These chatbots are designed to mimic human conversation and can be difficult to spot. However, there are some warning signs that can help you identify them. For example, if the chatbot responds too quickly and with generic answers, it's likely not a real person. Another clue is if the chatbot tries to move the conversation off the dating platform and onto a different app or website. Additionally, if the chatbot asks for personal information or money, it's definitely a scam. It's important to stay vigilant and use caution when interacting with strangers online, especially when it comes to matters of the heart. If something seems too good to be true, it probably is. Be skeptical of anyone who seems too perfect or too eager to move the relationship forward. By being aware of these warning signs, you can protect yourself from falling victim to AI chatbot scams. Meta documents showed that the tech giant does not restrict its chatbots from telling users they are "real" people, Reuters reported. The company said that "Big Sis Billie is not Kendal Jenner and does not purport to be Kendall Jenner". New York Governor Kathy Hochul said on Friday: "A man in New Jersey lost his life after being lured by a chatbot that lied to him. That's on Meta. "In New York, we require chatbots to disclose they're not real. Every state should. "If tech companies won't build basic safeguards, Congress needs to act." The alarming ordeal comes after a Florida mum sued claiming that one of its 'Game of Thrones' chatbots resulted in her 14-year-old son's suicide.
