logo
The personalities of MLB's trade deadline: Hunters, Fishermen and the Cleveland Grind Machine

The personalities of MLB's trade deadline: Hunters, Fishermen and the Cleveland Grind Machine

New York Times2 days ago
This is the first of a three-part series examining how the personalities of MLB executives impact baseball's trade deadline. Part two is coming Tuesday.
The display screen on Jerry Dipoto's iPhone can elicit in him despair or delight. It just depends on who is calling.
'Sometimes, the phone is going to ring and the first thing you think is, 'Oh, god,'' Dipoto said. 'You know that the likelihood of getting a deal done isn't very high.'
Advertisement
Dipoto, the Seattle Mariners' president of baseball operations, does not feel that way when he receives a call from A.J. Preller, his counterpart with the San Diego Padres. The two clubs share a spring training complex. Their two chief baseball executives share a propensity for action.
'We know each other's players inside and out,' Dipoto said. 'I'd be lying to you if I didn't say that both A.J. and I love to deal. It's intriguing to get on the phone and see what's possible.'
At this time of year, as the trade deadline approaches, executives must figure out which players on rival clubs are available and how to acquire them. To do so, the execs must understand how their contemporaries see the world and operate within it. The personalities of Major League Baseball executives form the game's hidden undercurrent.
There are hunters who identify their targets and make clear their demands. There are fishermen who cast lines far and wide across the sport. There are volume shooters who believe completing a trade is more valuable than maximizing the return in every transaction. There is the skull-crushing ennui of dealing with the Colorado Rockies and the exquisite torture of trying to finalize a transaction with the Cleveland Guardians.
There are executives, like Milwaukee Brewers general manager Matt Arnold, who sketch elaborate, three-team deals. Others avoid gambits like that. 'I'm not smart enough to do it,' Arizona Diamondbacks general manager Mike Hazen said. 'Honestly. I mean, that's the honest answer. Do you want me to lie to you?'
Some, like Tampa Bay Rays president of baseball operations Erik Neander, prefer texting. Cashman can pepper his messages with GIFs. Others, like Anthopoulos and Preller, like to kibitz on the phone. In order to do the job, several executives explained, you need to know how to connect with your counterparts. 'You talk to everybody a little bit differently, based on past history and what you think may resonate with them,' Preller said.
To be a successful executive requires an understanding of your peers. To understand these interpersonal dynamics as the deadline approaches, The Athletic canvassed more than two dozen executives about how relationships can facilitate transactions. Some requested anonymity in order to speak freely about their competitors. The conversations provided a partial taxonomy of the decision-making executives about to embark on deadline dealing.
Advertisement
In other words, when the phone rings, do you want to pick up?
A few days after the final out of the 2022 World Series, as baseball executives gathered in Las Vegas for the GM Meetings, Alex Anthopoulos approached Kansas City Royals executive J.J. Picollo. The two men had crossed paths for years in scouting circles, but were not particularly close. Anthopoulos intended to trade pitcher Jake Odorizzi and wondered if Kansas City wanted him. Picollo had just taken over the Royals' baseball operations department after spending his career in player development, and was still learning the transactional rhythms.
'I went upstairs and said, 'Guys, do we have interest in Odorizzi?'' Picollo said. 'We were kicking it around, kicking it around. The next day (Anthopoulos) traded him. OK. I learned something. If he calls, it's going to happen.'
As an assistant general manager with the Toronto Blue Jays, Anthopoulos often grew frustrated at hours wasted in offseason meetings. The executives would speculate about trade targets. 'And I would think to myself: Do we even know if that player is available?' he said. Or the group would canvass the lobby for information. 'It never made sense to me,' Anthopoulos said. 'Why aren't we just asking directly? Let's get an answer.'
So Anthopoulos makes calls. And makes calls. And makes calls.
When he became a chief executive, first with Toronto in 2009 and later in Atlanta in 2017, Anthopoulos established himself as one of the sport's foremost hunters. Anthopoulos chuckled as he recalled the mantra of former Braves president John Schuerholz: 'N.D.A.: no d—ing around.' He noted how former Chicago Cubs general manager Jim Hendry told him, 'I'm so candid and transparent that the other side doesn't believe me.'
Anthopoulos takes a similar tack. He considers it a courtesy to his rivals. 'I'm so conscious of not wasting the other side's time,' Anthopoulos said. 'Because when you're saying, 'I'm interested in so-and-so. Can you give me a price?' you're creating a lot of work for that team. They're going through your system. They're meeting, they're talking to people. It's disrespectful, to me, if you're not real.'
Advertisement
His peers described themselves as appreciative of his frankness and entertained by his vigor. He thinks fast and speaks faster. 'He can rifle through 30 names before you get to the point where you take your first breath,' Dipoto said. One executive, who insisted he harbored great affection for Anthopoulos, suggested he avoids him near the deadline because 'I can't get him off the damn phone.'
'Alex can be very transparent,' New York Mets president of baseball operations David Stearns said. 'He's also very smart. And isn't going to give up information he doesn't think he needs to give up to get a deal done.'
Dave Dombrowski, the Philadelphia Phillies' president of baseball operations, uses a similar approach, if less frenetic energy. He became a general manager for the first time in 1988, with the Montreal Expos. On Sunday, he turned 69. When a new chief baseball officer gets promoted, Dombrowski likes to reach out with congratulations. He intends to establish a baseline for future business.
'I think the most important thing is you're always staying in contact with everybody as much as you can,' Dombrowski said. 'You have a pulse for what everybody is trying to do.'
That foregrounding allows Dombrowski to pounce during the summer. In an era where executives fret over losing prospects for short-term rentals, Dombrowski often makes offers that stand out. 'Because the industry has gotten so obsessed with future value, if you focus on present value you can win a lot of deals,' one executive said. 'And he always focuses on present value.'
Brian Cashman, now in his 27th season as New York Yankees general manager, does not operate with the same disregard for perceived risk. But like Dombrowski, rival executives said, Cashman starts discussions with clarity.
'He has a really clear sense of what he will or won't do,' Guardians president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti said. 'And he'll tell you that.' Added Minnesota Twins president of baseball operations Derek Falvey, 'Cash is usually pretty direct and pretty straightforward about where he wants to go. With other teams, you know there's probably a lot longer feeling-out process.'
Advertisement
Cashman framed his style as a matter of humility.
'I'm not the smartest person in the room,' Cashman said. 'So there's no manipulation, there's no sleight of hand. I cut to the chase. I don't play games. I don't have time.'
During a conversation this spring, Anthopoulos sounded amused when told about how his other executives perceive him. He takes pride in his approach, but understands it can be imperfect.
'Being decisive can help if you're competing with someone who is being indecisive,' Anthopoulos said. 'But that doesn't stop you from making a bad trade.'
A rival executive conjured a metaphor for A.J. Preller that was fitting for an executive who often wears bucket hats and basketball shorts.
'I picture him in a boat in the middle of a lake, with 1,000 lines in the water,' the executive said.
A different executive crafted a similar image for Andrew Friedman — a juggler tasked with keeping all his options viable. The two illustrations are fitting for a pair of executives who operate in different ways but end up in similar positions. 'Andrew works his network,' one executive said. 'He's really f—ing good. And he knows what's going on out there. And A.J. does, too — on a different network.'
The Padres hired Preller in the summer of 2014. Two months later, Friedman arrived in Los Angeles. The teams executed a significant swap that winter, with catcher Yasmani Grandal joining the Dodgers in exchange for outfielder Matt Kemp. Since then, the two executives are far more often in competition. On the field, the Dodgers and Padres have established the sport's most bitter rivalry. Off the field, the front offices compete for the same players, from Mookie Betts to Juan Soto to Roki Sasaki.
The conflict can confound other teams. A common complaint from third parties at the deadline is that they are unsure if the Dodgers are actually interested in a player or just trying to inflate the price for the Padres — or vice versa. Clubs do not doubt Preller's sincerity, but worry about other options he is pursuing. 'You can think you're going to do a deal with A.J.,' one executive said. 'But just beware that he's having 900 calls a day, and he's going to do the one deal that is best for him. And it is very easy to get left out in the cold.'
Advertisement
Preller, 48, started as a scout. He prides himself on still scouring the backfields and visiting high school fields. He tries to puzzle out how different players appeal to different clubs. 'The better clubs, they understand what these teams are trying to do,' Preller said. 'I think having a feel for that is huge. And having a feel for value, like a realistic view of how the other teams are valuing their players.'
Friedman, 48, began his career in finance. No executive, his peers say, better understands the movements of markets. His former lieutenants in Tampa Bay now run front offices across the sport. His executive tree rivals that of Sean McVay and Kyle Shanahan in the NFL. But Friedman also maintains dialogue with other clubs, storing information and planting seeds.
'Making trades is really difficult,' Friedman said. 'And the better you can understand the other team's objectives, what they're trying to accomplish, it at least makes it easier.'
Before last season, the Dodgers had spent years trying to pry utilityman Tommy Edman from the St. Louis Cardinals. In the winter after 2023, Chicago White Sox general manager Chris Getz recalled, the two teams discussed three-team concepts that could bring Edman to Los Angeles. Several months later, in the midst of a historically bad team's fire sale, the White Sox served as the middleman in a trade that sent Edman and White Sox reliever Michael Kopech to the Dodgers. 'What Andrew is really f—ing good at is he doesn't leave any stone unturned,' one executive said.
Edman and Kopech solidified a Dodgers roster that defeated the Padres in the National League Division Series en route to a championship. The outcome only crystallized the challenge facing Preller. He viewed his mandate from then-owner Peter Seidler as conquering the Dodgers and capturing the first World Series in San Diego history. Seidler, who died in November 2023, authorized unprecedented spending in free agency. Preller pursued seismic upgrades through trades, from former American League Cy Young Award winner Blake Snell to flame-throwing closer Josh Hader to, of course, Soto.
To do so, Preller has demonstrated a willingness to skim the cream from his farm system. In the summer of 2022, Preller built a colossal package to acquire Soto, including three players who have become All Stars: shortstop CJ Abrams, pitcher MacKenzie Gore and outfielder James Wood. Preller has insisted he harbors no regrets about the deal, even after payroll constraints forced him to trade Soto away heading into 2024.
Preller remained undaunted last summer. He shipped out two first-round picks from 2022 (pitcher Dylan Lesko, as part of a deal for Rays reliever Jason Adam; and pitcher Robby Snelling, as part of a deal for Miami Marlins reliever Tanner Scott) and the team's first-rounder from 2023 (outfielder Dillon Head, in a package for Marlins infielder Luis Arraez). 'A.J.,' one rival executive chuckled, 'ain't scared.'
Advertisement
The haul was not enough to take down the Dodgers. But Preller will keep trying. And he does not intend to alter his strategy. 'He's told me this before over the years: 'We're willing to do something stupid — not crazy,'' Dipoto said.
'We're going to trade good players to get players,' Preller said. 'We're willing to make moves.'
A successful fisherman needs enticing bait.
As last Christmas drew near, Mike Hazen found himself in an unfamiliar position. He was about to complete a trade with the Guardians. Hazen cut his teeth in Cleveland's front office two decades ago. He considers the team's chief executives, Chris Antonetti and general manager Mike Chernoff, 'some of my best friends in the world.' That doesn't make negotiating with his pals any easier.
'In fact, Chernoff and I were joking about, 'Are we actually going to get a trade done?'' Hazen said. Then Chernoff mentioned other teams were showing interest. 'And I was like, 'Here we go again.''
Eventually the two clubs finalized a deal. Arizona received first baseman Josh Naylor in return for pitcher Slade Cecconi. But it is never easy with Cleveland, rival executives say. The team keeps it vague early in discussions and pushes for every scrap of available talent near the finish line.
The Guardians enter negotiations, one executive said, like a witness on the stand attempting not to perjure himself. 'They operate in a way where they want to share as little information as possible,' another executive said. A third executive compared their haggling to squeezing every drop of moisture from a towel. Rival front offices have coined a nickname for Antonetti's group: the Cleveland Grind Machine.
'I have heard some version of that,' Antonetti said one afternoon this summer. 'I can appreciate that there are people who feel it can be challenging on that front.'
Advertisement
Antonetti neither denies nor apologizes for this. 'We're pretty deliberate in the decisions we make,' he said. He described obstacles familiar to competitive clubs in lower-revenue markets. The Guardians do not spend much money in free agency. The team rarely selects in the upper third of the draft. Cleveland cannot afford, Antonetti said, to make major mistakes in transactions.
'We don't have a choice, really,' Antonetti said. 'We have to be disciplined. We recognize that we have a small margin for error.'
Hazen applauds the restraint. 'They're smart,' Hazen said. 'They do it right. I'm more like this,' at which point Hazen pantomimed a gunslinger pulling pistols from his holster. ('No, he isn't!' Anthopoulos said, when told about Hazen's finger-gun routine.)
Cleveland is not the only team with a reputation for transactional difficulty. Many rival executives viewed the Rockies as a franchise on an island, unwilling to make moves that other clubs view as obvious. 'The Rockies never sell, even though they're terrible,' one executive said. That has begun to change this summer, with the club flirting with the worst record in baseball history. On Friday, Colorado dealt third baseman Ryan McMahon to the Yankees, making the rare decision to trade a homegrown player who had signed a contract extension.
Before this summer, several executives lamented, the Rockies declined to engage in the basics of negotiation. When a team expresses interest in a player, it is customary for the seller to respond with what it would take to complete a deal. This can be specific or vague, but it at least furthers discussion. What Colorado would do, these executives said, was request that the inquiring team reveal which players they would give up in return. 'They're just not going to do deals,' another executive said.
Earlier this season, Rockies general manager Bill Schmidt acknowledged this deadline would likely be different for his club. He shrugged off the criticism. 'It's about matching up what you think is fair value,' he said.
Finding that same equilibrium with Cleveland can be a challenge, rival executives said. Both Antonetti and Chernoff learned their craft under the tutelage of executive Mark Shapiro, who left Cleveland in 2015 to become president of the Blue Jays and brought along Ross Atkins as general manager. A year later, the Twins hired another Cleveland lieutenant in Falvey. All three clubs, rival executives say, display aspects of the Grind Machine. But the Guardians are the genuine article.
Advertisement
The strategy creates a contrast with Tampa Bay, another small-market contender. Both philosophies can bear fruit. Only one earns your club a memorable nickname.
When Jerry Dipoto arrived in Seattle in the fall of 2015, he looked to Tampa Bay for guidance. He had just ended a rocky tenure running the Los Angeles Angels, where he often clashed with manager Mike Scioscia under the meddlesome ownership of Arte Moreno. He sought organizational stability. To do so, he opted to emulate the franchise with the least stable roster construction.
'We've modeled a lot of what we do after the Rays,' Dipoto said.
The Rays are, in many ways, the most influential team of the 21st century. The team has retained that mantle even after Friedman left for the Dodgers. There are Tampa Bay alumni running the Brewers (Arnold) and Marlins (Peter Bendix); Chaim Bloom, the former Rays and Red Sox executive, will take over the Cardinals after this season. Neander has kept the Rays relevant despite the executive brain drain and the regularly changing roster.
The club turns over by design. Tampa Bay is, in the industry parlance, 'transactional.' The team pursues 'good deals but not great deals, not once-in-a-century deals,' Neander said. 'You're putting yourself in a position to make a lot of deals. And I think by way of making a lot of deals, you're betting on the volume putting you in a position (to succeed).'
In Seattle, Dipoto decided to replicate the Tampa Bay method. At times, though, it looked like madness.
He is the premier trader of this era. Since taking over the Mariners, Dipoto has executed 185 trades, according to a tracker maintained by Jordan Shusterman of Yahoo Sports. He has made deals with every team besides the Angels, Rockies and Tigers. On 17 occasions, he has transacted with the Rays, so many that 'you can almost make a deal via carrier pigeon, you don't even have to talk it through,' he said. He has bought. He has sold. He has acquired Luis Castillo and Luis F. Castillo. He has traded pitcher Roenis Elías twice.
'We've made an absurd number of trades over time,' Dipoto said. 'The reputation that we have in the industry is probably deserved.'
In interviews for this story, executives often asked: Have you talked to Dipoto yet? 'If I could pick one guy to talk to for this story, I would pick Jerry,' Stearns said.
Dipoto combined elements of the hunters and the fishermen. He is direct, executives said. He is willing to give up real prospects. He is open to counters. 'When we call somebody, they know we're not just fishing for information,' Dipoto said.
Advertisement
In time, his pace has slowed, as the trades have netted solutions for the club at shortstop (J.P. Crawford, acquired from Philadelphia in 2018), closer (Andrés Muñoz, acquired with fellow reliever Matt Brash from San Diego in 2020) and cleanup hitter (Randy Arozarena, from Tampa Bay in 2024).
Dipoto has already been busy this trade season, acquiring slugger Josh Naylor from the Diamondbacks last week to aid his team's push for the postseason. It's fair to expect that he's still active in the market and willing to deal. He always is. Especially if he looks down at his phone and sees Preller is on the line. You never know what sort of bait is floating in the water.
(Illustrations: Kelsea Petersen / The Athletic; Photos: Orlando Ramirez / Getty, Harry How / Getty, Mary DiCicco / Getty, Alika Jenner / Getty; Ben VanHouten / Getty; Aaron Ontiveroz / Getty; Brandon Sloter / Getty; Matt Thomas / Getty)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I'm a Retirement Planner: 5 Best Money Tips for Supplementing Social Security
I'm a Retirement Planner: 5 Best Money Tips for Supplementing Social Security

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I'm a Retirement Planner: 5 Best Money Tips for Supplementing Social Security

Retiring comfortably often means getting creative with your income sources. If you're counting on Social Security, for many retirees that alone is not enough income to live on. Find Out: Read Next: But how does one go about supplementing Social Security? Certified financial planner Christopher Stroup, owner of Silicon Beach Financial, offered some strategies for diversifying income streams, creating tax-efficient strategies and looking at other ways to bring in income. Delay Social Security If you're thinking of taking Social Security benefits as soon as you can, it may behoove you to delay them, Stroup said, to maximize the benefits you are entitled to. Stroup pointed out that delaying Social Security can boost lifetime benefits by 24% to 32%, making it a powerful long-term strategy. 'To bridge the gap, retirees can tap brokerage accounts, part-time work or laddered CDs. Ideally, leverage sources that avoid triggering early IRA withdrawals or higher tax brackets prematurely.' Be Aware: Maintain Part-Time or Freelance Work In combination with delaying Social Security, retirees can continue working part time while using high-yield savings or CDs for short-term income, Stroup suggested. You can also tap into home equity (via downsizing or a reverse mortgage) to stretch limited savings. 'A tailored plan can help prioritize predictable, low-risk income sources without sacrificing future stability,' Stroup said. Even modest income from freelance consulting, tutoring or remote support roles can reduce withdrawal pressure on retirement accounts, Stroup said. 'We often help retirees match their skills to flexible, low-stress work that keeps them socially engaged and financially confident without disrupting their lifestyle.' Set Up Investment Income If you've got the time to make investments for some years prior to retirement, look into setting up 'predictable cash flows like bond ladders or qualified dividend income to cover essential expenses,' Stroup urged. Then, let growth assets ride for longer-term needs. This 'income floor + growth cushion' approach adds both stability and resilience, he explained, particularly for tech-savvy retirees who want flexibility without excess risk. On the topic of risk, he reminded retirees that 'the goal isn't to eliminate risk, it's to align it with purpose.' In his practice, they help clients separate assets by time horizon, with safer investments for near-term needs and growth-oriented assets for later years. 'This barbell strategy creates peace of mind and guards against inflation without overexposure to volatility.' Take Advantage of Tax Credits and State Programs Depending on your income level and circumstances, there may also be tax credits such as the saver's credit, energy efficiency tax credits or Medicare Savings Programs that you qualify for, Stroup said. Look into state-level benefits, as well, such as property tax relief or utility subsidies. Consider a Strategic Roth Conversion Lastly, Stroup said that many retirees overlook the power of strategic Roth conversions early in retirement. While this strategy may not work for every retiree, this timing can be 'a prime window' to convert taxable dollars at reduced rates, which cuts future tax bills and increases flexibility later, he said. 'It's one of our favorite proactive planning tools.' More From GOBankingRates 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on I'm a Retirement Planner: 5 Best Money Tips for Supplementing Social Security

How to negotiate student loan debt settlement
How to negotiate student loan debt settlement

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How to negotiate student loan debt settlement

Key takeaways Your student loans generally have to be in default to negotiate a settlement. Settlements usually refer to private loans, while compromise is more common with federal loans, but both involve negotiating to pay less than what you owe. You'll need to start by contacting your loan servicer to see if they are open to debt settlement. Any settlement should be finalized in writing with clear paid-in-full terms. A settlement could damage your credit score and even have tax consequences. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership If you have missed or are unable to make payments on your student loan debt, a student loan debt settlement or compromise may offer some relief. Eligibility generally requires nine months of missed payments, and even then, a settlement isn't guaranteed. Federal student loan compromise is more difficult and requires approval by government agencies. Private student loan settlements are easier since they're negotiated directly with the lenders without the involvement of any federal government agencies. Whether you plan to tackle this on your own or get the help of an experienced attorney or nonprofit, understanding how to negotiate federal or private student loan debt settlements could give you an idea of whether it's a realistic relief option. Who should consider a student loan settlement? Your federal student loans are 270 days past due. Your private student loans are 90 to 120 days late. Your loan is in some stage of the collection process. You have the cash to make a lump sum payment to settle your balance. You've received notice of a pending court judgment or garnishment action. You can prove you don't have the resources (income or assets) to repay the full amount you borrowed. You've defaulted on the same loan several times. If you find yourself in any of the scenarios above, you'll need to take very specific steps soon to increase the odds of a successful student loan settlement. 5 Steps to negotiating student loan settlements Once you've confirmed your default status with your private or federal student loan servicer you'll need to take some steps to start the settlement process. 1. Gather required documentation Lenders are more likely to negotiate if you're experiencing financial hardship. Gather proof of your situation to show why you can't repay the full amount. This documentation might include: Paystubs or tax returns showing a large drop in income Written proof of a job termination or layoff Documents showing disability due to an accident or illness Detailed letters of explanation regarding the nature of your hardship Supporting letters from doctors, employers or social service agencies, if applicable 2. Have your funds ready If you're hoping to reduce the amount you owe by a substantial amount, make sure the money is available. Joshua Cohen is a lawyer who helps people struggling with student loan problems. He advises borrowers not to come to the table without cash in hand. 3. Know the difference between federal and private settlement options You have fewer settlement options for federal loans than private student loans. You'll also need to be in full student loan default to even be considered for a federal settlement – being late on payments won't cut it. Private student loan lenders may offer more settlement options, even if you're not fully in default but still in collection status. Related: How to avoid joining the nearly 5 million federal student loan borrowers in default Cohen says not to bother trying to set the terms of what you want to – or even think – you should have to pay. The settlement options don't allow for any wiggle room and usually include only two choices: 100% principal + 50% interest 90% of principal and interest Although there is a 'compromise' option, Cohen said it's usually only available in rare circumstances. Settlements offered by private lenders can vary significantly. Student loan attorney Stanley Tate at Tate Law explains the factors that may influence how little or how much you could end up settling your balance. 'Older, stale debts – especially those past the statute of limitations or those previously charged off – might settle for as little as 10 to 20 cents on the dollar,' he says. 'On the other hand, newer defaults, with recently charged-off loans, could require settlements closer to 60 to 70 cents on the dollar. According to student loan attorney Adam Minsky, private lenders may offer more settlement flexibility than federal student loans. 4. Negotiate the terms of the settlement You can try to negotiate directly with your lender or hire an attorney to help you. If you go it alone, explain your situation and ask open-ended questions such as, 'What are my options at this point?' or 'How can we settle this debt?' Allowing the lender to make the first offer gives you the advantage since you know the starting point for negotiations. Hiring an experienced student loan attorney may give you an edge, especially if the lawyer knows how your lender's settlement process works. 5. Request a paid-in-full statement Never make a payment until you have a written agreement that clearly outlines the terms of the settlement. This should include the amount you're paying, the deadline for payment, as well as confirmation that the lender will consider the debt settled once payment is received. Have a lawyer review the terms with you, and save your paid-in-full statement in case lenders or debt collectors try to request money from you later. You might also need your statement to request an update on your credit report or when filing your tax return. How student loan debt settlement works Not all student loan lenders are willing to entertain settlement offers, and the amount of debt that can be forgiven varies according to the lender. This is especially true when it comes to settling private vs. federal student loans. 1. Federal student loans The government won't settle a student loan balance unless you're in default. Even then, settlement terms are typically not affordable. With an arsenal of collection tools that includes wage garnishment and tax refund offsets, federal loan servicers are less likely to negotiate. According to Tate, term settlements tend to 'require nearly the full principal balance, plus a substantial portion (often 50 percent) of the outstanding interest' that is due in 90 days. If you qualify and can afford to repay private student loans and the lower rates they offer, Tate says using them to pay off your federal student loan balances may make some sense, but he warns against refinancing to avoid the more severe federal collection tactics since 'that would be viewed as deceptive, potentially fraudulent, and [will expose] you to serious legal consequences.' 2. Private student loans You're likely to have much more luck negotiating a settlement with a private student loan lender because they don't have the collection power of the federal government. They also want to provide some type of return to their investors. If you can't refinance or keep up with payments, Tate says you may find options with private lenders that you won't find with federal student loan servicers. 'In those situation, private lenders are frequently open to accepting less than the full balance owed, but it's never a guarantee.' Some attorneys have more luck negotiating private student loan settlements as part of a bankruptcy. 'I can often renegotiate the terms, including dropping the interest rate to 0%, get a long-term fixed affordable payment and plan for the borrower which also protects a cosigner,' Cohen says. Settling student loan debt: Pros and cons Pros Saves money Gets you out of debt Avoids court Improves your credit score Cons Lowers your credit score Reduces your available cash Increases potential tax liability Lenders may not settle at terms you can afford Pros in detail Saves money: You could substantially reduce the amount you owe on private student loan balances, or stop the interest-accrual on delinquent federal loans. Gets you out of default: Once you settle, your remaining balance is cleared and your account closed. Avoids court: By settling, you may be able to avoid being taken to court, paying legal fees or having your wages garnished. Improves your credit score. As your rebuild your credit score with new debt that's paid on time, your credit scores may increase. Cons in detail Lowers your credit score: Missed payments and defaulting on your loan can dramatically lower your credit score. Reduces your available cash: You'll need to pay a large lump sum of cash to settle, leaving you with less cash on hand to pay for emergencies or other expenses. Increases potential tax liability: The debt that the lender or collection agency cancels could be considered taxable income. Lenders may not settle at terms you can afford: This is more true for defaulted federal loans than private student loans. Lenders aren't required to settle for less than you borrowed. 4 Alternatives to student loan settlement Before settling your student loans, try getting back on track with your payments through alternative options that may be available. 1. Deferment or forbearance If you're facing short-term financial hardship, deferment or forbearance can temporarily pause your loan payments, as long as your loan was, or is, taken out before July 2027. That hardship flexibility will end for loans taken out after July 2027 as part of student loan repayment changes that went into effect as part of the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB). The forbearance term will also change from 12 to nine months. 2. Income-driven repayment plans The OBBB will also see big changes for income-driven repayment (IDR) plans on student loans taken out after July 1, 2026. Only the revised standard plan and the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP) will be available. Income-based repayment (IBR) may also be available. Borrowers in discontinued programs will need to change to one of the available repayment programs by July 1, 2028. That would put an end to previous income-driven repayment plans, which based your payments on 10 to 20 percent of your discretionary income for 20 or 25 years of payments, after which the government would forgive the remaining balance. 3. Refinancing If you have good credit and a stable income, refinancing your student loans with a private lender could lower your interest rate and reduce your monthly payments. Be mindful that refinancing federal loans with a private lender will mean losing access to government protections like forbearance and income-based repayment plans. 4. Federal student loan consolidation To help lower your monthly payment and make your loans more manageable, you may be able to consolidate your federal student loans into one Direct Consolidation Loan. Keep in mind that, while this can lower your monthly payment, you will have a longer repayment term and pay more in interest over the life of the loan. To consolidate your federal student loans, they must be in repayment or in a grace period. Related: Can you consolidate defaulted student loans? Student loan resources help provides federal student loan information, including repayment options, forbearance, deferment and delinquency guidance. For help with your private student loans, reach out to your lender or servicer. Or contact an experienced student loan lawyer for a consultation. Borrowers who are struggling to repay their student loans have several resources available. A few options include: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is a government agency that protects borrowers from predatory lending and scams. The National Consumer Law Center works with lawyers and advocates to provide student loan assistance to borrowers with low incomes to help them understand their rights and loan responsibilities. The Student Borrower Protection Center is a nonprofit focused on protecting student loan borrowers. You can find several helpful resources on the center's website, including a list of state-based student loan ombudspersons and advocates to help with loan-related issues. Bottom line Settling your student loan debt can provide financial relief, but it may not be affordable if you have federal student loans. Private student debt settlement is typically more cost effective, but the amount private lenders are willing to settle may vary based on a variety of factors. Even if a settlement is possible, it can negatively impact your credit and may result in tax liabilities on the forgiven amount. Before pursuing this path, it's important to explore alternatives, such as IDR, RAP or refinancing, which could offer long-term relief without the downsides of settlement. Frequently asked questions What happens if you never pay your student loans? If you don't repay your student loans, you may incur late fees, penalties and long-term credit score damage. This can disqualify you from future loans, housing rentals and even jobs. If you miss enough payments, your lender can file a lawsuit against you, seize your tax refunds and garnish your wages to repay the debt. Should I pay off my student loans in one lump sum? Yes, as long as you have the cash to pay the amount in full within the offer period. Don't make any payments until you have the settlement offer in writing from your lender or lawyer. How is the student loan debt settlement calculated? Federal student lenders will offer only one of two settlements: 100% principal plus 50% of owed interest or 90% of principal and interest owed. Settlements for less than that are rare and require proof of extreme hardship. Private student loan lenders will base the settled amount on your financial situation, the age of the defaulted loan and other factors that may vary. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Stewart Named a Forbes America's Best Employer for Women 2025
Stewart Named a Forbes America's Best Employer for Women 2025

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stewart Named a Forbes America's Best Employer for Women 2025

Company named #1 in industry category while being recognized as a best employer for women for two consecutive years HOUSTON, July 30, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Stewart Information Services Corporation (NYSE:STC) announced today that it has been awarded a place on the Forbes list of America's Best Employers for Women 2025, marking the company's second year receiving this honor. This prestigious award is presented in collaboration with Statista, the world-leading statistics portal and industry ranking provider. The awards list was announced on July 30, 2025, and can be viewed on the Forbes website. Stewart is proud to have been ranked among the top 5% overall on the 2025 list and #1 within Forbes' industry category of Business Services & Supplies. Within Stewart's U.S. workforce, 71% of employees are women, including 61% of managers and 38% of our Executive Leadership Team. These figures highlight the company's dedication to creating a workplace where all individuals can succeed at every level. "This recognition by Forbes as one of America's Best Employers for Women is a proud moment that reinforces our belief that when we invest in and support an environment where everyone thrives, it benefits our people, our customers, and our business," said Stewart CEO Fred Eppinger. "I applaud this achievement and the incredible women across Stewart who help drive our success every day." America's Best Employers for Women 2025 is based on data collected through online panels, with over 140,000 women working for companies and institutions in the U.S. with at least 1,000 employees over the past three years. Only responses from women were considered. The analysis is based on three criteria: personal evaluations, public evaluations and a Leadership Diversity Index. "Women play a vital role in shaping our company's future, and we're committed to supporting them every step of the way," said Emily Kain, Chief Human Resources Officer at Stewart. "This award reflects the intentional actions we've taken to champion women at every stage of life and career. From inclusive benefits to development opportunities, we are focused on creating a workplace where women are equipped and empowered to thrive." Over the past several years, Stewart has made purposeful investments to foster a culture where women are supported through every milestone and moment that matters. These include enhanced health and welfare benefits, fertility and family-building support, paid leave for childbirth and bonding, as well as personalized development programs such as financial wellness resources and retirement planning. Together, these initiatives reflect Stewart's commitment to creating a workplace where women are equipped to grow, lead, and thrive, both personally and professionally. Learn more at About Stewart Stewart (NYSE-STC) is a global real estate services company, offering products and services through our direct operations, network of Stewart Trusted Providers™ and family of companies. From residential and commercial title insurance and closing and settlement services to specialized offerings for the mortgage and real estate industries, we offer the comprehensive service, deep expertise and solutions our customers need for any real estate transaction. At Stewart, we are dedicated to becoming the premier title services company and we are committed to doing so by partnering with our customers to create mutual success. Learn more at View source version on Contacts John Chattaway, Stewart Media Relations(713) 625-8180; mediarelations@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store