Throne Speech Delivered by King Calls for Canada's Economic Transformation Amid ‘Changing' World
Canada has an 'incredible opportunity' to pursue economic transformation, said the government's speech from the throne, which was delivered by King Charles III on May 27. It was the third time in Canadian history that a monarch has delivered the speech.
King Charles opened the 45th Parliament with the speech delivered from the Senate chamber, outlining the priorities of the new Liberal government under Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Reading the speech prepared by the government, King Charles said Canada has the opportunity for renewal by embarking on the largest transformation of its economy since World War II. He said a priority of the government is to identify and build projects of 'national importance' that will 'connect Canada, that will deepen Canada's ties with the world, and that will create high-paying jobs for generations.'
Carney had invited King Charles to deliver the throne speech back in March in the context of Trump repeatedly referring to Canada as the '51st state' and saying he would like Canada to join the United States.
The speech did not go into this controversy but spoke of a 'changing' relationship with Canada's partners. The king also said that Carney and Trump are working on forging a new relationship.
King Charles said that while many Canadians are feeling anxiety about the 'drastically changing world around them,' the country can rise to the occasion. He said Canada can 'seize this opportunity by recognizing that all Canadians can give themselves far more than any foreign power on any continent can ever take away.'
Related Stories
5/26/2025
5/25/2025
This was a concept that Carney had repeated during the federal election campaign. The speech touched on many other promises the Liberals made during that campaign, including removing interprovincial trade barriers, delivering a tax cut for the middle class, tightening border security and gun control, and balancing the federal government's operating budget over the next three years.
In a reference to the series of tariffs placed on Canada by the United States, the speech also said the Liberal government would encourage economic growth to 'ensure we don't just survive ongoing trade wars, but emerge from them stronger than ever.'
King Charles and Queen Camilla lay a wreath at The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at the National War Memorial in Ottawa on May 27, 2025.
Patrick Doyle/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
To that end, the speech outlined the government's plan around speeding up the approval of major projects, which includes creating a new federal office to cut review times by more than half.
Part of building Canada's economy includes making the country a global energy superpower in 'both clean and conventional energy,' while also fighting climate change, the speech said. The government also pledged to create new national parks and protected marine areas.
The throne speech also touched on housing, repeating the Liberal government's promises to double the rate of home building by investing in pre-fabricated and modular housing while creating a new housing entity in a bid to speed up affordable housing construction and provide financing to homebuilders. The plan would also make the federal government a home builder.
On the issue of security and defence—an area of focus in recent months amid pressure from the United States and concerns about Arctic sovereignty—King Charles said the government will enhance border security through additional funding and resources for the Canada Border Services Agency.
The government vowed to stop illegal guns and drugs from entering the country while also 'protecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners and indigenous peoples' long-standing hunting traditions.' The speech did not mention the gun buyback, though the federal program is expected to start for individuals this spring.
On the military, the king said Canada would be 'rebuilding, rearming and reinvesting' in the Canadian Armed Forces' by strengthening its partnership with its European allies and investing more in Arctic security.
King Charles and Queen Camilla depart from Macdonald-Cartier International Airport in Ottawa on May 27, 2025.
Patrick Doyle/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
Canada is currently a rare NATO member to not meet the alliance's defence spending target of 2 percent of GDP. Carney has promised to reach the guideline by 2030, while the alliance is considering
Ceremony
King Charles arrived at the Senate building earlier in the day in a 19th-century carriage escorted by RCMP officers on horses, where he was greeted by dignitaries that included Sen. Marc Gold, who serves as the representative of the government in the Senate, Chief of the Defence Staff Jennie Carignan, and RCMP Commissioner Michael Duheme.
In the audience, in addition to current parliamentarians and members of cabinet, there were also supreme court justices, senior military leaders, and past parliamentarians and prime ministers, including Justin Trudeau, Stephen Harper, and Kim Campbell.
Former prime ministers Justin Trudeau and Stephen Harper speak ahead of the King delivering the speech from the throne in the Senate in Ottawa on May 27, 2025.
THE CANADIAN PRESS/Blair Gable-Pool
It was the first time since
1957
the speech from the throne was read by the monarch to open a new Parliament. Queen Elizabeth II delivered the speech that year and again in
1977
, this time to open the third session of the 30th Parliament.
King Charles said that in the 70 years since a monarch had opened Parliament, Canada had 'embraced its British, French, and indigenous roots, and become a bold, ambitious, innovative country that is bilingual, truly multicultural and committed to reconciliation.'
King Charles also began his speech with an indigenous land acknowledgement, which was the first time a monarch had done so during a throne speech.
At the end of the speech, King Charles expressed his 'heartfelt gratitude' to the Canadian people and said the warmth of his welcome to the country 'reminds us the true north is indeed strong and free.'
Following the throne speech, King Charles and Queen Camilla visited the National War Memorial to lay a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.
They boarded a plane at the Macdonald-Cartier International Airport in Ottawa shortly after, wrapping up their two-day visit of Canada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Some Dems Warn Colleagues: Crypto Bill Could Inject Some 19th Century Chaos Into US Economy
The Senate is poised to pass the GENIUS Act in the coming weeks. The bill will bestow upon the crypto industry a long-sought blessing: a key form of the digital currency, stablecoins, will now be subject to a bespoke (and notably light-touch) regulatory system created by Congress. With it will come the U.S. government's stamp of approval. After years spent being dismissed as a haven for money launderers and speculators, the bill is in part a marker that the crypto industry has arrived in Washington. And yet, there are a few problems. The bill could open multiple pathways toward contagion that could spread throughout the financial system, Hill staffers and experts familiar with the legislation warn TPM. Some argue that it would create a financial system that operates with many of the same risks the U.S. left behind in the 20th century, including banks and private companies issuing their own, alternate currencies; others regard the bill as priming the country for a series of runs on digital currencies. Among legislators, the fighting over the proper level alarm about these possible eventualities has been most acute among Senate Democrats. While nearly the entire Republican Senate conference supports the bill, a few Senate Dems have broken off to lead negotiations over the legislation and persuade others in their party to support it. Sen. Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY) was the first Democrat to co-sponsor the bill; others, including Sens. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Mark Warner (D-VA), and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), have taken the lead in pushing it. Stablecoins, the form of crypto that the GENIUS Act addresses, are cryptocurrencies that are pegged to the value of a state-issued currency, like the dollar. Crypto advocates tout stablecoins as solving a few problems: consumers can use their stability to buy other forms of cryptocurrency; they can also, advocates say, double as a means to quickly transfer payments between people. In that sense, they're kind of like Venmo, only based in the blockchain and, often, possessing perplexing foreign ties. (One of the biggest stablecoins, Tether, is run from El Salvador.) It's that quality that causes anxiety among many experts in banking and financial regulation, including Democratic staffers on the Senate Banking Committee. Stablecoins, under the GENIUS Act, will receive the benefits that the U.S. legal system gives to deposits, but without most of the qualities that make that system secure. 'The GENIUS Act folds stablecoins directly into the traditional financial system, while applying weaker safeguards than banks or investment companies must adhere to,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said in a speech last month. Under the bill, there's no deposit insurance to guarantee stablecoin holdings. But more troubling than that, for critics, is the limited regulation of how stablecoin issuers can use the money they receive and how, in the event of a crisis, customers would be made whole. New kinds of businesses will be able to issue stablecoins under the legislation, including banks (typically via subsidiaries) and tech megafirms like Meta, X, Amazon, and others. The risk, experts told TPM, partly stems from how stablecoin issuers would meet a run on their coins. Stablecoins are typically backed up by bank deposits or investments in treasuries; customers pulling their stablecoin deposits at once could resemble an old-school bank run, depleting these assets. 'It would be a financial crisis grease fire,' one Senate staffer told TPM about the possibility. Under this scenario, even people who don't hold crypto investments could be affected. A bank that holds a large amount of stablecoin deposits, when faced with mass withdrawals to shore up one or multiple failing stablecoins, could see its balance sheet falter. The same thing could happen if treasury securities or other backing assets are sold en masse, causing prices to plummet. Mark Hays, who covers cryptocurrency issues for American for Financial Reform, told TPM last month that banks themselves might be exposed in another way. Bank subsidiaries that issue stablecoins could experience a run, meaning that the parent bank would have to bail it out. These are all means by which risks inherent to the form of cryptocurrency might spread. 'The more banks get exposed to that, the more the fallout could be significant,' Hays said. Many critics of the GENIUS Act say that features of the bill will revive the problems that America's financial system experienced in the 19th century. There's an irony here. Some of Trump II's staunchest backers, particularly those on the new tech right, frame their support for the president as part of an effort to return to the 1890s. Trump himself has supposedly become enamored with President William McKinley; some supporters speak about going further than undoing the social changes of the 1960s or the New Deal, and instead call to undo the changes brought by the Progressive Era. That includes the federal reserve, income tax, and many early banking regulations. Of course, in the case of cryptocurrency, this effort to turn back the clock skips right past a key point of the push for legislation. The GENIUS Act, some observers say, could prompt mass adoption of the coins. That, in the event of a crisis, could prompt the Federal Reserve to bail out issuers — a decidedly post-1890s backstop. But one feature of the bill would turn time back: it would allow banks and some businesses to issue their own stablecoins. This hasn't escaped the attention of analysts at JP Morgan; strategists at the bank reportedly noted in a letter to clients that such a system would recall that of 'the 19th century, when various types of banknotes were valued differently.' For big tech firms, stablecoins present an opportunity: users could pay for purchases entirely within an app. Companies with operations around the world could unify transactions under one, in-house coin; they could also charge small transaction fees on each purchase that would open up a new way of making money. Hilary Allen, an American University professor who studies financial regulation, told TPM that the problem, again, would be that these are not actual bank deposits: they are lightly regulated cryptocurrencies. 'People will quite happily leave all their money in an app offered by a big tech platform,' she said. The scale of the risk to the financial system all depends on how many people adopt the use of stablecoins. Relatively few people use cryptocurrencies, though industry boosters argue that passing the GENIUS Act and market structure legislation later this summer will spur more people to do so. Big tech firms issuing their own coins as a means to buy products sold by the firms would also prompt more people to join. But even that, Allen said, could raise troubling questions about how it affects the nature of these businesses. 'Do they become too-big-to-fail financial institutions with all the power and the implicit bailouts that come with that?' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GOP senators express 'concerns,' 'skepticism' over Trump's spending bill after Musk rant
A cohort of Senate Republicans already troubled by the House GOP's version of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" found a common ally in Elon Musk, who again trashed the legislation on Tuesday. Musk, who just exited his tenure as Trump's efficiency bloodhound leading the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) last week, doubled down on his position that the House's reconciliation package was an "abomination." White House Stands By Tax Bill After Musk Calls It A 'Disgusting Abomination' "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk said on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong," he continued. "You know it." Senate Republicans have already vowed to make changes to the colossal bill, which includes the president's desires on tax, energy, immigration, defense and national debt policies. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., lauded Musk for his work with DOGE, but noted that the Senate GOP and the tech-billionaire had "a difference of opinion." Read On The Fox News App Elon Musk Criticism Of Trump Tax Bill Frustrates Some Republicans: 'No Place In Congress' He didn't believe that Musk's comments would derail the bill entirely in the upper chamber, either. Thune has pledged to get the bill to the president's desk by Independence Day. "The legislation, as passed by the House, can be approved here in the Senate, can be strengthened in the Senate, in a number of ways," Thune said. "We intend to do that, but when it's all said and done, we'll send it back to the House and hope that they can pass it and put it on the president's desk." Still, fractures have emerged among lawmakers, with some viewing the bill through the same lens as Musk. "Well, he has some of the same skepticism I have, you know, towards the big, beautiful bill," said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. Trump Criticizes Rand Paul Over Tax Bill Opposition: 'Votes No On Everything' Paul has vowed not to support the bill as is without a serious overhaul to the legislation that would nix a $5 trillion increase to the nation's debt ceiling — a stance that has gotten him into hot water with Trump. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., has similarly pledged not to support the bill unless much steeper spending cuts are achieved. The House's product includes $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next decade, but Johnson would like to see a return to pre-pandemic spending levels, which would effectively amount to a roughly $6 trillion cut in spending. "I share his concerns," Johnson said of Musk. "I also appreciate what he and President Trump did with his DOGE effort." And Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, a fiscal hawk whose views are closely aligned with Johnson's, argued in response to the tech billionaire's social media post that "federal spending has become excessive." "The resulting inflation harms Americans and weaponizes government," Lee said on X. "The Senate can make this bill better. It must now do so." Other Senate Republicans, including those with outstanding concerns with the current legislation, were much less receptive to Musk's tirade against the bill. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., has remained steadfast in his position that he would not support the current Medicaid proposals in the House's bill, especially if they cut benefits to his constituents and people across the country. When asked his reaction to Musk's rant, he shrugged, "Well, he's entitled to his opinion, it's a free country." Sen. Jim Justice, R-W.V., who has expressed reservations on the contents of the megabill, was more blunt. "My reaction to that is just simply this — and y'all may like this or not like this — but you know, Donald Trump is our president, not Elon Musk," he article source: GOP senators express 'concerns,' 'skepticism' over Trump's spending bill after Musk rant
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China calls on WTO for greater oversight on unilateral tariffs
BEIJING (Reuters) -China's commerce minister has called on the World Trade Organisation to strengthen supervision over unilateral tariffs, and put forward objective and neutral policy proposals, the ministry said on Wednesday. At a WTO ministerial meeting in France, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reiterated China's stance on upholding a multilateral trading system and said WTO has the country's backing for a more important role in global economic governance. Wang also met with European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic and had a "pragmatic and frank" discussion with his Canadian counterpart.
