EXCLUSIVE Revealed: SECOND woman stalked and brutally attacked in idyllic French village where British expat was stabbed to death: Six weeks on from Karen Carter's murder, a sinister new development...
Yellow police tape still surrounds Karen Carter's honey-coloured stone cottage on the outskirts of Trémolat, a small village east of Bordeaux. It looks forlorn now, sags where once it was taut, and has faded slightly in the heat, just like the flowers left in tribute. Among them, a posy laid by her husband Alan.
Opposite, a road sign warning 'DANGER' urges drivers to slow down to avoid cumbersome farm vehicles – though one might argue that a more present 'danger' in this slow-moving, rural idyll comes from a killer still at large.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer accused of U-turn after ordering inquiry into grooming gangs
Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of a U-turn after committing to a statutory inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal. After resisting pressure for months to implement a full probe, the Prime Minister said he had read 'every single word' of an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Louise Casey and would accept her recommendation for the investigation. Earlier this year, the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations already made in a seven-year national inquiry by Professor Alexis Jay. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described the move as a 'welcome U-turn', while Kemi Badenoch called on him to apologise for 'six wasted months'. 'Just like he dismissed concerns about the winter fuel payment and then had to U-turn, just like he needed the Supreme Court to tell him what a woman is, he had to be led by the nose to make the correct decision here,' she said. 'I've been repeatedly calling for a full national inquiry since January. It's about time he recognised he made a mistake and apologised for six wasted months.' Speaking to reporters travelling with him on his visit to Canada, the Prime Minister said: 'I have never said we should not look again at any issue. I have wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry. That's why I asked Louise Casey who I hugely respect to do an audit. 'Her position when she started the audit was that there was not a real need for a national inquiry over and above what was going on. 'She has looked at the material she has looked at and she has come to the view that there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she has seen. 'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation. That is the right thing to do on the basis of what she has put in her audit.' The Times newspaper reported that the findings of Baroness Casey's review will be set out in Parliament on Monday. The inquiry will be able to compel witnesses to give evidence, and it is understood that it will be national in scope, co-ordinating a series of targeted local investigations. Prof Jay's 2022 report concluded there had been institutional failings across the country and tens of thousands of victims in England and Wales. A national row over grooming gangs was ignited in January after tech billionaire Elon Musk used his X social media platform to launch a barrage of attacks on Sir Keir and safeguarding minister Jess Phillips. It followed the Government's decision to decline a request from Oldham Council for a Whitehall-led inquiry into child sexual abuse in the town. The Government later commissioned a 'rapid' audit by Lady Casey into the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse, which had been due to take three months but was delayed.
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Taxman begins fraud investigation into HS2
A fraud investigation into HS2 has been started by the taxman over allegations of 'large-scale' financial impropriety. The company responsible for building the high-speed rail line has referred itself to HM Revenue & Customs after completing an internal review into a whistleblower's claim that a subcontractor may have been committing tax fraud. Last month it was revealed that HS2 Ltd was investigating whether a subcontractor working on the project had falsely declared self-employed workers as directly employed staff and charged inflated rates. It was alleged that 'fake payslips' had been submitted to mislead auditors. A firm has been suspended. The investigation is said to focus on two companies that provided employees to Balfour Beatty Vinci, one of HS2's main contractors and a joint venture whose history can be traced back to the construction of the Channel Tunnel more than 30 years ago. A spokesman for the joint venture declined to comment. HS2 has been rocked by long delays, mammoth cost overruns and allegations of chronic mismanagement. This week, the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, will present the initial findings of an internal review by Mark Wild, who was parachuted in last December as chief executive of HS2 Ltd to try to get the project back on track. The Labour government is overseeing a major 'reset' of the high-speed rail line after its northern leg was scrapped in 2023 by the Conservatives. It is understood that Wild has told Alexander that plans to open the HS2 phase one leg from London to Birmingham by 2033 will not be achieved without a shake-up of the phasing of construction. Wild has not put a date on when he thinks it is feasible to open the line, preferring instead to offer the government a series of options once he has completed a more detailed review. Wild has also not confirmed an updated cost estimate to the transport secretary, sources insisted, despite reports that the bill for finishing the work between Birmingham and Old Oak Common on the outskirts of London had ballooned to £100 billion. Construction at Old Oak Common station BEN WHITLEY A spokesman for HS2 Ltd said: 'We treat all whistleblower allegations seriously and are continuing to conduct our own investigation. Furthermore, HS2 Ltd has formally reported the allegations to HMRC, and we encourage anyone who believes they may have relevant information, which could support our inquiries, to report it in confidence.' 'Mark Wild, our chief executive, has been clear that HS2 faces serious cost and schedule challenges. He is now undertaking a comprehensive review which will report to the government in due course and lead to a full reset of the company and project. This work is yet to be concluded and, given the scale and complexity of HS2, it is vital that Mark is given the time to carry it out properly.' A senior Whitehall source said: 'He [Wild] is looking under the bonnet and is not liking what he is finding,' said a source, adding that Alexander would point to 'ministerial mismanagement', a 'lack of ministerial oversight' and an organisation 'not fit for purpose'.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Perjury cases are rare in family law in Australia. Experts say courts need to be better at cracking down on lying
In the family court several years ago, a man wove a web of deceit. He forged bank records and other documents in a lie that would later unravel. He had launched a case seeking property orders after splitting with his partner. He later made claims to the court, backed up by documents, about when he sold his business. The claims were strongly in his favour. But after the original documents were sought, the judge discovered the man had lied, altering dates on bank documents and lying about other matters. The man's deceit was referred to police and he was charged with giving false testimony and fabricating evidence in court. The man was subsequently sentenced to more than a year in jail in a state court. Prosecutions for perjury – when someone lies under oath to the court – are 'extremely rare' in family court cases, experts say. One lawyer says she hopes the above case will deter people from being deceptive in court in the future. But experts say courts need to be better at cracking down on people who bend the truth for personal gain – and refer cases to police when perjury is suspected, especially in domestic and family violence matters. Vivian Galanis, the managing principal solicitor at Wallumatta Legal, says perjury before the family court often involves selective disclosure, omissions or inconsistencies that can be difficult to untangle. 'In my experience, dishonesty often comes up around financial disclosure where one party may downplay assets, debts or income,' she says. 'It's hard to say how often perjury actually happens because unless the other party has the means to investigate and contradict the evidence, it tends to go unchallenged.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The family court can't investigate perjury allegations – they need to be referred to the Australian federal police, and someone found guilty faces up to five years in prison. But there are other powers available to the family court if a judge suspects a party hasn't met their obligation of making a 'full and frank' disclosure, such as the judge awarding a greater share of the assets to the person they believe has told the truth. They can also allow certain documents to be subpoenaed. Galanis said even when there is a strong suspicion of dishonesty, formal referrals to police are extremely rare in the case of family court cases, and prosecutions for perjury rarer still. From 2014 to 2019, there were no court referrals to investigate potential perjury offences in the family court, according to a 2021 government report on the family law system. There were no prosecutions for perjury in relation to family court cases during that time. The same report stated that many submissions to the review suggested there needed to be tougher penalties for false allegations or providing false evidence. But while the report noted concerns about perjury in family court cases were widespread, it said actual cases were relatively rare. However, Justin Dowd, who is now semi-retired after working in family law for 50 years, says: 'I think sadly the court has, over time, become immune, if not to people telling outright lies, then certainly bending the truth to advance their case. 'Various times when people have lied to the court, particularly by underestimating their finances, the court had penalised them financially, but not referred it on.' Dowd says even if it is referred, it doesn't mean the AFP will investigate. Sometimes, there are other higher priority investigations. Resourcing was raised as an issue in the judgment for the man convicted of perjury over his family court case. The investigation began several years after it was referred to the police by the court. The federal police said the delay was due to the pandemic and the redirection of resources. The judge considered the impact on his family when sentencing the man after receiving character references from other people. Galanis says dishonesty in the family court is a particular issue for women who have experienced coercive control or financial abuse. 'The family law process can become another battleground,' she says. 'When an ex-partner continues to lie, hide assets or withholds information, it doesn't just undermine the legal process, it re-traumatises, reinforcing the same dynamics of power and control they have fought so hard to escape. 'These clients are often faced with a difficult choice: whether to invest more time, money, and emotional energy in uncovering financial dishonesty, or to accept an outcome that may be incomplete, but allows them to move on. It's a compromise no one should be forced to make, but many do.' Jess de Vries, director of legal services at Women's Legal Service Victoria, agrees that alleged perpetrators can manipulate the system to their advantage. 'We need the court to be relying on their enforcement mechanisms,' she says. 'We also need to know where there are real concerns about potential perjury, that it is referred to the AFP.' A woman currently involved in an asset dispute before the family court told Guardian Australia that she suspects her former partner is not being upfront about his earnings – and alleges this is a continuation of his controlling behaviour. She alleges he claimed in court he has not earned any money since they separated two years ago. However, due to being familiar with the nature of his work as a 'successful businessman' from the time they were together, she doesn't think that can be true. 'The narrative doesn't make sense,' she says. Getting to the bottom of such disputes can be costly – it can cost thousands of dollars to get financial records subpoenaed. On Tuesday, there were changes to the Family Law Act so that the duty of separating couples to disclose their finances now falls under that law. Before this, it sat under rules that guide how family law policies are applied. But de Vries is uncertain about how much of a difference this will make. 'The nature of the duty of financial disclosure will not change, and the consequences for non-compliance have not been updated as part of the amendments,' she says. She thinks the perjury case outlined above could have consequences, though. 'People are clearer on what the impacts can be if they perjure themselves, and that it can mean prison.'
