Bipartisan bill seeks to ban Chinese AI from federal agencies, as US vows to win the AI race
Advertisement
The ever-tighter race is now a central part of the US-China rivalry. And so much is at stake that the US must win, witnesses told the congressional panel.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The two countries are 'in a long-term techno-security competition that will determine the shape of the global political order for the coming years,' said Thomas Mahnken, president and CEO of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
Jack Clark, co-founder and head of policy at Anthropic, told the committee that AI has built-in values.
'I know that AI systems are a reflection of the societies that are built from. AI built in democracies will lead to better technology for all of humanity. AI built in authoritarian nations will... be inescapably intertwined and imbued with authoritarianism,' Clark said. 'We must take decisive action to ensure America prevails.'
Advertisement
Earlier this year, Chris Lehane, OpenAI's head of global affairs, told reporters in Paris that the US and China were the only two countries in the world that could build AI at scale. The competition, which he described as one between democratic AI and autocratic AI, is 'very real and very serious,' and the stakes are 'enormous,' he said, for 'the global rails of AI will be built by one of those two countries.'
The 2025 AI Index Report by Stanford University's Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence center has the US in the lead in producing top AI models. But the report notes China is rapidly closing the performance gap, reaching near parity in 2024 on several major benchmarks. It also shows that China leads in AI publications and patents.
At the hearing, Clark urged the lawmakers to maintain and strengthen export controls of advanced chips to China. 'This competition fundamentally runs on compute,' he said. The US must control the flow of powerful chips to China, Clark said, 'or else you're giving them the tools they will need to build powerful AI to harm American interests.'
Mark Beall, Jr., president of government affairs at The AI Policy Network, said there are 'a number of very glaring gaps' in the US export controls that have allowed China to obtain controlled chips. Lawmakers earlier this year introduced a bill to track such chips to ensure they would not be diverted to the wrong hands.
In another legislative step, Republican and Democratic lawmakers in both the House and the Senate on Wednesday introduced a bill to ban Chinese AI systems in the federal government.
Advertisement
'The US must draw a hard line: hostile AI systems have no business operating inside our government,' Moolenaar said.
The No Adversarial AI Act, as proposed, seeks to identify AI systems developed by foreign adversaries and ban their use in the US government, with exceptions for use in research and counter terrorism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
36 minutes ago
Nestle says it will remove artificial dyes from US foods by 2026
Nestle said Wednesday it will eliminate artificial colors from its U.S. food and beverages by the middle of 2026. It's the latest big food company making that pledge. Last week, Kraft Heinz and General Mills said they would remove artificial dyes from their U.S. products by 2027. General Mills also said it plans to remove artificial dyes from its U.S. cereals and from all foods served in K-12 schools by the middle of 2026. The move has broad support. About two-thirds of Americans favor restricting or reformulating processed foods to remove ingredients like added sugar or dyes, according to an AP-NORC poll. Both California and West Virginia have recently banned artificial dyes in foods served in schools. On Sunday, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas signed a bill requiring foods made with artificial dyes or additives to contain a new safety label starting in 2027. The label would say they contain ingredients 'not recommended for human consumption' in Australia, Canada, the European Union or the U.K. The federal government is also stepping up its scrutiny of artificial colors. In January, days before President Donald Trump took office, the U.S. regulators banned the dye called Red 3 from the nation's food supply, nearly 35 years after it was barred from cosmetics because of potential cancer risk. In April, Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said the agency would take steps to eliminate synthetic dyes by the end of 2026, largely by relying on voluntary efforts from the food industry. Nestle has pledged to remove artificial dyes before. Early in 2015, the company said it would remove artificial flavors and colors from its products by the end of that year. But the promise didn't hold. Nestle said Wednesday it's been removing synthetic dyes from its products over the last decade, and 90% of its U.S. portfolio doesn't contain them. Among those that do is Nesquik Banana Strawberry milk, which is made with Red 3. Nestle said Wednesday it wants to evolve with its U.S. customers' changing nutritional needs and preferences. 'Serving and delighting people is at the heart of everything we do and every decision that we make,' Nestle's U.S. CEO Marty Thompson said in a statement.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alico, Inc. applauds Gov. Ron DeSantis for signing House Bill 4041 to create the Corkscrew Grove Stewardship District
FORT MYERS, Fla., June 25, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Alico, Inc. ('Alico' or the 'Company') (Nasdaq: ALCO), a Southwest Florida-based agribusiness and land management company with over 125 years of experience as stewards of its lands, applauds Gov. Ron DeSantis for signing House Bill 4041. The bill, which takes effect immediately, creates the Corkscrew Grove Stewardship District, an independent special district responsible for the construction, operations and maintenance of community infrastructure in eastern Collier County. The enabling legislation was sponsored by Rep. Lauren Melo, a Naples Republican, and received unanimous support from the Collier County Legislative Delegation, the Florida House Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee, the Florida House Ways and Means Committee, the Florida House State Affairs Committee, the Senate Rules Committee, and the full Florida House and Florida Senate. The proposal also received unanimous support from the Collier Board of County Commissioners. The Corkscrew Grove Stewardship District will assist Alico in its efforts to effectively finance infrastructure, help restore and manage natural areas, and oversee the administration of the master planned communities and lands within the district's boundaries. In March 2025, Alico announced the creation of Corkscrew Grove Villages in eastern Collier County. Located on approximately 4,600 acres at the northwest corner of Collier County on the border of Lee and Hendry counties, Corkscrew Grove Villages will not only provide future residents with ample opportunities to live, work and play, but also enhance public infrastructure, permanently protect thousands of acres of sensitive lands, and enhance wetlands and water resources. The plan consists of two 1,500-acre villages accompanied by more than 6,000 acres of permanent conservation area. The district, which will be overseen by a five-member Board of Supervisors, will also help facilitate collaboration and communications with local, state and federal government agencies and community stakeholders. This includes partnering with the Immokalee Water and Sewer District on the planning, design, construction and delivery of potable water and sewer to Corkscrew Grove Stewardship District residents. 'We are grateful for the support of Gov. Ron DeSantis, Rep. Lauren Melo and the entire Florida Legislature,' said John Kiernan, the president and CEO of Alico. 'Their approval of the Corkscrew Grove Stewardship District is not only a key milestone in implementing Alico's strategic transformation, which thoughtfully converts select properties to well planned communities, but also in executing Collier County's Rural Land Stewardship Area plan.' Approved by the Collier Board of County Commissioners in 2002 and spanning approximately 185,000 acres in eastern Collier County, the Rural Land Stewardship Area (RLSA) plan is an innovative, incentive-based approach to planning and implementing long-term growth in rural regions. For the past 20 years, Alico has worked closely with other Southwest Florida landowners and community stakeholders to develop and implement the RLSA plan. While the long-term vision for Corkscrew Grove Village includes two villages, Alico is currently seeking approval for the East Village as its first step. The process is anticipated to take approximately one year, with the final decision by the Collier Board of County Commissioners expected in 2026. Alico has also submitted permits to the South Florida Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for both villages. Construction on the first village could begin in 2028 or 2029, if approvals are granted. For more information about Corkscrew Grove Villages, visit For more information about Alico, visit About Alico, Inc. Alico, Inc. (Nasdaq: ALCO) is a Florida-based agribusiness and land management company with over 125 years of experience. Following its strategic transformation in 2025, Alico operates as a diversified land company with approximately 51,300 acres across 8 Florida counties. The Company focuses on strategic land development opportunities and diversified agricultural operations, leveraging its extensive land portfolio to create long-term shareholder value while maintaining its commitment to responsible land stewardship and conservation. Learn more about Alico at Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the Company's expectations with respect to its Strategic Transformation; the Corkscrew Grove Stewardship District's assistance in the Company's efforts to effectively finance infrastructure, help restore and manage natural areas, and oversee the administration of the master planned communities and lands within the district's boundaries; the Company's plans to pursue commercial and residential development, including with respect to the Corkscrew Grove Villages and the timeline for development thereof; and any other statements relating to our future activities or other future events or conditions. These statements are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our business based, in part, on assumptions made by our management and can be identified by terms such as 'if,' 'will,' 'should,' 'expects,' 'plans,' 'hopes,' 'anticipates,' 'could,' 'intends,' 'targets,' 'projects,' 'contemplates,' 'believes,' 'estimates,' 'forecasts,' 'predicts,' 'potential' or 'continue' or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including, but not limited to: our implementation of our planned Strategic Transformation; our plan to wind down our citrus production operations to focus on our long-term diversified land usage and real estate development strategy; our ability to secure necessary regulatory approvals and permits for land development projects, effectively manage and allocate resources to new business initiatives, attract and retain skilled personnel with expertise in diversified land usage and real estate development, navigate potential market fluctuations and economic conditions, maintain strong relationships with lenders and continue to satisfy covenants and conditions under current loan agreements and address potential environmental and zoning issues, and other challenges inherent in real estate development; our ability to increase our revenues from land usage and real estate development; adverse weather conditions, natural disasters and other natural conditions, including the effects of climate change and hurricanes and tropical storms; risks related to our expected significant revenue shift to real estate development and diversified farming operations; our ability to effectively perform grove management services, or to effectively manage our portfolio of groves; product contamination and product liability claims; water use regulations restricting our access to water; changes in immigration laws; harm to our reputation; tax risks associated with a Section 1031 Exchange; risks associated with the undertaking of one or more significant corporate transactions; the seasonality of our citrus business; fluctuations in our earnings due to market supply and prices and demand for our products; climate change, or legal, regulatory, or market measures to address climate change; Environmental, Social and Governance issues, including those related to climate change and sustainability; increases in labor, personnel and benefits costs; increases in commodity or raw product costs, such as fuel and chemical costs; transportation risks; any change or the classification or valuation methods employed by county property appraisers related to our real estate taxes; liability for the use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides and other potentially hazardous substances; compliance with applicable environmental laws; loss of key employees; material weaknesses and other control deficiencies relating to our internal control over financial reporting; macroeconomic conditions, such as rising inflation and the deadly conflicts in Ukraine and Israel and the Middle East; system security risks, data protection breaches, cybersecurity incidents and systems integration issues; our indebtedness and ability to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations; higher interest expenses as a result of variable rates of interest for our debt; our ability to continue to pay cash dividends; and certain of the other factors described under the sections "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2025 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC'). Except as required by law, we do not undertake an obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments, or otherwise. Media Contact:Jenna Buzzacco-FoersterGravina, Smith, Matte & Arnold Marketing and PR(239) 275-5758Jenna@ Investor Contact:John MillsICR(646) 277-1254InvestorRelations@ Brad HeineChief Financial Officer(239) 226-2000bheine@
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sam Altman comes out swinging at The New York Times
From the moment OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepped onstage, it was clear this was not going to be a normal interview. Altman and his chief operating officer, Brad Lightcap, stood awkwardly toward the back of the stage at a jam-packed San Francisco venue that typically hosts jazz concerts. Hundreds of people filled steep theatre-style seating on Wednesday night to watch Kevin Roose, a columnist with The New York Times, and Platformer's Casey Newton record a live episode of their popular technology podcast, Hard Fork. Altman and Lightcap were the main event, but they'd walked out too early. Roose explained that he and Newton were planning to — ideally, before OpenAI's executives were supposed to come out — list off several headlines that had been written about OpenAI in the weeks leading up to the event. 'This is more fun that we're out here for this,' said Altman. Seconds later, the OpenAI CEO asked, 'Are you going to talk about where you sue us because you don't like user privacy?' Within minutes of the program starting, Altman hijacked the conversation to talk about The New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI and its largest investor, Microsoft, in which the publisher alleges that Altman's company improperly used its articles to train large language models. Altman was particularly peeved about a recent development in the lawsuit, in which lawyers representing The New York Times asked OpenAI to retain consumer ChatGPT and API customer data. 'The New York Times, one of the great institutions, truly, for a long time, is taking a position that we should have to preserve our users' logs even if they're chatting in private mode, even if they've asked us to delete them,' said Altman. 'Still love The New York Times, but that one we feel strongly about.' For a few minutes, OpenAI's CEO pressed the podcasters to share their personal opinions about the New York Times lawsuit — they demurred, noting that as journalists whose work appears in The New York Times, they are not involved in the lawsuit. Altman and Lightcap's brash entrance lasted only a few minutes, and the rest of the interview proceeded, seemingly, as planned. However, the flare-up felt indicative of the inflection point Silicon Valley seems to be approaching in its relationship with the media industry. In the last several years, multiple publishers have brought lawsuits against OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta for training their AI models on copyrighted works. At a high level, these lawsuits argue that AI models have the potential to devalue, and even replace, the copyrighted works produced by media institutions. But the tides may be turning in favor of the tech companies. Earlier this week, OpenAI competitor Anthropic received a major win in its legal battle against publishers. A federal judge ruled that Anthropic's use of books to train its AI models was legal in some circumstances, which could have broad implications for other publishers' lawsuits against OpenAI, Google, and Meta. Perhaps Altman and Lightcap felt emboldened by the industry win heading into their live interview with The New York Times journalists. But these days, OpenAI is fending off threats from every direction, and that became clear throughout the night. Mark Zuckerberg has recently been trying to recruit OpenAI's top talent by offering them $100 million compensation packages to join Meta's AI superintelligence lab, Altman revealed weeks ago on his brother's podcast. When asked whether the Meta CEO really believes in superintelligent AI systems, or if it's just a recruiting strategy, Lightcap quipped: 'I think [Zuckerberg] believes he is superintelligent.' Later, Roose asked Altman about OpenAI's relationship with Microsoft, which has reportedly been pushed to a boiling point in recent months as the partners negotiate a new contract. While Microsoft was once a major accelerant to OpenAI, the two are now competing in enterprise software and other domains. 'In any deep partnership, there are points of tension and we certainly have those,' said Altman. 'We're both ambitious companies, so we do find some flashpoints, but I would expect that it is something that we find deep value in for both sides for a very long time to come.' OpenAI's leadership today seems to spend a lot of time swatting down competitors and lawsuits. That may get in the way of OpenAI's ability to solve broader issues around AI, such as how to safely deploy highly intelligent AI systems at scale. At one point, Newton asked OpenAI's leaders how they were thinking about recent stories of mentally unstable people using ChatGPT to traverse dangerous rabbit holes, including to discuss conspiracy theories or suicide with the chatbot. Altman said OpenAI takes many steps to prevent these conversations, such as by cutting them off early, or directing users to professional services where they can get help. 'We don't want to slide into the mistakes that I think the previous generation of tech companies made by not reacting quickly enough,' said Altman. To a follow-up question, the OpenAI CEO added, 'However, to users that are in a fragile enough mental place, that are on the edge of a psychotic break, we haven't yet figured out how a warning gets through.'
