China Begins Construction Of Mega-Dam On Brahmaputra River In Tibet
Beijing approved the project in December on the river -- known as Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet and Brahmaputra in India -- linking it to the country's carbon neutrality targets and economic goals in the Tibet region.
"The electricity generated will be primarily transmitted to other regions for consumption, while also meeting local power needs in Tibet," state news agency Xinhua reported after the groundbreaking ceremony in southeastern Tibet's Nyingchi.
Once built, the dam could dwarf the record-breaking Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River in central China -- and have a potentially serious impact on millions of people downstream in India and Bangladesh.
The project will entail constructing five hydropower stations, with the total investment estimated to be around 1.2 trillion yuan ($167.1 billion), Xinhua said.
India said in January it had raised concerns with China about the project in Tibet, saying it will "monitor and take necessary measures to protect our interests".
China "has been urged to ensure that the interests of the downstream states of the Brahmaputra are not harmed by activities in upstream areas", India's foreign ministry said then.
In December, Beijing's foreign ministry said that the project would not have any "negative impact" downstream, adding that China "will also maintain communication with countries at the lower reaches" of the river.
Besides downstream concerns, environmentalists have also warned about the irreversible impact of such mega projects in the ecologically sensitive Tibetan plateau.
Both India and China, neighbours and rival Asian powers, share thousands of kilometres of disputed borders, where tens of thousands of soldiers are posted on either side.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Trump's Tariff On India To Do Little To Upset IPhone Manufacturing Plans
Bengaluru: President Donald Trump's 25 per cent tariffs on Indian goods will do little to slow the role of the Asian country as a key hub for manufacturing iPhones, even when it means more expensive smartphones for US consumers, analysts and industry executives said. Apple has realigned its India exports to almost exclusively serve the US market, with nearly all the $3.2 billion-worth of iPhones exported by Foxconn from India going to the United States between March and May. It's "too early to say" if recent events or future changes in Trump's stance will alter Apple's manufacturing plans in India, an industry executive familiar with Apple's strategy said. "These plans are made with a longer window." Trump on Wednesday imposed a 25 per cent tariff on goods imported from the country, effective Friday, a move that sent jitters across India Inc., though some view it as a negotiation tactic. For Apple, India is now central to its strategy of diversifying manufacturing beyond China, where geopolitical pressures have pushed it to consider alternative bases. India supplied 71 per cent of all iPhones sold in the US market between April and June, up from 31 per cent a year earlier, driven by a corresponding decline in shipments from China, according to Counterpoint Research. Despite the newly announced tariffs, manufacturing iPhones in India would continue to remain cost-competitive, with expenses lower than when Apple began production there eight years ago, narrowing the cost gap with China, analysts said. Factors like growing local component availability, federal government incentives, and wages nearly half those in China have positioned India as one of the top two iPhone-producing countries, alongside China. "Making supply chain adjustments, particularly with new iPhone models nearing release, is unlikely due to the complex factors involved. It is expected to be business as usual, especially with a resilient supply chain like Apple," said Tarun Pathak, a research director at Counterpoint. Trump's Ire Trump has repeatedly targeted Apple for making US-sold iPhones outside the country by threats, including company-specific tariffs, but hurdles like high costs, technological shortcomings, and legal issues have stood in the way. In May, he recalled telling Apple CEO Tim Cook: "we put up with all the plants you built in China for years ... we are not interested in you building in India, India can take care of themselves". Apple would rather absorb the higher costs for iPhones sold in the United States than slam the brakes on its India expansion, said Faisal Kawoosa, chief analyst at Indian research firm Techarc. "Given that sales in the US are largely operator-driven and sold as part of plans, it might mean adding a few more dollars to monthly plans rather than giving an upfront blow to consumers".
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
'TACO' Routine, And Other Explanations For Trump's Great India Meltdown
The ground beneath the India-US relations is shifting thick and fast. In light of the recently imposed 25% tariffs on India by the Trump administration, two contradictions now define the India-US bilateral relationship. Despite ongoing negotiations that had not yet broken down, the tariffs were unexpectedly introduced, signalling a discord between diplomatic momentum and policy action. A Dual Challenge Yet, confidence in the overall trajectory of the bilateral relationship appears to endure. India's response to the tariffs struck a measured tone, maintaining a willingness to continue negotiations while clearly delineating its red lines. Notably, the tariffs levied on India are steeper than those imposed on other Asian economies such as Indonesia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Japan. What may be more troubling than the tariffs themselves is President Trump's invocation of India's energy ties with Russia. This suggests a broader strategic discomfort beyond trade. As the tariff negotiations evolve, India now faces a dual challenge in its relations with the United States: first, managing the domestic economic impact of higher US tariffs, and second, navigating the risk of secondary sanctions stemming from its relationship with Russia, particularly as the Russia-Ukraine conflict continues to unfold. Saving Face? On the trade front, perhaps the last word on a trade deal is yet to be said or written. As such, there is a good chance India and the US may continue negotiations to arrive at a better position. Meanwhile, the tariffs may continue. Trump's announcement comes against the backdrop of a series of frustrations both domestically and internationally. Trump had already pushed the initial deadline for the tariffs from July to August, and another extension would further entrench the belief in the 'TACO' - 'Trump Always Chickens Out' - theory. Technically, any extension beyond August 1 would have complicated Washington's other negotiations, most notably with China, which seemed to be progressing satisfactorily to both parties until now. Domestically, a hard posturing vis-à-vis large economies would sell well to douse the political fire in the Beltway due to the ongoing Epstein controversy. Internationally, posturing against India - a strategic partner with which Trump associates himself closely - could usher in advantageous positions for Washington against Beijing, a more lucrative catch. The Russia Embarrassment The other international concern for Trump that he has little control over is the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Trump has tried all the tricks in the book - from isolating Ukraine to rebuking Russia - but has failed to bring Putin to the negotiating table, let alone stop the war. Slowly but steadily, the Russia question has crept up on Trump in the form of the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, which has been introduced in the US Congress. As Trump realises the difficulty in stopping the conflict, some of his frustrations could quickly spill over to economic measures used as levers to arm-twist other stakeholders. India, for itself, may have realised the futility of entering a cycle of retaliation with Donald Trump and has consistently signalled a willingness for measured conciliation in select sectors in its trade negotiations with the US. Needless to say, giving a carte blanche market access to the world's largest economy, which positions itself quite differently on the levers driving its economy, may work to the detriment of a developing economy like India, where income gaps and wealth distribution remain significant challenges. Tariffs For Everyone As a growing number of countries fall in line with Trump's tariff tactics, a few trends emerge. From the perspective of a mercurial president who is hell-bent on striking deals on his own terms to restore trade balance for the American economy, Trump is rapidly normalising the practice of tariffing friends, partners and allies alike. Trump's pragmatic approach to relations with other countries takes a unitary view of how the US should gain economically, and functions regardless of the recipient countries' economic or political circumstances. As the largest economy in the world, it does have the privilege to make independent decisions, which imposes costs on others. However, if Trump continues on this path, the new fundamentals imposed by his presidency may become structural to America's relations with other countries. While these steps will obviously shape a new economic order, they could very well change geopolitics - perhaps most worryingly in the Indo-Pacific. Good (Not Really) Old Days The timing of it all also furthers the somewhat rough patch in India-US relations that began with an exhilarated Trump rushing to claim credit for bringing India-Pakistan hostilities to an end post-Operation Sindoor. What followed was Trump's repeated attempts to reclaim the peace narrative, and, in that effort, re-hyphenate India and Pakistan. Needless to say, Trump's strategy has backfired, with India categorically rejecting any role of mediation by Trump consequentially important to the cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. Natural to Trump's style, he has moved to embrace Pakistan and seek economic benefits from Islamabad. As such, the announcement of a trade deal between the US and Pakistan, "expanding market access, attracting investment, and fostering cooperation in areas of mutual interest", and working together with Pakistan on developing oil reserves are developments that do not augur well for India-US relations. The happenings of the past few months are rapidly circling back to the old days of America's proximity with Islamabad. Although riding on an economic logic, Trump's Pakistan embrace will not be without scrutiny in New Delhi.
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Samsung gains momentum with Tesla tie-up, tariff agreement reduces uncertainty
Samsung Electronics said a trade deal between South Korea and Washington will help to alleviate business uncertainty, as the technology giant forecast more major chip orders after signing a $16.5 billion deal with Elon Musk's Tesla. Samsung sees relief from US tariff deal, expects boost from $16.5B Tesla chip order.(Bloomberg) U.S. President Donald Trump said the U.S. will charge a 15% tariff on imports from South Korea as part of the deal that eases, for now, tension with a top-10 trading partner and key Asian ally. Imports from South Korea, a powerhouse exporter of computer chips, cars and steel, had faced a 25% rate. The tariff deal comes days after Tesla said it had signed a deal to source chips from Samsung, a move that analysts said could help the tech giant's struggling contract business. "Building on this milestone, we anticipate securing additional orders from large customers," Samsung Vice President Noh Mi-jung said on an earnings call, referring to its struggling contract chipmaking business. Samsung's new U.S. semiconductor factory in Texas, which is expected to make chips for Tesla, is on track to begin production in 2026, she said. "The key to the Tesla order is how much Samsung would be able to address production yield issues for its advanced 2 nanometer chips," said Greg Roh, head of research at Hyundai Motor Securities. The Texas project is central to Samsung Chairman Jay Y. Lee's strategy of expanding beyond its bread-and-butter memory chip business into high-end contract chip manufacturing, which is dominated by Taiwan's TSMC. Noh's comments came after the company posted 4.7 trillion won ($3.37 billion) in operating profit for the April-June period, its weakest earnings in six quarters. That was roughly in line with an earlier estimate that had disappointed investors. The South Korean tech giant forecast a gradual second-half recovery for its overall business, without providing further details. Second-quarter operating profit at its chip division plunged 94% from a year earlier, it said, hurt by delays in supplying the latest AI chips to Nvidia and U.S. export curbs on advanced semiconductor sales to China. Focus on AI chips Prolonged weakness in Samsung's performance has deepened investor concerns over the South Korean company's ability to catch up with smaller rivals like SK Hynix in developing high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips used in AI data centres and sold to customers including Nvidia. Last October, Samsung said it was making progress on a major deal to supply HBM3E chips to an unidentified customer that analysts said was Nvidia. Samsung on Tuesday did not give an update to the plan, while warning that the supply of HBM3E chips has been growing faster than demand, which would affect pricing. The tech giant said it has also provided samples of its next-generation HBM4 chips to customers, with a plan to supply them next year. Customers for this chip are also expected to include Nvidia, analysts said. Samsung said on Thursday it expected the industry environment would improve in the second half of the year, driven by AI chip demand due to continued investments by major cloud service providers. Meta Platforms and Microsoft on Wednesday pointed to strong AI chip demand and major investments in data centres in their earnings announcements. Samsung said there were also some concerns about slowing global growth due to an uncertain trade environment and geopolitical risks. "We believe that the uncertainty has been reduced through the conclusion of negotiations between the United States and South Korea," Samsung Chief Financial Officer Park Soon-cheol said after Trump announced the trade deal. Park said Samsung was closely monitoring a U.S. national security probe into imports of semiconductors and electronics such as smartphones, tablets and PCs, which he said could have a significant impact on its businesses. Samsung's second-quarter revenue rose 0.7% to 74.6 trillion won, in line with its earlier estimate of 74 trillion won. Its chip division posted a profit of 400 billion won during the quarter, down from 6.5 trillion won a year earlier, marking the first time in six quarters the figure has dropped below the 1 trillion won mark. Samsung said in a statement inventory value adjustments to memory chips and one-off costs from the impact of U.S. export restrictions on sales to China on its contract chipmaking business lowered the division's profit. Samsung said smartphone demand, which had rebounded in the first half thanks to stockpiling ahead of U.S. tariffs and China subsidies, is expected to see slowing growth in the second half. For TVs, Samsung expected demand to slightly decline due to inflation and economic uncertainty in the second half from a year earlier. Shares of Samsung were down 1.8% in early afternoon trade, underperforming the benchmark KOSPI index, which was 0.5% lower. ($1 = 1,393.4100 won)
